I'm newbie in XNA, so sorry about the simple question, but I can't find any solution.
I've got simple model (similar to flat cuboid), which I cannot change (model itself). I would like to create rotate animation. In this particular problem, my model is just a cover of piano. However, the axis over which I'm going to rotate is covered by cover's median. As a result, my model is rotating like a turbine, instead of opening and closing.
I would like to rotate my object over given "line". I found Matrix.CreateLookAt(currentPosition, dstPosition, Vector.Up); method, but still don't know how o combine rotation with such matrix.
Matrix.CreateLookAt is meant for use in a camera, not for manipulating models (although I'm sure some clever individuals who understand what sort of matrix it creates have done so).
What you are wanting to do is rotate your model around an arbitrary axis in space. It's not an animation (those are created in 3D modeling software, not the game), it's a transformation. Transformations are methods by which you can move, rotate and scale a model, and are obviously the crux of 3D game graphics.
For your problem, you want to rotate this flat piece around its edge, yes? To do this, you will combine translation and axis rotation.
First, you want to move the model so the edge you want to rotate around intersects with the origin. So, if the edge was a straight line in the Z direction, it would be perfectly aligned with the Z axis and intersecting 0,0,0. To do this you will need to know the dimensions of your model. Once you have those, create a Matrix:
Matrix originTranslation = Matrix.CreateTranslation(new Vector3(-modelWidth / 2f, 0, 0))
(This assumes a square model. Manipulate the Vector3 until the edge you want is intersecting the origin)
Now, we want to do the rotating. This depends on the angle of your edge. If your model is a square and thus the edge is straight forward in the Z direction, we can just rotate around Vector3.Forward. However, if your edge is angled (as I imagine a piano cover to be), you will have to determine the angle yourself and create a Unit Vector with that same angle. Now you will create another Matrix:
Matrix axisRotation = Matrix.CreateFromAxisAngle(myAxis, rotation)
where myAxis is the unit vector which represents the angle of the edge, and rotation is a float for the number of radians to rotate.
That last bit is the key to your 'animation'. What you are going to want to do is vary that float amount depending on how much time has passed to create an 'animation' of the piano cover opening over time. Of course you will want to clamp it at an upper value, or your cover will just keep rotating.
Now, in order to actually transform your cover model, you must multiply its world matrix by the two above matrices, in order.
pianoCover.World *= originTranslation * axisRotation;
then if you wish you can translate the cover back so that its center is at the origin (by multiplying by a Transform Matrix with the Vector3 values negative of what you first had them), and then subsequently translate your cover to wherever it needs to be in space using another Transform Matrix to that point.
So, note how matrices are used in 3D games. A matrix is created using the appropriate Matrix method in order to create qualities which you desire (translation, rotation around and axis, scale, etc). You make a matrix for each of these properties. Then you multiply them in a specific order (order matters in matrix multiplication) to transform your model as you wish. Often, as seen here, these transformations are intermediate in order to get the desired effect (we could not simply move the cover to where we wanted it then rotate it around its edge; we had to move the edge to the origin, rotate, move it back, etc).
Working with matrices in 3D is pretty tough. In fact, I may not have gotten all that right (I hope by now I know that well enough, but...). The more practice you get, the better you can judge how to perform tasks like this. I would recommend reading tutorials on the subject. Any tutorial that covers 3D in XNA will have this topic.
In closing, though, if you know 3D Modeling software well enough, I would probably suggest you just make an actual animation of a piano and cover opening and closing and use that animated model in your game, instead of using models for both the piano and cover and trying to keep them together.
Related
I'm studying Introduction to robotic and found there is different equations to determine the position and orientation for the end effector of a robot using DH parameters transformation matrix, they are :
1.
Translate by d_i along the z_i-axis.
Rotate counterclockwise by theta_i about the z_i-axis.
Translate by a_{i-1} along the x_{i-1}-axis.
Rotate counterclockwise by alpha_{i-1} about the x_{i-1}-axis.
2.
Rotate by theta_i about the Z_i-axis.
Translate by d_i along the z_i-axis.
Translate by a_(i-1) along the x(i-1)-axis.
Rotate by alpha_(i-1)along the x(i-1)-axis.
3.
Rotate by alpha_(i-1)along the x(i-1)-axis.
Translate by a_(i-1)along the x(i-1)-axis.
Rotate by theta_i about the Z_i-axis.
Translate by d_i about the Z_i-axis.
What is the difference between them? Will the result be different?
Which one should I use when calculating the position and orientation?
As far as I know there is no difference. They should all give you the same end result, but be consistent. pick one form and stick with it.
The main problem comes when you are trying to reverse the process. Using method 1 to got from time t to t+1 is fine, but if you wanted to go from t+1 to t you would need to use method 1. Using another method to do the transform (though it should technically work) usually doesn't because nonlinearities in modeling and rounding errors for rotation (cos and sin terms).
This isn't really surprising though, it's the same issue you encounter when going from a local reference(with respect to a robot) to a global reference. The order of translations and rotations must be maintained for forward and backword transformations
I'm tracking a marker with ARToolKit+. I receive a model view matrix that looks about right. Now I'd like to warp the image in a way that the marker looks just like it would look if I looked straight at it. But whatever I do, the result looks just extremely distorted. I know that ARToolKit stores the 4x4 matrix in column major order, so I fixed that for OpenCV.
What I tried so far was:
1) fix the order to row major order
2) calculate the inverse with cvInverse (although transposing the 3x3 rotation part + inverting the translation should suffice)
3) use that matrix with cvPerspectiveWarp
Am I doing something wrong?
tl;dr:
I want this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ-LU-C2p2Q
I get some distorted lines and lots of black instead.
Your problem is in converting from 4x4 to 3x3. The short answer is that you want to drop the 3rd column and bottom row to make the 3x3 and then premultiply with your camera matrix. For a longer explanation see here
Clarification
The pose you get from ARTK represents a transform from one place to another. When I say "the initial image appears without rotation" I meant that your transform goes from an initial state which has no rotation about the x or y axis to the current state. That is a fine assumption for most augmented reality applications, I mentioned it just to be thorough.
As for why you can drop the 3rd column. Since you are transforming a plane, your z coordinate can be completely expressed by your x and y coordinates given the equation of your plane. If we assume that initially there is no rotation then your initial z coordinate is a constant value. If there is rotation then z is not constant but it varies deterministically in x and y according to its plane equation which can still be expressed in one matrix (though you don't need that). Since in your case your 4x4 transform is probably expressing the transform from the marker lying flat at z = 0 to its current position, the 3rd column of your 4x4 matrix does nothing (it all gets multiplied by 0) so it can be dropped without affecting the result.
In short: Forget about the rotation stuff, its more complicated than you need, just realize that the transform is from initial coordinates to final coordinates and your initial coordinates are always
[x,y,0,1]
which makes your third column irrelevant.
Update
I'm sorry! I just re-read your question and realized you just want to warp the marker so it looks like a straight on view, I got caught up in describing a general transform from 4x4 to 3x3. The 4x4 transform you get from ARTK is not the transform that will de warp the warker, it is the transform that moves the marker from the origin to its final position. To de warp the marker like you asked the process is similar but would be slightly different. I haven't done that before but here is my guess.
First, you need to get the 4x4 transform between where the marker is in world space, and where you would like it to appear to be after warping it. Right now the transform goes from the origin to the marker location. To change the transform to go from some point farther down on the z axis (say 100) to the marker location define the transform.
initial_marker_pose = [1,0,0,0
0,1,0,0
0,0,1,100
0,0,0,1];
Now you have the transform from the origin to what you want as your "inital" position, and the transform from the origin to your "final" position. To get the transform from initial to final simply
initial_to_final = origin_to_marker*initial_marker_pose.inv();
Now you would follow the process outlined in the link I gave you, in this case your initial zpos is no longer 0, it is 100. Then when you are finished you will need to invert your 3x3 matrix. That is because this process takes you from a straight on view to the one defined by the pose from ARTK and you want the opposite of that. You will need to experiment with the initial z position. The smaller it is, the larger your marker will appear after de-warping.
Hopefully that works, sorry for the confusion about your question.
I am using the glMatrix to code Webgl and want to get the eye position, focal point and up direction from the existing projection and view matrix (kinda like the reverse of lookat function). Is there any way to do this?
I didn't implement one, no. I'm not even sure that you could decompose it into the original vectors, for that matter. The lookAt point could be anywhere along a ray from the origin, and how would you determine what the appropriate up vector was? I'm thinking this is a one-way algorithm (just too lazy to prove it!)
Beyond that, however, I question wether you would want to do this even if there was a method for it. I'll be willing to bet that it's almost always more beneficial to track the values you're using and manipulate them rather than to try and pull them back and forth from matrix to vectors and back.
Yes and No: Yes you can invert the model view transformation and no you will not get exactly all three vectors the same.
The model view transformation of lookAt is very similar to the connectTo operation as used in CSG models. It is mounting your scene in front of your camera. This is done by translation and three axis rotations. The eye point is translated to (0,0,0) and all further rotation is done around it. You can easily derive the eye point by transforming (0,0,0) with the inverse matrix.
But the center point is just used for adjusting the axis of view along the -Z axis. In openGL the eye is facing to -Z. The distance between center and eye is lost. So you can easy get a center point along your axis of view if you define the distance yourself. Let's say we want a distance of d. Then we just need to transform (0,0,-d) with the inverse matrix and we get a valid center point, but not exactly the same. The center point is defining only two rotation angles, the camera pan and tilt.
Even more worse is the reconstruction of the up vector. It is only used for the roll angle of the camera and thus only for one scalar value. Thus for the inverse transformation you can not only choose any positive value along the Y axis, you could choose any point in the YZ plane with a positive Y value. To get a up vector perfectly normal to the viewing axis and of size 1 we just transform (0,1,0) with the inverse matrix. Remember to transform as vector this time (not as point).
Now we have eye, center and up reconstructed in a way to get exactly the same result of lookAt next time. But since this matrix contains only 6 values of information (translation,pan,tilt,roll) we had to choose 3 values that were lost (distance center to eye, size and angle of up vector in YZ plane of camera).
The model view matrix can of course do other transformation (any affine) but the lookAt function is using this matrix only for translation and rotation. It is adjusting the scene in front of the camera without distorting it.
I have created a Camera class that allows me to move around a scene in first person. The camera has worked just fine until I decided to use it as a location to add something to the 3D world. What I am trying to do is add a cube to the world when I press a mouse button. I want to cube to eventually travel away from the camera, but for now I just want to create it right in front of it. Sometimes it works and sometimes it creates it to one side or the other. It all depends on how much I've rotated and translated the camera.
I am tryinng to find the vector in front of my camera by using the View Matrix like so:
Vector3 inFront = Camera.ViewMatrix.Forward;
I plan to use the vector to add some physics behind the cube and have it travel away from the camera. For now I am just wanting to get a correct Vector.
I know you normally draw thing in the world using the WorldMatrix, but I can't figure out how to convert my ViewMatrix into a WorldMatrix. Still learing :-)
What am I doing wrong?
-Scott
First of all, there is no real difference between a "World Matrix" and a "View Matrix", they are both transformation matrices and the distinction is somewhat arbitrary. Some systems even combine the two (OpenGL simply has a "ModelView" matrix).
Traditionally the "world matrix" is used to move individual models from "model space" to "world space". Then the "view matrix" is used to move all the models from world space into their relative positions in front of the camera (which, in effect, "moves the camera"). And finally the "Projection Matrix" converts the 3D positions into their 2D positions on the screen (generally with a perspective projection). Because they are matrices, they can be multiplied together into a single matrix that can transform points in a single step.
First of all, take a look at the properties of the Matrix struct.
What you also need to realise is that Matrix.Forward returns a Vector3. A Vector3 can represent either a position or a scalar and a direction. You need two of them to represent a position and a direction.
Now, my 3D matrix maths is a bit rusty, but I'm pretty sure that what you want is the Matrix.Translation as the position of the camera in world space. And Matrix.Forward as the forward direction of the camera in world space.
Unless your camera/view matrix is performing a scaling operation on the world (and really it shouldn't), then the Vector3 you get back from Matrix.Forward will have unit length - in other words just a direction (no scalar). Use this to give a direction to move your object in.
I assume you have to location of the camera. Have you tried something like this (I haven't done Matrix/Vector math in a few years so this might be off):
float scalar = 10; // how far away from the camera you want to move the object
Vector3 camPos = ???; // supplied from somewhere elese
Vector3 inFront = Camera.ViewMatrix.Forward;
Vector3 newPos = camPos + inFront * scalar;
I have a set of points to define a shape. These points are in order and essentially are my "selection".
I want to be able to contract this selection by an arbitrary amount to get a smaller version of my original shape.
In a basic example with a triangle, the points are simply moved along their normal which is defined by the points to the left and the right of the points in question.
Eventually all 3 points will meet and form one point but until that point they will make a smaller and smaller triangle.
For more complex shapes, when moving the individual points inward, they may pass through the outer edge of the shape resulting in weird artifacts. Obviously I'll need to cull these points and remove them from the array.
Any help in exactly how I can do that would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
This is just an idea but couldn't you find the center of mass of the object, create a vector from the center to each point, and move each point along this vector?
To find the center of mass would of course involve averaging each x and y coordinate. Getting a vector is as simple a subtracting the point in question with the center point. Normalizing and scaling are common vector operations that can be found with the Google.
EDIT
Another way to interpret what you're asking is you want to erode your collection of points. As in morphology erosion. This is typically applied to binary images but you can slightly modify the concept to work with a collection of points. Essentially, you need to write a function that, given a point, will return true (black) or false (white) depending on if that point is inside or outside the shape defined by your points. You'd have to look up how to do that for shapes that aren't always concave (it's harder but not impossible).
Now, obviously, every single one of your actual points will return false because they're all on the border (by definition). However, you now have a matrix of points around your point of interest that define where is "inside" and where is "outside". Average all of the "inside" points and move your actual point along the vector between itself and towards this average. You could play with different erosion kernels to see what works best.
You could even work with a kernel with floating point weights instead of either/or values which will affect your average calculation proportional to their weights. With this, you could approximate a circular kernel with a low number of points. Try the simpler method first.
Find the selection center (as suggested by colithium)
Map the selection points to the coordinate system with the selection center at (0,0). For example, if the selection center is at (150,150), and a given selection point is at (125,75), the mapped position of the point becomes (-25,-75).
Scale the mapped points (multiply X and Y by something in the range of 0.0..1.0)
Remap the points back to the original coordinate system
Only simple maths required, no need to muck about normalizing vectors.