Using Rails 3.0.7 and git, deploying with capistrano. I'm using different machines as web and app servers. I cannot deploy the application code to the web server, only the static assets--basically the public/ folder.
This would seem common but no luck searching for a best practice.
Is anything build around capistrano to handle this case? Otherwise I'm thinking that adding tasks to create the structure, but scp the public directory from the app server would be the solution.
So I assume there's a business reason you can't deploy the app to the other server?
If there isn't then just deploy the whole code
and configure your web server to just serve the public folder.
(in Apache/Passenger the configs would be exactly the same, you just wouldn't enable passenger on the static server)
That is the only simple way to do it..
otherwise you're going to cause yourself a load of headaches..
Nevertheless I'm going to make up a way to solve this.
If you do need to deploy just the static code
then I suggest you create two repositories
the app (eg. git#myserver:app.git
the static files (eg. git#myserver:static.git)
Now in your app include git#myserver:static.git as a submodule mounted at public/
Having done this, you should search standard capistrano recipes for deploying with git submodules (in particular I guess you'll want to store a local cache of the submodules, update it, then git submodule init somehow with that)
You can then have two capistrano recipes
I suggest you check out capistrano multi-stage... defining app and static as two stages
You can therefore just specify git#myserver:app.git as the repository for "app"
and git#myserver:static.git as the repository for "static"
then a simple cap app deploy:migrations && cap static deploy should do it.
but remember these will not be simultaneous
I too wish there were more established practices published. We've done ours based on the Django book which recommends making your public app directory a networked directory.
This is much better as scp only works if your public directory is static. Many apps will write things to the public directory, e.g. image generation on-the-fly. These files also need to be copied to the web server immediately.
I recommend using a NFS, Samba Share or similar, so that your public directory is actually just a networked folder, so when you write to it, it's like writing to the remote folder.
To integrate it into capistrano we do the following:
create this networked folder in shared/public
After deploy:update_code:
move content from current/public to shared/public (overriding files as needed)
remove or rename current/public then symlink current/public to shared/public
Downsides:
* doesn't remove old files (like someone earlier said)
* no real rollback option (apart from redeploying older version)
Best approach I've come up with is to in fact scp files over to the web server.
Related
I have a directory under /public folder with the use of CarrierWave I store all my PDF files under this dir. But the problem is all the time I deploy new version of my Rails app this directory gets cleaned up and the all files are missing. This directory is was set under my uploader.
I also have a directory named "private" which I created manually in order to not to serve sensitive files globally on WEB. Those files also gone after new deployment process.
How can I prevent files from deleting on deploy process?
Thanks.
I assume you are using some automation for deployment. Because if you are updating your code on server instance manually then you can preserve pre uploaded file, but using manually method to update code is not a good practice.
So in automation deployment we generally follow this kind of flow.
Whenever you deploy that create a new deploy version and set that as current version.
Simply that means it's creating a new directory and placing your rails project in it. Now the files you are storing inside the project directory are there in the previous version those are not gone if you are using any linux instance.(Only if you have setup that way to preserve last few versions to restore incase of new deploy is exploded)
Clear till now?
Not suppose you are not keeping any previous version, your files are gone forever.
So it's not a good idea to store any file under project repository.
Best practice is to use bucket system like AWS bucket or Google cloud bucket, where we store all the uploaded file. If having bucket is not in budget, you can choose a different directory on linux server instance outside of project directory. But you have to setup all those upload paths and directory system to be used as bucket.
This problem I am facing with is happening because of capistrano. Every time I run cap production deploy command on my server, the capistrano deployment tool syncs every file with git repo. And the files added by end-users are not stored under my git repos of course, so capistrano overwriting the empty public folder from my repo to the server. Adding the path to :linked_dirs variable under deploy.rb solved my problem.
Another approach could be using a directory which is somewhere else than your project root path (such as /home/files) to store all your files. By doing this you will be seperating your files from project and also prevent capistrano's overwriting problem.
Hope this information will be useful for someone or future me :) ..
When you deploy with capistrano, a new deploy(folder) is created from the repository.
Any files not in the repository are not carried over.
If you want to persist files in public, you need to create a directory in your server first and then create a symlink with capistrano inside public to that folder.
Then have your carrierwave uploads saved to that location.
During each deployment cap will symlink to that directory and your files will be there
So we have resources in the grails-app/assets folder, i.e: javascript files, stylesheets and other documents.
Some of these documents are user docs which would have to have the option of being updated in production mode. When you usually add something to this assets folder, the grails app doesn't detect this change until after redeploying the app which would cause the folder to be reprocessed.
Is there any way to detect these changes in production systems or an alternate location other than the assets folder where grails would pick up this new/updated file without re-deployment ?
Under production the most recommendable approach is to have an Apache Httpd or an NGinx server as a front end where you put the static assets. In both cases you will need configure reverse proxy on NGinx or mod_jk (depending of your Java container.).
Inclusive you may think on store large assets in a repository like S3 (if you will run on Internet).
I'm using Amazon Elastic Beanstalk for my Rails application.
My Rails application generates pdf-documents, that are stored in public/posters.
When I deploying commit in question, all files from public folder are replaced by files from deployed commit.
I other words, I'm loosing all the user-generated data after commit.
How to configure my app or AWS to make some folders shared between commits, to prevent deletion?
Thanks!
If you use capistrano, you can use shared_children option.
set :shared_children, %w(public/posters log tmp/pids)
Otherwise you can setup symbol link.
make shared directory for posters
add public/posters in .gitignore
make symbol link public/posters to shared/posters
I have started developing a new Rails app on my server using RVM, Rails 3, & Ruby v1.9.2. I am using Git as my code repository. It's a simple app and I don't want to use an extra server. I just want to deploy my app directly from the same server I am developing on.
I've installed Phusion Passenger w/ Apache to serve my app, but have realized that I can't do that pointing to my development directory as my RAILS_ENV is set to "development". (I found I got file permission errors on the asset pipeline and other issues when I attempted to set RAILS_ENV to "production" and serve the app)
What's the simplest/easiest way to deploy the app? Can I simply:
1) Create a separate user to run rails production (Rails in dev currently runs as me on my Ubuntu server)
2) Clone my repo into a separate dir and configure Apache accordingly
3) Seed my database with the data needed for production (not much data needed here)
4) What else?
I've looked briefly at Capistrano, but it seems like overkill for this simple app. I only need to be able to provide a simple web interface for some data entry. Seems like git push should be sufficient, but I haven't done this before so maybe I'm wrong? Also, if I git push how do I ensure file permissions in the "production" directories are all set properly, particularly for any new files that get created in the originating app directory structure?
Thanks for any ideas.
No- you do not need Capistrano for the above; at this stage I feel it will only serve to confuse you further.
I'd suggest you first save your repo to a private Github or free BitBucket account. What you should do is keep one folder for 'development'.
Remember that Passenger is 'just' a module working with Apache. So what you need to do is setup a virtual host under apache and direct that to another folder on your system. For this example, consider:
~/rails/myapp_development/ and ~/rails/myapp_production/
Passenger always runs the app in production, so that should not be an issue. You can do bundle --without=production in your development setup to ignore any gems listed in the Gemfile under the production namespace, i.e. say you've got the mysql adaptor specified, you can ignore this and have Rails only rely on the SQlite gem.
You can now simply develop in the development folder, commit, push to BitBucket. Deploying will be as simply going into the production folder and doing a git pull and touch tmp/restart.txt.
When Capistrano deploys a Rails app, it creates a shared/ directory to store files that should be shared across releases and not re-exported every time. In my application I have several things in the shared/ directory that rarely change (so they belong there rather than in the application tree), but I'd still like them to be version controlled for the times when they do change.
What is the best way to approach version controlling those files but keeping them separate from the repository Capistrano is exporting from?
The /shared directory is really for un-versioned data. For example, you might store bundled gems so that you don't have to re-install all your gems every release. You can also store you logs there so they don't get overwritten every time you deploy. You can store pid files there so you don't loose the process ids of critical processes during a deploy. You might even store user generated or partially processed data there so that it is not removed during a release. If a file is meant to be versioned and has the chance of changing though, I would recommend keeping it with the rest of your files and out of the shared directory.
That said, you can always also write deploy scripts to pre-populate data in your shared directory, like database configuration files. These scripts will get run on each deploy and can be entirely customized. For example, your database config script might only write the config file if it doesn't already exist.
Another common use of the shared directory is for configuration files. Versioning and source control for configuration files is a very good idea, but should managed in a system configuration management tool. In my environment, I manage code releases with Capistrano and system configuration with Puppet. That way, there is still source control over configuration files, but they are kept distinct from the code deploy process. In turn, the code deploy process is kept independent of system configuration.