Given this array of hashes here:
arr = [{:question_type=>"Fire", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Water", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Metal", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Earth", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Wood", :total=>100.0}]
I would like to pick the hash with the highest value for the total key.
So the code bellow seems to do the work
max = arr.max_by{|x| x[:total]}
puts max[:question_type]
#=> Wood
However if I have 2 hashes with the same value it will return the first one only
arr2 = [{:question_type=>"Fire", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Water", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Metal", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Earth", :total=>50.0}, {:question_type=>"Wood", :total=>50.0}]
max = arr2.max_by{|x| x[:total]} #it should be arr2
puts max[:question_type]
#=> Earth
What would be the best way to get it to return Earth and Wood in case both are the highest values?
You can do this with group_by and max:
arr.group_by { |x| x[:total] }.max.last
You could do this in tow steps this way:
max = arr.max_by{|x| x[:total]}
max = arr.select{ |x| x[:total] == max[:total }
You can always just take that max value and select.
arr = [{:question_type=>"Fire", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Water", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Metal", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Earth", :total=>50.0}, {:question_type=>"Wood", :total=>50.0}]
max = arr.max_by{|x| x[:total]}
max_values = arr.select{|hash| hash[:total] == max[:total]}
An alternative approach to some solid answers already posted here is to roll your own method to retrieve the max values, including multiples if there are ties:
def get_max(arr)
result = []
current_max = 0.0
arr.each do |hash|
if hash[:total] > current_max
result = [hash[:question_type]]
current_max = hash[:total]
elsif hash[:total] == current_max
result.push(hash[:question_type])
end
end
result
end
arr = [{:question_type=>"Fire", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Water", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Metal", :total=>0.0}, {:question_type=>"Earth", :total=>50.0}, {:question_type=>"Wood", :total=>50.0}]
puts get_max(arr)
# => ["Earth", "Wood"]
It may not be as succinct as using something like #max_by and #select, but the benefit of the above approach is you only iterate through the array once.
Hope it helps!
String = "Mod1:10022932,10828075,5946410,13321905,5491120,5030731|Mod2:22704455,22991440,22991464,21984312,21777721,21777723,21889761,21939852,23091478,22339903,23091485,22099714,21998260,22364832,21939858,21944274,21944226,22800221,22704443,21777728,21777719,21678184,21998265,21834900,21984331,22704454,21998261,21944214,21862610,21836482|Mod3:10828075,13321905,5491120,5946410,5030731,15806212,4100566,4787137,2625339,2408317,2646868,19612047,2646862,11983534,8591489,19612048,10249319,14220471,15806209,13330887,15075124,17656842,3056657,5086273|Mod4:10828075,5946410,13321905,5030731,5491120,4787137,4100566,15806212,2625339,3542205,2408317,2646862,2646868|Mod5:10022932;0.2512,10828075;0.2093,5030731;0.1465,5946410;0.1465,4787137;0.1465,2625339;0.0143,5491120;0.0143,13321905;0.0143,3542205;0.0143,15806212;0.0119,4100566;0.0119,19612047;0.0100,2408317;0.0100"
How can I split it out so that I can get each title(Mod1, Mod2..) and the ID's that belong to each title.
This is that I've tried so far, which is removing everything after the pipe, which I dont want.
mod_name = string.split(":")[0]
mod_ids = string.split(":")[1] #This gets me the ID's but also include the |Mod*
ids = mod_mod_ids.split("|").first.strip #Only returns Id's before the first "|"
Desired Output:
I need to save mod_name and mod_ids to their respective columns,
mod_name = #name ("Mod1...Mod2 etc) #string
mod_ids = #ids (All Ids after the ":" in Mod*:) #array
I think this does what you want:
ids = string.split("|").map {|part| [part.split(":")[0], part.split(":")[1].split(/,|;/)]}
There are a couple of ways to do this:
# This will split the string on "|" and ":" and will return:
# %w( Mod1 id1 Mod2 id2 Mod3 id3 ... )
ids = string.split(/[|:]/)
# This will first split on "|", and for each string, split it again on ":" and returs:
# [ %w(Mod1 id1), %w(Mod2 id2), %w(Mod3 id3), ... ]
ids = string.split("|").map { |str| str.split(":") }
If you want a Hash as a result for easy access via the titles, then you could do this:
str.split('|').inject({}){|h,x| k,v = x.split(':'); h[k] = v.split(','); h}
=> {
"Mod1"=>["10022932", "10828075", "5946410", "13321905", "5491120", "5030731"],
"Mod2"=>["22704455", "22991440", "22991464", "21984312", "21777721", "21777723", "21889761", "21939852", "23091478", "22339903", "23091485", "22099714", "21998260", "22364832", "21939858", "21944274", "21944226", "22800221", "22704443", "21777728", "21777719", "21678184", "21998265", "21834900", "21984331", "22704454", "21998261", "21944214", "21862610", "21836482"],
"Mod3"=>["10828075", "13321905", "5491120", "5946410", "5030731", "15806212", "4100566", "4787137", "2625339", "2408317", "2646868", "19612047", "2646862", "11983534", "8591489", "19612048", "10249319", "14220471", "15806209", "13330887", "15075124", "17656842", "3056657", "5086273"],
"Mod4"=>["10828075", "5946410", "13321905", "5030731", "5491120", "4787137", "4100566", "15806212", "2625339", "3542205", "2408317", "2646862", "2646868"],
"Mod5"=>["10022932;0.2512", "10828075;0.2093", "5030731;0.1465", "5946410;0.1465", "4787137;0.1465", "2625339;0.0143", "5491120;0.0143", "13321905;0.0143", "3542205;0.0143", "15806212;0.0119", "4100566;0.0119", "19612047;0.0100", "2408317;0.0100"]
}
Untested:
all_mods = {}
string.split("|").each do |fragment|
mod_fragments = fragment.split(":")
all_mods[mod_fragments[0]] = mod_fragments[1].split(",")
end
What I ended up using thanks to #tillerjs help.
data = sting.split("|")
data.each do |mod|
module_name = mod.split(":")[0]
recommendations = mod.split(":")[1]
end
I implemented a function to group anagrams.
In a nutshell:
input: ['cars', 'for', 'potatoes', 'racs', 'four','scar', 'creams', scream']
output: [["cars", "racs", "scar"], ["four"], ["for"], ["potatoes"],["creams", "scream"]]
I would like to know if there is a better way to do this.
I really think I used too much repetition statements: until, select,
delete_if.
Is there any way to combine the select and delete_if statement? That
means, can selected items be automatically deleted?
Code:
def group_anagrams(words)
array = []
until words.empty?
word = words.first
array.push( words.select { |match| word.downcase.chars.sort.join.eql?(match.downcase.chars.sort.join ) } )
words.delete_if { |match| word.downcase.chars.sort.join.eql?(match.downcase.chars.sort.join ) }
end
array
end
Thanks in advance,
Like that:
a = ['cars', 'for', 'potatoes', 'racs', 'four','scar', 'creams', 'scream']
a.group_by { |element| element.downcase.chars.sort }.values
Output is:
[["cars", "racs", "scar"], ["for"], ["potatoes"], ["four"], ["creams", "scream"]]
If you want to you can turn this one-liner to a method of course.
You could use the partition function instead of select, implemented in Enumerable. It splits the entries within the array according to the decision-function into two arrays.
def group_anagrams(words)
array = []
until words.empty?
word = words.first
delta, words = words.partition { |match| word.downcase.chars.sort.join.eql?(match.downcase.chars.sort.join ) } )
array += delta
end
array
end
(untested)