I have a Record model (Active Record) that stores some custom logs.
Record is in polymorphic association with all the other model in my app, and I can effectively log what I want hooking my Record methods in the other controllers.
What I need:
To have the logs in a separate database.
So I have to:
Be able to manage two different databases in my apllication (one is Postgres/ActiveRecord and the other one is MongoDB/MongoMapper)
Generate a polymorphic association between my Record model, now with MongoMapper, and the rest of my Active Record models.
That way I can persist my logs to the MongoDB database.
Thanks.
Yes this can be done.
To create a polymorphic association you need both the class and an id. Idiomatically the fields will be named <assoc>_type and <assoc>_id‡. You will need to do some wiring up to make everything work.
Create a MongoMapper::Document Class with the keys <assoc>_type and <assoc>_id with the correct types (I believe MongoMapper allows Class as a key type) along with any other keys you may need.
Define the method <assoc> and <assoc>=
def assoc
assoc_type.find(assoc_id)
end
def assoc=(input)
assoc_type = input.class #STI makes this more complicated we must store the base class
asspc_id = input.id
end
Possibly add a method to your ActiveRecord models allowing them to access you MongoMapper logging class. If there are a lot, you may want to build a module and include it in all the classes that need that kind of functionality.
‡ replace with something meaningful for you application like 'reference' or 'subject'
Related
I have an application where a User can create many Links, and each Link can store different type of data, depending on what type of Link it is. For example, a TelephoneLinkData stores a telephone number, an EmailLinkData stores an email address, a subject and a body. Each Link also has some fields in common, such as a reference to the user and a name.
I've tried to map this into ActiveRecord as cleanly as I can. Currently, I have a polymorphic relationship from Link to its data-type:
class Link < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :link_data, polymorphic: true
...
class EmailLinkData < ApplicationRecord
has_one :link, as: :link_data
accepts_nested_attributes_for :links
...
Technically, I think this would be described as a reverse polymorphic relationship as instead of a class having possibly different parent classes, what I'm trying to model is a class having multiple possible different child classes. This works fine, and I'm able to create Links through the various *LinkData controllers, but what I'd really want to do is have the Link act as the primary source of interaction for the user, so that the user manages their links through the /links path. For example, I would like the API to allow a User to create a link by posting to /links with the data for the LinkData nested in the link_data field
I've looked around for other ways to model this relationship, and the most common other suggestion seems to be Single-Table Inheritance, but the majority of my columns will differ between LinkData classes, so that feels like the wrong abstraction.
Is there a more idiomatic way to model this data structure?
As is always the case, the best choice depends on the business or application needs, so it's difficult to provide a recommendation without knowing more about what you're trying to do.
It sounds like you prefer the MTI approach, essentially using actual foreign keys and an XOR constraint to the Link table instead of a type column. That's a totally reasonable (although not as common) alternative to a polymorphic association.
However, I think there was a bit of a misunderstanding in your question.
Technically, I think this would be described as a reverse polymorphic relationship as instead of a class having possibly different parent classes...
A polymorphic association in Ruby/Rails doesn't have anything to do with class inheritance (e.g. parents and children). You might be thinking of Single table inheritance. A polymorphic association allows one class (e.g. a Link) to be associated a record in any other table (e.g. the various classes of LinkData) via two fields, a association_id and association_type. These associated classes need not be related to each other. For example, a common use case might be the acts_as_commentable gem, that allows you to add a comment to any other object, and the comment would have a polymorphic association with the other classes.
In the second part of your question you mention that you'd like the User to interact with Link's via a single controller.
I would like the API to allow a User to create a link by posting to /links with the data for the LinkData nested in the link_data field
There's nothing stopping you from implementing this using the initially proposed data model. ActiveRecord may not handle this completely for you out of the box, but you can imagine implementing a link_data= method on the Link class that would create the appropriate associated object.
I'd say the pros/cons of using a polymorphic association would be...
Pros:
easy to setup and use
easy to make required (validate presence of / not null)
easy to associate with a new class
Cons:
no referential / database integrity
have to migrate data if you change a class name
And using the MTI approach is basically the opposite. A bit harder to setup and use, harder to add a new association/table, harder to ensure exactly one association exists... but the long term data quality benefits are significant.
I was able to get things to work the way I wanted to using multiple table inheritance, based largely on this chapter: https://danchak99.wordpress.com/enterprise-rails/chapter-10-multiple-table-inheritance/
I have a model called Client.
This extends not from ActiveRecord::Base but from my own wrapper class.
These objects are not stored in my own database.
I have some other models called Answer and Device for example. These are stored in my database with a client_id.
Now, what I want to do is that is can call Answer.client and Client.answers for example. The normal way would be with ActiveRecord associations but that doesn't work is this case.
I can define my own .answers and .client method but in my opinion that's not the way to go with Rails.
Thanks in advance for replying!
i have model with validations, some methods, filters and so. Unfortunately the data are from API, so i need to overload the method which is pull the records from DB. Which method is that?
So far i have creation. Method create in active record's model is presisting new record. I just add method create to my model and it's creating records over the API. Now i want it for selecting the data.
Following code is example of what i already have (creation of records):
def create
EmployeesApi.create(self.attributes.reject{|k,v| %w(id created_at updated_at).include? k })
end
I need it as low level as possible, because it has some relations and app specific validations. Moving also the relations and surrounding logic would mean integrate two existing systems and that's not ok in this case.
Another explanation:
I want to bypass the database for data of the model, but for association let everything as it was. The model's data are stored in another app/database/system.
I'll load model's own data by API and ActiveRecord will pair/load it's associations from local DB
If EmployeeApi would be modeled after ActiveResource you could possibly enhance it with ActiveModel. Associations might work only in one way (from ActiveRecord to ActiveResource). It is also good to consider exceptions such as API is down.
I think what you are trying to achieve is to pull some data from the DB before creating this record? or validate some DB field, maybe ensure a unique constrain or something.. Please look into the active record hooks/callbacks
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Callbacks.html
You can do something like this:
class Subscription < ActiveRecord::Base
before_create :record_signup
private
def record_signup
self.signed_up_on = Date.today
end
end
I want to aggregate data from different sources, Twitter lastfm and that sort. I just can't figure out how to store the data. Clearly in a database but I can't figure out how abstract to make the table to hold all this data without compromising the logical understanding of the data in each column.
I was wondering if anybody else had experience with this and now they tackled it in rails.
One option, if you want to stick with SQL, would be to have a Model/Table which contains fields common to every data source (title, url, summary) which is associated to other Models/Tables which contain the fields specific to individual data sources. The associations could be regular or polymorphic. And if you wanted to get in to some metaprogramming you could use method_missing to delegate method calls for fields not present in the 'common' Model to the associated models. This would work best with a polymorphic join. Psudeo-code:
class DataSource
belongs_to :data_source_extension, :polymorphic => true
def method_missing(method)
if data_source_extension.responds_to? method
data_source_extension.send(method)
else
super
end
end
end
The other option would be STI, so one table with all fields and a 'type' field which tells Rails which model the record should be wrapped in. This depends on how many different sources you have and how different they are from each other.
If the fields don't need to be searchable storing a Hash in a Text field works well. See Serialize and the attr_bucket gem.
Or if you want to trendy a NoSQL type database allows on-the-fly fields to be generated.
What you need is a document-oriented database (I recommend you MongoDB), and then having a set of adapters, one for each type of provider.
Document oriented database
I have a user table, and a teacher that I newly created. The teacher is sub class of user, so, I use scaffold generator to generate the teacher table, than, I modify the model to do teacher is subclass of user. After all that, I did a db:migrate. Then, I go to
http://localhost:3000/teachers/new
It shows an error:
undefined method `teacherSalary' for #<Teacher:0x103331900>
So, my question is what did I do wrong? I want to create a page for doing user register, the user can ONLY be a teacher / student. But I can't add a teacher record ... ... Moreover, I go to
http://localhost:3000/users/new
I want to have a combo box that allow user register their user to be a "teacher" or a "student". But everything seems not work like I expected. What I need to do? Thank you very very much for your help.
Within your database you should have a single table called users. This table should have a string column which by default is called type. If you use another name for this column then you will have to set the inheritance column name manually using self.inheritance_column = "column_name"
Within your application you have three models, User, Student and Teacher. User inherits from ActiveRecord::Base as usual, Student and Teacher both inherit from User.
You should then be able to instantiate new Teacher and Student objects. Internally this works by writing the model name to the type field on the user tables and then when you use Student.find it adds a clause to the SQL to only return rows where the type = 'Student'
You can add shared behaviour to the User class, e.g. validations etc then add additional behaviour to the inherited classes.
A fuller description of how STI works can be found in Martin Fowlers Book(Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture).
I found this definition really handy:
STI means one table contains the data of more than one model, usually differentiated by the "type" column. ("users" table contains data for the models "Teacher", ""Pupil", "Employee", "Assistant", etc.)
Keeps similar models in the same table instead of creating new ones.
A Polymorphic Association means that one model can be associated with more than one other model(Comment can belong to post, image, file, user_type...)
To prevent foreign key conflicts, the association is reperesented with the *_id and *_type columns instead of only *_id.
For what you have here , I am not sure if STI is the best way go . STI should generally be used when there is a OO like inheritance and the Models have the same Attribute but different behaviour . In your case Teacher and Student can sure have a few shared attributed , but they are also bound to have different ones as well .
You might want to experiment with a polymorphic association as well .