While it could of course be done neater by putting the code into the controller or something, I can not image why the following is happening:
assume that #some_table.some_text contains 5 lines.
putting the following code in my html.erb file:
<% #some_table.some_text.lines.each do |cur_line| %>
foo
<% end %>
results in 5 foos followed by all the lines in #some_table.some_text.
I could imagine this would happen when using the <%= %> but not with <% %>.
Obviously, I don't want the #some_table.some_text to be shown.
What am I doing wrong here?
That's just the way that the Ruby lines method works - it returns an Enumerable, which can't be looped through in the same way. For your purposes, try
<% #some_table.some_text.split(/\n/).each do |cur_line| %>
instead.
Alternatively convert the Enemerable into an array before calling each, using one of the methods, eg:
<% #some_table.some_text.lines.collect.each do |cur_line| %>
Related
I am trying to pass a string to my view from controller like this:
controller:
def index
#str = 'foo'
end
view:
String: <% #str %>
The variable itself seems to arrive because I get no error. However, it arrives empty (only "String" is in html, nothing else). And it seems to work great with other built-in types, e.g. Time. What am I missing here? I use Ruby 2.2.1 and Rails 4.
As others have said, you need to use
<%= #str %>
I'll give you an explanation as well - you use <% %> for when you need to run some Ruby code that you don't want displayed to the screen. For example, you might have conditional logic like
<% if user_signed_in? %>
<%= #welcome_string %>
<% end %>
Use <%= %> when you want to output, drop the '=' for conditional logic or anything that doesn't need to display.
in your view
String: <%= #str %>
In view user following code:
String: <%= #str %>
In your view, use:
<%= #str %>
As the other users have pointed out, you need to use <%=
The = is an ERB flag to so export the result of the code inside of the tags and put it into the DOM.
If you want to put some logic into your page that you don't want to evaluate, you leave the = out.
<% if user_wants_to_see_output? %>
<%= "User will see this" %>
<% end %>
so I have a standard has_many through association in my models, very similar to the question here: Loop through ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy with each
I used the advice in that problem but I think I am having some trouble getting it through on my ERB file so that it shows up in my app. At the moment I have the following:
<%= #memberships.map do |a| %>
<%=a.name%>
<% end %>
In this scenario, the membership model is the one through which users and organizations have many though (#memberships = #user.organizations). So the #memberships.class returns
ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy::ActiveRecord_Associations_CollectionProxy_Organization
on the rails console. So the moment, in the browser the code returns on a page where the user is in two orgs:
orgone orgtwo["\n", "\n"]
I just don't know how to manipulate the proxy classes to return what I want. Thanks!
UPDATE:
I figured it out, I had to remove the = at the top of the block, and I added some styling with a comma:
<% #memberships.map do |a| %>
<h3><%=a.name %> <%= ", " unless a == #memberships.last %></h3>
<% end %>
If you want to print the name of each membership, what you want is
<% #memberships.each do |membership| %>
<%= membership.name %>
<% end -%>
The <% prefix in ERB executes code without appending the results to the output buffer, while the <%= prefix outputs the string representation of the result of the expression. Since each returns an enumerator, a <%= will return the string representation of the enumerator which is something like #<Enumerator:0xDEADBEEF.
Short version:
It seems weird to me to have rails code like, say,
<% if #list.empty
%><%= val %><%
end %>
Is there some way to do something like this?
<% if #list.empty
some_display_function_i_wish_existed val
end %>
Long version:
I have a model, tweet.rb, that overrides to_s. The to_s works fine.
I have a view that needs to output to_s for each tweet in #meme.tweets .
I've observed the following:
<% #meme.tweets.each do |tweet|
tweet
end %>
Result: no output
<% #meme.tweets.each do |tweet|
puts tweet # or tweet.to_s does the same thing
end %>
...Result: no output
<%= #meme.tweets.each do |tweet|
tweet
end %>
...Result: output is entire inspection of each tweet, not to_s
<%= #meme.tweets.each do |tweet|
puts tweet # or tweet.to_s does the same thing
end %>
...Result: output is entire inspection of each tweet, not to_s
<% #meme.tweets.each do |tweet| %>
<%= tweet %>
<% end %>
...Result: works as intended (outputs result of to_s for each tweet). So does:
<%= #meme.tweets.collect do |tweet|
tweet.to_s
end %>
...Result: works as intended.
I come from a PHP background, and don't really understand the rules here.
I know I can do it the way I did in the last example.
But could someone explain why none of the other examples work as I intend?
It seems to me that the rules APPEAR to be:
1) <%= something %> will take that thing, call to_s on it, which will default to inspect if not overridden.
2) <% something %> will execute something
Is there a way to use 2) <% %> to send output to the view?
Or is it against the rules to have <% %> tags that span multiple lines of ruby code at all?
<%= code %> will print to the the output the result of the inner code. <% %> won't print anything, it just evaluates the inner code.
That's why the first example doesn't work. On the second example you expect the puts to print the tweets, but puts doesn't print on the same buffer... (you'll see the tweets printed on the rails console instead).
On 3rd and 4th example you are printing the collection as an object (#meme.tweets.each returns an Enumerable and ERb call #to_s on that) and not the code inside the block.
The 5th form is correct. That's what you'll normally do.
The 6th form is in some way correct too. There you are iterating a collection, calling #to_s on each element and then collecting them on a new array, that gets printed to the output (but you are printing an array of strings, not just one big string).
you can get a similar result with #join. (It returns a string created by converting each element of the array to a string)
<%= #meme.tweets.join %>
<% %> are used when you do not want the Ruby code you're executing to output anything. The <%= %> tags are used when you want to output something. This is why your example using <%= %> and tweet.to_s works as intended.
If you don't specify which attribute you want to output, then yes, puts will display the whole object. If for example, you had a message attribute on your tweet object, writing tweet.message (inside of a <%= %>, of course) would output just the message attribute of that tweet.
The direct answer is the concat function, eg:
Hi, my name is <% concat("Shelvacu") %>.
which is the same as
Hi, my name is <%= "Shelvacu" %>.
Which both output Hi, my name is Shelvacu.
Think of it like this: An erb template is parsed, transformed into valid ruby code, and then that ruby code is run*. Everything that is not inside <% ... %> is converted to concat("..."), <% statement %> is converted to statement, and <%= statement %> is converted to concat(statement.to_s).
So when ERB sees
1 + 2 = <%= 1 + 2 %>
<% puts "hello" %>
<% #meme.tweets.each do |tweet| %>
<%= tweet %>
<% end %>
that code is then translated to*
concat("1 + 2 = ")
concat((1 + 2).to_s)
concat("\n\n")
puts "hello"
concat("\n\n")
#meme.tweets.each do |tweet|
concat(tweet.to_s)
end
* This is an oversimplification, ERB does much more so that errors point the right line, statements don't merge with eachother in unexpected ways, and I didn't even mention <%- ... %>. However, this should be a decent mental model for understanding whats happening when you write code in ERB.
I'm trying to left justify a string in a rails view with a pad character.
The following doesn't work:
<%= menu_items.description.ljust(5,".")%>
Neither does this:
<%= menu_items.description.to_s.ljust(5,".")%>
Just to mess around and try to get something I found the following works.
<%= menu_items.description.length.to_s.ljust(5,".")%>
It prints out the length converted to a string and appends the pad characters. What gives? How do I make the first snippet work?
The following works because .length gives you a number, probably zero, and then adds ....
<%= menu_items.description.length.to_s.ljust(5,".")%>
What do you get when you just do this:
<%= menu_items.description %>
Look like menu_items is an array. Try this
<% menu_items.each do |menu_item| %>
<%= menu_item.description.ljust(5,".") %>
<% end %>
Also, if it is not an array, then the .. will be appended to make it a total length of 5. If description is longer, it will do nothing.
I have a simple page that displays some 'Games'.
Heres the code:
<ul>
<%= #tvshow.games.each do |game| %>
<li><%= game.gameTitle %></li>
<% end %>
</ul>
It displays like this:
The All-Syrup Squishee
#<Game:0xb6783820>
With the #Game tag coming AFTER the list item but before the closing list tag. Any idea why it's showing up or how I could get rid of it?
<%= outputs the result as markup, in this case an instance of the Game class.
For this kind of loop you want to use <% which executes some code but does not produce markup.
Edit line 2 to read <% #tvshow.games.each do |game| %>
Remove your first = from the line with the each
Rails is printing the result of the each statement, which returns the array itself. When you output an array, you will output the .to_s of each of its contents, which in your case is the default representations of the Game objects