I'm building my first webapp, following the Michael Hartl Rails Tutorial. After finishing Chapter 10, I find that my application works locally but does not work when I push it to Heroku. The development log output reads:
Started GET "/" for 98.154.183.51 at Thu Jan 06 01:07:15 -0800 2011
Processing by PagesController#home as HTML
Rendered layouts/_header.html.erb (28.3ms)
Rendered pages/home.html.erb within layouts/application (30.9ms)
Completed in 35ms
User Load (29.6ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."id" = 101) LIMIT 1
CACHE (0.0ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."id" = 101) LIMIT 1
Rendered layouts/_header.html.erb (149.3ms)
CACHE (0.0ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."id" = 101) LIMIT 1
Rendered layouts/_sidebar.html.erb (8.1ms)
Rendered layouts/_footer.html.erb (0.6ms)
Rendered sessions/new.html.erb within layouts/application (342.4ms)
Completed 200 OK in 421ms (Views: 390.1ms | ActiveRecord: 29.9ms)
Whereas the heroku production log reads:
Started GET "/" for 98.154.183.51 at Thu Jan 06 01:07:15 -0800 2011
Processing by PagesController#home as HTML
Rendered layouts/_header.html.erb (28.3ms)
Rendered pages/home.html.erb within layouts/application (30.9ms)
Completed in 35ms
ActionView::Template::Error (PGError: ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: "nil"
: SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."id" = 'nil') LIMIT 1):
I'm not sure why the Heroku-deployed app looks for a user_id of "nil", whereas my local app looks for one of "101." This is my first app, so I'm not sure where to even begin the troubleshooting. I've tried pushing my local db to the Heroku one via heroku rake db:push, but I still get the same errors. Any advice? Thanks in advance for your help.
Make sure you
Migrated your database on Heroku with heroku rake db:migrate
Have a valid user in your database (you could e.g. create one with the Rails console on Heroku)
It seems your code is trying to load a User instance when you have none in your database. If your app works once you have some users in your database, fix your code to act appropriately if no users are present.
You might want to run you rake db:seed also if you have setup some initial values.
Related
So, long story short - I'm comfortable with HTML, CSS, SQL a bit of Javascript etc as a hobby, but am far from a 'proper' developer. Recently a friend paid a developer to build a web app for them (the friend have no IT skills at all). The developer (who is no longer on the scene) left them with a working demo in Heroku and a GitHub repo which I have now cloned. My friend wanted some of the cosmetic bits changing, which I offered to help with, but in order to do this, I had to create my own version of the app on Heroku from my forked repo.
I couldn't get this to work, kept getting an error message when trying to deploy the app, despite the code being completely unchanged from the parent. I should mention now that the app has been written in Ruby, with which I have zero experience. But I thought I'd have a go anyway...
After much Googling, I managed to get the app to successfully deploy by changing the version of #rails/webpacker in the package.json file. I then changed any references to originalApp.herokuapps.com to myNewVersion.herokuapps.com.
After this, I had to set some Config Vars in Heroku (relating to gmail and stripe) to get things up and running. This all seemed to work ok...
So I'm now at the point where a user can sign up on the app and subscribe to the service using Stripe (test) and is successfully sent a confirmation email.
However, once a user is logged in, anytime they try to go to any other page, for example the 'About Us' or 'Contact Us' page, it immediately redirects (or stays) on the same page. There's no other pages the logged-in user can access. However, if I log out, then the 'guest' user can navigate to the other pages freely.
Example:
If I'm logged in, the URL shows https://myproject.herokuapp.com/start and the contents of the page are what the user was presented with after signing up and paying the Stripe fee.
If they then click on, for example, the 'About Us' link, the log shows this (I've edited the URLs to show myproject instead of the real project name):
2022-01-05T22:16:29.805824+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.805699 #4] INFO -- : [0efc978f-35cf-4d11-ae66-edbdb5b26ec4] Started GET "/about-us" for 90.197.167.151 at 2022-01-05 22:16:29 +0000
2022-01-05T22:16:29.806538+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.806485 #4] INFO -- : [0efc978f-35cf-4d11-ae66-edbdb5b26ec4] Processing by PagesController#about_us as HTML
2022-01-05T22:16:29.809496+00:00 app[web.1]: D, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.809430 #4] DEBUG -- : [0efc978f-35cf-4d11-ae66-edbdb5b26ec4] [1m[36mUser Load (0.7ms)[0m [1m[34mSELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = $1 ORDER BY "users"."id" ASC LIMIT $2[0m [["id", 1], ["LIMIT", 1]]
2022-01-05T22:16:29.810151+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.810102 #4] INFO -- : [0efc978f-35cf-4d11-ae66-edbdb5b26ec4] Redirected to https://myproject.herokuapp.com/start
2022-01-05T22:16:29.810227+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.810201 #4] INFO -- : [0efc978f-35cf-4d11-ae66-edbdb5b26ec4] Filter chain halted as :check_subscription rendered or redirected
2022-01-05T22:16:29.810322+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.810300 #4] INFO -- : [0efc978f-35cf-4d11-ae66-edbdb5b26ec4] Completed 302 Found in 4ms (ActiveRecord: 0.7ms | Allocations: 964)
2022-01-05T22:16:29.835064+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.834991 #4] INFO -- : [a7c07664-645b-449c-a9a8-a50a2c060f3b] Started GET "/start" for 90.197.167.151 at 2022-01-05 22:16:29 +0000
2022-01-05T22:16:29.835712+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.835663 #4] INFO -- : [a7c07664-645b-449c-a9a8-a50a2c060f3b] Processing by CheckoutsController#start as HTML
2022-01-05T22:16:29.836943+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.836887 #4] INFO -- : [a7c07664-645b-449c-a9a8-a50a2c060f3b] Rendering checkouts/start.html.erb within layouts/application
2022-01-05T22:16:29.839055+00:00 app[web.1]: D, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.838940 #4] DEBUG -- : [a7c07664-645b-449c-a9a8-a50a2c060f3b] [1m[36mUser Load (0.7ms)[0m [1m[34mSELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = $1 ORDER BY "users"."id" ASC LIMIT $2[0m [["id", 1], ["LIMIT", 1]]
2022-01-05T22:16:29.839685+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.839609 #4] INFO -- : [a7c07664-645b-449c-a9a8-a50a2c060f3b] Rendered checkouts/start.html.erb within layouts/application (Duration: 2.6ms | Allocations: 401)
2022-01-05T22:16:29.841324+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.841270 #4] INFO -- : [a7c07664-645b-449c-a9a8-a50a2c060f3b] Rendered shared/_navbar.html.erb (Duration: 0.9ms | Allocations: 905)
2022-01-05T22:16:29.841552+00:00 app[web.1]: I, [2022-01-05T22:16:29.841516 #4] INFO -- : [a7c07664-645b-449c-a9a8-a50a2c060f3b] Completed 200 OK in 6ms (Views: 4.1ms | ActiveRecord: 0.7ms | Allocations: 2433)
2022-01-05T22:16:29.816017+00:00 heroku[router]: at=info method=GET path="/about-us" host=myproject.herokuapp.com request_id=0efc978f-35cf-4d11-ae66-edbdb5b26ec4 fwd="90.197.167.151" dyno=web.1 connect=0ms service=6ms status=302 bytes=1393 protocol=https
As said, I'm not familiar with Ruby at all, but I suspect it's something to do with the lines that mention:
Redirected to https://myproject.herokuapp.com/start
Filter chain halted as :check_subscription rendered or redirected
You can see it's trying to go to the /about-us page but it remains on /start.
I believe the app uses something called 'Devise' for the user registration process.
Given the code is the same as the parent repo that I forked from, I'm guessing the issue is either a setting within Heroku or some kind of variable that I'm missing or have not updated. If anyone can advise me on next steps with regards to research or a solution, I'd be very grateful. I appreciate I'm no expert, but I'm just trying to do a friend a favour after they've been left hanging by another dev. Many Thanks.
Update:
application_controller.rb
before_action :authenticate_user!, :halt_if_mobile
before_action :check_subscription, except: %i[ home start ]
def halt_if_mobile
if browser.device.mobile?
render inline: "Mobile access is currently disabled"
return
end
end
def check_subscription
return unless current_user
return if controller_path =~ /devise/ || controller_path =~ /registrations/
if !current_user.active
redirect_to start_path, notice: 'Please update your payment settings'
return
end
end
end
I've updated a Rails '6.0.3' app to use hotwire-rails rather than turbolinks and am getting a 304 for the response with no update to the view within the turbo_frame_tag
I created a new Rails app from scratch and implemented hotwire successfully so I'm guessing the issue is with residual Javascript in my existing app.
Server request
The server request matches that of the new app so it doesn't appear to be the issue, note the 200 status code.
Started GET "/models/1/edit" for ::1 at 2021-01-18 13:33:22 +1100
Processing by ModelsController#edit as TURBO_STREAM
Parameters: {"id"=>"1"}
User Load (0.2ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = $1 ORDER BY "users"."id" ASC LIMIT $2 [["id", 2], ["LIMIT", 1]]
Model Load (0.1ms) SELECT "models".* FROM "models" WHERE "models"."id" = $1 LIMIT $2 [["id", 1], ["LIMIT", 1]]
↳ app/controllers/models_controller.rb:15:in `edit'
Rendering models/edit.haml
Rendered models/edit.haml (Duration: 1.1ms | Allocations: 1500)
Completed 200 OK in 4ms (Views: 1.3ms | ActiveRecord: 0.3ms | Allocations: 4244)
Browser
The browser response seems to be identical except for the status code being 304 rather than 200 and obviously no view change rendered.
Steps to recreate
Existing Rails '6.0.3' app
Update Gemfile to remove tubolinks and webpacker
trash app/javascript
trash node_modules/**
rails hotwire:install
Extra info
When I ran rails hotwire:install I get a File unchanged! The supplied flag value not found! app/assets/config/manifest.js message - I've checked the file and it's identical to the one generated in the new app.
I've got a RefineryCMS 3 application and in the backend the thumbnails for uploaded images are not showing up.
If I run the app in production mode on my development machine then the thumbnails show up. On the production machine the rails app is ran through passenger & apache and it fails.
I have copied my development copy to the production server for a test and ran the refinery project in development mode and I still get the same issue
rails s -b 192.168.200.215
Here is the standard output when I try and load the images area in refinery admin;
Started GET "/refinery/images" for 192.168.200.4 at 2016-03-01 15:32:25 +1100
Processing by Refinery::Admin::ImagesController#index as HTML
Parameters: {"locale"=>:en}
Refinery::Authentication::Devise::User Load (0.2ms) SELECT "refinery_authentication_devise_users".* FROM "refinery_authentication_devise_users" WHERE "refinery_authentication_devise_users"."id" = ? ORDER BY "refinery_authentication_devise_users"."id" ASC LIMIT 1 [["id", 1]]
Refinery::Authentication::Devise::Role Load (0.1ms) SELECT "refinery_authentication_devise_roles".* FROM "refinery_authentication_devise_roles" INNER JOIN "refinery_authentication_devise_roles_users" ON "refinery_authentication_devise_roles"."id" = "refinery_authentication_devise_roles_users"."role_id" WHERE "refinery_authentication_devise_roles_users"."user_id" = ? [["user_id", 1]]
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-acts-as-indexed-2.0.1/app/views/refinery/acts_as_indexed/admin/_search_header.html.erb (0.2ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/_search_header.html.erb (4.4ms)
(0.2ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "refinery_images"
CACHE (0.0ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "refinery_images"
Refinery::Image Load (0.3ms) SELECT "refinery_images".* FROM "refinery_images" ORDER BY updated_at DESC LIMIT 20 OFFSET 0
Refinery::Image::Translation Load (0.3ms) SELECT "refinery_image_translations".* FROM "refinery_image_translations" WHERE "refinery_image_translations"."refinery_image_id" IN (2)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-images-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/images/_grid_view.html.erb (10.3ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-images-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/images/_images.html.erb (14.5ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-images-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/images/_records.html.erb (33.7ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-acts-as-indexed-2.0.1/app/views/refinery/acts_as_indexed/admin/_search.html.erb (2.2ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/_search.html.erb (4.8ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-images-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/images/_actions.html.erb (17.0ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-images-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/images/index.html.erb within layouts/refinery/admin (61.1ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/_html_tag.html.erb (0.2ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/_javascripts.html.erb (159.9ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/_head.html.erb (232.9ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/_site_bar.html.erb (3.4ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/_menu_item.html.erb (28.4ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/admin/_menu.html.erb (31.9ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/_no_script.html.erb (0.3ms)
Rendered /var/lib/gems/2.1.0/gems/refinerycms-core-3.0.1/app/views/refinery/_message.html.erb (0.1ms)
Completed 200 OK in 375ms (Views: 362.0ms | ActiveRecord: 1.1ms)
Started GET "/system/images/W1siZiIsIjIwMTYvMDMvMDEvN3lmN3ZpNDRtZV9hYWEuanBnIl0sWyJwIiwidGh1bWIiLCIxMzV4MTM1I2MiXV0/aaa.jpg?sha=7a0325c4ef12ef3d" for 192.168.200.4 at 2016-03-01 15:32:27 +1100
When it tries to get the /system/images/.... it fails in the web browser console. If I try and access that directly with the following
http://192.168.200.215:3000/system/images/W1siZiIsIjIwMTYvMDMvMDEvN3lmN3ZpNDRtZV9hYWEuanBnIl0sWyJwIiwidGh1bWIiLCIxMzV4MTM1I2MiXV0/aaa.jpg
I get the following error in the browser
Internal Server Error
The production server didn't have imagemagick installed.
sudo apt-get install imagemagick
This fixed it.
I moved an app from the bamboo stack to cedar and the server is behaving wierdly, it times out on the first request, taking 40sec according to the logs, while the next, same request, takes 1.5 sec. You would think the dyno slept, but I've got 2-3 dynos (using hirefire), and 3 workers.
rails 3.2
ruby 1.9.3
heroku cedar
heroku postgres crane
MongoDB, MongoHQ large
mongo_mapper 0.11.1
thin
no caching
It's an app with low user interaction, as it's mostly a huge background worker tool. The clients using it are few, but important, I obviously can't have the app timing out every morning or after lunch. You'd hate it too.
➜ my_app git:(master) ✗ heroku logs -t -p web --remote production
first request after some inactivity 40880ms
Started GET "/my_model" for xx.160.183.xxx at 2013-10-31 15:19:34 +0000
Processing by MyModelsController#index as HTML
User Load (6.8ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = 110237164 LIMIT 1
MyModel Load (12.0ms) SELECT "my_model".* FROM "my_model" ORDER BY name ASC
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (3515.6ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (3514.8ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (3210.6ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (3968.4ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (2652.0ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (2253.5ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1339.7ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1333.0ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (2901.9ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (636.3ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1598.6ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (10.1ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (909.3ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (911.5ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1435.4ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1043.9ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1712.3ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (793.8ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (290.2ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1142.0ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (342.6ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (376.0ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (2161.8ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1194.9ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (1293.4ms)
Rendered my_model/_my_model_overview.html.erb (40695.0ms)
Rendered my_model/index.html.erb within layouts/application (40721.5ms)
Rendered shared/_menu.html.erb (1.0ms)
Rendered shared/_usermenu.html.erb (2.3ms)
Rendered shared/_header.html.erb (27.1ms)
Rendered shared/_messages.html.erb (0.1ms)
Rendered feedbacks/_new.html.erb (15.8ms)
Completed 200 OK in 40880ms (Views: 40856.2ms | ActiveRecord: 18.8ms)
It's a table, where each row is a partial, extracted so that I could see what took time.
Here it is after the timeout. 1398ms
Started GET "/my_models" for xxx.160.183.xxx at 2013-10-31 15:21:18 +0000
Processing by MyModelsController#index as HTML
User Load (2.4ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = 110237164 LIMIT 1
MyModel Load (3.2ms) SELECT "my_models".* FROM "my_models" ORDER BY name ASC
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (87.7ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (25.5ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (35.7ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (107.8ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (163.9ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (26.2ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (26.3ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (19.3ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (121.4ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (62.6ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (94.9ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (8.2ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (19.1ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (15.8ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (59.9ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (20.6ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (78.8ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (25.3ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (13.3ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (130.1ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (9.7ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (11.1ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (92.0ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (51.6ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_model_statuses.html.erb (23.1ms)
Rendered my_models/_my_models_overview.html.erb (1385.7ms)
Rendered my_models/index.html.erb within layouts/application (1386.3ms)
Rendered shared/_menu.html.erb (0.3ms)
Rendered shared/_usermenu.html.erb (0.6ms)
Rendered shared/_header.html.erb (1.5ms)
Rendered shared/_messages.html.erb (0.0ms)
Rendered feedbacks/_new.html.erb (1.5ms)
Completed 200 OK in 1398ms (Views: 1388.8ms | ActiveRecord: 5.5ms)
I'm not using any explicit cache, just plain Rails ActiveRecord to populate the table. Locally it's not like this at all. Heroku support recommends concurrency and caching, which is for a high-traffic app. This is a low-traffic app, a tool. They haven't commented on the bamboo vs cedar topic so I'm reaching out here in case anybody learns things I'm not aware of.
In both cases DB < 20 ms, so this is all CPU stuff, rendering templates.
It's how heroku handles resources. It's called dyno-idling and they released this about it last year: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/dynos#dyno-idling.
The heorku way to fix it is to pay for an extra dyno, then it will run all the time. But you can also use ping services to ping your site. Some will do it every hour, some every fifteen minutes and some once a minute. That will keep your dyno active and your thin server always "awake"
Yeah... I'll share instead of deleting the question. Hopefully my mistakes will help somebody get to the bottom of this faster.
The problem was with a mongodb query. Not sleeping dynos or services. Simply my own code.
It as Very confusing as MongoHQ has a "Slow queries" page that reported "no slow queries". I'd like to applaud Matt McCay for the excellent support and respectful approach, despite this being a (yet another?) "user error". He showed me the mongodb logging that showed this:
Tue Nov 5 22:59:46.722 [conn2335303] query myapp-production.day_reports query: { $query: { my_model_id: 2147259060, some_unindexed_field: { $gt: 0 } }, $orderby: { some_index_timestamp: -1 } } ntoreturn:1 ntoskip:0 nscanned:775 scanAndOrder:1 keyUpdates:0 locks(micros) r:7474265 nreturned:0 reslen:20 7474ms
Tue Nov 5 22:59:49.439 [conn2335303] query myapp-production.day_reports query: { $query: { my_model_id: 2147259071, some_unindexed_field: { $gt: 0 } }, $orderby: { some_index_timestamp: -1 } } ntoreturn:1 ntoskip:0 nscanned:502 scanAndOrder:1 keyUpdates:0 locks(micros) r:2570470 nreturned:0 reslen:20 2570ms
Show just two of many (30) in the same query. Note the 7474ms and 2570ms
I wonder why these wouldn't be listed as "slow queries" in MongoHQ... Let this be a warning to not let yourself be fooled or blinded by that.
Solution: In my case, I solved this by denormalizing, I saved the calculated value on my model on each write. I could have used indexes too, it would have been really fast, but in this case the models I read are in PostgreSQL and with the denormalization I wouldn't need to connect to MongoDB at all - on this particular request.
Why was it so much faster on the following queries?
The answer is found here: http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/faq/fundamentals/#does-mongodb-handle-caching
MongoDB saves/caches the last fetched data, in RAM.
How should I have troubleshooted this, ideally?
Isolate and eliminate. I should have plugged in and out both heroku postgresql and mongohq to rule them out. The "slow first time, fast after" made me fixate on server issues, I should know better.
Study the logs more thoroughly.
I'd like to have the logs from each request be grouped together and easy to tell apart from another request's logs, eg
**********************
Started GET "/" for 67.205.67.76 at 2013-09-15 00:05:15 -0700
Processing by RootController#index as HTML
Rendered root/_index.html.erb within layouts/application (7.0ms)
Rendered layouts/_fonts_hack.html.erb (0.0ms)
Rendered layouts/_ie_version_vars.html.erb (0.0ms)
Rendered topbars/_logged_out_topbar.html.erb (2.0ms)
Rendered layouts/_old_browser_warnings.html.erb (0.0ms)
Completed 200 OK in 27ms (Views: 26.0ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms)
**********************
Started GET "/" for 67.205.67.76 at 2013-09-15 00:05:15 -0700
Processing by RootController#index as HTML
Rendered root/_index.html.erb within layouts/application (7.0ms)
Rendered layouts/_fonts_hack.html.erb (0.0ms)
Rendered layouts/_ie_version_vars.html.erb (0.0ms)
Rendered topbars/_logged_out_topbar.html.erb (2.0ms)
Rendered layouts/_old_browser_warnings.html.erb (0.0ms)
Completed 200 OK in 27ms (Views: 26.0ms | ActiveRecord: 0.0ms)
***********************
Is something like this possible? sometimes in my logs currently its kind of hard to visually see where one request begins and another ends, and sometimes logs from different requests get interspersed.
A better option would be to use the request uuid
config.log_tags = [:uuid]
Doesnt seem like it from what I can tell, but next best thing: add Pid and Thread object_id tags to each log, then search for and highlight a particular tag once you get to the start of a request, and then all the highlighted lines will be the ones in your request.
config.log_tags = [ lambda {|r| "#{Process.pid}##{Thread.current.object_id}" } ]