We recently upgraded a major application to Visual Studio 2010.
Unfortunately, we are still using several database servers that are still running SQL Server 2000 (8.0.2055 to be precise).
According to this article (Link), "Since mainstream support for SQL Server 2000 ended on 04/08/2008, Visual Studio 2010 will only support debugging SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008.
We have a lot of stored procedures that we keep in Source Control and execute them from within Visual Studio whenever we need to update them.
Is there any way around this restriction? 3rd-party tool, anything.
While researching this, I saw a few sites that indicate an ODBC connection could be used to get to the SQL2000 box. I was able to create a System DSN and then a Data Connection within VS2010, but am unable to connect to it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Chris
The only way I've found so far is to extract our data library out of the project and keep it in VS 2008 targeted at 3.5 while we're building it. Once it's complete and ready, we open up the primary project in VS 2010, check out the changed files and then use the file system to copy the changed files over.
We then keep the supplementary 3.5 project in source control parallel to the primary project.
They will still build and function in .Net 4.0, but we have found that the IDE will not accept any connections or commands to them.
Related
i have a Mvc 4 project i would like to publish on a windows server 2012. On the windows server 2012 i have setup IIS 8 and Sql express. Do you know of a good guide to set this up? My issue is that i can't get the database working. I would like to make it so i can easily publish changes to the website. Any ideas how to do this?
is it possible to setup Visual studios on the server for the nuget package console?
the only way i have got this working was to copy the entire database to sql express but if i change anything i have to do it agian. Not a very stable solution.
Best regards John,
It's not exactly clear what the problem is, but I'll try to give a couple of pointers.
First, nuget shouldn't be involved in the deployment per se; it's involved when building the project, but once you get a deployment package it should contain everything the project needs - look at setting up the deployment using the visual studio built in tools, i.e. see this MSDN link.
The database is a separate side of this. You say you can't 'get it working' which I can't really help with since there's no details - you need to be familiar with connection strings and change your connection string during the deployment so your app can connect to the right database. The publishing wizard linked above can help with this as well, or you can use config transforms, or any number of other mechanisms.
Documentation here has details about what you can do on the database side. The publishing wizard (when using web deploy) can read the database schema and even make schema comparisons so you can deploy schema updates, but I've never actually used that solution - I usually need more control over what happens so I manage my schema upgrade and downgrade scripts myself.
Since there are many problems compounded in this question I suggest you ask a separate, more focused, question about each one.
I do have a serious problem , I can automate to create data tables ( included AspNetRoles/AspNetUsers/AspNetUserRoles/AspNEtUserLogins etc..) in Visual Studio 2015 with MSSQL/MySQL but how can I use Oracle to do the same thing, please do me a favor to give me solutions or any slight club.
From a different piece of software I have been working with in the past I had this same issue when I was lacking the Oracle ODBC drivers on the machine trying to connect to this database.
Could this maybe be the same problem you have here? In that case you would need to install the Orable ODBC connectors and then recreate the tables.
I'm considering using VS2012 RC to put together coded UI tests (since VS2010 SP2 FP2 does not fully support IE9).
Currently, my test projects are contained within a solution which is connected to our TFS team project. I also set up a build definition to build the project when new code is checked in (the builds are performed on our build machine).
I suppose that if I upgrade my solution to VS2012, then to be able to build the solution on the build machine I will need VS2012 RC installed there too, right? But then is it possible to specify in my build definition for my project to be built by VS2012 instead of VS2010?
Is it possible for me to upgrade my project with VS2012 while still using TFS2010? I should note my solution will be the only one upgraded to VS2012. All the other solutions in the company still need to be built by VS2010. A company-wide upgrade to VS2012 won't be in place for at least a few months, I imagine.
Or do I need a separate build machine or anything?
Any thoughts, ideas or solutions appreciated!
UPDATE: So I gave it a try, and everything worked okay. My only problem is that the Coded UI tests I have didn't work after being re-built on on my build machine, but I suppose that's probably something I'd need to ask about elsewhere. To clarify, the solution built successfully, but the tests still failed.
Visual Studio 2012's project changes allow most types to still be opened by Visual Studio 2010 with SP1, so it depends on what kind of projects are in your solution - see this page for the full compatibility list:
If you created your assets in Visual Studio 2010 with Service Pack 1
(SP1), many of them will load and run in Visual Studio 2012 without
any further action on your part. Many assets will also open again in
Visual Studio 2010 with SP1 without any issues, even after you open
those assets in Visual Studio 2012.
See also "Round-tripping with Visual Studio 11" on the VS blog which has more detail.
Note though that if your build process uses custom build activities then just installing Visual Studio 2012 breaks the build definition on your local machine, and also that MVC1 or MVC2 projects just aren't supported by VS2012. Oh, and Visual Studio 2012 isn't a RC any more, it was RTM'd last week.
(I presume you mean 2012 RTM rather than RC, now that the final release is available)
Theoretically (from what I've read) VS2012 and VS2010 use the same project/solution file format, so you should be able to switch between them without any compatibility issues (aside, presumably from obvious things like creating new file types that VS2010 doesn't understand)
TFS updates have historically been backwards compatible, so you can usually use different client and server versions (but usually you need a compatibility pack installed for old clients on new servers, a new client running against an old server has usualyl been fine). So I'd expect this to work well.
I'd say try it, but diff any files that appear in VCS2012's Pending Changes carefully before you check in to be sure that it hasn't changed anything that will cause problems. The worst that can happen then is that your development machine gets a "corrupt" version of the code and you'll need to revert to 2010.
(This is the approach I've been using with our 130-project C# solution, and so far (1 day) it's working fine, apart from the new UI making my eyes bleed as they try to find the information in all the indistinguishable monochrome clutter)
We are setting up a new TFS 2008 implementation as our first usage of TFS for source control. We have several projects in Visual Studio 2003, 2005 and 2008, as well as other script/non-Visual Studio based projects.
My question is, for the Visual Studio 2003 and 2005 projects do we have to install Team Explorer 2003/2005 and make use of them to add projects to source control and to check out/in files, or, can we just use Team Explorer 2008 to add projects and check in/out files? The thought being that the developer could use 2008 to check out any thing and then open the appropriate visual studio version to work on their local instance of the project before then checking it back in using team explorer 2008 within their local visual studio 2008 application.
The concern is that by using team explorer 2008, that visual studio 2008 might impose changes on the older systems solutions dll or control details.
Thanks for any guidance.
This is possible. I have colleagues who are using Team Explorer for non-code files (Word documents, help files, etc.) and use it like they would VSS or any other SCC.
As an added bonus, I'm pretty sure that TFS Server 2008 is backwards compatible to at least 2005 (haven't run against 2003 in awhile). IIRC, I've run VSTS 2005 For Developers against a 2008 TFS Server.
I would double-check for you, but I've recently recently re-imaged my dev machine and haven't re-installed 2005 (working on new stuff!).
As an aside, I've found TFS to be a huge timesaver as far as the whole dev process. The IDE integration is top notch, and the linked bug/task tracking and changesets, with alerts, notes, built-in queries and reports had me wondering how I ever got along w/o it.
HTH.
The Team Foundation Client for VS 2005 and VS 2008 can be installed side by side so there's no issue there (there isn't one for VS 2003, but you could probably use the MSSCCI provider).
You can however, if you want to, do all of your source control operations in VS 2008 (or the Windows Explorer extensions in the latest power tools) but work on the projects from VS 2003/2005 without any issues. You just need to make sure you don't accidentally open the project files from within VS 2008 because that will upgrade the project format.
i did an upgrade and it caused lots of problems. unfortunately i didn't back it up. Is there anyway i can convert a 2010 solution file back into asp.net mvc 2008?
Make a backup of what's left of what you currently have before doing this ...
Create a new solution in Visual Studio 2008. Create new projects for the 2008 solution. Use the project menu or right-click the project and choose "Add Existing Items..." Choose all the code files .cs .vb, etc from your 2010 structure and include them in the 2008 structure.
Basically you're copying all the code back into a 2008 structure with the 2008 formatted project and solution files. The code shouldn't be substantially changed beyond repair. You might have to manually address some issues in the converted code but once you know what they are it will be a repetitive process more than anything.
If you are writing code of any importance you should be using a version control system like as SVN. I haven't tried Visual Studio 2010 yet, but can tell you from experience that the differences between 2005 and 2008 are laughably small. You can down convert a 2008 solution file by manually changing the first two lines from:
Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 10.00
Visual Studio 2008
to
Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 9.00
Visual Studio 2005
the project files are fairly trivial as well with the product tag changing from:
9.0.21022
to
8.0.50727
Please note the changes I have listed for project files may not be 100% accurate and I have not tested for differences between service pack releases. However, creating a new project in an earlier version of Visual studio, making a copy and then doing an upgrade should allow you to run a diff and provide a better answer than what is currently accepted.