My app connects to a .NET web service via KSoap2 library. When I'm using HttpConnection everything works great and is very fast. However, when i switch to HttpsConnection the app slows down to a crawl and freezes up the phone. This happens when making soap calls as well as downloading files from my app. I know that https is always going to be slower than http, but it shouldn't take minutes to make a simple call that normally takes a fraction of a second.
Has anyone seen this issue before? Anything i can do about it?
Thanks
How much data are you passing in the request/response? I haven't noticed SSL to be any slower than regular HTTP in our app - but those are relatively small requests (several kilobytes at most).
Related
We decided to upgrade our website Asp.net core code from .net5 to .net6, we simply set the 'target framework' of the web application to.net6 from .net5. There were no compilation errors, we gave it a test in our development environment and all seemed well.
There were no code changes at all made, and previously the .net5 application has been running for many months without issue (and before that .net framework 4.8).
When we deployed our app to our live production environment, within a few minutes we noticed a slowdown of external calls (calls to https endpoints, often REST-like), we log any calls that take more than 5 seconds, over the space of a few minutes all calls went from slow to timing out (20 seconds).
We are using System.Net.WebClient for all of our calls, which I understand is now obsolete in .net6, however, I would not expect this to suddenly change behavior, and even so, we attempted to change to HttpClient, the recommended approach, with the same results.
I feel like I must be missing something really fundamental, we just upgraded the target framework and redeployed and now all calls made by WebClient eventually timeout.
It feels like a "running out of resources" issue, in code, due to the slow down then timeout, but I am at a loss to explain what is going on here.
To be clear, we are not doing anything special, just calling about 3 external services via WebClient for each user, and we have maybe 100 users a minute at peak, previously, there have been no timeouts.
Any pointers on what might be causing the timeouts would be greatly appreciated.
I guess time will tell if this is the answer, but we changed all of our calls to use DownloadStringTaskAsync and UploadStringTaskAsync, i.e. all calls from blocking to async await, and after 24hrs, we have not seen the same behaviour in our live environment under full load.
Why a web app using .net 5 core would not have these issues but .net 6 would, is hard to understand. For context, we are not under crazy high load, we are talking a peak of perhaps 150 users per minute, but that is what we are seeing.
Perhaps it was something specific to our set up, but I am writing this to save someone else the pain of trying to debug this issue in the future.
That is suspicious and unexpected. If you have HttpClient repro, can you please post it on GitHub https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues? (ideally minimal repro we can run locally for debugging)
If your repro is not transferable to another machine, or requires specific endpoints you can't expose, we may have to guide you through some local debugging ...
-Karel (.NET Networking team)
We have an ASP.NET MVC application hosted in an azure app-service. After running the profiler to help diagnose possible slow requests, we were surprised to see this:
An unusually high % of slow requests in the CLRThreadPoolQueue. We've now run multiple profile sessions each come back having between 40-80% in the CLRThreadPoolQueue (something we'd never seen before in previous profiles). CPU each time was below 40%, and after checking our metrics we aren't getting sudden spikes in requests.
The majority of the requests listed as slow are super simple api calls. We've added response caching and made them async. The only thing they do is hit a database looking for a single record result. We've checked the metrics on the database and the query avg run time is around 50ms or less. Looking at application insights for these requests confirms this, and shows that the database query doesn't take place until the very end of the request time line (I assume this is the request sitting in the queue).
Recently we started including SignalR into a portion of our application. Its not fully in use but it is in the code base. We since switched to using Azure SignalR Service and saw no changes. The addition of SignalR is the only "major" change/addition we've made since encountering this issue.
I understand we can scale up and/or increase the minWorkerThreads. However, this feels like I'm just treating the symptom not the cause.
Things we've tried:
Finding the most frequent requests and making them async (they weren't before)
Response caching to frequent requests
Using Azure SignalR service rather than hosting it on the same web
Running memory dumps and contacting azure support (they
found nothing).
Scaling up to an S3
Profiling with and without thread report
-- None of these steps have resolved our issue --
How can we determine what requests and/or code is causing requests to pile up in the CLRThreadPoolQueue?
We encountered a similar problem, I guess internally SignalR must be using up a lot of threads or some other contended resource.
We did three things that helped a lot:
Call ThreadPool.SetMinThreads(400, 1) on app startup to make sure that the threadpool has enough threads to handle all the incoming requests from the start
Create a second App Service with the same code deployed to it. In the javascript, set the SignalR URL to point to that second instance. That way, all the SignalR requests go to one app service, and all the app's HTTP requests go to the other. Obviously this requires a SignalR backplane to be set up, but assuming your app service has more than 1 instance you'll have had to do this anyway
Review the code for any synchronous code paths (eg. making a non-async call to the database or to an API) and convert them to async code paths
So I'm developing an iOS app based on WKWebView. It's generated by Cordova. My problem is that every time I load the images from the server it may be slow coz the connection to the server is sometimes really slow.
I tried to save the images to cache but it still can be slow sometimes coz I found in the console that my WKWebView is still gonna talk to the server (304) to verify the version of my cached images.
Is there any method that I can use to block that 304 request and load cached images directly?
I believe WKWebView should automatically (or rather by default) take advantage of the caching hints in your HTTP header. You need to set-up/increase leverage browser caching on your sever. How you do this depends on what server you're using, but it is generally easy to do. Using the Apache web server you need to edit your server config (usually at /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf) to Include conf/extra/httpd-leverage-cacheing.conf and edit that sub-config file as needed. Typically, images are considered good to use for 1 to 4 weeks, depending on how often they change.
So I fixed this lag problem by changing into a linux server instead of a node server. That's it lol.
Hi
I've been working on a medium sized MVC project. It works fine on the localhost at a good speed rate. In each page, there's a lot of server-side data retrieved, I use a lot of jquery to minimize the traffic to the server, but even then, the webpage loads very slowly. There are many events on which I retrieve json results, to get a specific number from the database and make calculations, this data takes a long time to be retrieved on the webpage, although on the localhost it is immediately shown. Also, when I submit pages, it takes awfully a lot of time to submit. I've published my project to GoDaddy's server and also my database is there. What could be the problem that is making the project that slow? How can I minimize it? And why is it only when the website is online and not on the localhost too?
As such, issue can be anywhere and only certain way to know is instrumenting the code. I will suggest that you add simple logging traces with date-time stamp in your server code (note that logging should be configurable, any logging framework (including System.Diagnostic.Trace) should support it) and check where the time is spent. For example, database trips can be expensive etc. If you don't find the culprit on server side code i.e. sever is serving the request in reasonable time then you have to look at the performance over network. Tools such as Fiddler (or Firefox) should help you here - sometimes issuing too many requests from browser is also problematic because browser may make only n concurrent requests or even server may have been configured to accept only n requests from particular client - this could result in serialization of request increasing total response time. These scenarios are difficult to catch on localhost because network latency is almost zero there. You may also use tool such as YSlow for related performance improvement suggestions. But please do your investigation first, find the bottlenecks and then ask for solutions to specific problems.
Run it in chrome. Turn on the developer tools. Expand the Console. watch for errors. Also from there you can monitor those network calls to see which is slow.
if MVC uses entity framework (based on LINQ), it will sure be slow
because LINQ is slow compared to the old ADO.NET
I have a website that is hanging every 5 or 10 requests. When it works, it works fast, but if you leave the browser sit for a couple minutes and then click a link, it just hangs without responding. The user has to push refresh a few times in the browser and then it runs fast again.
I'm running .NET 3.5, ASP.NET MVC 1.0 on IIS 7.0 (Windows Server 2008). The web app connects to a SQLServer 2005 DB that is running locally on the same instance. The DB has about 300 Megs of RAM and the rest is free for web requests I presume.
It's hosted on GoGrid's cloud servers, and this instance has 1GB of RAM and 1 Core. I realize that's not much, but currently I'm the only one using the site, and I still receive these hangs.
I know it's a difficult thing to troubleshoot, but I was hoping that someone could point me in the right direction as to possible IIS configuration problems, or what the "rough" average hardware requirements would be using these technologies per 1000 users, etc. Maybe for a webserver the minimum I should have is 2 cores so that if it's busy you still get a response. Or maybe the slashdot people are right and I'm an idiot for using Windows period, lol. In my experience though, it's usually MY algorithm/configuration error and not the underlying technology's fault.
Any insights are appreciated.
What diagnistics are available to you? Can you tell what happens when the user first hits the button? Does your application see that request, and then take ages to process it, or is there a delay and then your app gets going and works as quickly as ever? Or does that first request just get lost completely?
My guess is that there's some kind of paging going on, I beleive that Windows tends to have a habit of putting non-recently used apps out of the way and then paging them back in. Is that happening to your app, or the DB, or both?
As an experiment - what happens if you have a sneekly little "howAreYou" page in your app. Does the tiniest possible amount of work, such as getting a use count from the db and displaying it. Have a little monitor client hit that page every minute or so. Measure Performance over time. Spikes? Consistency? Does the very presence of activity maintain your applicaition's presence and prevent paging?
Another idea: do you rely on any caching? Do you have any kind of aging on that cache?
Your application pool may be shutting down because of inactivity. There is an Idle Time-out setting per pool, in minutes (it's under the pool's Advanced Settings - Process Model). It will take some time for the application to start again once it shuts down.
Of course, it might just be the virtualization like others suggested, but this is worth a shot.
Is the site getting significant traffic? If so I'd look for poorly-optimized queries or queries that are being looped.
Your configuration sounds fine assuming your overall traffic is relatively low.
To many data base connections without being release?
Connecting some service/component that is causing timeout?
Bad resource release?
Network traffic?
Looping queries or in code logic?