I am trying to figure out how to determine the user which triggered a specific event when monitoring some files with inotify. Is that even possible? Does the inotify_event structure has something like this?
inotify_event doesn't have a field for that. Since inotify is asynchronous you can't catch the user in the act either.
Have you considered a fuse filesystem? I think LoggedFS (GPL2+) fits the bill.
Related
I need to monitor user changes on active record level with associations. This changes should be displayed on a stream like page. Since every user has different permission on different areas of my application also the audit stream has to be limited to their permissions.
I know about Paper trail (does not work on all type of relations:( ), Vestal versions, acts_as_audit and so on, but do not know what is the best practise to use this gems as described in my case.
What is the best practise to audit AR changes including associations and display in an activity stream with different user rights ?
A simple way to audit AR activities is provided by Rails with Observer.
Observer allows to add callback function on Models. You can then update an Acitivty model allowing to see what has been changed. Take note that Observer are independent of Controller. What or Whoever change your model should pass through your observer. The drawback is that it can slow down your application.
A more efficient but also more complicated way would be to use EventMachine. See this article for an introduction about it.
A way between EventMachine and Observer could be to use delayed jobs with Observers. If you have to compute something when auditing, it can allow you to do it without slowing down your application like a sleeping turtle. There's some good tips here about Delayed Jobs.
Further to my post on custom format clipboard, I am considering the possibility of writing my own custom clipboad monitoring component.
Prior to the statement:
ClipboardWindow:=SetClipboardViewer(Form1.Handle);
I have seen in a sample code I studied the following snippet:
OpenClipboard(Form1.Handle);
EmptyClipboard;
CloseClipboard;
whereas others don't include a cleaning code at all. I am confused.
I believe Clipbrd.TClipboard.Clear just does the same the VCL way.
My question is:
When clearing the clipboard before joining the clipboard chain is mandatory ?
No, there is no need to clear the clipboard. Indeed, you shouldn't. Other clipboard monitors will needlessly react to the update, and the user may want to paste that thing that you just destroyed.
Additionally, there is a lot more to clipboard chain monitoring than just adding yourself to the chain. You must pass the events along to the next window (result handle from SetClipboardViewer), and you must, without failure, remove yourself from the chain when your app exits. Also, you need to avoid blocking the clipboard unnecessarily. Typically, this means waiting to register for the clipboard events until you're ready to actually process events. For example, don't make it the first thing in your startup, if you're going to subsequently open a dialog asking the user where he wants to store the data, if he has a license key, etc..
I have tips, as well as common pitfalls here:
http://www.clipboardextender.com/developing-clipboard-aware-programs-for-windows/6
The rule is as simple as possible: if you want to delete the clipboard content (so other apps can't use it) delete it. if not, keep it.
You don't know if your use wants to keep the data OR You want to implement something fancy?
Do you know those applications (Paint Shop Pro is one of them) that are asking: "You left a large image (10MB of data) in clipboard. Do you want to keep it or clear it?"
You could do something similar. :)
I'm trying to detect the event of someone switching data services on/off from the options --> mobile network menu.
I've had limited success with RadioStatusListener and the pdpStateChange event. It fires on some phones/OS's
I think I'm able to detect most other ways you might lose/gain your data service but this one seems like my white whale.
I use BB OS's 4.5 and up.
Thanks in advance for any help.
I'm not aware of any direct way of listening for the configuration change you've highlighted, but if you want to know whether you have data coverage at all, you can use the CoverageStatusListener
I am creating one desktop application in which I want to track user activity on the system like opened Microsoft Excel with file name and worked for ... much of time on that..
I want to create on xml file to maintain that log.
Please provide me help on that.
This feels like one of those questions where you have to figure out what is meant by the question itself. Taken at face value, it sounds like you want to monitor how long a user spends in any process running in their session, however it may be that you only really want to know if, and for how long a user spends time in a specific subset of all running processes.
Since I'm not sure which of these is the correct assumption to make, I will address both as best I can.
Regardless of whether you are monitoring one or all processes, you need to know what processes are running when you start up, and you need to be notified when a new process is created. The first of these requirements can be met using the GetProcesses() method of the System.Diagnostics.Process class, the second is a tad more tricky.
One option for checking whether new processes exist is to call GetProcesses after a specified interval (polling) and determine whether the list of processes has changed. While you can do this, it may be very expensive in terms of system resources, especially if done too frequently.
Another option is to look for some mechanism that allows you to register to be notified of the creation of a new process asynchronously, I don't believe such a thing exists within the .NET Framework 2.0 but is likely to exist as part of the Win32 API, unfortunately I cant give you a specific function name because I don't know what it is.
Finally, however you do it, I recommend being as specific as you can about the notifications you choose to subscribe for, the less of them there are, the less resources are used generating and processing them.
Once you know what processes are running and which you are interested in you will need to determine when focus changes to a new process of interest so that you can time how long the user spends actually using the application, for this you can use the GetForegroundWindow function to get the window handle of the currently focused window.
As far as longing to an XML file, you can either use an external library such as long4net as suggested by pranay's answer, or you can build the log file using the XmlTextWriter or XmlDocument classes in the System.Xml namespace
I worked my way through the Prism guidance and think I got a grasp of most of their communication vehicles.
Commanding is very straightforward, so it is clear that the DelegateCommand will be used just to connect the View with its Model.
It is somewhat less clear, when it comes to cross Module Communication, specifically when to use EventAggregation over Composite Commands.
The practical effect is the same e.g.
You publish an event -> all subscribers receive notice and execute code in response
You execute a composite command -> all registered commands get executed and with it their attached code
Both work along the lines of "fire and forget", that is they don't care about any responses from their subscribers after firing the event/executing the commands.
I have trouble seeing a practical difference in usage although I understand that the implementation of both (under the hood) is very different.
So should we think of what it actually means - Event? Is that when something happens (an event occurs)? Something the user did not directly request like a "web request completed"?
And Command? Does that mean a user clicked something and thus issued a command to our application, requesting a service directly?
Is that it? Or are there other ways to determine when to use one of these communication vehicles over the other. The guidance, although one of the best documentations I read, gives no specific explanation.
So I hope people involved in/using Prism can help in shedding some light on this.
There are two primary differences between these two.
CanExecute for Commands. A Command
can say whether or not it is valid
for execution by calling
Command.RaiseCanExecuteChanged() and
having its CanExecute delegate
return false. If you consider the
case of a "Save All"
CompositeCommand compositing several
"Save" commands, but one of the
commands saying that it can't
execute, the Save All button will
automatically disable (nice!).
EventAggregator is a Messaging
pattern and Commands are a
Commanding pattern. Although
CompositeCommands are not explicitly
a UI pattern, it is implicitly so
(generally they are hooked up to an
input action, like a Button click).
EventAggregator is not this way -
any part of the application
effectively raise an EventAggregator
event: background processes,
ViewModels, etc. It is a
brokered avenue for messaging
across your application with support
for things like filtering,
background thread execution, etc.
Hope this helps explain the differences. It's more difficult to say when to use each, but generally I use the rule of thumb that if it's user interaction that raises the event, use a command for anything else, use EventAggregator.
Hope this helps.
Additionally, there is one more important difference: With the current implementation, an event from the EventAggregator is asynchronous, while the CompositeCommand is synchronous.
If you want to implement something like "notify that event X happened; do something that relies on the event handlers for event X to have executed", you either have to do something like Application.DoEvents() or use CompositeCommands.