I have two tables, one containing a list of different options users can select from. For example:
tbl_options
id_option
option
The next table I use to store which of these options the user selects. For example:
tbl_selected
id_selected
id_option
id_user
I use PHP to loop through the tbl_options table to generate a full list of checkboxes that the user can select from. When a user selects an option, the id_option and id_user are stored in the tbl_selected table. When a user deselects an option, the id_selected record is deleted from the tbl_selected table.
The challenge I am having is the best way to retrieve the full list of options in tbl_options, plus having the query indicate the associated records stored in the tbl_selected table.
I've tried LEFT JOIN'ing tbl_options to tbl_selected which provides me with the full list of options, but as soon as I add the WHERE id_user = ### the query only returns those records with values in tbl_selected. Ideally, I would like to see the results from a query as follows:
id_option option id_user
1 Apples 3
2 Oranges 3
3 Bananas
4 Pears
5 Peaches 3
This would indicate that user #3 has stored Apples, Oranges and Peaches. This also indicates that user #3 has not selected Bananas or Pears.
Is this possible using a SQL statement or should I pursue a different technique?
Your problem is that the user-restriction is applied to the whole query. To apply it only to the Join condition you need to add it to the ON clause like this:
select o.id_option, o.[option], s.id_user
from tbl_options o
left outer join tbl_selected s
on o.id_option = s.id_option and s.id_user = 3
Related
I have a sqlite database that I'm trying to build a query. The table column I need to retrieve is iEDLID from the table below :
Right now all I have to go on is a known iEventID from the table below :
And the the nClientLocationID from the table below.
So the requirements are I need to get current iEDLID to write, lookup from tblEventDateLocations for dEventDate and the tblLocation.nClientLocationID based on the tblLocations.iLocationID I already have and event selected on this screen.
So I would need a query that does a "SELECT DISTINCT table EventDateLocations.iEDLID FROM tblEventDateLocations ...."
So basically from another query I have the iEventID I need, and I have the event ID i need but where the dEventDate=(select date('now')) I need to retrieve the iEventDateID from table EventDates.iEventDateID to use on the table EventDateLocations
this is the point where I'm trying to wrap my head around the joins for this query and the syntax...
It seems like you want this:
select distinct edl.iEDLDID
from
tblEventDateLocations edl
join tblEventDates ed on edl.EventDateId = ed.EventDateId
where
ed.EventId = ?
and ed.dEventDate = date('now')
and edl.nClientLocationID = ?
where the ? of course represent the known event ID and location ID parameters.
Since nClientLocationId appears on table tblEventDateLocations you do not need to join table tblLocations unless you want to filter out results whose location ID does not appear in that table.
have some denormalized data, along the lines of the following:
FruitData:
LOAD * INLINE [
ID,ColumnA, ColumnB, ColumnC
1,'Apple','Pear','Banana'
2,'Banana','Mango','Strawberry'
3,'Pear','Strawberry','Kiwi'
];
MasterFruits
LOAD * INLINE [
Fruitname
'Apple'
'Banana'
'Pear'
'Mango'
'Kiwi'
'Strawberry'
'Papaya'
];
And what I need to do is compare these fields to a master list of fruit (held in another table). This would mean that if I chose Banana, IDs 1 and 2 would come up and if I chose Strawberry, IDs 2 and 3 would come up.
Is there any way I can create a listbox that searches across all 3 fields at once?
A list box is just a mechanism to allow you to "select" a value in a certain field as a filter. The real magic behind what Qlikview is doing comes from the associations made in the data model. Since your tables have no common field you couldn't, for example, load a List Box for Fruitname and click something and have it alter List Boxes for other fields such as ColumnA, B, or C. To get the behavior you want you need to associate the two tables. This is can be accomplished by concatenating the various columns into one column (essentially normalizing the data).
[LinkTable]:
LOAD Distinct ColumnA as Fruitname,
ID
Resident FruitData;
Concatenate([LinkTable])
LOAD Distinct ColumnB as Fruitname,
ID
Resident FruitData;
Concatenate([LinkTable])
LOAD Distinct ColumnC as Fruitname,
ID
Resident FruitData;
You can see the table this produces here:
and the data model looks like this:
and finally, the desired behavior:
I am trying to generate a report to screen of accounting transaction history. In most situations it is one display row per record in the AccountingTransaction table. But occasionally there are transactions that I wish to display to the end user as one transaction which are really, behind the scenes, two accounting transactions. This is caused by deferral of revenues and fund splitting since this app is a fund accounting app.
If I display all rows one by one, those double entries look odd to the user since the fund splitting and deferral is "behind the scenes". So I want to roll up all the related transactions into one display row on screen.
I have my query now using group by to group the related transactions
#history = AccountingTransaction.where("customer_id in (?) AND no_download <> 1", customers_in_account).group(:transaction_type_id, :reference_id).order(:created_at)
as I loop through I get the transactions grouped as I want but I am struggling with how to display the total sum of the 'credit' field for all records in the group. (It is only showing the credit for the first record of the group) If I add a .sum(:credit) to my query, of course, it returns the sums just as I want but not all the other data.
Is there a way for me to group these records like in my #history query and also get the sum of the credit field for each respective group?
* Addition *
What I really want is what the following SQL query would give me.
SELECT transaction_type_id, reference_id, sum(credit)
WHERE customer_id in (21,22,23,24) AND no_download <> 1
GROUP BY reference_id, transaction_type_id ORDER BY created_at
I'm not sure you can do "ORDER BY created_at" and not include it in the select fields, but here is an example.
#history = AccountingTransaction.
select([:reference_id, :transaction_type_id, :created_at]).
select(AccountingTransaction.arel_table[:credit].sum.as("credit_sum")).
where("customer_id in (?) AND no_download <> 1", customers_in_account).
group(:transaction_type_id, :reference_id).
order(:created_at)
To access the credit_sum you could do:
#history[0].attributes["credit_sum"]
I guess if you'd like, you could create a method:
def credit_sum
attributes["credit_sum"]
end
EDIT *
As stated in comments you can access the attribute directly:
#history[0].credit_sum
In my ETL process I am using Change Data Capture (CDC) to discover only rows that have been changed in the source tables since the last extraction. Then I do the transformation only for this rows. The problem is when I have for example 2 tables which I want to join into one dimension, and only one of them has changed. For example I have table Countries and Towns as following:
Countries:
ID Name
1 France
Towns:
ID Name Country_ID
1 Lyon 1
Now lets say a new row is added to Towns table:
ID Name Country_ID
1 Lyon 1
2 Paris 2
The Countries table has not been changed, so CDC for these tables shows me only the row from Towns table. The problem is when I do the join between Countries and Towns, there is no row in Countries change set, so the join will result in empty set.
Do you have an idea how to solve it? Of course there might be more difficult cases, involving 3 and more tables, and consequential joins.
This is a typical problem found when doing Realtime Change-Data-Capture, or even Incremental-only daily changes.
There's multiple ways to solve this.
One way would be to do your joins on the natural keys in the dimension or mapping table, to get the associated country (SELECT distinct country_name, [..other attributes..] from dim_table where country_id = X).
Another alternative would be to do the join as part of the change capture process - when a row is loaded to towns, a trigger goes off that loads the foreign key values into the associated staging tables (country, etc).
There is allot i could babble on for more information on but i will be specific to what is in your question. I would suggest the following to get the results...
1st Pass is where everything matches via the join...
Union All
2nd Pass Gets all towns where there isn't a country
(left outer join with a where condition that
requires the ID in the countries table to be null/missing).
You would default the Country ID value in that unmatched join to something designated as a "Unmatched Value" typically 0 or -1 is used or a series of standard -negative numbers that you could assign descriptions to later to identify why data is bad for your example -1 could be "Found Town Without Country".
In one of my models I have a country column. How would I go about selecting the top 3 countries based on how many models have that country?
Without any further information you can try this out:
YourModel.group('country').order('count_country DESC').limit(3).count('country')
when you call count on a field rails automatically adds an AS count_field_name field to your query.
Count must be called at the end of the query because it returns an ordered hash.