I am using a custom ant buildscript for my Android app.
I have a property ${distributionTarget} that is evaluated to for example Android_Market.
However, in some methods, I don't get the output of app-Android_Market-release.apk but I get app-${distributionTarget}-release.apk.
I am positive the property has been set correctly, since earlier in the build-stage I have a echo method, that does shows the value of the property correctly.
What am I missing here?
It appears the property was initialized earlier on with no value. Refactoring the build-script to init the properties later made it work.
Related
I'm trying to use a third party library inside ue5. For it to compile, I need to add the "Zc__cplusplus" option to the compiler.
While going through a file named "VCToolChain.cs" I found out that, the needed option will be included if the variable "Target.WindowsPlatform.bUpdatedCPPMacro" is set to true.
So my question is where and when is this variable set?
Can I set it in some non hacky way?
I am using AADL which is domain specific language created using Xtext and EMF. I am trying to use function IResourceServiceProvider.Registry.INSTANCE.getResourceServiceProvider(URI.createFileURI("dummy.aadl")) but it returns null. how can I fix it?
It looks like you did never called the doSetup method of the AADLStandalibeSetup (or however your language impl is called). It is used to register your language if you do not run in an OSGi equinox environment.
In Dart Editor build 27025, the following code produces a syntax error on the line declaring the getter get x:
main() {
var _x;
set x(x) => _x = x; // This is okay
get x => _x; // Syntax error here
}
Note that the setter set x doesn't produce an error. Is this a bug in Dart Editor or am I doing something wrong here?
As you said, getters are functions that are used to retrieve the values of object properties and setters are functions that are used to set the values of object properties. In you example code, _x is not an object property.
The spec shows that getterSignature and setterSignature are only allowed in classes and at the top-level of libraries.
The only thing that surprises me is that your set doesn't produce a syntax error.
That's an interesting one. I think the bug may be that it doesn't complain about the setter. If you delete the getter and just use the setter it doesn't actually run. Or even parse. Which I think means they're not allowed within a function, though it's not immediately clear to me why.
A Dart project member responded to my bug report that "it isn't valid to declare a getter or a setter inside another method or function. This can be seen by following the grammar for a statement to a localFunctionDeclaration to a functionSignature.
That said, it's a bug that there was no syntax error for the setter."
can i change the value of parameter in called target and then retrieve it in the calling target in ant.Probably By refid if there is any other way that is appreciated.
Normally you cannot modify an ant property in ant once it's set, but as oers pointed out in a comment, you can use the Variable task in ant-contrib. You can even override an existing property with a Variable. According to the documentation, you should still use properties in most cases, and only use variables in the cases where you really need to be able to modify a value.
Another workaround is to set additional properties and call the other targets using those properties.
If I understand MODX Revolution correctly, I should be able to make a Property Set (Tools -> Property Sets) and apply it to an element as default properties. See rtfm.modx.com.
I have created a Property Set - 'tvsEnabled' - with the following values:
includeTVs: 1
tvPrefix: (empty string)
processTVs: 1
And then I call the following Snippet:
[[getResources#tvsEnabled? &parents=`8` &tpl=`TplArticle`]]
This returns nothing...
Firstly, please provide the code for TplArticle tpl, as there may be error in that tpl as well. The above code is perfectly correct.
Secondly, the tvPrefix parameter should be set properly. If you put an empty string, its no harm. But, try not overriding its default value. Now, if you have put an empty string, your tpl should access template variables according to the tvPrefix that you have provided, for e.g., [[+name]]. If you don't override its default value, you have to access template variables with the +tv. prefix, for e.g., [[+tv.name]].
If this doesn't work out, please do elaborate on the total task at hand and all the pieces of codes in relation to that, which you have written.