We need to build a Youtube Clone site; does any one know how to convert various video formats to flv with H.264 encoding? Is there any program to achieve this?
it seems that you need to find some command-line video encoder.
following items are the first three products I found by google:
1. E.M. Total Video Converter Command Line
2. Flash Video MX SDK V2
3. Sothink Video Encoder Engine
you can compare the three above and choose one as your tool.
Related
I'm using VLC to playback my H.265 videos
Using Cyberlink PowerDirector to re-encode videos to H.265 from original H.264, saves a bunch of space and i'm the only one viewing the content so not an issue for media platforms.
Currently when running the re-encode the video will come out as expected, except the subtitles no longer exist. This software does have the ability to attach subs via SRT or what have you but I need to first extract the existing subs into a text file as the program doesn't allow that (to my knowledge), VLC apparently does?
PowerDirector does indeed have a built in function to extract subtitles from a video which can be accessed via the timeline when right clicking the video and selecting "Extract Subtitles/English" or whatever language.
This imports the existing data into a locally stored SRT directly in the built in subtitles editor page of the program.
I have a Roku app and some of the videos come from Youtube. I have no problem retrieving the videos but if I select a video with HD it wants to automatically stream the Dash version. I can prevent Dash if I force a non HD version but who wants to watch a SD version..
SO I am wondering is there any way to force the mp4 stream opposed to a Dash stream?
I have read that XP does not play Dash and so I tried using Windows NT 5.1 as the user-agent but that did not work.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
DASH and MP4 are not mutually exclusive - they perform different functions in the video delivery.
In simple terms you can view it like this:
Camera captures frames - 'raw video'
The 'raw video' is encoded in some way to store it, generally in a way that balances video size vs the quality. The video is then sometimes refereed to by the encoder used (the codec) - for example if a h.264 codec is used the video may be called a h.264 video.
The video stream, i.e. all the individual frames that make up the video, is packaged into a container. This container may contain video and audio streams, and it may even have multiple video streams. The video is then often referred to by the container format - for example if our h.264 encoded video above is packaged into an MP4 container it is often referred to as an MP4 video, even though the MP4 'container' may contain several video and audio tracks.
To improve the quality of video streaming, a video may also use a streaming protocol like MPEG DASH. The theory here is simple: multiple copies of the video are created with different bit rates, and hence different size and quality. Each of these copies is broken up into, for example, 10 second chunks. An index file is created, called a manifest, and a pointer to each video and audio stream is included. A client playing the video, for example a browser, requests each 10 second chunk as it needs it. It chooses which copy of the video it selects the next chunk from depending on the current network conditions. This means if the network is good it can switch to higher quality copy for the next chunk and if there is a problem it can switch down to a lower quality chunk. If we take our example video encoded by h.264 and put into a MP4 container, we can now package it using DASH streaming format. A video packaged like this is often referred to as a DASH video.
The above is a simplified overview, but it hopefully highlights that your videos may be actually MP4 and DASH, and in fact commonly are.
As an additional note, different devices may support different codecs (and even codec profiles), packaging formats and streaming formats - for example iOS devices tend to support HLS rather than DASH at the time of writing. This changes frequently as devices and standards evolve and is one of the reasons it can be tricky to find a single format that will play on all devices and clients - for this reason servers often will provide the same video in multiple codec and streaming formats to support as many devices and clients as possible.
Problem:
To get an iOS app that streams video accepted into the app store, we need to have a HLS version.
What’s the problem?
Android does not support HLS well, and for other reasons, we need to store MP4 and HLS files of the same content.
What’s the difference between MP4 and HLS and why do you need to store both?
MP4 is a container that stores H.264 video and AAC audio for best compatibility in HTML 5 browsers – jsvideo players often have flash fallback if the browser does not support MP4 video in HTML 5 that use the same MP4 file, but played through flash.
HLS is a protocol where text files (.m3u8) contain references to playlists, which themselves reference .ts files (or m2ts), which are mpeg-2 transport streams, not to be confused with mpeg-2 video. The .ts files are containers for the same H.264 video and AAC audio.
Why am I complaining?
It takes time to create the HLS files and playlists from the MP4 files
(Most importantly) We are now storing twice as much data on S3
Why should I care? If your S3 bill is $10K per month for storing both MP4 and HLS, now it is only $5K. Or put another way, if you are paying $100K for storing data in MP4, it would cost $200K to store the same content in both MP4 and HLS.
What do I want?
I want to store only the .ts files and serve both desktop users, iOS users, and Android users with that single file.
Is it possible?
Doesn’t HLS require 5-10 second .ts segments instead of one big file?
As of IETF draft 7, and version 4 of the protocol, HLS supports the tag EXT-X-BYTERANGE which allows you to specify a media segment as a byte range (subrange) of a larger URL.
Are .ts files compatible with HTML5 video?
Apparently not. They are a different container than MP4, yet contain the same video and audio content. Worth looking into how to store the raw video/audio data once and simply using the correct containers when necessary. If JS video players can convert HTML 5 MP4 files into Flash video on the fly if the browser does not support HTML 5 MP4, then why not be able to do the same with M2TS data?
I might be ignorant on some level, but maybe someone can shed some light on this issue, and possibly present a solution.
There currently is no good solution.
A little background.
Video streaming used to require custom protocols such as RTP/RTMP/RTSP etc. These protocols work fine except, we were basically building two separate networks. One HTTP based for standard web traffic, and the other one. The idea came along to split video into little chunks and serve them to the player over HTTP. This way we do not need special servers/software and we could take advantage of the giant HTTP CDNs that were being built. In addition. because the video was split into chunks, we can can encode the same video into different qualities/file sizes. Then the player can choose the best quality video for its current bandwidth. This was the perfect solution for mobile because of the constant changing network conditions. Several competing standard were developed. Move networks was the first to market [citation needed]. The design was copied by Microsoft (Smooth Streaming) and Apple (HTTP Live streaming aka HLS). Microsoft is phasing out smooth streaming in favor of DASH. DASH looks like it will become the default streaming solution of the future. Except, because of its design-by-comity approach, it has basically been stuck in comity for a few years. Now, in those few years, Apple sold Millions of IOS devices. So HLS can not just be discontinued. Why doesn't everyone just use HLS then? I can think of three reasons 1) Its Apples standard, and people are haters. 2) Transport streams are a complicate file format. and 3) Transport streams a patent encumbered. MP4 is not patent encumbered but it also does not have the adaptive abilities. This make user experience poor on 2G networks. The only network supported by the iPhone 1. Also AT&T at the time did not want full bitrate video streamed over there woefully inadequate celular network. HLS was the compromise. All of this predates HTML5. So the video tag was not even considered in its design.
Addressing your points:
1) It takes time to create the HLS files and playlists from the MP4
files
This is a programing website, Automate it.
2) We are now storing twice as much data on S3
[sic] I want to store only the .ts files and serve both desktop users,
iOS users, and Android users with that single file.
You and me both man :).
Possible solutions.
1) What is specifically wrong with Androids implementation? (except for lack of in older devices)
2) JW player can play HLS (Not sure about on android)
3) Server side transmux on demand.
Doesn’t HLS require 5-10 second .ts segments instead of one big file?
You can do byte-ranges, but you need to make sure all devices you are interested in support it.
If JS video players can convert HTML 5 MP4 files into Flash video on
the fly if the browser does not support HTML 5 MP4, then why not be
able to do the same with M2TS data?
They don't convert. Flash natively supports mp4. It is possible to convert TS in AS3/JS. I have done it. JW player can convert TS in browser. video.js may be able to as well.
I like to stream the web cam pictures wich are captured by opencv. I think about a solution with ffmpeg and live555 (poorly they are not document so well). My problems are:
How can convert the captured images to a H264 format so the picures/second match. If it is in a loop I get more than 25 pictures/sekond and the video is to fast.
How can i directly stream the converted H264 stream over the network via rtp / rtps or similar.
Thanks for your help!
This is a common problem.
if you are not require to distribute your software (private use / server side / open-source), you may use FFMpeg compiled with x264 encoder, there's a config flag for that in FFMpeg's config script.
If you do require to distribute your software, i don't know any LGPL licensed library for that, i believe there is no such library. You'd have to use some paid solution.
You should implement DeviceSource.cpp, see DeviceSource.hh and use it as the FramedSource.
Edit: Apple revealed video encoder API, allowing access to stream of h264 frames in iOS8
For an example of how to use x264 and Live555 to encode and stream frames, see the following:
spyPanda open source project.
How to write a Live555 FramedSource to allow me to stream H.264 live SO question.
Everyone knows about there instructional videos http://delphi.wikia.com/wiki/Delphi_Videos but I want to watch them on my iPad when I go on vacation.
The problem is the videos are in swf and will not play on my iPad. Does any know of another source for these videos in another format?
Thanks.
For the moment flash video is the container of choice for most video content on the internet. Saif is right. If you want those specific videos you'll need to convert them yourself. There are several decent flv to mp4 converters available for free (Miro comes to mind). SWF is takes a bit more work to extract the video content.
Now if you are looking for Delphi content that's already available in MPEG 4 you can try http://edn.embarcadero.com/tv. The content from the most recent Coderage event is available as an mp4 download.
You can convert them into a proper format using a free video convert like Any Video Converter
I've had reasonable success watching on-line Flash content on my iPad using iOSFlashVideo.
Not tried it on off-line flash files though.
--jeroen