If I'm creating a UIView programmatically and I wish to change the UIView properties (background, for example, or actually, messing with CALayers), must I place the code outside of UIView such as in the View controller? Can I put the code somewhere inside UIView?
I was checking out the CoreAnimationKioskStyleMenu example, its code is inside UIView but it's loaded from Nib and can be placed at awakeFromNib, so it doesn't seem to apply to my case.
That depends. Obviously, a good way to handle this is to use a xib file, as it is designed to hold data like this, but that isn't always the best answer for every situation.
If the view is meant to be reused frequently (like a button, or some widget) throughout the application, its best to store all that customization in a subclass of the UIView.
If its a single larger view that will always be managed by a UIViewController, you can keep some of the information in the UIViewController. However, if you end up subclassing a UIView anyway it's probably best practice to keep the data in the UIView.
As a general note, I believe its worth your time to push as much of this data into a xib using interface builder. Magic values (like colors or sizes) peppered through your code will always be a problem if you want to modify it. I have found modifying a xib to be much easier.
Actually there are some methods where you could place initialization/ customization code.
(void)willMoveToSuperview:(UIView *)newSuperview;
(void)didMoveToSuperview;
will get called as soon as u add the view as a subview to another view, at which point you already have the frame and all the properties, and you can do further customizing as you wish.
(void)layoutSubviews -- generally used for changing subviews' frames and layout organization.
Will get called each time the view needs to be redrawn by the system, or when you specifically call [self setNeedsLayout] on your UIView.
Hope this helps.
Related
I want to design and generate view elements in code, without using storyboard. But I haven't figure out a simple way to locate where should I put my view elements by describing its CGRect. For example, I can drag a button direct into the storyboard and put it where i want, however, in code, I have to write something like
[button setFrame:CGRectMake(24.0f, 113.0f, 271.0f, 140.0f)];
Is there any way or any software can help me?
Your question is a bit broad. You can create your view in code by including in your subclass of UIViewController properties for each subview (control) element and then make all the initialisation in designated initialiser and setting frames and other customisation in viewDidLoad method most likely. But for details where to what set you should go to references for UIViewController lifecycle as it may depend on what you want to achieve. in some cases setting frames in viewDidLoad will be fine whereas sometimes you will need to make some changes in viewDidLayoutSubviews for example.
If I want to initialize views programmatically, where in the viewcontroller lifecycle should this happen?
The initial intuition is loadView. However, here, we don't yet have the frame of the view itself (necessary for calculating the sizes/positions of the views). Ditto for viewDidLoad.
Next intuition is viewWillAppear- here we DO (finally) have a guarantee of the frame of the view. However, this has potential to be called many times throughout the vc lifecycle. Ditto for viewDidAppear, etc...
Finally, I found viewWillLayoutSubviews. This works for the initialization of most static layouts- however, whenever any view moves this gets called again (same problem as viewWillAppear).
I've seen recommendations to init the views in loadView and set their frames in viewWillLayoutSubviews (since setting frames should be idempotent, who cares if it gets called a couple times). But then why does apple so strongly encourage initWithFrame: as the standard initialization method of UIViews (https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/windowsviews/conceptual/viewpg_iphoneos/CreatingViews/CreatingViews.html)?
Would it be crazy to subclass all my UIViewControllers to have an initWithViewFrame: method? That way I can pass in a frame, manually set it immediately in loadView and be done with it? Or is it better to have a viewHasBeenFormatted flag in viewWillAppear that, if not set, calls the formatting of views and then sets it?
Or is this just apple's way of saying "use interface builder or you're screwed"?
Any help is appreciated!
edit- accidentally wrote loadView where I meant viewWillAppear (in final paragraph)
update- I guess I've come to terms with the fact that there is no place where
The frame is confidently known
The code will only be run once (on setup)
Looks like you're expected to initWithFrame: all your views in viewDidLoad (but then I guess the contents of that view shouldn't treat that frame as even remotely final? because how could it be when it was derived on an assumption? ugh...). Then re-set their frames in layoutSubviews. And make sure to manually handle the differences between initial layout and layout as a result of a moved view there... Man I feel like I've GOT to be missing something... (lol denial...)
I guess that, OR submit and use IB.
update2- viewWillLayoutSubviews WILL get called when one of its subviews is resized. So it is still disqualified as it fails property 2 of the required characteristics that I'm looking for. :(
If you're doing layout with IB, it's fine to do additional view initialization in viewDidLoad (for example, if you need to do stuff that IB doesn't handle well, or if you have UIView subclasses with properties not supported by IB). Alternatively, if you're not using IB, the documentation says you should use loadView to manually initialize your view hierarchy.
You're right, though, that you can't rely on the frame being accurate at that point. So you can accomplish layout via each view's autoResizingMask property, layout constraints (if you're iOS 6 and later), and/or overriding layoutSubviews.
My usual approach is to do layout to some degree in IB, then do anything else I need to (nontrivial layout, custom classes, etc) in viewDidLoad. Then, if I have layout to figure out that autoResizingMask doesn't cover (I'm supporting down to iOS 5), I override viewWillAppear (or layoutSubviews if I'm subclassing UIView) and do some pixel math. I've got a category on UIView to help with this that has things like:
-(void)centerSubviewHorizontally:(UIView *)view pixelsFromTop:(float)pixels;
-(void)centerSubviewHorizontally:(UIView *)view pixelsBelow:(float)pixels siblingView:(UIView *)sibling;
View controllers should not have initWithFrame: methods. What I do in all of my code (I never use IB) is to let the default loadView do its own thing. I create and setup all subviews in viewDidLoad. At this point the view controller's frame has at least a sane value. All subviews can be created with their own sane frames based on the initial size of the view controller's view. With proper autoresizingMask values this may be all you need.
If you need more specific subview layout, put the appropriate layout code in the viewWillLayoutSubviews method. This will deal with any view controller view frame changes including rotation, in-call status bars, etc.
If you don't use interface builder you should override loadView and initialize the views there. If you use autolayout you can also add your constraints there. If you don't use autolayout you can override the layoutSubviews method of your views to adjust the frames.
A quick question from a wanna-be iOS developer. I want to create a UI for an iPhone app without Interface Builder, only programmatically. However, I want to stick to MVC recommendations and separate V and C and have a clean readable code, therefore:
I create UIView class files (e.x. SplashView.h and SplashView.m)
I create UIViewController class files (SplashViewController.h and SplashViewController.m)
I define my UI elements (view, subviews, buttons and text fields) in the UIView class files
I load the main view in view controller's loadView method, and then do other things in view controller's viewDidLoad method
Is this a correct approach to begin with?
Second part of the question, independent of Y/N answer to the first. Where do I define these custom UI elements?
- Inside the view's initWithFrame: method?
- In separate (property getter? property setter?) methods? I.e. do I have to declare each UI element as a property first in the .h file?
If these questions sound a bit ignorant, it must be because they are :) I found lots of sample code on StackOverflow, but little to indicate where you actually put it. I would be really grateful for any help, especially if you could paste/reference some relevant code.
Your list is correct. This is how I do all of my apps. No Interface Builder, just code.
Each custom view typically creates its own subviews in an appropriate initXXX method. This could be initWithFrame: but you could define others as needed. Subview layout can be done through constraints, autoresizing masks, or by implementing layoutSubview.
Each view controller would instantiate its needed views in the viewDidLoad. View layout can be done with constraints, autoresizing masks, or by implementing viewWillLayoutSubviews.
The use of properties is completely optional. Create public properties for anything to be set/get from an outside class. Optionally create private properties for values internal to the implementation.
Go to the Apple website for Sample Code; download everything that you can for applications that are similar to your goal.
I would like to know how to best possible address the following issue:
I have a single ViewController. Its view contains a great number of complex subviews (subclass of UIView). Due to the complexity some of these UIViews initialise their own UIGestureRecognisers and implement the according target actions. As I want to coordinate the gestures of various subviews I have to set the single once ViewController as the gesture's delegate.
There are various possibilities for that.
1) Initialize ALL gestures in the the viewController (this will lead to a massive viewController)
2) defining a protocol in the UIVIews (getViewController), implemented by the ViewController
#protocol CustomViewDelegate <NSObject>
#required
- (UIViewController *)getViewController;
#end
3) customise the init method of the UIViews and using the ViewController as an option.
- (id)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame andViewController:(UIViewController *)vc;
What is the most elegant possibility to solve this issue? Is it OK to implement target actions inside a UIView object?
Thanks for your thoughts...
If you're defining custom UIView subclasses, you can invest them with as much logic as it makes sense to store local to them, give them delegate protocols to pass anything else up and, as long as you expose the delegate as an IBOutlet, you can wire up your view controller as the relevant delegate directly in Interface Builder or the UI designer part of Xcode 4. I personally think that would be the most natural way forward, since it consolidates any view-specific logic directly in the view and lets you do the wiring up where you would normally do the wiring up.
In terms of overall design, such a scheme conforms to model-view-controller provided your views are doing only view-related logic. So, for example, if you had a custom rectangular view that can take a swipe anywhere on it to reposition a pin, and the 2d position of the pin affects some other system setting, you'd be correct to catch the gesture in the view, reposition the pin and then send updates on its position down to the delegate, which would fulfil the role of controller and push the value to any other views that are affected and out to the model.
Commenting on your suggested solutions directly:
(1) this would focus all logic into the one controller; whether it's correct from a design point-of-view depends on the extent to which you're having to interrogate your custom views (in that you don't want to end up treating them as mostly data that external actors have to know how to manipulate) and the extent to which you want to reuse logic.
(2) I'm not sure I entirely understand the suggestion — what is getViewController defined on and how does it know how to respond? If it's the UIViews themselves and the view controller has to identify itself first then I'd suggest just adopting the delegate pattern wholesale rather than specialising to views and view controllers, e.g. as you may want to build compound views that tie together logic from several subviews.
(3) as a rule of thumb, the sort of things to pass to init are those that the class actually needs to know to be able to initialise; it would probably be better to use a normal property to set the controller after the fact. Or make it an IBOutlet and wire it up so that it happens automatically via the NIB.
I have a nib file where I have a view that contains a background image, a button and another image that covers the full screen (a shadow) that needs to be moved to the front.
On the view, I'm creating child views, and after creating those and adding them using [self addView] I need to move to the front the shadow image.
I'm currently using the tag attribute to find that view, but I'm thinking there's probably a better way, by means of identifying the subviews I add in Interface Builder by some name.
I tries adding a IBOutlet to connect the subview with its parent, but it didn't work (and made no sense, since the subview is already connected to its parent in some way).
The IBOutlets way should work, and is probably the best way to do it. Make sure you made the proper connection in Interface Builder after you declared them in the .h file.
The iPhone does a lazy loading of view controllers. The nib might not have been loaded in initWithCoder or any init method for that matter as Kendall specified.
viewDidLoad is the preferred place to access anything from the nib if you want to access them before the view is displayed.
Hope that helps.
At what point are you trying to access the subviews? If you try within init of a ViewController, the IBOutlets will be nil. The first method you can get at them is probably viewDidLoad.
The reason it does make sense to do things this way is that IBOutlets are just direct pointers to some component, even if they are already subviews of something else. Just saves a lot of hunting.
Using the Tag is a perfectly valid way to locate specific views, so long as you're using the viewWithTag: method. If you're already using tags, there's no need to change to IBOutlets unless you just don't like calling viewWithTag:.