STS is over 350MB and most of it is corporate blubber ware that I do not need. For example its default installation includes bunch of Servers that shows up in project explorer and other things related to VMware cloud related products. All I need is Grails and Groovy and JavaScript related development and nothing else.
What is the procedure to remove all these things for clean and light installation of STS without destabilizing STS?
You can choose not to install tc server, Spring Roo and Apache Maven during the install. Also, you can go under Help -> About SpringSource Tool Suite, click Installation Details..., and uninstall plugins you don't want.
I know this question is already answered, but I just wanted to mention another way of installiong STS. You can do this through update sites. This way is slightly more complicated (only slightly), but does have the smallest footprint. You can see the instructions here:
http://blog.springsource.com/2011/03/25/early-access-springsource-tool-suite-for-eclipse-indigo-3-7/
Related
Can anyone suggest choices for a modern(ish) editor or IDE (mainly for use on Linux hosts/guests) that has good Git integration and if possible some level of vi/vim keystroke compatibility available ?
I mainly work with ansible, puppet, python (including pyspark), docker, k8s and editing via sshfs would also help, as would being able to use the ssh protocol (rather than git's own protocol) for remote git repo interaction.
I am considering Atom as I believe most or all of what I want can be accomplished through addition of various modules.
I was a big Atom user in the past but in the last few years I've moved to Visual Studio Code https://code.visualstudio.com/, the git integration is really good.
The real advantage though is the plugins, I work a lot with Puppet and the official Puppet plugin is a really good https://puppet-vscode.github.io/.
Most of the documentation I write is in markdown so having a plugin to preview markdown saves me a lot of time.
I've just recently started doing some work with Terraform and the plugin for that has made it a breeze https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=HashiCorp.terraform. This https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-azuretools.vscode-docker is a great Docker plugin.
There is a stack of other plugins I use all the time to help with JSON, YAML, DOT and Ruby files and marking ToDo's in files.
I haven't used one but I'd expect there is a vim/vi, I come from a Solaris/Linux background so I was naturally very resistant to using any Microsoft products but VSC has won me over despite that prejudice.
I've been developing a web application and a lot of customers are asking if they can host the application in their network (for security reasons). I have been looking for a way to package up a rails app into a single executable (with server and all), but haven't been able to find anything. My other requirement is that we distribute it without the source. Because of that I was looking at JRuby and Warbler. The end product should run on linux or windows. Has anyone done anything like this before, or can anyone point me in the right direction.
Thanks
My best guess would be to use JRuby and the JRubyCompiler, although I have no idea if you could compile a whole rails project (including all the required gems). I got it to compile a small ruby script though. Anyway, if you succeed, you could package those in a jar or war and deploy that as a contained application.
It doesn't sound like you necessarily need to package it as an executable, as long as the code is obfuscated. I personally haven't needed to protect any of my code, but a quick google search returned this product http://rubyencoder.com/. I'm sure there are others out there, but the basic idea is that your code is unreadable and cannot be reverse engineered. This would allow you to run a standard rails environment without giving access to your source code.
If you have the budget and really want to outsource this, the Github guys partnered with BitRock to build their cross-platform installable product (Github Firewall Install). BitRock has this case study on their website.
I've been searching for a while, and I can't find any modern rails plugin management tools. I found several gem management tools (such as bundler and isolate), but no plugin management tools. The closest thing to that I found was piston, and that's not exactly what I was looking for was it was for plugin svn:externals management. Our plugins are not using svn:externals. Some can be used as gems, and managed by bundler, but not all plugins are offered by their developers in that form.
They can always be managed by hand, of course, but I'd rather have a tool to keep them current, etc., that works for plugins like isolate or bundler work for gems.
If others could use this I'll see if I can get supervisor approval to work on such and contribute it, assuming also there's not a good or even fair solution out there that I'm missing.
Cheers,
Craig
I use git submodules for that.
But, indeed in Rails 3, it is more natural to package each plugin as a gem, and i think it is the preferred way, especially for the reasons you mention.
Have been developing with Grails for couple of weeks now,
Though I've loved the experience and the possibilities, I've seen following problems starting up.
Please share if you've had similar issues.. and remedies would help too.
Transaction management (in-built) doesn't seem to work in some circumstances.
AOP with domain objects doesn't work
Grails IDE-plugins are pretty primitive
GWT-Integration (with the plugin)
Plugin installation (fails unusually) probably cause plugins are not matured enough.
Lack of extensive documentation (though what is available is pretty good)
Debugging support
If you actually want solutions for these problems you should post a separate question for each with a lot more information than you've provided here. For example, I can't possibly diagnose the cause of the problem when all I know is
Transaction management (in-built)
doesn't seem to work in some
circumstances.
Here is my opinion on these issues:
Transaction management (in-built) doesn't seem to work in some circumstances.
I haven't noticed any such problem
AOP with domain objects doesn't work
I guess what you mean here is that meta-programming domain objects doesn't work. I have encountered this and haven't found any solution. If you really meant AOP then I can't help you as I've never used it with Groovy.
Grails IDE-plugins are pretty primitive
The IntelliJ plugin is very, very good. The Netbeans plugin is OK. Last time I tried the Eclipse Groovy plugin it was awful. However, I believe that a new Eclipse Groovy plugin has recently been released as part of the Spring Tool Suite (STS). It's supposed to be big improvement on the previous Eclipse Groovy plugin, but I don't think it has much Grails support yet
GWT-Integration (with the plugin)
I don't use GWT, so have no comment
Plugin installation (fails unusually) probably cause plugins are not matured enough.
I've never had problems installing plugins, though if I update a plugin, I sometimes need to manually remove the old version from the .grails directory.
Lack of extensive documentation (though what is available is pretty good)
I think the level of documentation for Grails is way ahead of most OS projects. There is a wide range of Grails books available, there's an active mailing list, and the official document is 176 page long.
Debugging support
Again, it depends on the tools you're using. With IntelliJ, debugging a Grails app is as easy as debugging a Java app with Eclipse.
My own pet peeves about Grails development are:
Upgrading from one version to another is often a very painful process due to lack of backward compatibility. When I upgraded from 1.0.4 to 1.1.1 about 20% of my tests started failing
Application reloading is very hit and miss.
My feedback after few months with Grails:
Didn't happen to me.
I don't use AOP
Wrong. IntelliJ is very good and especially the last beta version. You can download it for a free trial. I know that Eclipse support is very limited and NetBeans becomes better but still behind IntelliJ
I can't say. I don't use it
Agree. My piece of advice here is to follow these following principles: 1.Use plugins as few as you can. Your application will be lighter and more maintainable. Also, you will upgrade Grails version more easily. 2.if you want to use a plugin, test it before with a dummy project. It takes few minutes for creating a grails application and you could test your next plugin rapidly. Be aware that sometimes plugins have compatibility issues between theselves so, do not hesitate to install all of the plugins you need into your dummy project
Agree. Grails is a very complex framework and documentation does not cover every aspect of Grails. But what is available is well explained. Also, grails community is very responsive, so if you don't find something you will easily have an answer in Grails forum or even on StackOverflow
Definitely Agree. Again, with IntelliJ you can debug easily but it is resource-consuming and takes time when reloading your app. So usually, I end up with logging traces and I debugg my full stack of exceptions like that! IMHO, this is one of the major shortcomings of Grails.
I'm in the process of deploying a rails application to Windows machines. I do all of my development with OS X and Linux, but the final app will actually run on Windows machines.
That said, my client is looking for an all-in-one Apache(I had to talk him out of IIS)+Rails+Application deployment/installer. He wants to hand all of his (Windows-based) clients an install CD for their respective servers (they all want their own setup).
Is there anything like this in existence? I realize Capistrano exists but that requires a great deal of setup on the hosts (especially for Windows) beforehand and it's not very feasible in this particular case.
In the past I've used InnoSetup (http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php) for creating installers, but I'm not sure that's going to work in this case.
If you guys have any input, suggestions, or highly persuasive client techniques (to talk them all out of Windows =P) it would be most appreciated.
Best.
Try with RubyStack:
BitNami RubyStack is an installer that greatly simplifies the installation of Ruby on Rails and its runtime dependencies. It includes ready-to-run versions of Ruby, Rails, MySQL and Subversion as well as a number of third-party libraries like FiveRuns TuneUp. RubyStack is distributed for free under the Apache 2.0 license and has been packaged using BitRock's multiplatform installer.
http://bitnami.org/stack/rubystack
I'd look into using jruby with glassfish. Make sure the users have java and it should be good to go.
RubyStack is the closest thing to what you're after, although you might need to tailer the install a bit and remove some unwanted baggage. I don't know of any other Windows projects for a production environment (InstantRails is designed for development).
Maybe you can make InstantRails meet your needs.
Ruby and thus Ruby on Rails is a fairly notorious deployment on Windows even in the best of circumstances, moreso when the setup is out or your hands like that. I don't mean to admonish, but this definitely speaks to matching development and deployment enviroment (I once ran into similar problems when I found out that the Java enviroment we were deploying to was a good half-a-decade out of date).
As I don't have enough Ruby-on-Windows experience to fairly weigh in on the matter, I'd say either LiveCD's or CygWin deployments may be worth looking at (Always good to broaden people's view on alternate Operating Systems, right?).
Have you considered building a single version that runs in a VM?
For this particular problem, I'd go with a traditional Windows installer package like NSIS.
When I had a client with a Windows-only IT department, though, I found they were much more amenable to an XServer than a linux server. I don't generally think of OS X as a server OS, but it actually worked really well. I tried for linux first, and when they shot it down, I suggested OS X and they jumped at it.
It helped, I think, that they already supported some Mac laptops.
Good luck!
As other posters have suggested, RubyStack should be a good option. It is free and you can always use it to run your own 'post install' scripts to customize it for what you want. If you want a supported stack or addition/modifications to RubyStack you can get commercial support from BitRock We have done so for several Rails based companies that wanted a local version, including for the guys over at GitHub