How can I retrieve the list of IMAP UIDs from the selected folder? I want to get the list of mail UIDs, so I am passing the 1150 UID FETCH FLAGS (\Seen \Flagged), but I am not able to retrieve the list: it gives me an error like BAD Command. So how I can retrieve the list of UID from the selected folder?
The easiest (and most compact) way to list all the UIDs in the currently-selected folder is via UID SEARCH ALL:
A001 UID SEARCH ALL
* SEARCH 288 291 292 293 295 323 324 325 326 327 385 387 472 474 641 720 748
A001 OK UID SEARCH completed
The errors in your UID FETCH request were leaving out the sequence-set and including a list of flags. If you rewrote it as
A002 UID FETCH 1:* (UID)
or
A002 UID FETCH 1:* (UID FLAGS)
it would work.
Related
There have been numerous questions about inconsistent results from the YouTube Data API: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Most of them have accepted answers that seem to indicate there was a problem with the API request that was fixed by the instructions in the answers. But none of those situations apply to the API request discussed here.
There have also been two questions about duplicates in the API results: 1, 2. Both of them have the same answer, which says to use the next-page token. But both questions say the token was used, so that answer is not helpful.
Yesterday, I submitted a series of API requests to get the list of most-viewed videos about 3D printing. The first request in the series was:
https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/search?q=3D print&type=video&maxResults=50&part=id,snippet&order=viewCount&key=<my key>
I ran that in a VBA sub, which took the next-page token from each result and resubmitted the URL with &pageToken=<nextPageToken> inserted.
The result was a list of 649 unique video IDs. So far so good.
After making some changes in the VBA code and seeing some duplicates in the result set, I went back today and ran the original VBA sub again. The result was again a list of 649 video IDs, but this time the list included duplicates and it also included IDs that were not in yesterday's list and was missing IDs that were there yesterday. Here is a comparison from the first two pages and the last two pages of the two result sets:
Page
# on page
# overall
Run 1
Run 2
Same as
Seq
Dup
1
1
1
f2mdMcf-fJs
f2mdMcf-fJs
1
1
2
2
WSauz5KVKTU
WSauz5KVKTU
2
Seq
1
3
3
zsSCUWs7k9Q
XYIUM5TkhMo
None
1
4
4
B5Q1J5c8oNc
zsSCUWs7k9Q
3
Seq
1
5
5
cUxIb3Pt-hQ
B5Q1J5c8oNc
4
Seq
1
6
6
4yyOOn7pWnA
LDjE28szwr8
None
1
7
7
3N46jQ0Xi3c
cUxIb3Pt-hQ
5
Seq
1
8
8
08dBVz8_VzU
4yyOOn7pWnA
6
Seq
...
1
13
13
oeKIe1ik2O8
e1rQ8YwNSDs
11
Seq
1
14
14
FrG_eSECfps
RVB2JreIcoc
12
Seq
1
15
15
pPQCwz2q96o
oeKIe1ik2O8
13
Seq
1
16
16
uo3KuoEiu3I
pPQCwz2q96o
15
NOT
1
17
17
0U6aIwd5h9s
uo3KuoEiu3I
16
Seq
...
1
47
47
ShGsW68zbIo
iu9rhqsvrPs
46
Seq
1
48
48
0q0xS7W78KQ
ShGsW68zbIo
47
Seq
1
49
49
UheJQsXOAnY
0q0xS7W78KQ
48
Seq
Dup
1
50
50
H8AcqOh0wis
H8AcqOh0wis
50
NOT
Dup
2
1
51
EWq3-2VuqbQ
0q0xS7W78KQ
48
NOT
Dup
2
2
52
scuTZza4f_o
H8AcqOh0wis
50
NOT
Dup
2
3
53
bJWJW-mz4_U
UheJQsXOAnY
49
NOT
2
4
54
Ii4VYsh9OlM
EWq3-2VuqbQ
51
NOT
2
5
55
r2-OGUu57pU
scuTZza4f_o
52
Seq
2
6
56
8KTnu18Mi9Q
bJWJW-mz4_U
53
Seq
2
7
57
DconsfGsXyA
Ii4VYsh9OlM
54
Seq
2
8
58
UttEvLJP3l8
8KTnu18Mi9Q
56
NOT
2
9
59
GJOOLH9ZP2I
DconsfGsXyA
57
Seq
2
10
60
ewgmg9Q5Ab8
UttEvLJP3l8
58
Seq
...
13
35
635
qHpR_p8lA4I
FFVOzo7tSV8
639
Seq
13
36
636
DplwDDZNTRc
76IBjdM9s6g
640
Seq
13
37
637
3AObqGsimr8
qEh0uZuu7_U
None
13
38
638
88keQ4PWH18
RhfGJduOlrw
641
Seq
13
39
639
FFVOzo7tSV8
QxzH9QkirCU
643
NOT
13
40
640
76IBjdM9s6g
Qsgz4GbL8O4
None
13
41
641
RhfGJduOlrw
BSgg7mEzfqY
644
Seq
13
42
642
lVEqwV0Nlzg
VcmjbJ2q8-w
645
Seq
13
43
643
QxzH9QkirCU
gOU0BCL-TXs
None
13
44
644
BSgg7mEzfqY
IoOXQUcW24s
646
Seq
13
45
645
VcmjbJ2q8-w
o4_2_a6LzFU
647
Seq
Dup
14
1
646
IoOXQUcW24s
o4_2_a6LzFU
647
NOT
Dup
14
2
647
o4_2_a6LzFU
ijVPcGaqVjc
648
Seq
14
3
648
ijVPcGaqVjc
nk3FlgEuG-s
649
Seq
14
4
649
nk3FlgEuG-s
27ZLFn8Dejg
None
The last three columns have the following meanings:
Same as: If an ID from Run 2 is the same as an ID from Run 1, then this column has the # overall for Run 1.
Seq: Indicates whether the number in column "Same as" is one more than the previous number in that column.
Dup: Indicates whether an ID from Run 2 occurred more than once in that run.
Problems:
The videos XYIUM5TkhMo, LDjE28szwr8, qEh0uZuu7_U, Qsgz4GbL8O4, gOU0BCL-TXs, and 27ZLFn8Dejg were returned as #3, 6, 637, 640, 643, and 649 in Run 2, but were not returned at all in Run 1.
The videos FrG_eSECfps, r2-OGUu57pU, lVEqwV0Nlzg were returned as #14, 55, 642, in Run 1, but were not in Run 2.
The videos 0q0xS7W78KQ, H8AcqOh0wis, and o4_2_a6LzFU were returned as #49, 50, and 645 in Run 2, but then each appears a second time in that run (as well as appearing in Run 1 as #48, 50, and 647).
These results are troubling. They mean that no single search will return a reliable list of videos for a given value of q.
I mentioned at the beginning that previous questions about inconsistent results from the YouTube Data API had answers that seemed to resolve those inconsistencies. Is there a way to do that for this search? Is there something wrong with the way I'm composing the search that is causing the problem?
If there isn't a way to fix the search, then I suppose the only way to get a list of videos on the topic with high confidence of it being complete is to run the search multiple times and merge the results until no new IDs appear that were not in a previous result set. But even then, one would not know if there are other videos lurking undetected.
I have two tabs where i need to combine the data, one tab contains a list of customer numbers that has a subscription on a package. The same customer can subscribe to the same package several times
Subscriptions
11 100
11 102
11 105
11 108
11 110
11 120
11 132
11 137
11 143
11 145
11 147
11 154
11 154
11 154
11 154
Customer
141 3 User141 Address Zip Town
142 3 User142 Address Zip Town
143 3 User143 Address Zip Town
144 3 User144 Address Zip Town
145 3 User145 Address Zip Town
146 3 User146 Address Zip Town
147 3 User147 Address Zip Town
148 10 User148 Address Zip Town
149 10 User149 Address Zip Town
150 3 User150 Address Zip Town
151 3 User151 Address Zip Town
152 3 User152 Address Zip Town
154 4 User154 Address Zip Town
155 3 User155 Address Zip Town
I have been using filter to combine the two tables
=filter(Customer!A2:I; compare(Customer!A2:A;'Subscriptions'!B2:B;0))
But it only shows the entry 154 one time. Is there any way i it can be shown several times?
You're right!
This is what we are trying to achieve:
For each OrderID, Keep ONLY those OrderIDs where where their ColumnD has at least 2 SAME consecutive values AND where ColumnC has at least 2 same value in it.
So for example we would be keeping the first 2 rows of OrderID 101
So for example we would be keeping the 3 rows of OrderID 104
So for example we would be keeping the 2 rows of OrderID 305
The rest we don't want to see in the report!
Here is an image that might help explain what we want to achieve.
OrderID
ColumnB
ColumnC
ColumnD
101
159
10
18$
101
132
10
18$
101
147
22
18$
102
111
12
55$
103
130
10
18$
104
123
381
75$
104
456
381
75$
104
789
381
75$
305
555
101
37$
305
652
101
37$
I just now started with influx, Need help to get the data sorted by timestamp and the latest data by it.
select DB,AREA,sptotal,spfree,pctfree from ORA_SIZE GROUP BY DB order by time ;
name: ORA_SIZE
tags: DB=DB43B
time DB AREA sptotal spfree pctfree
---- -- ---- ------- ------ -------
1587919100011225116 DB43B DATA 442 303 68
1587919100011225116 DB43B SYSTEM 40 35 87
1587919088732608975 DB43B DATA 442 303 68
1587919088732608975 DB43B SYSTEM 40 35 87
Here, I want to retrieve only
1587919088732608975 DB43B DATA 442 303 68
1587919088732608975 DB43B SYSTEM 40 35 87
as they are the latest data based on time,
is there any query for this? Please advise.
Thanks,
You can use the Last Function to get the latest value of any field.
Example :
SELECT LAST(DB,AREA,sptotal,spfree,pctfree) FROM ORA_SIZE [WHERE_clause] [GROUP_BY_clause]
This query should return your desired data.
You can find the documentation here
I'm looking for the exact specifications of this file format. Anyone got a link? Or want to comment?
I have spent the better part of the day searching, yet I keep getting directed back to the GIMP online user-manual. It says "look at a .gpl file and you will see it is easy" to build manually with a text editor. I don't actually have GIMP, but I see examples online. Yep, easy. • EXCEPT:
• What meaning do the color names ultimately have? Are they purely semantic, or does a program rely on them? If the latter, then what if there are two (2) or more colors with the same name?
• What does the "Columns" line do?
I've seen examples that have no "Columns" line.
I've seen examples that have values of 0, 4, and 16; yet this does not in any way that I can see correspond to the color data. I see 3 columns of decimal-sRGB values, and an optional 4th column with the color-name; seems I remember the example with "Columns 4" had no color names, only the 3 RGB columns.
• Do columns of RGB values need to "line up"? Or will the following example from my output algorithm work? (from the Crayola palette):
159 129 112 Beaver
253 124 110 Bittersweet
0 0 0 Black
172 229 238 Blizzard Blue
31 117 254 Blue
162 162 208 Blue Bell
102 153 204 Blue Gray
13 152 186 Blue Green
• Does this format accept sRGBA colors? And if so, how is the "A" value defined (0-1, 0%-100%, 0-127, 0-255, etc.?) (seems I remember when creating .png files with PHP, the "A" value was 7-bit)?
• How exactly do you add comments / metadata?
Today I see an example that says lines that begin with # are comments, or anything after a # on a line is a comment. Yesterday I thought (maybe I'm confused) I saw an example that said that comment lines begin with ;
• Is any other data-format supported?
Originally I thought the text-line just before the color-data that I see in every example indicated the format: "#" signifying decimal-sRGB; until today when I see that is just a blank-line comment.
• What line ending character(s) can / must I use?
\n
\r
• What character-encodings can I use? ASCII only? ¿UTF-8 ☺ with extended ♪♫ charset (¡hopefully!)?
• Anything I'm missing? Any other options available?
Here is an example from http://gimpchat.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3375#
GIMP Palette
Name: bugslife_final.png-10
Columns: 16
#
191 180 180 Index 0
163 158 157 Index 1
145 136 132 Index 2
130 125 112 Index 3
… … …
56 50 49 Index 29
41 38 38 Index 30
23 23 23 Index 31
242 245 213 Index 32
227 232 181 Index 33
210 217 147 Index 34
195 204 118 Index 35
… … …
0 0 0 Index 251
0 0 0 Index 252
0 0 0 Index 253
0 0 0 Index 254
0 0 0 Index 255
Aloha!
Looking at the source code:
Columns is just an indication for display in the palette editor
Comments must start with a #. In non-empty lines that don't, the first three tokens are parsed as numbers
There is no alpha support