I have following in my routes.rb:
resources :users, :except => [:new, :create] do
get 'friends', :as => :friends, :on => :member, :to => "users#friends"
end
and following in my user.rb:
def to_param
self.login
end
And when, for example, user with dots in login (for example 'any.thing') comes from facebook, rails gives routing error (no route found, I suppose that's because it recognises anything after dot as a format or because of route constraints). How can I come over this error?
The following constrain definition permit the dot in id as well as any character except slash.
Supported formats must be explicitly defined (here .html and .json) to not to be taken by id.
resources :foobars,
:constraints => { :id => /[^\/]+(?=\.html\z|\.json\z)|[^\/]+/ }
That constrain definition is worked with Rails 3.1
For earlier Rails versions you may need to backport look-ahead support in regin gem (it is vendored in rack-mount gem)
You could replace periods with another character:
def to_param
login.gsub(/\./,"-") # note: 'self' is not needed here
end
user = User.find_by_login("bart.simpson")
user_path(user) # => "/users/bart-simpson"
EDIT
You're right, this fails to deal with unique logins that map to the same value. Maybe a better way is to use segment constraints in the route:
match 'users/(:id)' => 'users#show',
:constraints => { :id => /[0-9A-Za-z\-\.]+/ }
This should allow "/users/bart-simpson" and /users/bart.simpson" to generate :id => "bart-simpson" and :id => "bart.simpson" respectively. You'd have to alter the regex to add all the acceptable characters for the URL.
Note that this is mentioned in the Rails Routing Guide, section 3.2:
By default dynamic segments don’t accept dots – this is because the
dot is used as a separator for formatted routes. If you need to use a
dot within a dynamic segment add a constraint which overrides this –
for example :id => /[^\/]+/ allows anything except a slash.
To allow the :id segment to contain any character except '/':
match 'users/(:id)' => 'users#show', :constraints => {:id => /[^\/]+/}
It's written elsewhere in one of the answers, but this is IMO the simplest way.
Related
I am new to rails and was wondering how I can make this work. I want a URL to look like this:
http://localhost:3000/businesses/coldfire-gundam
using this route:
match "/businesses/:permalink", :to => "businesses#show", :as => :business_permalink
however when I place this route before this:
resources :businesses
any call to /businesses/1 (1 as param[:id]) does not work anymore, obviously because it is caught by the permalink declaration
how can I make it work then?
You need a way to differentiate /businesses/:id and /businesses/:permalink. The :id should always be numeric (unless of course you're using MongoDB) so if you can force your :permalink to always contain something non-numeric then a simple :constraints should do the trick:
match '/businesses/:permalink', :to => 'businesses#show`, :constraints => { :permalink => /.*\D/ }, :as => :business_permalink
The /.*\D/ forces the route to only match if :permalink contains at least one non-numeric character. You need the .* because route regexes are implicitly anchored at the beginning.
If you happen to be using MongoDB then your :id will probably be a hex BSON ID so you'd want to use /.*\H/ as your constraint and you'd want some way to ensure that your :permalink always contains at least one non-hex character.
Once all that's in place you can put your match "/businesses/:permalink" before your resources :businesses in routes.rb and everything should work fine. And routes are checked in the same order that they appear in routes.rb so you will want your match before your resources.
I would suggest using the friendly_id gem for creating permalink routes. This will handle most of the 'magic' for you in an easily reusable way.
Resources for the gem and railscast:
https://github.com/norman/friendly_id
http://railscasts.com/episodes/314-pretty-urls-with-friendlyid
I would like to do just a little bit of extra logic in rotues.rb, that probably doesn't belong there, but it seems to make the most sense to me.
I have two conflicting routes. To be primitive:
match '/videos/:browseby' => 'videos#browse', :as => "browse_by"
Where :browseby is looking for a string, such as "Tags", to browse videos by tags.
However, (and most probably saw this coming) I also have my basic show resource (again in primitive form):
match '/videos/:id' => 'videos#show', :as => "video"
Where :id is looking for the integer for the video ID.
Is there a way to add a small bit of logic such as...
match '/videos/:id' => 'videos#show', :as => "video", :format(:id) => :integer
(Which is my hypothetical rails syntax, to help show what I'm looking for.)
I know I can munch this in the Controller level, but it makes more sense to me to handle it at the route level.
You could try using :constraints and a regex:
match '/videos/:id' => 'videos#show', :as => "video", :constraints => { :id => /\d/ }
match '/videos/:browseby' => 'videos#browse', :as => "browse_by"
You'll also want to make sure the looser :browseby version comes after the :id version. Note that regex constraints are implicitly anchored at the beginning so that would work as long as your :browseby values didn't start with a number.
If you have tags that do start with numbers then you could use an object for the constraint and then you could include anchors in your regex:
class VideoIdsOnly
def matches?(request)
request.path =~ %r{\A/videos/\d+\z}
end
end
match '/videos/:id' => 'video#show', :as => "video", :constraints => VideoIdsOnly.new
match '/videos/:browseby' => 'videos#browse', :as => "browse_by"
If I have this route (in routes.rb):
match 'posts', :to => 'posts#index'
It will show and match the following routes:
# Case 1: non nested hash params
posts_path(:search => 'the', :category => 'old-school')
#=> "/posts?search=the&category=old-school"
# Case 2: nested hash params
posts_path(:filter => {:search => 'the', :category => 'old-school'})
#=> "/posts?filter[search]=the&filter[category]=old-school"
If I want to make the category param part of the main URL, I could do this for the Case 1.
match 'posts(/:category)', :to => 'posts#index'
that will show and match the following routes:
# Case 1: non nested hash params
posts_path(:search => 'the', :category => 'old-school')
#=> "/posts/old-school?search=the"
But how could I do the same if the param is nested (Case 2)?
I would expect the next route definition:
match 'posts(/:filter[category])', :to => 'posts#index'
to work this way:
# Case 2: nested hash params
posts_path(:filter => {:search => 'the', :category => 'old-school'})
#=> "/posts/old-school?filter[search]=the"
But it does not work.
I found this same question in two places with no righ answer:
how-to-specify-nested-parameters-in-the-routes
how-to-accept-hash-parameters-in-routes
The Rails Guides don't specify anthing about this.
Should I assume that this can not be done in rails? really?
you could just make two different routes instead
match 'posts', :to => 'posts#index'
match 'posts/:category', :to => 'posts#index'
The next route will not work as you intended it.
match 'posts(:filter[category])', :to => 'posts#index'
The :filter is just a place holder for either the first argument thats passed into the url helper or the value for the key :filter in a has that is passed in. Any expressions in the route string will not be evaluated.
I guess the answer to your question is that you cannot do this in rails. I would suggest to you though that you do this in another way. It is very helpful in rails to follow the convention and make things easier on yourself.
Looks like you are doing three things here. The base post routes
match 'posts', :to => 'posts#index'
A route that has the category nested in it. Most likely to give the user a better url
match 'posts/:category', :to => 'posts#index'
And a search url which can be the same as the first, or to make your action cleaner, a different one
match 'posts/search', :to => 'posts#search'
There is really no reason I can think of to complicate the routes in the way your are suggesting. A search query url doesn't look nice anyways so why bother handling two urls for searches. Just one will do.
You should definitely take a look at running
rake routes
as this will tell you exactly what you have defined in your routes file. You can also set up routing tests to ensure your custom routes are performing correctly.
Your example does not work (as you indicated)
# Case 2: nested hash params
posts_path(:filter => {:search => 'the', :category => 'old-school'})
#=> "/posts/old-school?filter[search]=the"
But what you should be looking for is this
posts_path(:filter => {:search => 'the', :category => 'old-school'})
#=> "/posts?filter[search]=the&filter[category]=old-school"
This is ok to do it this way.
If you want to keep posts/:category just use this for navigation only, not for search.
Hope that helps
I have a rails route set up like:
match ':controller/:id/:action'
# match 'teams/:id' => "teams#show" # doesn't have any additional effect, which makes sense to me
resources :teams, :only => [:index, :show]
That way I can say /teams/cleveland-indians and it will call teams#show with :id => 'cleveland-indians'. Works great. My issue is that url_for doesn't quite do what I want. In my views/teams/index view, I get this behavior:
url_for(:id => "cleveland-indians") # => /teams/cleveland-indians/index
url_for(:id => "cleveland-indians", :action => :show) # => /teams/cleveland-indians/show
Of course that second one behaves the way I want, but I'd like to get rid of the unnecessary /show at the end. I don't know much about how these helpers work, but I'd have guessed it would know that show was the default action for a GET with a specified id, same as the routing engine does. Anyway, what's the best way for me to take care of this? Or am I just doing it all wrong?
'resources' line should already provide you with the routes you probably want so you can just remove first 'match' line.
Note that you can also use 'teams_path', 'team_path("cleveland-indians")' instead of 'url_for'.
match '/posts/:id/:title' => 'posts#show', :as => :slug
resources :posts
I don't want slug_path to match some words as title parameter.
For example:
posts/5/edit
"edit" is making trouble. I want to restrict this word.
If you're only worried about the standard routes interfering (like edit), simply put your match statement after your resources :posts. That way, the match statement will only catch anything that the resources statement didn't know how to handle.
You can also use a regular expression as a constraint to limit what :title can match. Another option would also be to make your URL more explicit - this would also avoid confusion with the default restful actions:
match '/posts/:id/title/:title' => 'posts#show', :as => :slug