I have some touble with redirect 301 in my new app. I have to redirect some old urls into the new one.
I entred in my routes file this
match "/traslochi_puglia/index.htm", :to => redirect("/preventivo/90-traslochi-in-puglia")
and it works fine, but I can't understand why this
match "/trasloco_casa_abitazione.htm", :to => redirect("/3-trasloco-casa")
does not work. All the old urls with this pattern "/some_path/page.htm" works fine but not "page.htm". Any hint?
Thanks
If you want us to troubleshoot the specific issue you've outlined in your question, we need to see your entire routes.rb file. Without this information, my first guess is this:
The typical route pattern is /controller/action or /controller/:id/action or some combination thereof. With the pattern you've shown above, and assuming you have no named routes in your routes.rb file, then the route you've provided would point to a controller, but not an action. Therefore your app wouldn't know what action to execute, unless you've specifically created a route called /3-trasloco-casa which looks to me more like a URL to a specific resource, than an action on a controller.
Getting to the source of routing issues can most easily be done with a combination of running rake routes at the command line (which shows you the list of route patterns your app will recognize), and then going further by troubleshooting with route recognition, as outlined in this answer to this question:
Recognize routes in rails console Session
Related
So in our Rails 4.2 application, there is the alchemy_cms gem which requires its routes to be mounted last in config/routes.rb.
SampleApp::Application.routes.draw do
#other routes for the rails app here
# :
# :
mount Alchemy::Engine => '/'
end
We get routes like "/somehacker/routingurl" which then falls out to the Alchemy::Engine to handle, resulting in a default 500 error. If I wanted to do a custom 404 error, then the proper way to do it is to build a custom 404 page and have Alchemy handle the redirect? Otherwise since the Alchemy docs specify that it has to be the last route in config/routes.rb, there won't be a way to add a catchall route to redirect to some kind of error page I assume.
EDIT:
One of the problems is that there are some routes that are like the invalid "somehacker" route above that do need to be parsed by the Alchemy routing engine, such as "/en/us" where "en" is a valid locale. This is why I initially thought to put the route handling in the Alchemy engine's routes file.
If it is difficult for you to configure and use the Alchemy cms gem to redirect unknown routes into a custom defined page, you can use the bellow method to implement the same with a small coding tweak given bellow:
Rails 4.XXX
1. First Method.
(routes.rb)
You can still use a simple get to redirect all unknown routes.
get '*path', to: 'home#index'
If you wish to provide routing to both POST and GET requests you can still use match, but Rails wants you to specify the request method via via.
match "*path" => "home#index", via: [:get, :post]
Remember that routes.rb is executed sequentially (matching the first route that fits the supplied path structure), so put wildcard catching at the bottom of your matchings.
Here you can replace the home#index with any custom path that you defined in you application, also note that it is important to keep this redirection code only at the bottom of routes.rb.
2. You can follow the bellow tutorial on the same problem in a different perspective to solve can be found.
Custom 404 error page with Rails 4
I am creating a simple suggestion box app (to learn Rails) and am getting the following Rails routing error when I go to "/suggestion-boxes" running on my local machine (localhost:3000)
"Routing Error
No route matches [GET] "/suggestion-boxes"
In my routes.rb file I have:
SuggestionBoxApp::Application.routes.draw do
resources :suggestion_boxes
end
This is what I get when I run rake routes:
suggestion-box-app$ rake routes
suggestion_boxes GET /suggestion_boxes(.:format) suggestion_boxes#index
POST /suggestion_boxes(.:format) suggestion_boxes#create
new_suggestion_box GET /suggestion_boxes/new(.:format) suggestion_boxes#new
edit_suggestion_box GET /suggestion_boxes/:id/edit(.:format) suggestion_boxes#edit
suggestion_box GET /suggestion_boxes/:id(.:format) suggestion_boxes#show
PUT /suggestion_boxes/:id(.:format) suggestion_boxes#update
DELETE /suggestion_boxes/:id(.:format) suggestion_boxes#destroy
However, if I modify my routes file to
SuggestionBoxApp::Application.routes.draw do
get "suggestion-boxes" => "suggestion_boxes#index"
end
Then the page "/suggestion-boxes" displays as per the index action in my SuggestionBoxesController.
I tried restarting my server but this had no impact. While I of course can go with using GET, this error makes no sense, and I would like understand what is causing it.
Any insights would be very much appreciated.
The error is that you are not renaming the REST route, instead the controller one.
Try declaring
resources :suggestion_boxes, :as => "suggestion-boxes"
in your config/routes.rb file.
Somewhere in your code you are calling to suggestion-boxes controller which does not exist. Your controller is suggestion_boxes, spelling. So where every you have "suggestion-boxes" you should replace with "suggestion_boxes". The code that you added create an alias that matches 'suggestion-boxes' to the index action of the suggestion_boxes controller so this resolves it if it is your desired affect. But simply fixing your spelling would resolve your problem. I usually use the second approach if I want the change the URL that user see. Have a look at the routing doc for a better understanding
I'd just started toying around with Ruby on Rails and had come across an issue with linking to another action in a controller from a particular view. I am almost certain it's an issue (or lack of code) in my routes.rb file, but I think I'm misunderstanding exactly how this file works & what I have to do. I've got a solution but pretty sure it's not the "best way" to do it.
I have one controller called home with two actions, index (which is the default) and newbill. Inside index.html.erb I have:
<h1>Home View</h1>
<%= link_to "new", :controller => "home", :action => "newbill" %>
However I was getting a routing error:
No route matches {:controller=>"home", :action=>"newbill"}
Doing rake routes gives me the following:
root / {:controller=>"home", :action=>"index"}
I then (following some Googling) added this code to routes.rb
match 'home/newbill' => 'home#newbill', :as => :newbill
And then in my index.html.erb I've got this:
<%= link_to "Name", newbill_path %>
And now this works as expected. My questions however are:
Why does this work? What exactly is going on behind the scenes?
Surely this is not the best way to do it? Adding another match 'home/newbill'... for every controller / action I want to link to seems a rubbish way of doing things.
I really like Ruby, but struggling a bit with this aspect of Rails...routing in general is messing up my head a bit I think!
Any help is much appreciated :D
Thanks,
Jack
I guess the first time your code didn't work because your home controller is defined as a resource.
If you define a controller as a resource in routes.rb file it will support only 7 standard methods (according to REST architecture):
index
new
create
show
edit
update
destroy
If you need any more custom routes you should add them manually, say in your case 'newbill', may go as:
resources :home do
collection do
get :newbill
end
end
But as per my understanding, your newbill method should go to bills controllers new, method not in the home controller.
You are right, Rails routes are little bit confusing (at least for me), but once you understand you can do lots of cool stuff.
Read here for the Rails official routes documentation:
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/routing.html.
You should check out the Rails Routing guide. A read through will help you understand what is going on behind the scenes.
This works becuase rails filters every request through the router looking for a match. This enables you to define custom routes such as domain.com/post when the path is actually blog#post. Prior to rails 3, a catch-all route was the last route in the routes file. This allowed you to define a controller and action and it would just work. I'm on my iPad and not near any projects, so I can't verify it, but I think that route is still there in rails 3.1, it just needs to be umcommented.
I just switched to rails not long ago and I'm loving it. Everything works well in my rails 3.1 application, but now at the end I want to somehow handle routes like www.myapp.com/something (off course, I dont have something controller). I get a routing error when I visit this page, but I was wandering if there was a way to do something about it, even if it's only redirecting these routes to my root_url. I tried to find the answer online with no luck.
Yes, you can put a globbing route at the very end of your routes.rb to catch all misses:
match '/*paths', :to => 'some_controller#some_action'
in your Controller / action you can access the globbed path with
params[:paths]
more information http://guides.rubyonrails.org/routing.html#route-globbing
of course you can redirect without using an extra controller by using the redirect inline rack endpoint
match '/*paths' => redirect('/')
Is there a method like "full_url" such that #comment.full_url or full_url_for(#comment) returns "http://www.host.com/comments/id" where www.host.com is the default host domain and id is #comment.id. Or, if not, what would be an elegant way to generate this url string?
I'm pretty new at Rails, most of the methods I've learned insert the tag and other markup.
url_for is not helping because I can't do something like the following:
url_for(#comment, {:only_path => false})
I've spent way too much time trying to figure this out. It came down to either hacking or asking for the right way on SO. Here I am.
If you are setting up your routes correctly in your config/routes.rb file then you should have access to named routes in your controller and in your views. Which should mean that all you should need to do is:
comment_path(#comment)
Or for the full url
comment_url(#comment)
To see a list of all of the routes from the command line, you can type rake routes from the project root. Welcome to rails! Here is a good resource for rails 3 routing: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/routing.html
some additional resources via Railscasts:
http://railscasts.com/episodes/231-routing-walkthrough
http://railscasts.com/episodes/232-routing-walkthrough-part-2