I'm learning new tricks all the time and I'm always on the lookout for better ideas.
I have this rather ugly method. How would you clean it up?
def self.likesit(user_id, params)
game_id = params[:game_id]
videolink_id = params[:videolink_id]
like_type = params[:like_type]
return false if like_type.nil?
if like_type == "videolink"
liked = Like.where(:user_id => user_id, :likeable_id => videolink_id, :likeable_type => "Videolink").first unless videolink_id.nil?
elsif like_type == "game"
liked = Like.where(:user_id => user_id, :likeable_id => game_id, :likeable_type => "Game").first unless game_id.nil?
end
if liked.present?
liked.amount = 1
liked.save
return true
else # not voted on before...create Like record
if like_type == "videolink"
Like.create(:user_id => user_id, :likeable_id => videolink_id, :likeable_type => "Videolink", :amount => 1)
elsif like_type == "game"
Like.create(:user_id => user_id, :likeable_id => game_id, :likeable_type => "Game", :amount => 1)
end
return true
end
return false
end
I would do something like:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :likes, :dependent => :destroy
def likes_the(obj)
like = likes.find_or_initialize_by_likeable_type_and_likeable_id(obj.class.name, obj.id)
like.amount += 1
like.save
end
end
User.first.likes_the(VideoLink.first)
First, I think its wrong to deal with the "params" hash on the model level. To me its a red flag when you pass the entire params hash to a model. Thats in the scope of your controllers, your models should have no knowledge of the structure of your params hash, imo.
Second, I think its always cleaner to use objects when possible instead of class methods. What you are doing deals with an object, no reason to perform this on the class level. And finding the objects should be trivial in your controllers. After all this is the purpose of the controllers. To glue everything together.
Finally, eliminate all of the "return false" and "return true" madness. The save method takes care of that. The last "return false" in your method will never be called, because the if else clause above prevents it. In my opinion you should rarely be calling "return" in ruby, since ruby always returns the last evaluated line. In only use return if its at the very top of the method to handle an exception.
Hope this helps.
I'm not sure what the rest of your code looks like but you might consider this as a replacement:
def self.likesit(user_id, params)
return false unless params[:like_type]
query = {:user_id => user_id,
:likeable_id => eval("params[:#{params[:like_type]}_id]"),
:likeable_type => params[:like_type].capitalize}
if (liked = Like.where(query).first).present?
liked.amount = 1
liked.save
else # not voted on before...create Like record
Like.create(query.merge({:amount => 1}))
end
end
I assume liked.save and Like.create return true if they are succesful, otherwise nil is returned. And what about the unless game_id.nil? ? Do you really need that? If it's nil, it's nil and saved as nil. But you might as well check in your data model for nil's. (validations or something)
Related
I know that if you have an array and reference it as array.uniq it will return without any of the duplicates.
However in this case it is an array of objects (is that proper ruby speak?). I want each call to go into the #calls array unless the call.from is the same as a call_formatted object already present in the array.
How can I conditionally place these objects in the array if no other objects in the array have the same call.from value?
calls_raw.each do |call|
call_formatted = {
:date => date,
:time => time,
:from => call.from,
:duration => call.duration,
:recording => recording,
}
#calls << call_formatted
end
array.uniq { |item| item[:from] }
Use #map to build your array for you and call #uniq on it...
calls_raw.map do |call|
{
:date => date,
:time => time,
:from => call.from,
:duration => call.duration,
:recording => recording,
}
end.uniq{|call| call[:from]}
The above approach will first build an array of calls larger than it may ultimately need to be, and the final call to #uniq will make the list unique.
Or, to avoid adding all the duplicates in the array, you could build it with a Hash as such:
calls_raw.each_with_object do |call, h|
h[call.from] ||= {
:date => date,
:time => time,
:from => call.from,
:duration => call.duration,
:recording => recording,
}
end.values
The Hash approach will use the first occurrence of call.from as it is being set with ||=. To use the last occurrence of call.from then use a straightforward assignment with =.
It's also been suggested to just use a Set instead of an Array.
To take that approach you're going to have to implement #eql? and #hash on the class we're populating the set with.
class CallRaw
attr_accessor :from
def initialize(from)
self.from = from
end
def eql?(o)
# Base equality on 'from'
o.from == self.from
end
def hash
# Use the hash of 'from' for our hash
self.from.hash
end
end
require 'set'
s = Set.new
=> <Set: {}>
s << CallRaw.new("Chewbaca")
=> <Set: {<CallRaw:0x00000002211888 #from="Chewbaca">}>
# We expect now, that adding another will not grow our set any larger
s << CallRaw.new("Chewbaca")
=> <Set: {<CallRaw:0x00000002211888 #from="Chewbaca">}>
# Great, it's not getting any bigger
s << CallRaw.new("Chewbaca")
s << CallRaw.new("Chewbaca")
=> <Set: {#<CallRaw:0x00000002211888 #from="Chewbaca">}>
Awesome - the Set works!!!
Now, it is interesting to note that having implemented #eql? and #hash, we can now use Array#uniq without having to pass in a block.
a = Array.new
a << CallRaw.new("Chewbaca")
=> [<CallRaw:0x000000021e2128 #from="Chewbaca">]
a << CallRaw.new("Chewbaca")
=> [<CallRaw:0x000000021e2128 #from="Chewbaca">, <CallRaw:0x000000021c2bc0 #from="Chewbaca">]
a.uniq
=> [<CallRaw:0x000000021e2128 #from="Chewbaca">]
Now, I'm just wondering if there is a badge that StackOverflow awards for having too much coffee before setting out to answer a question?
Unless there's some reason it has to be an array, I'd store the data in a Hash, keyed by the from value.
Then it's easy and fast to look up an entry by the from value. You can choose to insert a new value only if there's no value already with the same key, or insert the new value and let it replace the old entry with that key.
Example:
calls = Hash.new
def add(call)
if not calls[call.from]
calls[call.from] = call
end
end
** update **
it all seems to be related to a custom validator: if I remove it, it works as expected. see code at the end
**
I have a model budget that has many multi_year_impacts
in the console, if I run:
b = Budget.find(4)
b.multi_year_impacts.size #=> 2
b.update_attributes({multi_year_impacts_attributes: {id: 20, _destroy: true} } ) #=> true
b.multi_year_impacts.size #=> 1 (so far so good)
b.reload
b.multi_year_impacts.size #=> 2 What???
and if before b.reload I do b.save (which shouldn't be needed anyway), it's the same.
Any idea why my child record doesn't get destroyed?
Some additional information, just in case:
Rails 3.2.12
in budget.rb
attr_accessible :multi_year_impacts_attributes
has_many :multi_year_impacts, as: :impactable, :dependent => :destroy
accepts_nested_attributes_for :multi_year_impacts, :allow_destroy => true
validates_with MultiYearImpactValidator # problem seems to com from here
in multi_year_impact.rb
belongs_to :impactable, polymorphic: true
in multi_year_impact_validator.rb
class MultiYearImpactValidator < ActiveModel::Validator
def validate(record)
return false unless record.amount_before && record.amount_after && record.savings
lines = record.multi_year_impacts.delete_if{|x| x.marked_for_destruction?}
%w[amount_before amount_after savings].each do |val|
if lines.inject(0){|s,e| s + e.send(val).to_f} != record.send(val)
record.errors.add(val.to_sym, " please check \"Repartition per year\" below: the sum of all lines must be equal of total amounts")
end
end
end
end
it might depend on your rails version, however, comparing your code to the current docs:
Now, when you add the _destroy key to the attributes hash, with a
value that evaluates to true, you will destroy the associated model:
member.avatar_attributes = { :id => '2', :_destroy => '1' }
member.avatar.marked_for_destruction? # => true
member.save
member.reload.avatar # => nil
Note that the model will not be destroyed until the parent is saved.
you could try with:
b.multi_year_impacts_attributes = {id: 20, _destroy: true}
b.save
So it looks like the culprit was here
if lines.inject(0){|s,e| s + e.send(val).to_f} != record.send(val)
record.errors.add(val.to_sym, " please check \"Repartition per year\" below: the sum of all lines must be equal of total amounts")
end
changing this to the slightly more complex
total = 0
lines.each do |l|
total += l.send(val).to_f unless l.marked_for_destruction?
end
if total != record.send(val)
record.errors[:amount_before] << " please check \"Repartition per year\" below: the sum of all lines must be equal of total amounts"
end
solved the problem.
I use Rails 3.0.6 with mongoID 2.0.2. Recently I encountered an issue with save! method when overriding setter (I am trying to create my own nested attributes).
So here is the model:
class FeedItem
include Mongoid::Document
has_many :audio_refs
def audio_refs=(attributes_array, binding)
attributes_array.each do |attributes|
if attributes[:audio_track][:id]
self.audio_refs.build(:audio_track => AudioTrack.find(attributes[:audio_track][:id]))
elsif attributes[:audio_track][:file]
self.audio_refs.build(:audio_track => AudioTrack.new(:user_id => attributes[:audio_track][:user_id], :file => attributes[:audio_track][:file]))
end
end
if !binding
self.save!
end
end
AudioRef model (which is just buffer between audio_tracks and feed_items) is:
class AudioRef
include Mongoid::Document
belongs_to :feed_item
belongs_to :audio_track
end
And AudioTrack:
class AudioTrack
include Mongoid::Document
has_many :audio_refs
mount_uploader :file, AudioUploader
end
So here is the spec for the FeedItem model which doesn`t work:
it "Should create audio_track and add audio_ref" do
#audio_track = Fabricate(:audio_track, :user_id => #author.id, :file => File.open("#{Rails.root}/spec/stuff/test.mp3"))
#feed_item= FeedItem.new(
:user => #author,
:message => {:body => Faker::Lorem.sentence(4)},
:audio_refs => [
{:audio_track => {:id => #audio_track.id}},
{:audio_track => {:user_id => #author.id, :file => File.open("#{Rails.root}/spec/stuff/test.mp3")}}
]
)
#feed_item.save!
#feed_item.reload
#feed_item.audio_refs.length.should be(2)
end
As you can see, the reason I am overriding audio_refs= method is that FeedItem can be created from existing AudioTracks (when there is params[:audio_track][:id]) or from uploaded file (params[:audio_track][:file]).
The problem is that #feed_item.audio_refs.length == 0 when I run this spec, i.e. audio_refs are not saved. Could you please help me with that?
Some investigation:
1) binding param is "true" by default (this means we are in building mode)
I found a solution to my problem but I didnt understand why save method doesnt work and didn`t make my code work. So first of all let me describe my investigations about the problem. After audio_refs= is called an array of audio_refs is created BUT in any audio_ref is no feed_item_id. Probably it is because the feed_item is not saved by the moment.
So the solution is quite simple - Virtual Attributes. To understand them watch corresponding railscasts
So my solution is to create audio_refs by means of callback "after_save"
I slightly changed my models:
In FeedItem.rb I added
attr_writer :audio_tracks #feed_item operates with audio_tracks array
after_save :assign_audio #method to be called on callback
def assign_audio
if #audio_tracks
#audio_tracks.each do |attributes|
if attributes[:id]
self.audio_refs << AudioRef.new(:audio_track => AudioTrack.find(attributes[:id]))
elsif attributes[:file]
self.audio_refs << AudioRef.new(:audio_track => AudioTrack.new(:user_id => attributes[:user_id], :file => attributes[:file]))
end
end
end
end
And the spec is now:
it "Should create audio_track and add audio_ref" do
#audio_track = Fabricate(:audio_track, :user_id => #author.id, :file => File.open("#{Rails.root}/spec/stuff/test.mp3"))
#feed_item= FeedItem.new(
:user => #author,
:message => {:body => Faker::Lorem.sentence(4)},
:audio_tracks => [
{:id => #audio_track.id},
{:user_id => #author.id, :file => File.open("#{Rails.root}/spec/stuff/test.mp3")}
]
)
#feed_item.save!
#feed_item.reload
#feed_item.audio_refs.length.should be(2)
end
And it works fine!!! Good luck with your coding)
Check that audio_refs=() is actually being called, by adding debug output of some kind. My feeling is that your FeedItem.new() call doesn't use the audio_refs=() setter.
Here's the source code of the ActiveRecord::Base#initialize method, taken from APIdock:
# File activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb, line 1396
def initialize(attributes = nil)
#attributes = attributes_from_column_definition
#attributes_cache = {}
#new_record = true
#readonly = false
#destroyed = false
#marked_for_destruction = false
#previously_changed = {}
#changed_attributes = {}
ensure_proper_type
populate_with_current_scope_attributes
self.attributes = attributes unless attributes.nil?
result = yield self if block_given?
_run_initialize_callbacks
result
end
I don't currently have an environment to test this, but it looks like it's setting the attributes hash directly without going through each attribute's setter. If that's the case, you'll need to call your setter manually.
Actually, I think the fact you're not getting an exception for the number of arguments (binding not set) proves that your setter isn't being called.
I'm building an application where users can purchase tracking numbers. I have an Order model and an Order Transaction model. If the Order Transaction returns from the gateway with success, I'm using an after_save callback to trigger a method that creates the tracking numbers and inserts them into the database. Sometimes a user just orders one, but if they order more than one, I can't seem to get rails to create and insert more than one record.
Here's what I'm using -- I've never had to user a loop like this, so I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
def create_trackables
if self.success == true
#order = Order.find(order_id)
#start = 0
while #start < #order.total_tokens
#trackable_token = Tracker.create_trackable_token
#start += 1
#trackable ||= Tracker.new(
:user_id => #current_user,
:token => #trackable_token,
:order_id => order_id
)
#trackable.save
end
end
end
dmarkow is right that you should use trackable instead of #trackable but you also should be using = instead of ||=. You also might as well just use create. Here's how I'd write it: def create_trackables
return unless self.success
order = Order.find(order_id) #you shouldn't need this line if it has_one :order
1.upto(order.total_tokens) do
Tracker.create!(
:user_id => #current_user,
:token => Tracker.create_trackable_token,
:order_id => order_id
)
end
end
Change #trackable to trackable to keep it scoped to the loop. Otherwise, the second time the loop runs, #trackable already has a value so the call to Tracker.new doesn't execute, and the #trackable.save line just keeps re-saving the same record. (Edit: Also remove the ||= and just use =).
def create_trackables
if self.success == true
#order = Order.find(order_id)
#start = 0
while #start < #order.total_tokens
#trackable_token = Tracker.create_trackable_token
#start += 1
trackable = Tracker.new(
:user_id => #current_user,
:token => #trackable_token,
:order_id => order_id
)
trackable.save
end
end
end
I have a model with an after_create callback. This callback causes a new record to be created in another model. However if a validation fails in the child record creation, the original transaction is still being saved.
This doesn't seem right. According to Rails docs the whole thing is wrapped in a transaction. Am I doing something wrong?
class ServiceProvision < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :cash_receipt
after_create :receive_payment_for_service_provision, :if => Proc.new { |sp| sp.immediate_settlement == true }
private
def receive_payment_for_service_provision
cash_account = CashAccount.find_by_currency_id_and_institution_id( self.currency_id, self.institution_id )
CashReceipt.create( :account_id => account.id, :service_provision_id => self.id, :amount => self.amount, :currency_id => self.currency.id, :cash_account_id => ( cash_account ? cash_account.id : nil ) )
end
end
class CashReceipt < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :service_provision
validates_presence_of :cash_account_id
end
The CashReceipt does fail and returns an error when its passed nil for the cash_account_id, however my new ServiceProvision object is still being saved.
it "should fail if a cash account doesn't exist for the currency and institution" do
currency = Factory.create( :currency )
institution = Factory.create( :institution )
service_provision = Factory.build( :service_provision, :currency_id => currency.id, :institution_id => institution.id, :immediate_settlement => true )
service_provision.save.should == false
service_provision.should have( 1 ).error
end
'ServiceProvision service provision creation should raise an error if a cash account doesn't exist for the currency and institution' FAILED expected: false,
got: true (using ==)
This seems to contradict this from the docs
Both Base#save and Base#destroy come
wrapped in a transaction that ensures
that whatever you do in validations or
callbacks will happen under the
protected cover of a transaction. So
you can use validations to check for
values that the transaction depends on
or you can raise exceptions in the
callbacks to rollback, including
after_* callbacks.
And if I manually try to cancel the transaction in the callback like so:
cr = CashReceipt.create( :account_id => account.id, :service_provision_id => self.id, :amount => self.amount, :currency_id => self.currency.id, :cash_account_id => ( cash_account ? cash_account.id : nil ) )
unless cr.errors.empty?
errors.add_to_base("Error while creating CashReciept [#{cr.errors}].")
return false
end
then the new ServiceProvision object is still saved.
Move the CacheReceipt creation to before_validation filter. Since you have a has_one association on
ServiceProvision, the CacheReceipt object will have the correct :service_provision_id after save. Your code will be as follows:
before_validation :receive_payment_for_service_provision, :if => :immediate_settlement?
def receive_payment_for_service_provision
cash_account = CashAccount.find_by_currency_id_and_institution_id( self.currency_id, self.institution_id )
self.cash_receipt.build(:account_id => account.id,
:amount => self.amount,
:currency_id => self.currency.id,
:cash_account_id => ( cash_account ? cash_account.id : nil ) )
end
Now the save on ServiceProvision instance will return false if there are errors while saving the associated CacheReceipt.
Rollbacks only happen automatically with before callbacks:
The whole callback chain is wrapped in a transaction. If any before callback method returns exactly false or raises an exception the execution chain gets halted and a ROLLBACK is issued. After callbacks can only accomplish that by raising an exception.
This makes sense because it allows for AR to prime the model and save it in memory before applying the transaction. Since you've done an after it has no knowledge of what to rollback too. Why not try before_save and see what you get.
You have to check the execution status of CashReceipt.create call in receive_payment_for_service_proviion method.
def receive_payment_for_service_provision
cash_account = CashAccount.find_by_currency_id_and_institution_id( self.currency_id, self.institution_id )
cr = CashReceipt.create( :account_id => account.id, :service_provision_id => self.id, :amount => self.amount, :currency_id => self.currency.id, :cash_account_id => ( cash_account ? cash_account.id : nil ) )
unless cr.errors.empty?
# Make the ServiceProvision instance invalid
errors.add_to_base("Error while creating CashReciept [#{cr.errors}].")
return false # terminate the callback chain and roll back the TX immediately.
end
end
PS: You can simplify your after_create specification as follows:
after_create :receive_payment_for_service_provision, :if => :immediate_settlement?
Thanks to #KandadaBoggu, who led me to the solution...
Turns out the solution is to change the callback to before_create, and then do this:
def receive_payment_for_service_provision
cash_account = CashAccount.find_by_currency_id_and_institution_id( self.currency_id, self.institution_id )
cr = self.create_cash_receipt( :account_id => account.id,
:amount => self.amount,
:currency_id => self.currency.id,
:cash_account_id => ( cash_account ? cash_account.id : nil ) )
unless cr.errors.empty?
errors.add_to_base( "Error while creating CashReciept [#{cr.errors}]." )
return false
end
end
In other words, we still need to manually check for validation errors in the association.