Some troubles with deploy rails application - ruby-on-rails

I created rails application, it works great in development environment, but now I want to deploy it. I have a vps with passenger and nginx, I deployed rails application with static pages, but now application needs database.
Which best way to clone structure from development base and then deploy it?
Please give any guides to deploy application?
I use (ubuntu 10.04_64, rails 3.0.6)

It sounds like you want a copy of your development database (structure and data).
If you are using a sqlite3 database in development (which you probably are), then on the server (after you've deployed) make a copy of it and name it production.sqlite3
cp development.sqlite3 production.sqlite3
This will copy the structure and data of your development database. If its a static site however, you could do this on the development machine before you deploy.
Let me know if you need instructions to do this for mysql (or any other database) and I will edit this answer.

rake db:migrate RAILS_ENV=production
or I misunderstood the question?

Related

Rails server not working when copying back from staging deploy

I ssh copied a rails app from a staging server because the development repository has been lost. My goal is to create a new development code base using the deployed code as a source. So far I have removed a hidden .bundle folder and replaces several aliases with folders and files. I then ran bundle install. For the database I did a sql dump from staging and used it to build a development database. I think I'm ready to run rails server. But when I try to run rails server in the base directory. It gives me the rails command line help as if I was running rails s in a directory with no app.
I'm not even sure if it is possible to reverse a deploy this way. I've looked at the rails guide on the app initialization process and all the files seem to be in place.
Remember that for Rails to start up, you need bin/rails, bin/bundle, config/boot, etc.
If you restore those files, it should work again.

Can Rails 2 different databases in the production environment?

My goal is to have 2 databases and 2 deployments of rails on the same server. I want to have the regular production server using the production database. Then I want to be able to deploy to a different web address that will use a different database. My goal is to be able to push the backup first and make sure all the migrations etc. work in the full environment. I would then push it to the main server.
The issue I seem to run into is that the database.ml file only lists the 3 database types. The passenger environment will also assume that its running in production and would migrate the main MySQL database even if I deploy the code to a different directory. Whats the best way around this? Was wondering if it is simple or if it involves setting lots of variables in lots of places? Any suggestions would be great!
You can add other database types to database.yml as you see fit.
staging:
adapter: postgresql
host: mydb_host
database: mydb_staging
etc...
You can copy config/environments/production.rb to config/environments/staging.rb and leave it as is so the two environments are exactly the same, or tweak staging.rb as you see fit.
Now you have a staging environment! Use it where appropriate, e.g.:
rake RAILS_ENV=staging db:migrate
I am not a passenger expert, but know that my shop has both staging and production instances of apps running on the same server under passenger, so it can be done. Google can probably instruct you better on configuring that than I can.

Want to develop rails site offline then move to server

Is there an issue with developing my site on my macbook and then moving to a server when done? Will there be issues I need to plan ahead for? DB or ruby related maybe? Dependencies or something a server could have different from my dev environment that could cause a nightmare later? I'd rather develop it offline since it'd be faster and wouldn't require an internet connection but in the past I've always done everything with live sites so this would be a first, and I am new to ruby on rails.
Developing locally and then deploying to your server(s) via something like capistrano is standard practise.
It's a good idea to keep your development environment as close as possible to your production environment (ruby versions, database versions etc). Bundler makes keeping your gems in sync easy
I used Heroku for some projects. The deployment was as easy as it could be. I just did a git push and it worked without problems... I really like bundler and rake :-)
Your Question embodies THE way to develop in Rails. Your development environment is an offline representation of what you're production site will be.
A quick workflow analysis for you could be:
rails new ~/my_app -d postgresql; cd ~/my_app; rm public/index.html
Next, create the database:
bundle exec rake db:create:all
Now you'll have the db and app all set up, let's set up your main pages:
bundle exec rails generate controller Site index about_us contact_us
Now you'll have something to see on the site, so run:
bundle exec rails server
This server acts as your offline connection and will handle the rendering of any text, images, html etc you want to serve in your rails app. Now you can join in the debates of TDD, to TATFT or JITT, rspec vs test::unit. Welcome.
Developing locally is definitely the way to go. However, I would look into getting it on production as soon as possible and pushing often. This way you can see changes happen as you make them and are aware of any possible breaking changes.
I use heroku a lot and when I start a new project I push it to heroku almost immediately. While developing, I can publish new changes simply by git push heroku master. Everyone has to find their own workflow, but this has always worked well for me.
If you are interested in Heroku here is a good link to get you started:
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/rails3

Developing & deploying Rails app from same machine

I have started developing a new Rails app on my server using RVM, Rails 3, & Ruby v1.9.2. I am using Git as my code repository. It's a simple app and I don't want to use an extra server. I just want to deploy my app directly from the same server I am developing on.
I've installed Phusion Passenger w/ Apache to serve my app, but have realized that I can't do that pointing to my development directory as my RAILS_ENV is set to "development". (I found I got file permission errors on the asset pipeline and other issues when I attempted to set RAILS_ENV to "production" and serve the app)
What's the simplest/easiest way to deploy the app? Can I simply:
1) Create a separate user to run rails production (Rails in dev currently runs as me on my Ubuntu server)
2) Clone my repo into a separate dir and configure Apache accordingly
3) Seed my database with the data needed for production (not much data needed here)
4) What else?
I've looked briefly at Capistrano, but it seems like overkill for this simple app. I only need to be able to provide a simple web interface for some data entry. Seems like git push should be sufficient, but I haven't done this before so maybe I'm wrong? Also, if I git push how do I ensure file permissions in the "production" directories are all set properly, particularly for any new files that get created in the originating app directory structure?
Thanks for any ideas.
No- you do not need Capistrano for the above; at this stage I feel it will only serve to confuse you further.
I'd suggest you first save your repo to a private Github or free BitBucket account. What you should do is keep one folder for 'development'.
Remember that Passenger is 'just' a module working with Apache. So what you need to do is setup a virtual host under apache and direct that to another folder on your system. For this example, consider:
~/rails/myapp_development/ and ~/rails/myapp_production/
Passenger always runs the app in production, so that should not be an issue. You can do bundle --without=production in your development setup to ignore any gems listed in the Gemfile under the production namespace, i.e. say you've got the mysql adaptor specified, you can ignore this and have Rails only rely on the SQlite gem.
You can now simply develop in the development folder, commit, push to BitBucket. Deploying will be as simply going into the production folder and doing a git pull and touch tmp/restart.txt.

RoR: Beginner and Heroku

I've been trying to setup my first rails app--I'm okay at stumbling around on my local machine (OSX) and finding out how to do stuff...
I want to setup my local machine to deploy on Heroku.
I have a heroku account, and rails running on my mac...how do I get the database setup for both my local config and heroku? I have MySql locally, but it looks like heroku uses Postgre...
Can you give me a step-by-step process so that I can get to making my app and forget about server config?! :)
You should be ok if you havent written any mysql specific code. Rails handles converting the rails model/controller code to whatever database you are using. As it says here, you are probably going to want to type:
heroku db:push
to set up your database using the schema and import the data from your local database.
If you're not already using it, check out Michael Hartl's Ruby on Rails Tutorial.
Germane to your question: http://ruby.railstutorial.org/ruby-on-rails-tutorial-book#sec:deploying
Edited because I apparently forgot how to spell germane...
First, you would setup your database.yml file to use your MySQL on your local machine for development. Set this up however you like, a good example is http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/database-support/mysql#databaseyml_example
And than when you are ready to migrate your development database from your local machine, you would run:
heroku db:push
This will export your MySQL, SQLite or Postgres DB on your development machine and import it into your heroku instance. Your heroku instance will overwrite your database.yml file with the correct Postgres info and your application will have your development schema in the heroku Postgres DB.

Resources