I've got the following:
<div class="tile ui-widget-content">
<h3 class="ui-widget-header">Resize me</h3>
You should see a ghost outline.
</div>
and:
$('.tile').resizable({
ghost:true
});
And it resizes, but I don't see a semi-transparent part of the element.
I'm copying from the docs.
The only difference I can see is that you are accessing the element from its class name rather than id. Have you tried using and id instead?
Edit: Just want to make sure you've also added css for the hover?
.ui-resizable-ghost { border: 1px dotted gray; }
Related
I am using Element's Notification component but when it is activated the dialog appears but seems to be "behind" the grey background that is also introduced. Clicking anywhere removes the grey background and allows the interaction with the dialog box but without the greyed out background that should be filtering out the noise of the normal screen. Here is a short video that shows the various states:
video
The code to put the component in as follows:
<div class="add-address" #click="showAddDialog = true">
+
</div>
</div>
<el-dialog
title="Add New Address"
:visible.sync="showAddDialog"
width="30%"
:before-close="newAddressDialogClosed">
<span>Postal Address</span>
<el-input v-model="newAddress" type="text"></el-input>
<span slot="footer" class="dialog-footer">
<el-button #click="dialogVisible = false">Cancel</el-button>
<el-button type="primary" #click="dialogVisible = false">Confirm</el-button>
</span>
</el-dialog>
I have used the inspector to poke around at the CSS but I haven't yet understood what's causing this from a CSS perspective nor a Vue/Element perspective. Any help would be appreciated.
I have further analyzed the HTML/CSS and the component appears to introduce two separate blocks in the DOM:
The lower block is the grey background which you'd expect to "blur" the page and focus attention on the modal. It, however, is in front of the dialog. Also of interest is that clicking anywhere seems to target the grey background and dismiss it but in so doing it also has a subtle effect on the placement on the dialog box as can be seen here:
Note that the z-index of the dialog box is greater than the background which intuitively makes sense to me but I'd have thought this would have put the dialog box on top. Guess that's not all there is to this.
I have hacked a work-around for now by changing the background to display: none and then adding the following HTML directly before the modal dialog in the DOM:
<div class="modal-background" v-if="showAddDialog"></div>
These seems to validate my underlying suspicion that placement within the DOM tree is important and the component's attempt to place the modal background at the very end of the DOM is somehow problematic.
I had the same issue and also found changing the z-index of the dialog had no effect. This was occurring when I had nested Element.Eleme.io elements, which appears to be the case for you also.
The z-index is not quite as simple as "higher always means on top". Elements are grouped into different stacking contexts; it is not possible for an element in a lower stacking context to appear above an element in a higher stacking context. Therefore depending on where the different elements were rendered in the DOM, they can land themselves in different stacking contexts, and are destined to remain at the same relation to one another, no matter how much the z-index has changed. (See https://philipwalton.com/articles/what-no-one-told-you-about-z-index/ for a more detailed explanation on the z-index).
Examining with Chrome dev tools, I found that the obscuring modal is not rendered in the same place as the dialog; in fact it is appended to the body, i.e. on the outer reaches of the application, which appears to be the reason they are not within the same stacking context. There is a quick fix; the dialog element has a property "modalAppendToBody". If true, the modal is rendered to the body, and if false it is rendered to the parent element of the dialog. By specifying this as false I managed to solve the issue:
<el-dialog
title="Add New Address"
:visible.sync="showAddDialog"
width="30%"
:before-close="newAddressDialogClosed
:modalAppendToBody="false">
</el-dialog>
you can use the CSS property called z-index
either any object which you want to set to back ? you just have to set z-index: -1; // or more
or you want to set any object on to the front of another ? you just have to set z-index: 1; //or more
Check the Snipet For More Info :
.a {
position: absolute;
left: 0px;
top: 0px;
z-index: -1;
}
.b {
margin-top:150px;
position: absolute;
left: 0px;
top: 0px;
z-index: 1;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<h1> I am on Image</h1>
<img class="a" src="http://qnimate.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/images2.jpg" width="100" height="140">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<h1> Image is on me</h1>
<img class="b" src="http://qnimate.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/images2.jpg" width="100" height="140">
</body>
</html>
I have padding on images and the padding affects the image link because there is a black line
Style
a:link{background-color:black}
img{padding:20px}
Html
<img src="blank">
So in Simple terms there is a black line coming from the image and I want to get rid of it. I can't get rid of the styled link because I use it for other links
Instead of black, use transparent or none
SNIPPET
.tran {
background-color: transparent;
}
.none {
background-color: none;
}
img {
padding: 20px
}
<a href="#/" class='tran'>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/o1RbMvI.png">
</a>
<a href="#/" class='none'>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/o1RbMvI.png">
</a>
If you want specific style for one link, but you don't want it to affect the others or be affected by the others, I would set up a specific class for the links you want to have a background-color: black; and then a separate class for the link that you don't want affected by it. zer00ne provides a sufficient answer for this. Just add class="tran" or whatever you want to name them into your links that you want to be connected together with whatever style you use in .tran{}, as shown in his answer. Play around with grouping things into classes and using the classes to style more specific elements in your CSS. Best of luck!
in css file:
.black{background-color:black;}
img{padding:20px;}
HTML:
<p>
<img src="blank">
<img src="blank">
</p>
So, on my web app's home page I have a birthday (mm/dd/yy) select fields however the drop down is being cut off by the next section of the homepage's background.
Here's the relevant CSS styling for the select:
.selectify .option {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #FFFFFF;
border-top: 0 none;
color: #999999;
cursor: pointer;
padding: 5px 20px;
}
And an image:
How can I get the drop down to go over the secondary background section?
Cheers!
After being given the link:
.banner has a style of overflow:hidden;. This is what is causing it to hide.
Delete it from the styles of banner.
Then, you have a class called container middel-class. Change this to just middel-class.
Then put container INSIDE middel-class. eg:
<div class='middel-class'>
<div class='container'>
.. <!-- rest of code as normal -->
</div> <!-- end of container -->
</div> <!-- end of middel-class -->
Also, it's middle, not middel, but it doesn't really matter :P
I cant say for sure without any code example of full place. This bug can be for few reasons
1.) Somewhere on a parent div (where located dropdown) you are using overflow:hidden - try delete it and see what happens
2.) also there is can be wrong z-index directly on the dropdown
I have a page on a project I'm creating for class where I wanted to align an image in the left side, with the text to the right aligned in the middle of the image. Instead of using html elements, I decided to try an internal CSS div elements within my external CSS. My problem is that I can't get them to align correctly vertically. I have the horizontal alignment, but the text either appears one line above or one line below the image. I tried the techniques included in this posting, but they didn't fix my problem. Align <div> elements side by side
Here is my internal CSS.
<style type="text/css">
/* left div holding the image */
#left {
width:170px;
align:left; }
/* right div to hold the text */
#right {
margin-left: 200px;
text-align:left; }
</style>
Here's the HTML
<div id="content">
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote>
<div id="right">Check back soon. Click here to receive an email when the site becomes available.</div><div id="left"><img src="images/construction-clipart.jpg" border="1" alt="Page under construction" /></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
Can you help me figure out how to make these align? To view how it is rendering, please visit my student project site at http://www.student.nvcc.edu/home/ligomes/TwoWiredChicks/Browse.html.
Thanks!
Finally, I hope this helps now. All you have for the right css is:
#right {
position: absolute;
margin-left: 200px
}
I was seeing a strange phenomena when using Scriptaculous BlindDown and SlideDown effects, where they would smoothly slide, and then at the very end, they would jump an additional amount, maybe 10% of the slide distance.
I already saw the note on the BlindDown page that you have to be sure not to use padding, which I'd already done.
I was still thinking that this must be my mistake somehow, when I noticed that I see the exact same thing happening on their demo page for Toggle when clicking on either the Blind or Slide demos:
http://wiki.github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/effect-toggle
Firefox 3.6.7, Chrome 6, and Internet Explorer 8 all display this effect on my computer.
So I was thinking about just writing it off and either living with it or cutting the effect out, when I noticed that the page for BlindDown does not display this effect:
http://wiki.github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/effect-blinddown
So there must be a way to make this work. On my page, the jump is occurring whether I directly use BlindDown/Slide or whether I use Toggle.
Has anyone out there used these and managed to do so without this problem? Any ideas on what the secret is?
It's usually due to margin or padding.
The element you're blind-downing mustn't have any margin or padding, or should have margin:0.1% so that contained margins don't collapse through the bounds of the element either. If you do this it'll be smooth as silk.
also - ensure you've set overflow:hidden
Enjoy.
(the other place it'll fall down is if you don't define height. If you do this little incantation before you animate it'll get and set you height without bothering anything else.
elem.setStyle({position:'absolute',visiblity:'invisible'});
elem.setStyle({'height':elem.getDimensions().height+'px'});
elem.setStyle({position:'relative',visibility:'visible'}); //or position:'static'
In my experience, the jumping is just a performance issue, which is effected by the system specs, browser, and complexity of the html content you are toggling. Some browsers like safari and chrome have a pretty good javascript engine making them more efficient.
I see this is happening for you even when using chrome though? Is the html content particularly complex, or your computer overloaded with applications running?
There is definitely a little very well known secret... Have you tried wrapping your content in an extra div container? You should consider this best practice and almost a requirement specifically when using Scriptaculous effects.
For example... Say you want to slideDown or Toggle a login form - and you have::
<div id="login-panel">
<input type="text" name="username" />
<button type="submit" name="send">Login</button>
</div>
All you have to do is add an extra inner div tag::
<div id="login-panel">
<div><!-- extra div here -->
<input type="text" name="username" />
<button type="submit" name="send">Login</button>
</div><!-- close it here -->
</div>
Now when you do something like Effect.toggle("login-panel", 'slide'); the transition should be much smoother and less jumpy. It may seem a little sloppy but it almost always helps. Hope this helps you!!
Keep in mind that when Scriptaculous begins an animation, the container that is being modified will be absolutely positioned and then a record of the height will be taken, similar to what danielsherson mentions. If however the container does not exist within a relatively positioned parent container, then the dimensions of the animating container may change quite drastically. The easiest way to test this is to modify your container using firebug to set the position to absolute. What happens? Did the height change? For the best results, there should be no change in the dimensions of your animating container when switching to absolute positioning. What happens to the rest of your document, such as content moving underneath, will not matter.
The padding/margin issue is a tricky one too since there really isn't a way to prevent the margins from overlapping and creating issues. Best way I found to address this is to set your animating container to float and then use the clearfix hack on a parent container to make sure nothing overlaps.
<body style="margin: 0 auto; width: 300px; position: relative; background: black;">
<div class="parent nonanimating clearfix">
<div class="animating" style="float: left; width: 100%; background: white;">
<div class="apply-your-margins-and-padding-here">
...content...
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="parent nonanimating clearfix">
<div class="animating" style="float: left; width: 100%; background: white;">
<div class="apply-your-margins-and-padding-here">
...content...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Note that the classes are not functional and just for reference to my comments with the exception of clearfix, which is the float clear hack. The backgrounds and widths are only specified to give a better example of what is happening. Add whatever animation you'd like to $$('.animating')
I use this one (there are many), all though it is old and I don't even design for many of the browsers this hack supports..
.clearfix:after {
content: ".";
display: block;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
height: 0;
}
.clearfix {
display: inline-block;
}
/* Hides from IE-mac \*/
* html .clearfix {height: 1%;}
.clearfix {display: block;}
/* End hide from IE-mac */
I don't think it's a performance issue at all. I'm having the same issue. The ONLY way I've been able to make it not jump is to define a height for the div I'm sliding. I realize that this is NOT a good solution but it's the only one I've been able to find. I've also tried adding the additional div and it had no effect on how the Effect.toggle slide worked.
If anyone else has any more info on this, I'm all ears.
To prevent a Scriptaculous effect from jumping or jerking, remove the 'style' attribute from the element which you are applying the Effect to.
This:
<div id="mydiv" style="padding:10px;margin:10px;">
<button onClick="new Effect.BlindUp('mydiv');" />
</div>
Becomes:
<div id="mydiv">
<button onClick="new Effect.BlindUp('mydiv');" />
</div>
The styling can be placed in a enclosed div like this:
<div id="mydiv">
<div style="padding:10px;margin:10px;">
<button onClick="new Effect.BlindUp('mydiv');" />
</div>
</div>
The problem is caused by Scriptaculous reapplying the element's (mydiv) inline style declarations after the effect has been performed.
I have found success with using position: relative; on the block element using the slide/blind animation. Make sure padding/margins are placed on the child elements and not the slide block element.