Can you use oAuth to only authenticate like you can with Twitter?
If you check Google's docs at http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/docs/OAuth2.html you'll find that the scope (meaning, the service you're supposed to ask permission to) is a required field.
It may be a turn off for many users if you ask them to access their contact list when the most you really do is authenticate, so I rather stick with OpenID which is designed just to retrieve the UID.
So, the answer is really NO, unless you're planning on using an additional API with Google.
OAuth is an authorization protocol and can't be used for authentication only unless the provider defines a dummy scope which, in effect, authorizes you to access "nothing", or "basic user info" (name, e-mail, etc.).
AFAIK, Google provides no such "dummy" scope. However, they do implement OpenID for such authentication purposes, as the protocol is better suited for that task, anyways.
Yes you can there are many options it depens on your platform advice you to check
oauth.net
You can find there options for Java, .NET, Cold Fusion,PHP,etc.
There are many Frameworks that have OAuth capabilities, on Spring you can use this
Sounds like there is some plans afoot on this...
http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2011/03/making-auth-easier-oauth-20-for-google.html?showComment=1300267218233#c6336940633709651714
some chap:
"Can someone help by pointing to the documentation for the API of "just get basic information for a user"
other chap:
"The problem is, that you get a lot of different login mechanisms because Twitter is using OAuth 1.0 (Or am I wrong?), Facebook is using OAuth 2.0 and Google is using OpenID for login. Please correct me if I´m wrong. So basically I have the same question.
Will Google support login for basic user informations with OAuth 2.0 for Google APIs?"
google dude:
"Today we're supporting OpenID for login, but we've heard your pain about mess of different identity protocols on the web. Stay tuned :)"
Seems to me, as OAuth2 covers authentication and authorization, it would make sense to allow basic info and make it easy on the integrator using one method for all
I'm plumping for this possibility anyway, hopefully by the time I'm ready to put my app live it will be available from Google - Facebook has this anyway and in my case that's a big enough draw
Related
I am trying to understand in what scenarios I should be using oauth. From reading the spec, I understand that you are essentially delegating identification to a 3rd party.
So if we take the example stackoverflow's login page you get
Oauth2 is being used for google and facebook, how do I determine what stackoverflow is using (when entering username and password directly)? Would that also be oauth 2? If it is using oauth, how would I go about understanding which flow they use?
Your question is a little unclear but what I think you're asking is if SO or some other site uses oAuth for all their authentication schemes. They could. If they using oAuth with user password authentication when you authenticate, the response you get back should have an Authorization Token and a Refresh Token in it that you would then use to authenticate on each successive request. Hope this helps. oAuth isn't a technology it's a protocol on how to do authentication in a better way.
See what is the request URL when you click to log in with gmail...
https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?passive=1209600&continue=https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?client_id%3D717762328687-p17pldm5fteklla3nplbss3ai9slta0a.apps.googleusercontent.com%26scope%3Dprofile%2Bemail%26redirect_uri%3Dhttps://stackauth.com/auth/oauth2/google%26state%3D%257B%2522sid%2522:1,%2522st%2522:%2522e35d652c26ae7fad9b61f6176cc93f2eb9bbb240c32231bc95f8270176d7a5d5%2522,%2522ses%2522:%252291fdf487240d4fa38576f780ad448f55%2522%257D%26response_type%3Dcode%26from_login%3D1%26as%3D-8520e47ae71bbb4&oauth=1&sarp=1&scc=1#identifier
Does that auth2 means oauth 2 ? I think so
UPD: As I understand OAuth mechanism is supported by 3-rd part. SO could use their own oauth for direct enter, or standard auttentication. It is up to SO.
To keep it short and easy:
If you want to add authentication to your application and you want to leave some security heavilifting to big companies like Facebook, Google and Stackoverflow it is generally a good idea if you do not know precisely how to handle such a delicate task and/or you are not using a specific Auth tool / framework.
On the other hand, from the user perspective, the application will be far more user friendly (just one click authorization instead of a painful registration).
If you want a much more detailed technical explanation I suggest you to read this other Stackoverflow post:
OAuth 2.0: Benefits and use cases — why?
I'd like to extend django-allauth to include other third party OAuth providers (e.g., SurveyMonkey, Qualtrics, etc). I haven't been able to find a good tutorial on how to extend django-allauth. Does anyone have any recommendations for how to get started, which classes to write, and how to format/customize URLs for the OAuth flow?
I am already using it to authenticate using Google and Twitter, but I'm finding that many of my users already have accounts on other services that would be more compelling for our use case. Any pointers here would be greatly appreciated!
You can take a look at this PR, it is adding slack as an OAuth provider.
https://github.com/pennersr/django-allauth/pull/1410/files
I would like to know if One Drive supports those four ways of Authorization. Please refer to this link. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749#page-23
We are integrating our DVR and NVR with One Drive now and we need to understand which authorization method One Drive supports. We are trying to use OneDrive with embedded ARM processors, so the user does not have access to a browser as they would for a web-app.
Please kindly advise how we should proceed from here. Thanks for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
Best Wishes,
Ted Yang
I am going to say yes, OneDrive probably supports those ways of authorization, because on their authentication documentations page they say the following:
The OneDrive API uses the standard OAuth 2.0 authentication scheme to authenticate users and generate access tokens.
That link takes us to the oauth.net site page for OAuth 2.0. On that page, we find the following:
The final version of the spec can be found at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749
which is the document you linked. The OneDrive API documentation says it supports OAuth 2.0, and your linking the definition of OAuth 2.0, so I think it's safe to say it's supported. How to use it is another question entirely, and one I am unable to answer.
I will note, however, that on the OAuth page, they have this to say about it's uses (emphasis mine):
OAuth 2.0 focuses on client developer simplicity while providing specific authorization flows for web applications, desktop applications, mobile phones, and living room devices.
I would presume that living room devices could include DVRs, and although your DVRs are for security purposes, the development of cloud storage APIs for either would undoubtedly be similar. So I would say this is probably quite possible.
How to do it:
First things first, you'll need to register your app. This gets you a client id and a client secret which you'll need. Registration directions
There are two methods: token flow and code flow. Token flow is two steps, and code flow is three steps. However token flow uses tokens that expire, so it would require the user to reenter thigns periodically. You therefor want to use code flow. Here's some directions for that.
Basically the steps of the code flow are:
Get an authorization code
User authorization code to get an access token
User access token to make API calls
You WILL need to make HTTP requests. I'm sure you should be able to do this with ARM embedded C. However, step 1 is what gives you to the Microsoft account login page. I am note sure how to circumvent this, exactly. I'm not sure you're supposed to be ABLE to circumvent this, since Microsoft doesn't want you handling their customers' passwords.
They have an example in Javascript that might give useful details on oauth in the oauth.js file. Javascript sample project
I am currently using OpenID as a relying-party to implement federated login on a website I'm developing. However cursory Google searches indicate that OpenID does not play well with web-services which I'd like to expose. However every tutorial, explanation or library seems oriented towards gaining access to a resource held by a 3rd party, Flickr library, Gmail address-book etc. Is it possible to use OAuth for this or am I barking up the wrong tree?
OAuth is not an appropriate technology to use here.
I would like to offer authenticated API access to my web app. The consumers of such a service are typically other web sites/services.
What would be the best method of authenticating these users? OAuth, openID, http authentication?
As so much in our line of work, the answer to "which is best?" is "it depends." :)
HTTP Authentication - If you're already letting clients log in to your service via an ID and password, you'll probably only have to do minimal work to get this to play nicely with your API. If your API is basically mono-purpose and doesn't require detailed permissions, you can get something working fairly quickly here.
API Token - If you want clients to be able to authenticate easily without providing a password (think companies that build a service that interacts with your API; maybe the IT dept. doesn't want the dev. team knowing the passwords; etc.), then attaching a random API token à la GitHub to the user account is probably the quickest way to go. As a bonus, you can supply a method for regenerating the API token without having to change the account password.
OAuth - If you have multiple permissions or want finer-grained control over how and when a client can access your API, OAuth is a pretty good bet (OAuth2 is much easier to work with, IMO, and supports multiple methods of obtaining an access token). Furthermore, many languages have libraries, gems, etc. that will allow them to simplify the OAuth workflow.
I would say the "best" method is oAuth. It's more flexible and it can be application independant for further uses .
I am using oAuth to authenticate my clients (applications).
;)