How can I use Ninject in my ASP MVC MSpec tests? - asp.net-mvc

I'm trying to write an MSpec test that instantiates one of my controllers with all the correct Ninject bindings. How do I go about doing that? This is what I have so far:
[Subject(Concern.Initialization)]
public class when_permanent_employee_page_is_loaded_for_first_time
{
private static PermanentEmployeeController controller;
Establish context = () =>
{
NinjectControllerFactory controllerFactory = new NinjectControllerFactory();
ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory(controllerFactory);
controller = (PermanentEmployeeController)controllerFactory.CreateController(new RequestContext(), "PermanentEmployee");
};
private Because of = () => controller.Index();
private It should_load_all_available_jobs = () =>
{
var blah = controller;
var blah3 = 3;
};
It should_load_all_available_locations;
It should_load_all_available_departments;
}
In the above code I'm simply trying to see if I can instantiate my controller with all the Ninject bindings in tact. The NinjectControllerFactory class looks like this:
public class NinjectControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
{
private IKernel kernel = new StandardKernel(new DefaultModule());
public IKernel Kernel
{
get
{
return kernel;
}
set
{
this.kernel = value;
}
}
protected override IController GetControllerInstance(System.Web.Routing.RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType)
{
if (controllerType == null)
{
return null;
}
return (IController)kernel.Get(controllerType);
}
}
And the DefaultModule class like this:
public class DefaultModule : NinjectModule
{
/// <summary>
/// Performs the binding of interfaces to their respective implementations. 'Tis very cool.
/// </summary>
public override void Load()
{
// Data service bindings
Bind<IJobService>().To<JobServiceImpl>().InTransientScope();
Bind<IJobWsWrapper>().To<JobWsWrapperImpl>().InTransientScope();
// View model factory bindings
Bind<IPermanentEmployeeViewModelFactory>().To<PermanentEmployeeViewModelFactoryImpl>().InTransientScope();
}
}
So my question is: is there a way to specify the bindings of my Ninject module in my MSpec test and then have my instantiated controller use those bindings? I want to avoid instantiating my Controller like this: var controller = new Controller() since that doesn't allow me to test the Ninject bindings. I've also looked into the TestControllerBuilder class from the MvcContrib library but I haven't figured out how to instantiate controllers with Ninject bindings with it. Thanks for the help!

Ok I figured out how to initialize my controller along with the Ninject Bindings in my MSpec tests! Well I didn't figure it out. A coworker did but that's irrelevant now. Here is how it's done:
public class when_permanent_employee_page_is_loaded_for_first_time
{
private static Mock<IJobService> jobServiceMock;
private static Mock<IUtilsService> utilsServiceMock;
private static PermanentEmployeeController controller;
private static ContextMocks mocks;
private static IList<Job> jobs = new List<Job>();
private static IList<string> departments = new List<string>();
private static IList<string> locations = new List<string>();
private static PermanentEmployeeJobsViewModel viewModel;
Establish context = () =>
{
jobServiceMock = new Mock<IJobService>();
jobServiceMock.Setup(x => x.GetJobs(1)).Returns(jobs);
jobServiceMock.Setup(x => x.GetDepartmentsFromJobs(jobs)).Returns(departments);
jobServiceMock.Setup(x => x.GetLocationsFromJobs(jobs)).Returns(locations);
utilsServiceMock = new Mock<IUtilsService>();
var kernel = new StandardKernel(new DefaultModule());
kernel.Rebind<IJobService>().ToConstant(jobServiceMock.Object);
kernel.Rebind<IUtilsService>().ToConstant(utilsServiceMock.Object);
controller = kernel.Get<PermanentEmployeeController>();
mocks = new ContextMocks(controller);
};
Because of = () =>
{
PartialViewResult view = (PartialViewResult)controller.Index();
viewModel = (PermanentEmployeeJobsViewModel)view.ViewData.Model;
};
It should_load_all_available_jobs = () =>
{
jobServiceMock.Verify(x => x.GetJobs(1));
jobServiceMock.Verify(x => x.GetDepartmentsFromJobs(jobs));
jobServiceMock.Verify(x => x.GetLocationsFromJobs(jobs));
viewModel.Departments.ShouldEqual(departments);
};
It should_load_all_available_locations;
It should_load_all_available_departments;
}
Ok that's it :). Hopefully someone else can benefit from this answer. Special thanks to my coworker for figuring this out. You know who you are :D

Related

How to use Func<T> in built-in dependency injection

Using asp.net 5 I'd like my controller to be injected with a Func<T>instead of T
For example:
public HomeController(Func<Interfaces.IUnitOfWork> uow)
Instead of
public HomeController(Interfaces.IUnitOfWork uow)
Is it possible with the built-in DI or am I forced to move to an external DI?
Func<T> does not get registered or resolved by default but there is nothing stopping you from registering it yourself.
e.g.
services.AddSingleton(provider =>
new Func<IUnitOfWork>(() => provider.GetService<IUnitOfWork>()));
Note that you will also need to register IUnitOfWork itself in the usual way.
You can register a Func<T> or a delegate with a ServiceCollection. I recommend a delegate because it allows you to distinguish between different methods with identical signatures.
Here's an example.
public interface IThingINeed {}
public class ThingINeed : IThingINeed { }
public delegate IThingINeed ThingINeedFactory();
public class DelegateRegistrationTests
{
[Test]
public void RegisterDelegateFromDependency()
{
var serviceCollection = new ServiceCollection();
serviceCollection.AddTransient<IThingINeed, ThingINeed>();
serviceCollection.AddTransient<ThingINeedFactory>(
provider => provider.GetService<IThingINeed>);
var serviceProvider = serviceCollection.BuildServiceProvider();
var factoryMethod = serviceProvider.GetService<ThingINeedFactory>();
var output = factoryMethod();
Assert.IsInstanceOf<ThingINeed>(output);
}
}
This almost looks like a service locator because the function we're resolving is actually IServiceCollection.GetService<ThingINeedFactory>(). But that's hidden in the composition root. A class that injects this delegate depends on the delegate, not on the implementation.
You can use the same approach if the method you want to return belongs to a class that the container must resolve.
public interface IThingINeed
{
string SayHello();
}
public class ThingINeed : IThingINeed
{
private readonly string _greeting;
public ThingINeed(string greeting)
{
_greeting = greeting;
}
public string SayHello() => _greeting;
}
public class ThingINeedFactory
{
public IThingINeed Create(string input) => new ThingINeed(input);
}
public delegate IThingINeed ThingINeedFactoryMethod(string input);
public class DelegateRegistrationTests
{
[Test]
public void RegisterDelegateFromDependency()
{
var serviceCollection = new ServiceCollection();
serviceCollection.AddSingleton<IThingINeed, ThingINeed>();
serviceCollection.AddSingleton<ThingINeedFactory>();
serviceCollection.AddSingleton<ThingINeedFactoryMethod>(provider =>
provider.GetService<ThingINeedFactory>().Create);
var serviceProvider = serviceCollection.BuildServiceProvider();
var factoryMethod = serviceProvider.GetService<ThingINeedFactoryMethod>();
var created = factoryMethod("abc");
var greeting = created.SayHello();
Assert.AreEqual("abc", greeting);
}
}
Here's an extension method to (maybe) make it a little bit easier:
public static class ServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection RegisterDelegate<TSource, TDelegate>(
this IServiceCollection serviceCollection,
Func<TSource, TDelegate> getDelegateFromSource)
where TDelegate : class
{
return serviceCollection.AddSingleton(provider =>
getDelegateFromSource(provider.GetService<TSource>()));
}
}
serviceCollection
.RegisterDelegate<ThingINeedFactory, ThingINeedFactoryMethod>(
factory => factory.Create);
As far as I'm aware deferring dependencies like this isn't possible using the current default IoC container within ASP.NET Core. I've not been able to get it working anyway!
To defer the initialisation of dependencies like this you'll need to implement an existing, more feature rich IoC container.
While there is no built in Func building support in the default dependency injection for .net core we can build an extension method to add in all the missing funcs. We just need to make sure we call it at the end of registration.
public static class ServiceCollectionExtensions
{
private static MethodInfo GetServiceMethod;
static ServiceCollectionExtensions()
{
Func<IServiceProvider, object> getServiceMethod = ServiceProviderServiceExtensions.GetService<object>;
GetServiceMethod = getServiceMethod.Method.GetGenericMethodDefinition();
}
/// <summary>
/// Registers all Funcs in constructors to the ServiceCollection - important to call after all registrations
/// </summary>
/// <param name="collection"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static IServiceCollection AddFactories(this IServiceCollection collection)
{
// Get a list of all Funcs used in constructors of regigstered types
var funcTypes = new HashSet<Type>(collection.Where(x => x.ImplementationType != null)
.Select(x => x.ImplementationType)
.SelectMany(x => x.GetConstructors(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance))
.SelectMany(x => x.GetParameters())
.Select(x => x.ParameterType)
.Where(x => x.IsGenericType && x.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Func<>)));
// Get a list of already registered Func<> and remove them from the hashset
var registeredFuncs = collection.Select(x => x.ServiceType)
.Where(x => x.IsGenericType && x.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Func<>));
funcTypes.ExceptWith(registeredFuncs);
// Each func build the factory for it
foreach (var funcType in funcTypes)
{
var type = funcType.GetGenericArguments().First();
collection.AddTransient(funcType, FuncBuilder(type));
}
return collection;
}
/// <summary>
/// This build expression tree for a func that is equivalent to
/// Func<IServiceProvider, Func<TType>> factory = serviceProvider => new Func<TType>(serviceProvider.GetService<TType>);
/// </summary>
/// <param name="type"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
private static Func<IServiceProvider, object> FuncBuilder(Type type)
{
var serviceProvider = Expression.Parameter(typeof(IServiceProvider), "serviceProvider");
var method = GetServiceMethod.MakeGenericMethod(type);
var call = Expression.Call(method, serviceProvider);
var returnType = typeof(Func<>).MakeGenericType(type);
var returnFunc = Expression.Lambda(returnType, call);
var func = Expression.Lambda(typeof(Func<,>).MakeGenericType(typeof(IServiceProvider), returnType), returnFunc, serviceProvider);
var factory = func.Compile() as Func<IServiceProvider, object>;
return factory;
}
}
In AddFactories we get a list of all the concreate types that are registered then check their constructors for any Func<>. From that list remove any Func that has been registered before. Using some expressiontrees we build the needed Funcs.
The code is also over in codereview, minus the check for already registered funcs.
I wrote a little extension method that registres the service and the factory (Func<T>):
public static class IServiceCollectionExtension
{
public static IServiceCollection AddFactory<TService, TServiceImplementation>(this IServiceCollection serviceCollection)
where TService : class
where TServiceImplementation : class, TService
{
return serviceCollection
.AddTransient<TService, TServiceImplementation>();
.AddSingleton<Func<TService>>(sp => sp.GetRequiredService<TService>);
}
}
Usage:
serviceCollection
.AddFactory<IMyInterface, MyImplementation>()
There are a few options available to you, the first is you can switch over to use the incredible Lamar (with it's ASP.NET Core integration).
For the most part, switching to Lamar is a few lines of code, and you'll be able to resolve Func<> and Lazy<> all day long.
I've been using it at scale for a while on a large microservices based platform and we're completely happy with it *.
If you don't want to move over to Lamar, you can use this for resolving Lazy<> (sorry, I've tried and tried, and I can't get it to work with Func<>:
// Add to your Service Collection.
services.AddTransient(typeof(Lazy<>), typeof(LazyServiceFactory<>));
class LazyServiceFactory<T> : Lazy<T>
{
public LazyServiceFactory(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
: base(() => serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<T>())
{
}
}
And just for completeness, here's a test too.
// And some tests...
[TestMethod]
[DataTestMethod]
[DataRow(ServiceLifetime.Transient)]
[DataRow(ServiceLifetime.Scoped)]
[DataRow(ServiceLifetime.Singleton)]
public void Resolve_GivenLazyilyRegisteredService_CanResolve(ServiceLifetime serviceLifetime)
{
// Arrange
IServiceProvider serviceProvider = CreateServiceProvider(serviceLifetime);
using IServiceScope scope = serviceProvider.CreateScope();
// Act
Func<Lazy<ClassHello>> result = () => scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<Lazy<ClassHello>>();
// Assert
result
.Should()
.NotThrow()
.And
.Subject()
.Value
.Should()
.NotBeNull();
}
static IServiceProvider CreateServiceProvider(ServiceLifetime serviceLifetime)
{
IServiceCollection services = new ServiceCollection();
services.Add(new ServiceDescriptor(typeof(Lazy<>), typeof(LazyServiceFactory<>), serviceLifetime));
services.Add(new ServiceDescriptor(typeof(ClassHello), typeof(ClassHello), serviceLifetime));
return services.BuildServiceProvider(true);
}
I've not put this through it's paces as I use Lamar pretty much exclusivly now, but this has come in handy for smaller/ disposable projects.
* My only minor issue is that it doesn't support IAsyncDisposable yet.
I have solution below
public static IServiceCollection WithFunc<TService>(this IServiceCollection serviceCollection) where TService : class {
var serviceType = typeof(TService);
var serviceDescriptor = serviceCollection.LastOrDefault(x => x.ServiceType == serviceType);
Debug.Assert(serviceDescriptor != null);
serviceCollection.Add(ServiceDescriptor.Describe(typeof(Func<TService>),
scope => new Func<TService>(scope.GetRequiredService<TService>),
serviceDescriptor.Lifetime));
return serviceCollection;
}
usage
[Fact]
void with_func() {
var services = new ServiceCollection()
.AddTransient<IFoo, Foo>().WithFunc<IFoo>()
.BuildServiceProvider();
var fooFunc = services.GetRequiredService<Func<IFoo>>();
Assert.NotNull(fooFunc);
}
more detail in gist https://gist.github.com/leoninew/d2f174fe1422e453c60fb78e69342310

Unity how to pass Request in Controller's constructor from Unity

The old controller code with Concrete dependencies:
public SomeController: Controller
{
public SomeController()
{
}
public ActionResult Default()
{
**Something something = new Something(Request.ServerVariables["HTTP_X_REWRITE_URL"].ToString());**
something.SomeMethod();
}
}
The new Controller code with TDD focus:
public SomeControllerNew: Controller
{
private readonly ISomething _something;
public SomeControllerNew(ISomething something)
{
_something = something;
}
public ActionResult Default()
{
_something.SomeMethod();
}
}
PROBLEM:
Now in new TDD approach i need to invoke constructor where I am registering the Interface. I have put it in UnityBootstraper common file, Something like:
var container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType();
**Something something = new Something(Request.ServerVariables["HTTP_X_REWRITE_URL"].ToString());**
something.SomeMethod();
This is not working here. Error is quite clear:
Object reference required for non-static field, method, property 'System.Web.Mvc.Controller.Request.get'.
I can't figure out how i can access http request here in UnityBootstrapper?
Edit:
Trying to do all this in RegisterRoutes.
public class RouteConfig
{
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new Unity.Mvc3.UnityDependencyResolver(UnityBootstrapper.Initialise()));
var container = new UnityContainer();
container.RegisterType<ISometing, Something>();
}
}
One way to do it is to create an abstract factory like this:
public interface ISomethingFactory
{
ISomething Create(string url);
}
public class SomethingFactory : ISomethingFactory
{
public ISomething Create(string url)
{
return new Something(url);
}
}
And make your controller depend on it like this:
public class SomeControllerNew: Controller
{
private readonly ISomething _something;
public SomeControllerNew(ISomethingFactory somethingFactory)
{
_something = somethingFactory.Create(Request.ServerVariables["HTTP_X_REWRITE_URL"].ToString();
}
public ActionResult Default()
{
_something.SomeMethod();
}
}
A better approach (IMO) is to use a custom Controller Factory instead of using the Dependency Resolver like this:
public class CustomFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
{
public override IController CreateController(RequestContext requestContext, string controllerName)
{
var request = requestContext.HttpContext.Request; //Here we have access to the request
if (controllerName == "Some") //Name of controller
{
//Use the container to resolve and return the controller.
//When you resolve, you can use ParameterOverride to specify the value of the string dependency that you need to inject into Something
}
return base.CreateController(requestContext, controllerName);
}
}
This way you don't have to introduce the ISomethingFactory, and your controller would still depend on ISomething directly.
You would need to tell the MVC framework about this custom controller factory like this (in Application_Start):
ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory(new CustomFactory());

Web API, Light Inject and Passing a Static Dictionary to the data layer

We have a multi-database solution and are passing the connection string to a factory function like so:
container.Register<IDbContextFactory>(
f => new DynamicDbContextFactory(ClientConfig.GetConnectionString()),
new PerScopeLifetime());
ClientConfig contains a static dictionary that gets populated on app start that maps a sub domain to a connection string. It seems that this approach is causing a memory leak (not 100% sure about this causing the leak but there is a leak).
public class ClientConfig
{
private static ConcurrentDictionary<string, string> ConnectionStringManager
{
get;
set;
}
// etc.
}
My question is in MVC what is the best way to hold a list of connection strings that can be easily looked up on each request in order to pass that down the chain.
Edit : The question was initially tagged with Autofac
With Autofac you don't have to use a dictionary and something like that to do what you want. You can use a custom parameter :
public class ConnectionStringParameter : Parameter
{
public override Boolean CanSupplyValue(ParameterInfo pi,
IComponentContext context,
out Func<Object> valueProvider)
{
valueProvider = null;
if (pi.ParameterType == typeof(String)
&& String.Equals(pi.Name, "connectionString",
StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
valueProvider = () =>
{
// get connectionstring based on HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.Host
return String.Empty;
};
}
return valueProvider != null;
}
}
Then register your Parameter using a Module
public class ConnectionStringModule : Autofac.Module
{
protected override void AttachToComponentRegistration(
IComponentRegistry componentRegistry, IComponentRegistration registration)
{
registration.Preparing += registration_Preparing;
}
private void registration_Preparing(Object sender, PreparingEventArgs e)
{
Parameter[] parameters = new Parameter[] { new ConnectionStringParameter() };
e.Parameters = e.Parameters.Concat(parameters);
}
}
Module you have to register inside your container using
ContainerBuilder builder = new ContainerBuilder();
builder.RegisterModule(new ConnectionStringModule());
Each time Autofac have to resolve a parameter of type String named connectionString it will used the custom parameter and get your connectionstring based on what you want.
By the way this code sample use HttpContext.Current. In case of a multithreaded process it may return null. I don't recommend using HttpContext.Current for such things. You can use an intermediate class instead of accessing it, for example a IConnectionstringProvider interface.
public interface IConnectionstringProvider
{
String ConnectionString { get; }
}
public class ConnectionStringProvider : IConnectionstringProvider
{
public ConnectionStringProvider(Strong host)
{
// get connectionstring based on host
this._connectionString = String.Empty;
}
private readonly String _connectionString;
public String ConnectionString
{
get { return this._connectionString; }
}
}
Inside your Parameter you will have to change the valueProvider by
valueProvider = () =>
{
return context.Resolve<IConnectionstringProvider>().ConnectionString;
};
And finally you will have to register your IConnectionstringProvider at the beginning of the request lifetimescope :
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
ContainerBuilder builder = new ContainerBuilder();
builder.RegisterModule(new ConnectionStringModule());
IContainer container = builder.Build();
container.ChildLifetimeScopeBeginning += container_ChildLifetimeScopeBeginning;
}
private static void container_ChildLifetimeScopeBeginning(
Object sender, LifetimeScopeBeginningEventArgs e)
{
String host = HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.Host;
ContainerBuilder childLifetimeScopeBuilder = new ContainerBuilder();
childLifetimeScopeBuilder.RegisterInstance(new ConnectionStringProvider(host))
.As<IConnectionstringProvider>()
.SingleInstance();
childLifetimeScopeBuilder.Update(e.LifetimeScope.ComponentRegistry);
}
}
Of course there is many way to do it but you have the idea

is it ok to use StructureMap like this? asp.net MVC 3

i have a doubt that i am not using the best practice for using Structure-Map.
all working fine but just a confusion in mind.
my code look like this.
global.asax
IContainer container = new Container(
x => {
x.For<IUserRepo>().Use<UserRepo>();
x.For<IPostRepo>().Use<PostRepo>(); // this is the soultion for the error
});
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new StructureMapDependencyResolver(container));
PostController
private readonly IPostRepo _postRepo;
public PostController(IPostRepo postRepo)
{
this._postRepo = postRepo;
}
StructureMapDependencyResolver
public class StructureMapDependencyResolver : IDependencyResolver
{
private readonly IContainer _container;
public StructureMapDependencyResolver(IContainer container )
{
this._container = container;
}
public object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
object instance = _container.TryGetInstance(serviceType);
if(instance == null && !serviceType.IsAbstract)
{
_container.Configure(c => c.AddType(serviceType,serviceType));
instance = _container.TryGetInstance(serviceType);
}
return instance;
}
public IEnumerable<object> GetServices(Type serviceType)
{
return _container.GetAllInstances(serviceType).Cast<object>();
}
}
here is the IPostRepo looks like
public interface IPostRepo
{
bool CreatePost(Post newPost);
List<Post> ShowAllPosts();
Post FindPostById(int postId);
Post EditPost(Post editPost);
UserPostCommentViewModel FindAllPostComments(int postId);
int? AddPlusOneToNumberOfViews(int postId);
}
thx martin for your help
No. Like I said in your other question, take out the Controller Activator ... unless you are using it for a purpose (which it doesn't seem like you are).
Also, this line is plain WRONG:
x.ForRequestedType<AccountController>().TheDefault.Is.
ConstructedBy(() => new AccountController(new UserRepo()));
You should not be using new for your UserRepo ... that is what the line above is taking care of:
x.For<IUserRepo>().Use<UserRepo>();
If you take out the ControllerActivator, you should have a nice start to an MVC app.

MVC 3 + IoC + NInject + Repositories + LINQ

I'm trying to work with NInject in my MVC 3 application, and i have one question.
Interface
public interface ITalesRepository
{
IEnumerable<Tale> GetAllTales();
}
Repository
public class TalesRepository : ITalesRepository
{
private FairyTalesMVC3DataContext _dataContext;
public TalesRepository(FairyTalesMVC3DataContext dataContext)
{
_dataContext = dataContext;
}
public IEnumerable<Tale> GetAllTales()
{
return _dataContext.Tales.OrderBy(c => c.NameAn);
}
}
Home controller
public class HomeController : Controller
{
private readonly ITalesRepository _talesRepository;
public HomeController(ITalesRepository talesRepository)
{
_talesRepository = talesRepository;
}
public ActionResult Index()
{
ViewBag.Tales = _talesRepository.GetAllTales();
return View();
}
}
So, i need to initialize my TalesRepository with DataContext, and now it is so:
private void RegisterDependencyResolver()
{
var kernel = new StandardKernel();
kernel.Bind<ITalesRepository>().To<TalesRepository>().WithConstructorArgument("dataContext", new FairyTalesMVC3DataContext(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["dbFairyTalesConnectionString"].ConnectionString));
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new NinjectDependencyResolver(kernel));
}
So, my question, is it ok or something wrong?
First of all:
public IEnumerable<Tale> GetAllTales()
{
return _dataContext.Tales.OrderBy(c => c.NameAn);
}
I would add .ToList() to the end. Else you'll get data layer exceptions in your presentation layer which is not fine.
Next, I would recommend that you switch to ViewModels instead of using ViewBag. It's a lot easier to prevent that logic leaks into the views if you are using ViewModels. Since you can add the logic to the ViewModel and thus get the same behaviour in all views using the model.
Your application should inherit from NinjectHttpApplication. It registers dependency resolver, so you don't have to do it.
You should also override CreateKernel in application class and register your own module with bindings:
public class MvcApplication : NinjectHttpApplication
{
protected override IKernel CreateKernel()
{
return new StandardKernel(new INinjectModule[] {new MvcModule()});
}
}
public class MvcModule : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<ITalesRepository>().To<TalesRepository>();
Bind<FairyTalesMVC3DataContext>().To<FairyTalesMVC3DataContext>().InRequestScope();
}
}

Resources