For the people that have experience with OpenCV, are there any webcams that don't work with OpenCV.
I am looking into the feasibility of a project and I know I am going to need a high quality feed (1080p), so I am going to need a webcam that is capable of that. So does OpenCV have problems with certain cameras?
To be analysing a video feed of that resolution on the fly I am going to need a fast processor, I know this, but will I need a machine that is not consumer available...ie, will an i7 do?
Thanks.
On Linux, if it's supported by v4l2, it is probably going to work (e.g., my home webcam isn't listed, but it's v4l2 compatible and works out of the box). You can always use the camera manufacturer's driver to acquire frames, and feed them to your OpenCV code. You can even sub-class the VideoCapture class, and implement your camera driver to make it work seamlessly with OpenCV.
I would think the latest i7 series should work just fine. You may want to also check out Intel's IPP library for more optimized routines. IPP also easily integrates into OpenCV code since OpenCV was an Intel project at its inception.
If you need really fast image processing, you might want to consider adding a high performance GPU to the box, so that you have that option available to you.
Unfortunately, the page that I'm about to reference doesn't exist anymore. OpenCV evolved a lot since I first wrote this answer in 2011 and it's difficult for them to keep track of which cameras in the market are supported by OpenCV.
Anyway, here is the old list of supported cameras organized by Operating System (this list was available until the beginning of 2013).
It depends if your camera is supported by OpenCV, mainly by the driver model that your camera is using.
Quote from Getting Started with OpenCV capturing,
Currently two camera interfaces can be used on Windows: Video for Windows (VFW) and Matrox Imaging Library (MIL) and two on Linux: Video for Linux(V4L) and IEEE1394. For the latter there exists two implemented interfaces (CvCaptureCAM_DC1394_CPP and CvCapture_DC1394V2).
So if your camera is VFW or MIL compliant under Windows or suits into standard V4L or IEEE1394 driver model, then probably it will work.
But if not, like mevatron says, you can even sub-class the VideoCapture class, and implement your camera driver to make it work seamlessly with OpenCV.
Related
I have the following products:
drone iris+
Pixhawk
For my last year project I want to process the image from the drone in real time and to control the drone by the image.
I don't find which product will be the best for me... is it the Raspberry pi or maybe something else that I'm not familiar with.
Thanks
Any embedded linux computer should work. The Odroid series has more computing power than a raspberry pi, which will be helpful here. See this article for setup instructions: http://dev.ardupilot.com/wiki/odroid-via-mavlink/
Regarding software: I would suggest using the OpenCV (computer vision) library for your image processing needs. There's a nice built in function for camera input that interfaces nicely with both Python and C++ programming languages. Depending on your experience writing software, I would recommend python (higher level, possibly slower, portable) or C++ (fighter jet: hard to use, higher ceiling in terms of performance). C++ might be appropriate for the speed necessary to operate a drone. I would check the docs to see if the package serves your needs before diving in.
Regarding hardware: Consider using Arduino to interface with peripheral hardware, but I'm definitely not experienced with this sort of thing.
Have fun!
I am using opencv 2.4.10 and am wondering if I hook up a usb 2.0 camera that uses a 10 bit analog to digital converter and has a resolution of 1328 x 1048, does openCV support that type of camera? If it does, how will it store the pixel information? (I have not purchased the camera yet and would buy a different one if the software won't work with it, so I can't just go test it myself).
clearly I didn't google well enough
https://web.archive.org/web/20120815172655/http://opencv.willowgarage.com/wiki/Welcome/OS/
list hasn't been updated for a while though
I have read that openCV does not recognise some webcams.
Can you suggest some webcams for a basic stereo-vision project using the following?:
openCV 2.2.0
Visual Studio 2010 (C++)
Windows 7 32 bits
Thanks.
I posted a similar question back then.
Good and compatible webcam to do image processing/computer vision?
What kind of camera you are looking for? Any model? State the model and I let you know if it's good enough.
Also, you can find a list of compatible webcams with openCV. It's an old list though. They stopped updating it since 2013, I think. Compatible webcam with openCV
You find that most common brands like Hp, Logitech, etc should work just fine. If you are worried, just state the model you are looking at in the comments. I see if I know if it's compatible with openCV.
EDIT:
To answer your question in the comment, nope, that shouldn't be the case. All cameras can run simultaneously at the same time. Reasons that cameras can't run simultaneously at the same time is usually due to the USB bandwidth. In fact, most cameras pose the same problem.
Some methods to overcome that problem:
1)put a Sleep(ms) in between the lines of your capture line.
2)Use lower resolution which would reduce the bandwidth used by each camera.
3)Use MJPEG format(compressed frames)
i want to specialize in image and video processing. Which library is better for signal processing, Intel IPP or OpenCV? What are the differences between them?
Adem Metin Çalı
You might not need to pick one or the other. If you have IPP installed, then you can compile OpenCV to call IPP internally. I think the OpenCV compiler flag for this is USE_IPP.
You can investigate whether the OpenCV functionality that you'd like to use can take advantage of the IPP back end.
If you tell us more about what you're building, I can give more detailed advice on the trade-offs with IPP, OpenCV, or some blend of the two.
For me it does not seem like an either-or situation.
You can check the differences and how they work together right from the Intel guys.
For some of us it might matter that while OpenCV is free, IPP is not. (When I checked a license was ~$200.) However it covers areas other than image/video processing (it also covers sound processing and cryptography for example).
Does anybody here do computer vision work on Mathematica? I would like to know what external libraries are available for doing that. The built in image processing functions are not enough. I am looking for things like SURF, stereo, camera calibration, multi-view geometry etc.
How difficult would it be to wrap OpenCV for use in Mathematica?
Apart from the extensive set of image processing tools that are now (version 8) natively present in Mathematica, and which include a number of CV algorithms like finding morphologic objects, image segmentation and feature detection (see figure below), there's the new LibraryLink functionality, which makes working with DLLs very easy. You wouldn't have to change OpenCV much to be able to call it from Mathematica. Just some wrappers for the functions to be called and you're basically done.
I don't think such a thing exists, but I'm getting started.
It has the advantage that you can perform some analytic methods... for example rather than hacking in openCV or even Matlab endlessly, you can compute analytically a quantity, and see that the method leading to this matrix is numerically unstable as a function of input variables. Thus you do not need to hack, as it would be pointless.
As for wrapping opencv, that doesn't seem to make sense. The correct procedure would be to fix bad implementations in opencv based on your analysis in Mathematica and on paper.
Agreeing with Peter, I don't believe that forcing Mathematica to use OpenCV is a great thing.
All of the computer vision people that I've talked to, read about, and seen examples are using Matlab and the Imaging toolkit. Its either that, or go with a OpenCV compatible language + OpenCV.
Mathematica has a rich set of tools for image processing, but I'm uncertain about the computer vision capabilities.