Rails modeling for a user - ruby-on-rails

When building a rails app that allows a User to login and create data, is it best to setup a belongs_to :user association on every single model? For example, let's say a user can create Favorites, Colors and Tags.
And let's say Favorites has_many :tags and Colors also has_many :tags. Is it still important for Tags to belong_to :user assuming the User is the only person who has authority to edit those tags?
And a similar question along the same lines: When updating data in FavoritesController, I've come to the conclusion that you perform CRUD operations by always doing something like current_user.favorites.find(param[:id].update_attributes(param[:favorite]) so that they can definitely only update models that belong to them. Right?
Update Wasn't too happy with any of the answers, as no one really answered my question but instead went after the for-example-only Tags model suggesting better ways to do that. I'm assuming I was right, and models should belong_to :user. I also discovered some great security tips that address my questions here: http://asciicasts.com/episodes/178-seven-security-tips

As you describe the tags it seems that they are more of an aspect, so you can implement them as a polymorphic association. But you should do it many-to-many, as tags can be reused among users and taggable objects. Let's call the join model Tagging, which will be the one that belongs to user if you want to remember who created the tagging.
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :taggings, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :colors, :through => :taggings, :source => :taggable, :source_type => "Color"
has_many :favorites, :through => :taggings, :source => :taggable, :source_type => "Favorite"
end
class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :taggable, :polymorphic => true
belongs_to :tag
end
class Color < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :taggings, :as => :taggable
has_many :tags, :through => :taggings
end
class Favorite < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :taggings, :as => :taggable
has_many :tags, :through => :taggings
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :favorites
has_many :colors
has_many :taggings
has_many :tags, :through => :taggings
end
As for the Favorite updating, I agree with you: you will mostly work within the scope of a user (most likely the currently logged in user).

It depends on your model. Both cases are valid but I'd discorage making a circular relationships like that. Having a hierarchy is more flexible. For example: User->Favorites->Tags (unless you want to tag users as well)
User.favorites.find(params[:id]).update_attributes(param[:favorite])
is what you mean I guess (syntax). Whoever calls the URL will perform that action. Dont rely on the fact that that URL is visible to one user only (owner of the favorite). You should have checks in place that the currently logged in user is the only one performing actions on the objects that belong to him.

The proposed mechanism sounds a bit too complex for me. I prefer the current_user way. Assume there is a current_user (following the authlogic way) in your authentication system, then simple add a user references (user_id) in every relevant table. Update the current_user for new or update record via a controller filter.
In the models, put relevant belongs_to :users accordingly, put enough has_many in users model if needed.

:has_many and :belongs_to in AR will explains the relationship between models, but not necessarily you have to use them in your models, the associaton between them will be already present in the tables as a foreign key.
But adding :has_many or :belongs_to to your models will give you extra methods to your model
ex:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :favorites
#def favorites
# Favorite.find_all_by_user_id(self.id)
# end
end
If you mention has_many it will give a new method in your model called favorites, that method will be invisible (will be present in the AR).
Similarly for any association, if you are planning to use this kind of methods you should use associations in your models.

Related

Related model can be one of two other models

I currently have essentially 3 models at the moment. I have Project, User and Contact.
I'm trying to assign users or contacts as a sort of 'member' to each project. I initially thought that a linking table here would suffice, for example ProjectMembers but i'm currently hitting a brick wall in my thought process when it comes to a project member only being allowed to be either a Contact or a User and whether to handle this via a relationship or by code in the model or the controller by checking which between user_id or contact_id was not null.
I had a look at polymorphic associations which looked promising, but somehow I ended up with the association backwards (Projects were being entered into the ProjectMember table as the type, rather than User or Contact) and confused myself even more.
The final output I would pretty much like would be simply to have the ability to run something like Project.first.project_members and have those members return with the role in that project. It'd be even nicer if I could run User.first.projects/Contact.first.projects and get those too, but that's something I can figure out down the line.
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Polymorphic association is something that you should go for here.
First: Project has a many to many relationship with User and Contact, hence you need a join table.
Second: Since you need to call something like Project.first.project_members, you should have a polymorphic association.
For this scenario, you should create a polymorphic join table.
Let's say you have the polymorphic table ProjectMember with memberable_id, memberable_type and project_id (well I have a hang of railcasts).
class ProjectMember < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :memberable, :polymorphic => true
belongs_to :project
end
and then in your User model,
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :project_members, :as => :memberable
has_many :projects, through: :project_members
end
and in Contact model
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :project_members, :as => :memberable
has_many :projects, through: :project_members
end
and in your Project model
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, :through => :project_members, :source => :memberable, :source_type => 'User'
has_many :contacts, :through => :project_members, :source => :memberable, :source_type => 'Contact'
has_many :project_members
end
Now you can call your desired associations, Project.first.project_members, User.first.projects or Contact.first.projects. Hope this helps.
Thanks

has_many :through relationships explained

I'm new to Rails and have some doubts about the kind of relationship do I need to use. Here is the case.
I have two models Offer and User, a user could belong to to many offers and offers can have many user. Also the users create the offers.
I think I have to use a has_many :through ralationship. For example I've created another model "Applicant". Applicant belongs_to user and belongs_to offer. But how is the relationship from the user and offer model? For example:
User Model
has_many :offer, :through => :applicant
Offer Model
has_many :user, :through => :applicant
My doubt is because I already have this two relationship
User Model
has_many :offers, :dependent => :destroy
Offer Model
belongs_to :user
After solve this, I guest I have to save the record in the applicant model from the applicanst_controller, right?
Thanks in advance
What you have described is a many-to-many relationship using a join table. You're actually pretty close but you just need to remove the has_many :offers, :dependent => :destroy from your user model and the blongs_to :user in your offer model. It should look something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :offers, :through => :applicants
end
class Applicant < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :users
belongs_to :offers
end
class Offer < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, :through => :applicants
end
You don't have to worry about the dependent destroy part as associations are automatically removed as the corresponding objects are removed. With a many to many association it doesn't really matter how you go about building the relationship. Either of the following will work:
#user.offers << #offer
#offers.users << #user
If you don't need to store any information specific to your applicant join table (e.g., time stamps, descriptions) you might instead want to look at a has_and_belongs_to_many relationship. Check out choosing between has_many_through and has_and_belongs_to_many for reference.
Edit
Heres the code for a HABTM relationship:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :offers
end
class Offer < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end

Using Rails, not sure if I should use belongs_to or not

Very new to Rails... I'm building out functionality that lets people compare photos, and I can't decide exactly how I should structure it. Ideally what I'd like is to have a "comparisons" table which keeps a record of the IDs of the photos compared as well as the user that compared them, but I'm not quite sure whether this warrants use of the "belongs_to" function or not. If so, how do I specify that each comparison belongs to TWO separate photos?
The following has_many, :through => Model structure will let you have additonal properties on the join table, e.g. 'comparing_user_id'.
class Photo < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :appearances
has_many :users, :through => :appearances
end
class Appearance < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :photo
belongs_to :user
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :appearances
has_many :photos, :through => :appearances
end

Rails model advice

I need some suggests for the model relationship that I'm going to develop:
I want to create a research table that keep track of all the reasearches performed inside the platform.
In the platform I'm developing, an user can search for other users.
In order to do it, I thought to create 3 fields in the research table: Performer (user_id that submit the research) Research_string (The string that the performer submit) and Results (that is one or more user).
Of course the relationship among user and research tables will be many to many, but note that the research table has 2 different column that involves the user_id (performer and results) so how can I specify to rails ? I thought something like that :
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :performed_research, :through => :research_table
class Research < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users
But how can I specify that the has_many users in the Research tables implies two different relations depending by the column ?
Tnx
EDITED: my solution
Your solution is not correct, because the user has only the research performed and not the research where he is resulted. I made another solution, that it's not the best of clear but it works, I would like to have your judge:
class Research < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :searcher, :class_name => 'User', :foreign_key=> 'submitter_id'
has_many :found_users, :through=>:user_researches,:source=>:user
#It is necessary to let the association work without class_name it would look for
userResearch class
has_many :user_researches, :class_name =>'User_research'
end
class User_research < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :research
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
# It returns a list of research performed by the user
has_many :researches, :foreign_key => 'submitter_id'
# It is necessary to let the searcher relationship works
has_many :user_researches, :class_name =>'User_research'
#==> Searcher will return an Array of research where the user's skill has been researched
has_many :follower_researches, :through => :user_researches, :source=>:research
end
I say that it;s not the best because the follower_research of the user model, show an array of research when he has been results ... and not an Array of submitter that searching him, so to obtain them, I have to scroll the array of research and then take the searcher field ... Are you able to perform an improvement (hopefully less complex than this)
Do you mean something like this?
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :research_entries
class ResearchEntry < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :performer, :class_name => 'User'
has_and_belongs_to_many :resulting_users, :class_name => 'User'
Update: I changed this to use the has_and_belongs_to_many relationship which will allow you to use a join table to connect many users into "resulting_users" field of the ResearchEntry
Something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :submitted_researches, :class_name => 'Research', :foreign_key => 'submitter_id'
has_manu :researches, :through => :performed_researches
class Research < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :submitter, :class_name => 'User'
has_many :researchers, :through => :performed_researches, :class_name => 'User'
class PerformedResearch < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :research
See: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html#the-has_many-through-association
Update: I think I misread something. What is results? and how is it related to users?
Update 2: Still not sure I understand but here's another stab
I originally thought you were doing something related to academic research and the Research model was for research papers with the performer being scientists that did the research.
From re-reading your question I'm now thinking you have a rails application with some users and a search feature that lets a user search for other users and for each search you are trying to keep track of which user did the search and which users they found.
Let me know if any of these assumptions are wrong.
Based on that:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :searches #all the searches this user performed
class Search < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :searcher, :class_name => 'User' # the user who performed the search
has_many :found_users, :though => :user_search_results, :foreign_key => 'user_id' # using foreign_key because I want to change the name to 'found_users'
#alternatively if you don't want to use foreign_key use the line bellow instead
#has_many :users, :thorough => :user_search_results
class UserSearchResult < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :search

Rails and Sencha Nested JSON: Has Many through?

I want to process nested JSON data sent from rails in Sencha.
In rails, my model associations are:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :codes
has_many :stores, :through => :codes, :uniq => true
class Store < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :deals
has_many :orders
has_many :rewards
has_many :codes
has_many :users, :through => :codes, :uniq => true
class Code < ActiveRecord::Base
validates :unique_code, :uniqueness => true
belongs_to :store
belongs_to :order
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :earn
As you can see, the class Code stores all the relationship information between User and Store.
Now, I can send nested JSON to sencha using
#user.to_json(:include => :stores, :deals, :rewards) (not proper code)
However how can I process the nested structure in Sencha? My goal is basically to have a ListPanel that first list and displays Stores that Users are subscribed to, and when clicked, details of the relationship are loaded such as what deals and rewards that store is currently offering.
I don't see an option for a "has many through" relationship in Sencha.
Thanks for the help.
I'm afraid there isn't an equivalent in Sencha Touch right now, and, as you say, there is the network impact to think about. You may simply have to create your own custom proxy or data loading routine for now. Not a great answer, I'm afraid.

Resources