How can I add filters to skip some of the classes in a namespace/assembly. For example: SYM.UI is the base assembly and i want to skip SYM.UI.ViewModels. Writing the below filter but it is including all of them and not fulfilling my request:
+[SYM.UI*]* -[SYM.UI.ViewModels*]*
Kindly help me correcting this?
The opencover wiki is a good place to start.
The usage is described as +/-[modulefilter]typefilter (this is based on how you would see the types in IL; where the type filter also includes the namespace and module filter usually is the name of the assembly (without the file extension).
Thus to exclude your types you could use
+[SYM.UI]* -[SYM.UI]SYM.UI.ViewModels.*
NOTE: Exclusion filters take preference over inclusion filters.
You can use following:
"-filter:+[*]* -[SYM.UI]SYM.UI.ViewModels.*"
Note that the quotes must be around the -filter: part, too
Related
I have rule A implemented with a macro that uses declare_directory to produce a set of files:
output = ctx.actions.declare_directory("selected")
Names of those files are not known in advance. The implementation returns the directory created by declare_directory with the following:
return DefaultInfo(
files = depset([output]),
)
Rule A is included in "srcs" attribute of rule B. Rule B is also implemented with a macro. Unfortunately the list of files passed to B implementation through "srcs" attribute only contains the "selected" directory created by rule A instead of files residing in that directory.
I know that Args class supports expansion of directories so I could pass names of all files in "selected" directory to a single action. What I need, however, is a separate action for every individual file for parallelism and caching. What is the best way to achieve that?
This is one of the intended use cases of directory outputs (called TreeArtifacts in the implementation), and it's implemented using ActionTemplate:
https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/blob/c2100ad420618bb53754508da806b5624209d9be/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/actions/ActionTemplate.java#L24-L57
However, this is not exposed to Starlark, and has only a couple usages currently, in the Android rules AndroidBinary.java and C++ rules CcCompilationHelper.java. The Android rules and C++ rules are going to be migrated over to Starlark, so this functionality might eventually be made available in Starlark, but I'm not sure of any concrete timelines. It would probably be good to file a feature request on Github.
I am writing a custom rule that takes inputs from cc_library, cc_binary, apple_static_library, and a few other platform-specific rules. I'd like to view each API given to me via referencing ctx.attr.foo inside the custom rule's implementation function.
There is a list of providers here https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/skylark/lib/skylark-provider.html but it doesn't say which rules are using them.
Is there a best practice for viewing what these rules are providing me, or does it require going through the source for each one?
This is how you get all providers and output groups from a target:
bazel cquery my_target --output=starlark --starlark:expr="providers(target)"
You can get a list of providers for a given target with dir. Something like this is helpful for debugging:
def _print_attrs_impl(ctx):
for target in ctx.attr.targets:
print('%s: %s' % (target.label, dir(target)))
Printing from inside a rule you're developing is often helpful too, to verify targets are actually what you expect them to be.
You can also apply dir to the providers themselves, to see what fields they have.
Currently, we can define a global path that'll be used for all results, under all packages.
I have different paths for different results and hence, is it possible to have the resultPath package wise ?
Or is there something that can help me achieve this ?
Obviously, I don't want to write the complete result-location in every-result, neither I want to change at every place if the location changes.
A workaround is to use #ResultPath on a Class by Class basis;
apply it to some abstract baseActions, one per package.
All other actions will extend the one of their <package>, inheriting the ResultPath setting.
I'm developing a xtext-based language which should refer to objects defined in a vendor-specific file format.
E.g. this file format defines messages, my language shall define Rules that work with these messages. Of course i want to use xtext features e.g. to autocomplete/validate message names, attributes etc.
Not sure if that is a good idea, but I came up with the following:
Use one xtext project to describe the file format
Add a dependency for this project to my DSL project, import the file format grammar to my grammar
import the description files via importURI
FileFormat grammar:
grammar com.example.xtext.fileformat.FileFormat;
generate fileformat "http://xtext.example.com/fileformat/FileFormat"
[...]
DSL grammar:
grammar com.example.xtext.dsl.DSL;
import "http://xtext.example.com/fileformat/FileFormat" AS ff;
Model:
rules += Rule*;
Rule: ImportFileRule | SampleRule;
ImportFileRule: "IMPORT" importURI=STRING "AS" name=ID ";";
SampleRule: "FORWARD" msg=[ff::Message] ";"
First of all: This works fine.
Now, different imported files may define messages with colliding names,
and I want to use fully qualified names for messages anyways.
The prefix for the message names should be defined in my DSL, e.g. the name of the ImportFileRule.
So I would like to use something like:
IMPORT "first-incredibly-long-filename-with-version-and-stuff.ff" AS first;
IMPORT "second-incredibly-long-filename-with-version-and-stuff.ff" AS second;
FORWARD first.msg_1; // references to msg_1 in first file
FORWARD second.msg_1; // references to msg_1 in second file
Unfortunately I don't see a easy way to achieve this with xtext.
At the moment I'm using a ID for the namespace qualifier and custom ProposalProvider/Validator classes,
which is ugly in detail and bypasses the EMF index, becoming slow with files of 1000 messages and 50000 attributes...
Would there be a right way to do it?
Was it a good idea to use xtext to parse the definition files in the first place?
I have two ideas what to check.
Xtext has a specific global scope provider called ImportedNameSpaceAwareScopeProvider. By using an overridden version of this, you could specify other headers to consider.
Check the implementation of the xtext grammar itself, as it supports such a feature with EPackage imports. I am not exactly sure, how it operates, but should work this way.
Finally, I ended up using the SimpleNamesFragment, ImportURIScopingFragment and a custom ScopeProvider derived from AbstractDeclarativeScopeProvider.
That way, I had to implement ScopeProvider methods for quiet a few rules but was much more flexible in using my "namespace prefix".
E.g. it is simple to implement syntaxes like
FORWARD FROM first: msg_01, msg_02;
BizTalk produced namespace default prefix as NS0. Is there a way to override it to generate something different without utilizing an XSLT (it's an overhead when the schema changes, XSLT has to be updated as well)? Something like
<pidx:Invoice>
and not
<ns0:Invoice>
This should be simple (after all it's just a namespace prefix), but clients are parsing document instead of using it as an XML with namespace, and having no expected namespace prefix causes them grief.
Thank you.
No, there's not.
A kludgey answer is to convert the XML to a string and search/replace.
You can do this. I had to do this when calling a Google API, which requires specific namespace prefixes.
The method is to use the Imports property at the <Schema> level in your XSD. Using the Imports dialog you can define specific prefixes on each namespace.
You will have to break up your schema into at least two separate XSD's so you can import one into the other and redefine the prefix at that time.