The old Delphi 7, uncheck runtime packages and build all trick doesn't seem to work anymore so I can't restore whatever would be a good set of runtime BPL's for my Delphi project.
I've got a problem, which I will probably ask another question about and link here, which I think might be solved by including a particular BPL that contains VCL.CheckLst.pas.
The reason I don't just know the answer to this is when I start a new VCL forms project, there are no VCL BPLs in the runtime packages by default, there's RTL and some firemonkey stuff and good old MadExcept and Indy, but no VCL, what's the deal with that? is my Delphi misconfigured?
There are no VCL. (note the . after VCL) runtime packages. There are the standard RTL packages you've been used to before; the VCL namespaces are contained in them.
To find out exactly what runtime packages you need to distribute, you might find this useful.
Go to the Project Options/Packages/Runtime Packages dialog (image below to help explain).
Expand the Link with runtime packages node, check True, and clear the three Value node checkmarks. You can also open the nodes below Runtime packages and clear the lists for the three entries there. Save the changes and close the dialog. (The IDE will repopulate the list and store it in the .dproj file; you'll see it if you reopen the Project Options dialog after building.)
Use Project|Build <yourproject>. Once it builds, use Project|Information for <yourproject>; the right side panel will show you the BPLs you'll be required to distribute. (VCL.CheckLst is in vc1x60.bpl, BTW, according to Sertac's comment below.) Make sure you build and don't just compile; you need to make sure all the dcu's are rebuilt so the package list can be determined.
Related
Installing components under Delphi XE3 is a nightmare.
First I need to add source files to
Tools -> Options -> Library
then I need to find a normal package and compile it
finally I need to find design time package and install it.
This is just quite tedious and error prone. Is there a nicer way to install components?
I have found Delphi Package Installer. Unfortunately it doesn't support Delphi XE3 or above.
I have heard that there is something similar which produces exe packages that install themselves (something like Inno Setup) but I can't find such thing.
No. The steps above are required.
First, adding the file path to Tools->Options->Delphi Options->Library Path is so the compiler knows where to find the files to compile them. (Actually, it's not required - you can eliminate this step by making sure that the .dpk files are in the same folder as the .pas files, and that all .pas file names are listed in the includes section in the .dpk. If the .pas files are in a different location, you'll need to either use relative paths in the .dpk (eg., MyComponents in '..\Source\MyComponents.pas') or add the location of the .pas files to Project->Options->Delphi Compiler->Search Path.)
The next step (finding the "normal package") is in order to build the runtime package. It's required, because the design-time package (next step) requires the code that's in that package in order to function in the Form Designer. It's also needed when you decide to build your application with runtime packages, if you use the third-party components and want to distribute the runtime package for it.
The separate design-time package (the third step) is required because designtime code can only be used at design-time; there's nothing that can be distributed with an application if it's built with runtime packages and the package build in step 2 is one of them.
This has been the way components are installed since around Delphi 3 or so, and the requirement to separate out designtime code into it's own package started being advised in Delphi 5 and enforced in Delphi 6 (when they relocated much of the IDE designtime support into their own separate packages and stopped distributing the source for them).
There really are no other options, unless the vendor supplies pre-build designtime and runtime packages for you, or supplies an installer that will do all of the above steps. (Most don't.) But if you update your Delphi version, you'd still have to go through the steps above.
What about the built-in component installer? It is part of Delphi XE, XE2 and XE3 and a description can be found here (I wrote it). It will even install components in C++Builder. You can instal into an existing package or into a new one, which it will create for you.
I would say that the best way to install components is to use your build manager (for example FinalBuilder) and add each component to a manager-project file which sets the necessary paths, builds the DPK files, and 'installs' the component in the IDE by making a registry entry. That way you have a documented procedure which allows you reliably to set up or repair your complete, tested, Delphi development environment. You can simply re-run the project when a component has been updated and tested. It is also quite easy to tweak an existing project to handle a new Delphi version.
The big disadvantage of a vendor-supplied installer is that all the ones I have seen simply overwrite the previous version on updates. I prefer to control the install myself, so that I have previous component source versions archived and available for comparison, in case testing reveals a problem with an upgrade. The 'one-click install' sounds fine, until a minor component upgrade suddenly causes your application to stop working.
Take a look at "Lazy Delphi Builder". It was created to simplify build/installation of many components at once. It resolves packages dependencies automatically. Free to use.
Link to some old tutorial
I am a .Net programmer and I'm currently debugging a Delphi application and as I go along
I encountered the following error:
Could you explain to me what is this error, and how I can resolve it?
I am new to using Delphi.
Error Explanation
The error that is been presented to you is telling you that a component on that form is not registered in the IDE, in this case TsStatusBar which is from the AlphaControls library: http://www.alphaskins.com/
The form would have been saved at some point with TsStatusBar placed on the form. When any component is added onto a form they leave references to the component in both the forms source file (*.pas) and the inside the forms dfm. This is why you are getting this error, because the component cannot be found, yet the references linking to it still remain.
Option 1 - Install the AlphaControls packge
The best option would be to install the components that are missing, this will solve your error problem as shown in your question.
Option 2 - Convert Project
AlphaControls provides a tool to convert a project from standard VCL to AlphaControls and vice versa, this may be an easier option then installing the AlphaControls package or manually editing source files, the convert tool is free. Just remember to make a backup before converting should anything go wrong.
Option 3 - Manually Editing the Source Files
You could manually remove these references yourself. Do note though, if you remove the references then Delphi will no longer know that the TsStatusBar was ever there, and without a doubt there will be code somewhere that would have interacted with this component which will create compiler errors.
As an alternative to removing the references, you could rename them from TsStatusBar to TStatusBar, which is a standard statusbar from the VCL. At worst there may be some small syntax errors that may need correcting. If you do decide to edit the forms source and dfm files then I would suggest you do it before loading the form into the IDE.
Option 4 - GExperts
You can also install an IDE Expert such as GExperts which can automate the process of renaming/converting component references.
I would however advise against removing or renaming the references in this circumstance as it seems the project is reliant on the AlphaControls package.
Summary
I can see there are more components from the AlphaControls package been used, so fixing the TsStatusBar error manually will only fix part of the problem.
If the project must remain in its current state then Installing the AlphaControls package is the way to go, if you are able to edit it then I would also suggest the project convert option, this way you won't even need the AlphaControls package.
If you do chose to install the package, it is important to realise that once you install the package Delphi knows where the source files are to be able to compile. After installing the packages, goto Menu > Tools > Options from the IDE, then you need to go to Library and add the folder for the AlphaControls source to the library path. The source folder will be the one containing the most .pas files, but you could add all folders if you are unsure. If you don't add to the Library path then Delphi will not be able compile when using the new components.
Your IDE does not have the package which contains TsStatusBar installed. Find that package, build it, and install it.
Design time components need their code to be integrated into the IDE. This is done using what are called packages. The package project has extension .dpk. You should find this package project in your revision control system. Load the .dpk file in Delphi, click Build from the package manager, and finally, when built, click Install. Now that the package with your component is known to the IDE, your form will load. Whoever maintains this code in your organisation will be able to help with all the details.
I'm trying to make a package for a custom component I made. It's based on several libraries, including Graphics32, GraphicEx and CCR.Exif.
I created a Package project, wrote the unit including its Register procedure, added some extra references Delphi notified me about to the requires section (including dbrtl.dcp, inet.dcp, soaprtl.dcp, vclimg.dcp, xmlrtl.dcp and dclGraphicEx140.dcp) and added many units to the contains section to avoid warnings about it happening implicitly. The project compiles and can be installed and used on my own machine without issues. However, when I want to install it on another machine, the troubles begin. In the end, I had to copy about all DCUs from all 3rd party components I used, plus both the DCP and BPL from GraphicEx, which I had to install even.
Supplying a lot of files is a bummer, yet surmountable, but having to install other packages as well is a no go. I could get rid of that DCP and BPL by putting even more units in the contains section, but that resulted in error messages on my own machine where GraphicEx is actually installed. This is confusing to me, because with Graphics32 nothing like that occurs...
Anyway, how do I keep my distribution to a minimum and avoid such situations? I want other developers on my team to be able to use the package without worrying about what I used to build it. For a start, can't all the 3rd party units be compiled into my own DCU?
What you experienced is an usual thing to the ones who write components. The distribution is always like that. Packages do not carry other packages, insted they reference them. It´s in their nature.
In order to overcome such a situation I always treat my components in the same way I would if they were a product to sell: I build a setup wizard that distributes and registers everything the package needs.
In my case InnoSetup works very well (http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php).
Summary
Haven't use Delphi for a while, but, did develop my custom visual controls (Last version I work was Delphi 6).
There are 2 issues when dealing with packages dependencies. One is installing at the Delphi enviroment, making controls appear on the component palette, plus, component editors & property editors.
And another when distributing the compiled packages into customers machines.
It also depends, on which version on Delphi you are running.
Design Time
When developing a custom package, there is a tab for package options, that indicates the destination folders.
The manuals usually tell the developers to leave those textboxes empty. That sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. I explicity write each folder path, in the respective textbox.
There is a textbox path for the ".dcp" files, other for the ".dcu", and so on.
If you have visual controls and stuff like property editors or component editors, its better to split the code in 2 packages ("Runtime" & "Designtime").
I usually put the delphi (packages) projects outside the delphi installation folder.
Run Time
Usually, the quick way is to put the "*.bpl" ".dcp" files in the Windows (32) / system folder, or similar "DLL" windows folder.
Packages folder structure source code suggestion
Managing packages can be difficult. I don't know how much the installation process has changed with Embarcadero, and the newer versions of Delphi. The following chart,is an example on how organize the source code. Hope it helps.
[-]--+--c:
.....|
.....+--[-]--+--software
.............|
.............+--[+]-----java
.............|
.............+--[+]-----php
.............|
.............+--[-]--+--delphi (not the delphi folder in program files)
.....................|
.....................+--[+]-----apps (source code for delphi programs)
.....................|
.....................+--[+]-----other
.....................|
.....................+--[-]--+--packages (all delphi packages source code here)
.............................|
.............................+--[+]-----lib (a single package for non visual controls, libraries)
.............................|
.............................+--[+]-----tools (package pair for non visual tcomponent descendants)
.............................|
.............................+--[+]-----json (example)
.............................|
.............................+--[+]-----xml (example)
.............................|
.............................+--[-]--+--mycontrols (folder custom visual controls)
.............................|.......|
.............................|.......+--[-]--+--delphi40 (folder for delphi40 version of "mycontrols")
.............................|.......|.......|
.............................|.......|.......+----------dsgvclctrls40.dpk (design-time package "mycontrols")
.............................|.......|.......|
.............................|.......|.......+----------runvclctrls40.dpk (run-time package "mycontrols")
.............................|.......|.......|
.............................|.......|.......+--[+]--+--demos (individual example for each "mycontrol")
.............................|.......|.......|
.............................|.......|.......+--[+]--+--design ("*.pas" component editors destination folder)
.............................|.......|.......|
.............................|.......|.......+--[+]--+--sources ("*.pas" source code destination folder)
.............................|.......|.......|
.............................|.......|.......+--[+]--+--bin ("*.dcu" destination folder)
.............................|.......|........
.............................|.......+--[+]--+--delphi50 (folder for delphi50 version of "mycontrols")
.............................|.......|........
.............................|.......+--[+]--+--delphi60 (folder for delphi60 version of "mycontrols")
.............................|.......|........
.............................|.......+--[+]--+--delphi70 (folder for delphi70 version of "mycontrols")
.............................|................
.............................+--[-]-----etc...
Cheers.
Thijs, you simply cannot do that with only a package. The target developer will require almost everything you added to the package. But there is an alternate way of doing what you want: Build a DLL with all the components/libraries you are using in your own component and wrap all those external components/libraries into some code you will export from the DLL. Then build your component without using the external components directly but the DLL you've built. You cannot in you component "use" any unit of the other external components/Libraries. You have to build a new unit with all the datatypes and required declaration for anything you export from your DLL. All this is perfectly working but will quickly becomes very complex for a large number of external components or libraries.
I think AlexSC has the best answer, but I think there might be an alternative if you ansolutely must have a custom component that has no dependencies.
I ran into the Delphi dependency frustrations a little while back trying to create an in-house component for our developers. My suggestion:
Uninstall all dependencies your component uses
In your component package, remove the above dcp from the requires section from your package.
Copy the source files of your dependencies to your components
When you distribute the component, you'll have to distibute it with the code of the required dependecies
You'll run into issues if you want to use the dependcies separately since Delphi won't allow you to have duplicate unit names in installed packages.
Also, the reason you don't want to use DCUs is the fact that the DCUs are compiled for a specific platform and compiler. So unless you are sure that all devolpers are on the same platform ad using the same version of Delphi, dependency code needs to be recompiled.
Again, AlexSC has the best answer and InnoStudio is a great little tool.
I write a lot of components and libraries for Delphi, most of which require the use of BPL Packaging so that they may be installed into the IDE.
This is simple enough and works well, right up until you want to maintain a single set of Package Project Files (in a single Project Group), but also want to compile and distribute those same packages for different Delphi versions.
Up to now I've been creating a different Package Project for each version of Delphi, and explicitly defining a Delphi Version Identifier as a suffix (e.g. Kinect_XE.bpl and Kinect_XE2.bpl).
I am aware that, in the Project Options for a Package Project, under Description, there are the fields LIB prefix and (more importantly for my needs) LIB suffix.
I am further aware that if I place a value in LIB suffix, it'll be appended to the end of the compiled BPL's filename.
My question, however, is first whether it is possible to have the IDE automatically populate the LIB suffix field with the IDE/RTL Version number, and if so... how?
I'm fairly certain this is possible, as it would appear that vcl120.bpl (and its counterparts for each respective version of Delphi) can be Referenced (as requirements) of your own packages using just vcl rather than having to type the full vcl120. It is, in fact, this same behaviour I'm hoping to achieve... where my packages can intra-reference eachother (as neccessary) without having to provide version-specific references to accommodate the suffixes.
Equally important is that resolving this will enable me to maintain a single set of Project Files in a single Project Group (with the obvious exception of XE2 where its Project Files don't necessarily behave very well with previous versions of Delphi due to the Platforms addition).
I suspect that I may need to put a value like $(VER) (or something similar) in the LIB suffix field, but this appears not to work and I've scoured Google looking for the correct solution.
Hope you can help!
UPDATE 1
I am now writing an IDE plugin to be used with (in the very least) Delphi 2007 to XE2, which gives DLL and BPL projects a new option called AutoSuffix. When toggled On, any IDE with the AutoSuffix plugin installed will immediately apply the correct IDE version suffix to the project.
The AutoSuffix plugin will be made available (freely) for everyone within the next 24 hours, and this question updated accordingly.
UPDATE 2
Okay... Delphi 2007 is being a pain! I've made AutoSuffix work with 2009 to XE2, so far, but 2007 requires a little more time (patience appreciated).
UPDATE 3
It would appear as though Embarcadero have heard our collective cry for simplier package unification between versions.
Mark is going to push this through to see if future versions of Delphi can accommodate a {$LIBSUFFIX AUTO} feature. I hope to hear back very soon whether this will be the case. If so, it certainly affects the way AutoSuffix will need to work on XE2 and older versions (as presently it doesn't provide the simple AUTO switch.. it has its own method).
My hope now is that EMB will take this request seriously, provide it as an integral feature going forward, so that it becomes a simple case of using AutoSuffix on existing versions to unify the process accross all versions!
AFAIK for Delphi up to XE2 there is no automatism for doing this.
Concerning the requires clause: when you require another package you are actually using the dcp, which doesn't inherit the LIBSUFFIX. Thus it is sufficient to require VCL.dcp during compile time, while VCL160.bpl is actually used during runtime. The DCP includes the complete BPL name to resolve that.
This makes the LIBSUFFIX approach superior to the simple "rename the package for each version of Delphi" one.
A solution like that suggested in QC83229 would make it easier to port a package to a newer Delphi version, but then you are still stuck with dproj files that are not backwards compatible.
I normally use different folders for each Delphi version, where only the project files are stored. For a new Delphi version I only have to copy a folder and change the LIBSUFFIX.
LIBSUFFIX directive is in *.dpk file, and you can edit *.dpk file manually.
You can write, for example
{$IFDEF CONDITIONALEXPRESSIONS}
{$IF CompilerVersion = 20.0}
{$LIBSUFFIX '120'}
{$IFEND}
{$IF CompilerVersion = 21.0}
{$LIBSUFFIX '140'}
{$IFEND}
{$ENDIF}
The bad thing is that IDE does not respect your manual edits of *.dpk file and deletes them then you make changes in a package. That is why some component vendors that use conditional defines in *.dpk file say in installation instruction if asked to save changes say 'NO'.
My suggestion would be to add this as a configurable option to project option sets (see QC #86491.) Rather than updating all the packages it would be sufficient to update a single option set file.
In fact, it seems the DllSuffix tag is recognized by the option set files in Delphi XE/XE2. Adding <DllSuffix>160</DllSuffix> to the <PropertyGroup> section of an option set file will cause the suffix to be appended to the package in the project manager. However, you still have to open the project options and click OK in order for it to be saved to the .dpk file.
I agree that it would be extremely useful with this feature (I would think also for the packages in the RTL.)
{$LIBSUFFIX AUTO} feature was added in Delphi 10.4.1:
In previous versions (version 10.3 and earlier) of C++Builder and
Delphi developers building packages needed to manually set their
package’s library suffix setting. The DocWiki “What’s new in version
10.4.1” mentions a new IDE projects option for setting the library suffix:
“Package AUTO libsuffix: packages can now have an automatic version
suffix, instead of manually updating and specifying the right version
suffix with each new release. (The compiler quietly supported this in
10.4, but full support for the feature in the IDE and package project settings is introduced in 10.4.1.)”
I am trying to start making my own libraries avaialble as packages prior to compiling my Apps with these packages hence modularising my code. For years I've 'sort of' understood packages, breathing a sigh of relief when I load a component package and click on 'Install' and it does. I understand that the process of installing a component (or components) is via the creation of a BPL which is then registered with the IDE.
Where I begin to get lost is how to make files available so that I can compile with EITHER a package OR pre-compiled dcu's (like the third party vendors do) and without pointing my project at the source code all the time. I can create a package with the following settings:
where I've specified that all my output will go into 'c:\scratch\wow'. After a build I find TEST.BPL, TEST.DCP and lots of DUC's. Now, when I point another project at this folder to use the DCU's, I get a missing DFM error (one of the units is a form). Should I be manually copying needed DFM's into this output folder? The DPK knows about this form, so why do I not get the DFM copied for me? I presume that using TEST.BPL, that file contains everything, but I wish to work in the two modes. Of course I can get around this by including the source folder in my project search path to find the DFM but third party libraries seem to already have the DFM's in their output folder. Did they install them there using the installer?
Thanks
instead
As others say you could use post-build events to copy your DFM files into place. Other people use a one-time external batch file that copies the DFMs to the DCU folder.
Personally I see very little benefit to making packages for things which are not developed also as reusable components. I also see very little benefit in partitioning an existing application into packages, when you don't reasonably need to use the same subsection or package more than once, or at designtime.
Things I would put into packages:
Delphi visual and non-visual components.
Things which absolutely must be plugged in at runtime, or left out. For example, supposing I sell MetaWare Light and MetaWare Pro, and instead of using compiler IFDEFs to build a differnt binary, I preferred for some reason to simply not ship the ADVANCEDFEATURE.BPL with my systems.
Things to beware of with packages:
I have run into a lot of compiler bugs when combining packages with generics. I have also run into IDE crashes and lockups, in Delphi 2009, 2010, XE and XE2. (I believe XE3 is better)
You should learn a bit about BorlandMM.dll and shared memory management in the BPL world before you move to it. There are some subtleties.
Packages limits the ability of the linker to decide what to remove. In fact, it pretty much destroys it. Packages contain everything that is linked into them, and nothing publically accessible can be removed.
Once you've created a binary package and shipped it to even one customer, you have a pretty difficult to modify contract (this BPL contains a particular signature or application binary interface) you have to be careful in the future to never change them, or mix and match them. Beware of DLL hell, even among your own customers, and be prepared to use versioning on your packages. Just as delphi packages have a version suffix, I recommend you use version suffixes in your own packages right off the bat, and bump them whenever binary compatibility has changed.
Delphi handles build dependencies between packages about as well as could be hoped, which is less well than a single monolithic application. In applications that I have that make heavy use of packages, I find project groups that contain a bunch of packages that depend on each other are very difficult to manage and build quickly. In fact, I have experienced that both compiles and builds are slower and more frustrating than they would be in a singular 750Kline megaproject.
I really wonder if you're not that into the package area of Delphi (you breath a sigh of relief whenever a delphi component actually builds and installs without issue?) if you really want to move into the Packages World totally. By all means, you should experiment. But I wouldn't bet the farm on it yet. Learn some more first.
Yes, you should copy the .dfm to the directory with the compiled units (.dcus), if that is the only directory you want in your search path. The BPL will of course contain the .dfms, and you need a .dcp to be able to link a BPL with your app.
Third party tools must have put the .dfms together with the .dcus in the directory using their installer, indeed.
Instead of copying *.DFM manually you can use Post-Build Event (Project/Options/Build Event), ex:
copy “$(PROJECTDIR)\Unit1.DFM” “c:\Scratch\wow\Unit1.DFM”
I found a way to do this without moving .dfm files to the directory of .dcu files, so you can have a directory for .dcu files only one for .dcp files only and another for .bpl files only.
All you need to do is to create another directory on your good structure, as I do. The directory is called RES and in it should be placed all the resource files (.res files, not .dcr files) that are used by applications compiled using your packages (components). In the Delphi Library Path, you must include in addition to the DCU directory (you should already have) a directory named RES.
On your component (design time) do everything you want with the form (design it, put other components, etc). In the source code of the unit you replace {$R *.dfm} with {$R UnitName.dfm}. In doing so, save all and close the DPK. Now move the .dfm file (do not copy, move!) to the RES folder (the .dfm file is a resource file to the Delphi. The {$R} directive is proof!) and after that open the DPK again to understand what has changed.
First realize that you may not open the form (F12) from his unit, though no error was issued by Delphi about "DFM missing".
Now, do a Build on your package and then install it. Realized again? No errors displayed! This happened because you have indicated the location of .dfm file in the Delphi library search path (RES directory).
Done! You can use your component and dfm will be found when your component is included in an application.
Many of you can now say that this way I will not longer be able to visually edit a form in the component design time. Yes this is true, but if you think about it, why would I want to change so often a form into a component that, in practice, should only be used and slightly edited? Draw your own conclusions ;)