I have a controller called InstallationController, and a fancy report representation of an installation called a Rate Card, but the end user insists on calling installations themselves Rate Cards. I would like him to see the URL http://site/RateCard/Edit/3, where this gets routed actually as http://site/Installation/Edit/3. How can I do this in MVC 3 RC2?
A couple of options are, you can either rename the controller to RateCardController, or add a new route that directs to the Installation controller, like:
routes.MapRoute(
"RateCard", // Route name
"RateCard/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Installation", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
Related
I am quite new to MVC. I am facing a problem with routing right now. My project URL is /account/Create. I can access controller and do my stuff for Create, but
I need to access /account controller because I need to write code in that level.
/account/create - I can access the code this level
/account - dont know how to access this controller
Project Stucture:
Sample Project
Controler
Model
View
What am I supposed to change in the following code?
//global.asax.cs
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } //Parameter defaults
);
}
/account/create is accessing code in the Account controller. Create has to be a method on the Account controller (unless you modify the default routes). Any public method you define on the account controller is accessible via /account/method URL. Based on the route you posted, going to /account URL is going to call the account controller Index method:
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
**new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional }** // Parameter defaults
);
That action = "Index" part above is defining what the default method on the account controller is, so going to /account URL is equivalent in this case to /account/index URL
And I just noticed that you spelled account wrong in the question, not sure if that may be your issue ;)
Update
Not sure if this is what you're after, but if you need to write code at the /Account level you can do this in the constructor of the controller.
Unless you substantially customize MVC, then controllers correspond to classes derived from Controller in mvc, and actions correspond to methods on those controllers.
What are you trying to achieve when you say you can't access the controller /Account?
The controller is only a container for Actions so you need to specify an Action. Of course, you can have a default Action in case an action isn't specified. That is specified in default the route above. It's called Index
I have the default directory in my IIS server set as an MVC 4 Razor application. I have it set up so that dynamic actions can be passed into the url. For example.
www.mydomain.com/4
www.mydomain.com/5
Basically those two launch accounts for users with id's of 4 and 5 respectively.
Works great.
But, I have a virtual directory on the same server called admin. I would hope that I could navigate to www.mydomain.com/admin but sadly MVC intercepts it and thinks that i'm looking up the user id of amdin.
Is there a way to poke holes in the route to allow for virtual directories?
Thanks in advance!
/Eric
########## adding my route
//route for site root
routes.MapRoute(
"YourRouteName", // Route name
"{flightNumber}/{action}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", flightNumber = " " } // Parameter defaults
);
You could constrain your route:
routes.MapRoute(
"YourRouteName",
"{flightNumber}/{action}",
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" },
new { flightNumber = #"\d+" }
);
Now it is required that you must always have a flightNumber which is one or more digits followed by an optional controller action.
Thus /5 will hit the Index action of Home controller and pass it flightNumber = 5 parameter and /5/admin would hit the Admin action of Home controller passing it flightNumber = 5 parameter.
Now if your ids are not integers but strings things will get complicated because the routing engine will no longer be able to disambiguate your routes. You could constrain the action part to a list of possible actions using a RegEx but find that approach a bit limiting because if someone adds a new action to the Home controller he would also need to update the route constraint.
My ASP.NET MVC site allows users to register and give themselves user names, which will be unique and allow others to browse their pages with a clean URL that includes their name, like Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn etc. do.
For example:
mysite.com/michael.guthrie
mysite.com/john
mysite.com/john/images
mysite.com/john/blog
etc.
The problem is that the first URL segment might be used for other "regular" controllers/actions, like:
mysite.com/about
mysite.com/register
So basically I seek for a routing scheme that says something like: If the first URL segment is a known controller, treat it as a controller (and parse the relevant action and parameters as usual), but if not - treat it as a user name, and pass it to a dedicated controller+action which will parse it and continue accordingly.
I don't want a solution that will enforce me to add routes for every specific controller that I have, such that after the routing module will go over all of them and won't find a match, it will get to the last one which defines a route for this special user name segment. The reason is primarily maintenance (I must remember to add a route every time I code a new controller, for example.)
I assume I can implement my own MvcRouteHandler / IRouteHandler but I feel there must be simpler solution that won't have me tweak MVC's out-of-the-box routing mechanism.
Note: I've read How to achieve nice litle USER page url like facebook or twitter? and it doesn't answer my question, it's just says that there is a URL rewriting module.
Do you know any good, elegant, clean way to achieve that?
You should have your first route be your Usesr route, with a route constraint along the lines of what I described in this answer: MVC routing question.
If your route is in the form {username}/{controller}/{id}, this route should cover all contingencies.
in the global.asax file you can map your routes
in the registerRoutes() method you can do something like this:
routes.MapRoute(
"ToonStudenten", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{userID}, // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Docent", action = "ToonStudenten", userID = UrlParameter.Optional} // Parameter defaults
);
I believe you can change the way your views look with this mapRouting, not entirely sure how though.. will try and search it up
You may want to take a look at this post:
MVC 3 keeping short url
You don't need to set a route for each URL. With a little help from route constraints you can do something like this:
routes.MapRoute(
"Home", // Route name
"{action}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" }, // Parameter defaults
new { action = "TaskA|TaskB|TaskC|etc" } //Route constraints
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Account", // Route name
"{action}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Account", action = "Logon" }, // Parameter defaults
new { action = "Logon|Logoff|Profile|FAQs|etc" } //Route constraints
);
I am trying to define dynamic sections of my site with the root url of the site. I am having some trouble defining the right MVC Route for it. Can someone please help.
My desired url will look like this: http://website.com/[dynamic-string]
But I have other standard pages like: http://website.com/about or http://website.com/faq or even just http://website.com.
My routes don't work correctly with that dynamic string. As shown below.
This is the route for the dynamic-string.
routes.MapRoute(
"CommunityName", // Route name
"{communityName}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Community", action = "Community", communityName = UrlParameter.Optional }
);
This is the route for all other STANDARD PAGES
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{action}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
My routes just don't match up. Everything either gets diverted to one or the other route depending on which route is declared first.
There is no difference between the two routes you mention. How can MVC know which url should be mapped to communityName and which to action? Any url can match both.
You can define your standard pages as a route (before the CommunityName route) or you can catch them in your Community action, see if the name matches a function in your Home controller and then call the right action function.
I've never done this before but you might be able to create a more intelligent routehandler that looks at your controller actions, checks if the action really exists and if true selects that route.
this is beacuse the routes are effectively the same. When you declare the action route you do not state any constraints to the route, for this reason anything will be assumed to be a the action name.
If you want two routes to capture at the same level then you must constrain the action names to those that exist on your controller, this way if it does not match it will pass to the next route.
You can see an example of and advanced constraint here:
http://blogs.planetcloud.co.uk/mygreatdiscovery/post/Custom-route-constraint-to-validate-against-a-list.aspx
In most of the articles, they put this code and explain it but I feel I am not getting it. could any body expalain it in simple terms please.
This question is looks simple but I cannot get it correct in my head.
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
My Questions:
Why do we use route.IgnoreRoute and why the parameters in {} ?
Maproute has First parameter-Default, What that resembles, Second Parameter-"{controller}/{action}/{id}", What this for and third parameter, we use new ?
How do I intrepret these routing?
Why all these?
I have used webforms so far and Cannot get it in?
Any Gurus in MVC could explain all these please?
Why do we use route.IgnoreRoute
This tells routing to ignore any requests that match the provided pattern. In this case to ignore any requests to axd resources.
and why the parameters in {} ?
The {} indicates that the delimited string is a variable. In the ignore route this is used so that any .axd requests are matched.
Maproute has First parameter-Default, What that resembles,
The first parameter is the route name. This can be used when referring to routes by name. It can be null which is what I tend to use.
Second Parameter-"{controller}/{action}/{id}", What this for
This is the pattern that is matched. In this case it is setting up the default route which is a url formed by the controller name, action name and an optional id. The url http://mysite.com/Foo/Bar would call the Bar method on the Foo controller. Changing the url to http://mysite.com/Foo/Bar/1 would pass a parameter with the identifier id and value 1.
and third parameter,
The third parameter supplies defaults. In the case of the default route the default controller name is Home and the default action is Index. The outcome of this is that a request to http://mysite.com would call the Index method on the Home controller. The id part of the route is specified as being optional.
we use new ?
The new keyword is creating an object using the object initializer syntax that was introduced in version 3 of the .Net framework. Microsoft article.
The major advantage of using routing is that it creates a convention for your urls. If you created a new controller called Account and action methods called Index and Review then the methods would be availble at /Account and Account/Review respectively.
First of all: ASP.NET MVC is not a simple version of webforms.
MVC has a special structure. You can find a MVC description here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-View-Controller
MapRoute adds the URL structure mapping. For example, following the default route link like www.domain.com/home/users/1 means that the server should call the users action in the controller called home. The action gets a parameter called id with the value of 1.
If you want to add the new Route you can simply add this uin next way:
routes.MapRoute(
"NewRoad", // Route name
"/photos/{username}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Photos", action = "Index", string username, id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
following this road the url will be: domain.com/photos/someuser/view/123. We can map the optional parameters like id, and static parameters, like username. By default we call photos controller and index action (if the action not set in ult, server will call default action "index", we set it in the route).