if i use Doctrine_Core::getTable('User')-> i will have no auto completion.
isnt it better to just use User:: for autocompletion?
and of course i have to define the methods static
what is the benefit with using getTable except that i can use a non static method?
Because User:: would need to call a static method, but the methods are all non-static, so that would be invalid code.
Read up on the singleton pattern.
If you just need auto completion, you can try the plugin here: http://www.symfony-project.org/plugins/sfDoctrineTableGetterPlugin
It builds a very light and fast auto-generated class and makes it possible to have code completion in all major IDE's like Eclipse PDT, Zend Studio, Net Beans.
Related
I see defaut template use ServiceProvder.GetService<ApplicationDbCotnext>() to initialize a DbContext,
But when you inside a Static Method, I have no idea how to get a DbContext, because there is no ServiceProvider.
Is there a way to get the ServiceProvider ?
Well, first of all, this has nothing to do with asp.net-core per se. This has more to do with how Dependency Injection works. You have to ask yourself why your method is static. Is that really necessary?
If you can't get rid of your static method, you might as well go all the way and introduce another anti-pattern, the Service Locator Pattern. In short: In the Startup class you put a reference to the ServiceProvider in a static property (call it for instance "ServiceProviderSingleton") of a static class (for instance "ServiceProviderProvider"). This way you can just call "ServiceProviderProvider.ServiceProviderSingleton.GetService()".
Again, i suggest giving your overal design a critical look. But if this is what you need/want then I hope it helped.
If we have a look at Microsoft's static methods (extension) - they seem not to use logging there - just throw appropriate Exception, for example in UseMvc method (for StartUp class):
https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/blob/760c8f38678118734399c58c2dac981ea6e47046/src/Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Core/Builder/MvcApplicationBuilderExtensions.cs
I would like to Verify that an expected method is called with the correct parameters in Swift in unit-testing. This was very easily done in Objective-C using the OCMock framework. You could do a combination of partialMocking and running OCMExpect/Verify to assert code paths with the right parameters were being called. Any idea how to do something like this in Swift?
Swift doesn't support reflection, so traditional mocking libraries aren't feasible. Instead, you need to create your own mock. There are at least two approaches to do this.
Create a testing subclass of the class under test. This is partial mocking. Avoid this if possible.
Use an interface instead of a class. Create a testing implementation of the interface.
Hand-crafted mocks aren't hard. You want to
Count the number of calls to a method
Capture its arguments
Simulate its return value
It is a lot of boilerplate. There are libraries out there that can auto-generate this code.
I inserted this line into my init() of my BootStrap class
Integer.metaClass.minutes = { 60000L * delegate }
I was then not able to use it from a Job class (Quartz plugin). Do I put this line of code somewhere else to make it a global modification?
I was also wondering the best way to make a function available inside all classes in Grails.
Like a global function. Would it be to extend the Object metaclass? or is there a better way?
Do I put this line of code somewhere else to make it a global modification?
Use the DelegatingMetaClass
I was also wondering the best way to make a function available inside all classes in Grails. Like a global function. Would it be to extend the Object metaclass? or is there a better way?
If you want the function to be an instance method of all classes, then you must add it to the metaClass of Object (see above). If not, simply add the function as a static method of a class, i.e. the same way you make functions globally accessible in Java.
Is it possible to let the IDE automatically implement inherited abstract methods in Delphi XE? In Java and C# IDEs it's a common functionality like pressing ALT+SHIFT+F10 in Visual Studio or ALT+RETURN in IntelliJ IDEA.
Without this I always have to look up manually which methods have to be implemented and copy their declarations, which really is something I shouldn't have to do nowadays!
You can use ctrl+space in the class declaration to get a list of all the methods you might want to override (or implement from an interface). It does however not tell you which is abstract but once you figured that out you will get the declaration for free by selecting the method(s) from the list.
And after that you can of course use class completion ctrl+shift+c to generate the code in implementation section.
No, the Delphi IDE doesn't have an automatic shortcut for this. But, you can use the compiler to make it easier on you.
Define your new class. Then put a line somewhere in your code that says TMyNewClass.Create(whatever). When the compiler parses this, if there are any unimplemented abstract methods on TMyNewClass, it will tell you about them in the compiler warnings.
I have several asp.net mvc websites consuming the same controller and model.
This common logic is put in seperate libraries.
These libraries use the HttpContext.Current.Session. How can I make these unit testable?
I read about the StateValue but can't completely grasp it. Where should I get this StateValue thing? Is it a lib I reference?
You can use mock helpers such as seen here
Your code should use IHttpSessionState not HttpSessionState.
If you look up the MSDN documentation for IHttpSessionState you will find an example implementation you can lift into your Unit Test project to create a mock session.
Replace code aquiring the Session with static delegate that return IHttpSessionState.
Initialise that static delegate with a function that uses HttpContext.Current.Session.
During Unit Testing replace delegate with your Mock implementation of IHttpSessionState.
just to channel people out of this sinkhole (which it is as of .NET 3.5) -- don't touch IHttpSessionState for purposes of mocking and testing:
http://www.codemerlin.com/2011/07/mocking-httpcontext-httpresponse-httprequest-httpsessionstate-etc-in-asp-net/