Can anyone tell me why you might use loadBytes() instead of a simple load()?
From the ActionScript 3.0 Reference (flash.system.LoaderContext):
When loading a SWF file with the Loader.loadBytes() method, you have the same application domain choice to make as for Loader.load(), but it's not necessary to specify a security domain, because Loader.loadBytes() always places its loaded SWF file into the security domain of the loading SWF file.
Related
Dartium does interpret dart files and it opens plenty of fun to develop new toys, and Chrome extensions and apps. But when it comes to do scripts injection in web pages, the executeScript method only takes files supposedly one of the .css and .js formats. Files in other mimetype (typically application/dart) is offbound. Therefore, the question is pretty much naive:
Is there anyway to directly inject a Dart file?
Thanks.
Not a way to directly inject dart-files, but a workaround to inject your dart-application would be to use dart2js and than inject the compiled js-file myDartScript.dart.precompiled.js of your dart-script.
(Use the precompiled-version to avoid errors against the Content Security Policy)
Maybe you also have to inject packages/browser/dart.js and packages/browser/interop.js.
Untested
I am struggling to get some performance in my MVC application.I am loading a partial page (popup) which is taking hardly 500ms. But each time the popup loads it also downloads 2 jQuery files as well.
is it possible to use the jQuery from cache or from parent page?
I have attached the image in red which shows 2 additional request to server.
In order to improve the performance you can try with the following approaches:
see if your application server supports GZip and configure the application/server to return the responses always archived in Gzip
Use minified version of JQuery
there are also Packing libraries where you can pack all the imported resources, such as CSS files and JS files, and the browser will do only 1 request per resource type. For instance, in Java we have a library called packtag.
In general, I recommend you using Google Chrome browser and its performance analyzer. It will give you good hints.
In the Bundle config use this code
BundleTable.EnableOptimizations = true;
and also indclude both files in single bundle.
Does the popup use an iframe or does it's content just get added to the DOM of the current page?
If it gets added to the current page you could try just adding the script references to the parent page instead. It might not always be the best idea if the parent page has no need for those two files, but if the parent page also uses the jQuery validation then the popup will be able to use the parent's reference to the script file.
For an iframe I'd suggest looking at Gzip and minification to make the scripts load faster.
Is it possible to use ASP.NET Web Optimization for minification without bundling?
Lets say I have a page Example.cshtml and corresponding javaScript file for that page Example.js. I would like to be able to do something like #Scripts.Render("~/Scripts/Views/Example.js") which will product minified file when not in debug mode. I could of course maintain many single JavaScript file bundles to do this but it seams like unnecessary chore.
Of course there are other solutions for javaScript compression but I think that single approach with run-time compression is the best way to go.
You would have to create a bundle with just one file to accomplish this currently.
I'd like to load content (HTML / CSS, Javascript - all files packed in a zip-file) into my application folder and runs it in an UIWebView. I guess this is possible, however I'm not sure if Apple allows it.
So Is the dynamic loading and storing of HTML pages generally allowed?
Thanks a lot.
Yes you can. Loading of web pages that way is fine as far as I know. I am working on a project that uses this zip archive tool to unpack the zip. It is a object oriented C wrapper on minizip
http://code.google.com/p/ziparchive/source/browse/trunk/ZipArchive.h
I am very new to Silverlight development. I understand that this is client side technology therefore the paradyme is differant from that of conventional ASP.NET development. Having said that, I don't understand where my server side code is deployed.
I have a silver light \ MVC application. I am trying to read an XML document from within my 'Models' folder. The following peice of code is executed from within a class that is in the same location as the XML document, 'Models'. The load() results in a SystemIOFileNotFound exception. I noticed that when building the application the XML document is not laid down in the same location as the web project's assembly. I assume this is specific to the fact that this is a Silverlight project. Can someone tell me what I'm missing?
_xdoc = new XDocument();
_xdoc = XDocument.Load(new Uri("videos.xml",UriKind.Relative).ToString());
Edit..
The behavior I am after is the start page (silverlight) populates controls via a server side controller. ie localhost/video
Silverlight can't access your filesystem (thankfully), which is why you can't access the file. Try embedding it as a resource, or storing it in the local storage API provided by silverlight.
Assuming that your Models folder is in the Web project (i.e. not the Silverlight project), I think that your problem is unrelated to Silverlight.
The code loading the XML file assumes that the file is in the current directory, so you need to ensure this through your deployment technique.
If you are doing this in the Silverlight part, you should put the XML file in an embedded resource and access it as a stream (get it with Assembly.GetManifestResourceStream) or as a resource (a la WPF, not an embedded resource) and access it with the package part syntax.
The problem was that I was attempting to access this static resource as you would in typical ASP.net. However I found it necessary to map the path to the file using the current HTTPContext:
HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data/videos.xml");
So the above worked for me. Since this code is in the web project and not in the silverlight project I am still unclear as to why I cannot just access this resource using a relative path. This code will be executed in the context of the web server.
i.e.
XDocument.load(../App_Data/videos.xml);