I have a view model with a collection of other objects in it.
public ParentViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<ChildViewModel> Child { get; set; }
}
public ChildViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
}
In one of my views I pass in a ParentViewModel as the model, and then use
<%: Html.EditorFor(x => x) %>
Which display a form for the Id and Name properties.
When the user clicks a button I call an action via Ajax to load in a partial view which takes a collection of Child:
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<IEnumerable<Child>>" %>
<%: Html.EditorFor(x => x) %>
which then uses the custom template Child to display a form for each Child passed in.
The problem I'm having is that the form created by the Child custom template does not use the naming conventions used by the DefaultModelBinder.
ie the field name is (when loaded by Ajax):
[0].FirstName
instead of:
Child[0].FirstName
So the Edit action in my controller:
[HttpPost]
public virtual ActionResult Edit(int id, FormCollection formValues)
{
ParentViewModel parent = new ParentViewModel();
UpdateModel(parent);
return View(parent);
}
to recreate a ParentViewModel from the submitted form does not work.
I'm wondering what the best way to accomplish loading in Custom Templates via Ajax and then being able to use UpdateModel is.
Couple of things to start with is that you need to remember the default ModelBinder is recursive and it will try and work out what it needs to do ... so quite clever. The other thing to remember is you don't need to use the html helpers, actual html works fine as well :-)
So, first with the Model, nothing different here ..
public class ParentViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<ChildViewModel> Child { get; set; }
}
public class ChildViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
}
Parent partial view - this takes an instance of the ParentViewModel
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<ParentViewModel>" %>
<h2>Parent</h2>
<%: Html.TextBox("parent.Name", Model.Name) %>
<%: Html.Hidden("parent.Id", Model.Id) %>
<% foreach (ChildViewModel childViewModel in Model.Child)
{
Html.RenderPartial("Child", childViewModel);
}
%>
Child partial view - this takes a single instance of the ChildViewModel
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<ChildViewModel>" %>
<h3>Child</h3>
<%: Html.Hidden("parent.Child.index", Model.Id) %>
<%: Html.Hidden(string.Format("parent.Child[{0}].Id", Model.Id), Model.Id)%>
<%: Html.TextBox(string.Format("parent.Child[{0}].FirstName", Model.Id), Model.FirstName) %>
Something to note at this point is that the index value is what is used for working out the unique record in the list. This does not need to be incremental value.
So, how do you call this? Well in the Index action which is going to display the data it needs to be passed in. I have setup some demo data and returned it in the ViewData dictionary to the index view.
So controller action ...
public ActionResult Index()
{
ViewData["Message"] = "Welcome to ASP.NET MVC!";
ViewData["Parent"] = GetData();
return View();
}
private ParentViewModel GetData()
{
var result = new ParentViewModel
{
Id = 1,
Name = "Parent name",
Child = new List<ChildViewModel>
{
new ChildViewModel {Id = 2, FirstName = "first child"},
new ChildViewModel {Id = 3, FirstName = "second child"}
}
};
return result;
}
In the real world you would call a data service etc.
And finally the contents of the Index view:
<form action="<%: Url.Action("Edit") %>" method="post">
<% if (ViewData["Parent"] != null) { %>
<%
Html.RenderPartial("Parent", ViewData["Parent"]); %>
<% } %>
<input type="submit" />
</form>
Saving
So now we have the data displayed how do we get it back into an action? Well this is something which the default model binder will do for you on simple data types in relatively complex formations. So you can setup the basic format of the action which you want to post to as:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(ParentViewModel parent)
{
}
This will give you the updated details with the original ids (from the hidden fields) so you can update/edit as required.
New children through Ajax
You mentioned in your question loading in custom templates via ajax, do you mean how to give the user an option of adding in another child without postback?
If so, you do something like this ...
Add action - Need an action which will return a new ChildViewModel
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Add()
{
var result = new ChildViewModel();
result.Id = 4;
result.FirstName = "** to update **";
return View("Child", result);
}
I've given it an id for easy of demo purposes.
You then need a way of calling the code, so the only view you need to update is the main Index view. This will include the javascript to get the action result, the link to call the code and a target HTML tag for the html to be appended to. Also don't forget to add your reference to jQuery in the master page or at the top of the view.
Index view - updated!
<script type="text/javascript">
function add() {
$.ajax(
{
type: "POST",
url: "<%: Url.Action("Add", "Home") %>",
success: function(result) {
$('#newchild').after(result);
},
error: function(req, status, error) {
}
});
}
</script>
<form action="<%: Url.Action("Edit") %>" method="post">
<% if (ViewData["Parent"] != null) { %>
<%
Html.RenderPartial("Parent", ViewData["Parent"]); %>
<% } %>
<div id="newchild"></div>
<br /><br />
<input type="submit" /> add child
</form>
This will call the add action, and append the response when it returns to the newChild div above the submit button.
I hope the long post is useful.
Enjoy :-)
Hmm... i personally would recommend to use a JSON result, instead of a HTML result, that you fiddle in the page...
makes the system cleaner. and your postback working ;-)
I found another way to accomplish this which works in my particular situation.
Instead of loading in a partial via via Ajax that is strongly typed to a child collection like:
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<IEnumerable<Child>>" %>
I created a strongly typed view to the parent type and then called EditorFor on the list like so:
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<Parent>" %>
<%: Html.EditorFor(x => x.ChildList) %>
This then calls a Custom Display Template and the result is that all the HTML elements get named correctly and the Default Model binder can put everything back together.
Related
I need to pass multiple data ( probably 2 Html.DropDownList's selected values ) to MVC controller action method from MVC View ( .aspx). I think it would be from somehow Html.Hidden form , but how?
I am unable to get the selected value from Html.DropDownList and pass it as Html.Hidden("paramName", MvcStringSelectedValue) to controller's action.
My Code is :
based on<br />
<%: Html.DropDownList("Semester")%>
<%= Html.Hidden("strSemesterToBaseOn",returnedValueFromAbove)%>
<%: Html.ValidationSummary(true) %>
<input type="submit" value="Clone" />
<% } %>
<br/><br/>
Do I need to write the input tag of "submitt" 2 times or just only once?
Edit ( EXTRA CODE )
Controller's action method :
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult CloneSemesterData(string strSemesterToOrganize, string strSemesterToBaseOn)
{
.............................................................
..............................
}
HERE ( another Controller's method ) IS THE DROP DOWN LIST Filled with Semester values
public ActionResult DepartmentAdministration()
{
// Get list of semesters
var lr = new ListRepository();
ViewData["Semester"] = new SelectList(lr.ListSemester(3)); //this ListSemester(3) will generate the list with 3 strings ( e.g "WS 2012", "SS2010")
return View();
}
My View code in .aspx file is :
//this executes when radioButton ="Clone" is selected
<% using (Html.BeginForm("CloneSemesterData", "CourseNeededHours"))
{%>
<%= Html.DropDownList("Semester")%> // this is First drop down list box , from which selected value , I want to transfer as 1st parameter of controller's action method
<%: Html.ValidationSummary(true) %>
based On
<%= Html.DropDownList("Semester")%> //this is Second drop down list box, from which selected value, I want to transfer as 2nd parameter of controller's action method.
<input type="submit" value="Clone" />
<% } %>
ERROR:
Now, after fixing using Edit 2 : it is giving red lines under
as it is somehow not recognizing the ViewData["SemesterList"]...
"System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper does not contain a definition for 'DropDownList' and the best extension method overloaded 'System.Web.Mvc.Html.SelectExtensions.DropDownList(System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper, string,System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable') has some invalid arguments".
Hope now it will clear, still ambiguity , do let me know then.
Regards
Usman
I am not really sure what you're asking here. You don't need any kind of hidden field to post the selected values of a dropdown. Your Dropdownlist code is invalid to begin with.
Typically you have something like this:
<%= Html.DropDownList("SemesterToOrganize", GetSemesterToOrganize()) %>
<%= Html.DropDownList("SemesterToBaseOn", GetSemesterToBaseOn()) %>
And in your controller:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult MyAction(string SemesterToOrganize, string SemesterToBaseOn) {
// your code.
}
EDIT:
Based on what you've told us. You are relying on the behavior of MVC of populating the DropDownList because you are adding your list to the ViewData with the same name as your dropdownlist. This won't work for you. You will have to populate each dropdown list seperately.
In your controller, do something like this:
public ActionResult MyAction ()
{
ViewData["SemesterList"] = // list of semesters
return View();
}
Then, in your view you have:
<%= Html.DropDownList("SemesterToOrganize", ViewData["SemesterList"]) %>
<%= Html.DropDownList("SemesterToBaseOn", ViewData["SemesterList"]) %>
then your post method
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult MyAction(string SemesterToOrganize, string SemesterToBaseOn) {
// your code.
}
If you want to continue to argue that you can do it your way, then you won't solve your problem. Each dropdown must have it's own unique id, otherwise it will not post correctly. The only way to solve this problem is to give each it's own unique id. That breaks the behavior of the drop down automatically getting the data, so you MUST specify the list of data explicitly.
So stop arguing that this is an unimportant part of the problem. It's not. It's key to the problem.
EDIT2:
Based on your code above:
<%= Html.DropDownList("strSemesterToOrganize", (SelectList)ViewData["Semester"]) %>
<%= Html.DropDownList("strSemesterToBaseOn", (SelectList)ViewData["Semester"]) %>
That's all you need
If you had just given us this, and didn't argue, this would been solved a lot easier.
// Try this. Change names and put in the appropriate namespace.
//Your view
#model MvcApplication2.Models.CloneSemesterDataViewModel
#Html.LabelFor(x => x.SemesterToOrganize)
#Html.DropDownListFor(x => x.SemesterToOrganize, Model.ListofSemestersToOrganize)
--------
#Html.LabelFor(x => x.SemesterToBaseOn)
#Html.DropDownListFor(x => x.SemesterToBaseOn, Model.ListofSemestersToBaseOn)
//view model
namespace MvcApplication2.Models
{
public class CloneSemesterDataViewModel
{
public string SemesterToOrganize { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> ListofSemestersToOrganize
{
get
{
return new List<SelectListItem> { new SelectListItem { Text = "SS2012" , Value = "SS2012"} };
}
}
public string SemesterToBaseOn { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> ListofSemestersToBaseOn
{
get
{
return new List<SelectListItem> { new SelectListItem { Text = "SS2012", Value = "SS2012" } };
}
}
}
}
----------
Controller.
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult CloneSemesterData(CloneSemesterDataViewModel viewModel)
{
//viewModel.SemesterToBaseOn
//viewModel.SemesterToOrganize
}
// This should do the trick.
I created a drop down list in a partial view and I am trying to render that on my aspx page. I am getting an error:
{"Error executing child request for handler 'System.Web.Mvc.HttpHandlerUtil+ServerExecuteHttpHandlerAsyncWrapper'."}
This is my aspx page where I am using the ascx control:
<td>
<% Html.RenderAction("getFilterdData");%>
</td>
My ascx control looks like this:
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<IEnumerable<assist>>" %>
<%=Html.DropDownList("Assists", (SelectList)ViewData["Assists"], "--Select One--")%>
and my controller code is like this:
public ActionResult getFilterdData()
{
scorerep sc = new scorerep();
ViewData["Assists"] = new SelectList(sc.FilterData(), "assist_a","");
return View();
}
Why am I getting this error and how can I fix it?
It is difficult to help without seeing the entire exception stacktrace. Here are a few tips:
Make sure that your partial Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<IEnumerable<assist>>" and not Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<IEnumerable<assist>>". You are using an ASCX partial and inheriting from System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage which is wrong.
Make sure that your partial view is called exactly the same as the controller action: getFilterdData.ascx (I see a typo here)
Make sure that the Assist class contains a property called assist_a as that's what you are using when rendering the dropdown
Make sure there is no exception being thrown inside the getFilterdData controller action while you are fetching the data.
Here's a working example:
Model:
public class Assist
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
Controller:
public class HomeController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
public ActionResult GetFilteredData()
{
// TODO: replace with your repository logic
ViewData["Assists"] = new SelectList(new[] {
new Assist { Id = "1", Value = "Assist 1" },
new Assist { Id = "2", Value = "Assist 2" },
new Assist { Id = "3", Value = "Assist 3" },
}, "Id", "Value");
return View();
}
}
View (~/Views/Home/Index.aspx):
<% Html.RenderAction("GetFilteredData"); %>
Partial: (~/Views/Home/GetFilteredData.ascx):
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<IEnumerable<Assist>>" %>
<%= Html.DropDownList("Assists", (SelectList)ViewData["Assists"], "--Select One--") %>
I have created an editor template for representing selecting from a dynamic dropdown list and it works as it should except for validation, which I have been unable to figure out. If the model has the [Required] attribute set, I want that to invalidate if the default option is selected.
The view model object that must be represented as the dropdown list is Selector:
public class Selector
{
public int SelectedId { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<Pair<int, string>> Choices { get; private set; }
public string DefaultValue { get; set; }
public Selector()
{
//For binding the object on Post
}
public Selector(IEnumerable<Pair<int, string>> choices, string defaultValue)
{
DefaultValue = defaultValue;
Choices = choices;
}
}
The editor template looks like this:
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl" %>
<select class="template-selector" id="<%= ViewData.ModelMetadata.PropertyName %>.SelectedId" name="<%= ViewData.ModelMetadata.PropertyName %>.SelectedId">
<%
var model = ViewData.ModelMetadata.Model as QASW.Web.Mvc.Selector;
if (model != null)
{
%>
<option><%= model.DefaultValue %></option><%
foreach (var choice in model.Choices)
{
%>
<option value="<%= choice.Value1 %>"><%= choice.Value2 %></option><%
}
}
%>
</select>
I sort of got it to work by calling it from the view like this (where Category is a Selector):
<%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(n => n.Category.SelectedId)%>
But it shows the validation error for not supplying a proper number and it does not care if I set the Required attribute.
I found a solution where validation is done against hidden fields using custom validation rules, here. Using this approach you can easily add custom validation to arbitrary types.
Why is not your editor template strongly typed?
<%# Control Language="C#"
Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<QASW.Web.Mvc.Selector>" %>
Why not use the DropDownListFor helper:
<%= Html.DropDownListFor(
x => x.SelectedId,
new SelectList(Model.Choices, "Value1", "Value2")
)%>
To avoid the magic strings you could add a ChoicesList property to your view model:
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> ChoicesList
{
get
{
return Choices.Select(x => new SelectListItem
{
Value = x.Value1.ToString(),
Text = x.Value2
});
}
}
and bind your helper to it:
<%= Html.DropDownListFor(x => x.SelectedId, Model.ChoicesList) %>
MVC isn't generating the client-side validation rules for my viewmodel. The HTML just contains this:
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
if (!window.mvcClientValidationMetadata) { window.mvcClientValidationMetadata = []; }
window.mvcClientValidationMetadata.push({"Fields":[],"FormId":"form0","ReplaceValidationSummary":false});
//]]>
</script>
Note that Fields[] is empty!
My view is strongly-typed and uses the new strongly-typed HTML helpers (TextBoxFor(), etc).
View Model / Domain Model
public class ItemFormViewModel
{
public Item Item { get; set; }
[Required] [StringLength(100)] public string Whatever { get; set; } // for demo
}
[MetadataType(typeof(ItemMetadata))]
public class Item
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string SKU { get; set; }
public int QuantityRequired { get; set; }
// etc.
}
public class ItemMetadata
{
[Required] [StringLength(100)] public string Name { get; set; }
[Required] [StringLength(50)] public string SKU { get; set; }
[Range(0, Int32.MaxValue)] public int QuantityRequired { get; set; }
// etc.
}
(I know I'm using a domain model as my / as part of my view model, which isn't a good practice, but disregard that for now.)
View
<%# Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master"
Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<ItemFormViewModel>" %>
<asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="MainContent" runat="server">
<h2>Editing item: <%= Html.Encode(Model.Item.Name) %></h2>
<% Html.EnableClientValidation(); %>
<%= Html.ValidationSummary("Could not save the item.") %>
<% using (Html.BeginForm()) { %>
<%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Item.Name) %>
<%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Item.SKU) %>
<%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Item.QuantityRequired) %>
<%= Html.HiddenFor(model => model.Item.ItemID) %>
<%= Html.TextBox("Whatever", Model.Whatever) %>
<input type="submit" value="Save" />
<% } %>
</asp:Content>
I included the Whatever property on the view model because I suspected that MVC wasn't recursively inspecting the sub-properties of ItemFormViewModel.Item, but even that isn't being validated? I've even tried delving into the MVC framework source code but have come up empty. What could be going on?
About five seconds after I posted the question, I realized something: My view didn't have ValidationMessage placeholders anywhere. I added <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Item.Name) %> and lo and behold, MVC added validation rules for Item.Name to the JS block at the bottom of the page.
It turns out that MVC does not emit client-side validation rules for a field unless you actually do one of the following:
Call Html.ValidationMessage() for the property.
Call Html.Validate() for the property. (This one won't output error messages)
Render the controls using Html.EditorForModel(). (source)
Doing any of these tells MVC, "This property of my viewmodel is editable by the user, so you should be validating it." Just using the HTML helper to stick a textbox on the page -- even if you're using the new strongly-typed helpers -- isn't enough.
I have had no luck getting this to work in MVC 2 RC. According to other questions here on SO, you have to get the MicrosoftMvcJQueryValidation.js file from the MVC Futures release, hold your left foot behind your head, and whistle Dixie for half an hour. I did this and more and have not been able to make it work.
Hopefully it will be fixed in RTM.
I've read several different posts on paging w/ in MVC but none describe a scenario where I have something like a search form and then want to display the results of the search criteria (with paging) beneath the form once the user clicks submit.
My problem is that, the paging solution I'm using will create <a href="..."> links that will pass the desired page like so: http://mysite.com/search/2/ and while that's all fine and dandy, I don't have the results of the query being sent to the db in memory or anything so I need to query the DB again.
If the results are handled by the POST controller action for /Search and the first page of the data is rendered as such, how do I get the same results (based on the form criteria specified by the user) when the user clicks to move to page 2?
Some javascript voodoo? Leverage Session State? Make my GET controller action have the same variables expected by the search criteria (but optional), when the GET action is called, instantiate a FormCollection instance, populate it and pass it to the POST action method (there-by satisfying DRY)?
Can someone point me in the right direction for this scenario or provide examples that have been implemented in the past? Thanks!
My method is to have an Action that handles both the post and the get scenarios.
This is my which can be handled by both GET and POST methods:
public ViewResult Index([DefaultValue(1)] int page,
[DefaultValue(30)] int pageSize,
string search,
[DefaultValue(0)] int regionId,
[DefaultValue(0)] int eventTypeId,
DateTime? from,
DateTime? to)
{
var events = EventRepo.GetFilteredEvents(page, pageSize, search, regionId, eventTypeId, from, to);
var eventFilterForm = EventService.GetEventFilterForm(from, to);
var eventIndexModel = new EventIndexModel(events, eventFilterForm);
return View("Index", eventIndexModel);
}
The eventFilterForm is a presentation model that contains some IEnumerable<SelectListItem> properties for my search form.
The eventIndexModel is a presentation model that combines the eventFilterForm and the results of the search - events
The events is a special type of IPagedList. You can get more information and code for that here and here. The first link talks about IPagedList where as the second link has an Advanced Paging scenario which you should need.
The advanced paging has the following method that I use:
public static string Pager(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper, int pageSize, int currentPage, int totalItemCount, RouteValueDictionary valuesDictionary)
And I use it like so:
<%= Html.Pager(Model.Events.PageSize,
Model.Events.PageNumber,
Model.Events.TotalItemCount,
new
{
action = "index",
controller = "search",
search = ViewData.EvalWithModelState("Search"),
regionId = ViewData.EvalWithModelState("RegionId"),
eventTypeId = ViewData.EvalWithModelState("EventTypeId"),
from = ViewData.EvalDateWithModelState("From"),
to = ViewData.EvalDateWithModelState("To")
}) %>
This creates links that look like:
/event/search?regionId=4&eventTypeId=39&from=2009/09/01&to=2010/08/31&page=3
HTHs,
Charles
Ps. EvalWithModelState is below:
PPs. If you are going to put dates into get variables - I would recommend reading my blog post on it... :-)
/// <summary>
/// Will get the specified key from ViewData. It will first look in ModelState
/// and if it's not found in there, it'll call ViewData.Eval(string key)
/// </summary>
/// <param name="viewData">ViewDataDictionary object</param>
/// <param name="key">Key to search the dictionary</param>
/// <returns>Value in ModelState if it finds one or calls ViewData.Eval()</returns>
public static string EvalWithModelState(this ViewDataDictionary viewData, string key)
{
if (viewData.ModelState.ContainsKey(key))
return viewData.ModelState[key].Value.AttemptedValue;
return (viewData.Eval(key) != null) ? viewData.Eval(key).ToString() : string.Empty;
}
Make the Search parameter part of your View Model:
public SearchViewModel
{
string SearchParameters { get; set; }
List<SearchObjects> SearchResults { get;set; }
}
Then just set the Search Textbox equal to SearchParameters.
You cannot "store" the search query unless you bring back ALL results and then store those in the page somehow. That is horribly inefficient. The web is stateless, so you will have to go back to the database and re-query for more results.
I understand what you are saying; you could change the form to use buttons and post the page back everytime. Or, you could pass all the criteria in the URL for the paging as querystring variables. Or you could use JQuery to do the post (it has a $.post method that can be invoked from a link click or other click (http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.post/).
HTH.
This problem goes away if you include the search text, as well as the current results page, in your querystring instead of POSTing the search text. As an added benefit, your users can then bookmark their search results.
To do this your search button just needs to build the GET request URL using the current value of the search box. This can be done either in javascript or by using GET as your search form's method attribute, e.g. <form method="get" action="/search">.
I recommend cacheing your search results and giving them an ID. Then for each paging link, you can reference the search ID as a parameter (on each search page link) and in your action, pull it from cache, then query over it.
Using this method, you don't need to worry about anything other than the first POST submit of the search form.
Refer to my post for more details.
I had this same problem and here's what I did.
Download PagedList from Nuget
Change your form to do a GET and create a ViewModel type similiar to this (if you love AdventureWorks and Model Binding as much as I do):
`
using PagedList;
namespace SearchFormResultPagingExample.Models {
public class SearchViewModel {
public int? Page { get; set; }
public string EmailAddress { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public IPagedList<Contact> SearchResults { get; set; }
public string SearchButton { get; set; }
}
}
`
3.Use the ViewModel as the parameter to your controller's action method
using System.Linq;
using System.Web.Mvc;
using SearchFormResultPagingExample.Models;
using PagedList; //NOTE: use Nuget to reference PagedList
namespace SearchFormResultPagingExample.Controllers {
public class SearchController : Controller {
const int RecordsPerPage = 25;
public ActionResult Index(SearchViewModel model) {
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(model.SearchButton) || model.Page.HasValue) {
var entities = new AdventureWorksEntities();
var results = entities.Contacts.Where(c => c.LastName.StartsWith(model.LastName) && c.EmailAddress.StartsWith(model.EmailAddress))
.OrderBy(o => o.LastName);
var pageIndex = model.Page ?? 0;
model.SearchResults = results.ToPagedList(pageIndex, 25);
}
return View(model);
}
}
}
Use the pager on in your View:
#model SearchFormResultPagingExample.Models.SearchViewModel
#using PagedList.Mvc;
<script src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery.validate.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script>
#using (Html.BeginForm("Index", "Search", FormMethod.Get)) {
#Html.ValidationSummary(false)
<fieldset>
<legend>Contact Search</legend>
<div class="editor-label">
#Html.LabelFor(model => model.EmailAddress)
</div>
<div class="editor-field">
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.EmailAddress)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.EmailAddress)
</div>
<div class="editor-label">
#Html.LabelFor(model => model.LastName)
</div>
<div class="editor-field">
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.LastName)
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.LastName)
</div>
<p>
<input name="SearchButton" type="submit" value="Search" />
</p>
</fieldset>
}
#if (Model.SearchResults != null && Model.SearchResults.Count > 0) {
foreach (var result in Model.SearchResults) {
<hr />
<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="*">
<div style="font-weight: bold; font-size:large;">#result.LastName, #result.FirstName</div>
#result.Title<br />
#result.Phone<br />
#result.EmailAddress
</td>
</tr>
</table>
}
<hr />
#Html.PagedListPager(Model.SearchResults,
page => Url.Action("Index", new RouteValueDictionary() {
{ "Page", page },
{ "EmailAddress", Model.EmailAddress },
{ "LastName", Model.LastName }
}),
PagedListRenderOptions.PageNumbersOnly)
}
MVC will coerce the querystring to and from your ViewModel type parameter. It's very slick!