I have a system set up to download jad files on users' Blackberries, but it only works intermittently, and seemingly randomly. If the user clicks on the link within their BlackBerry browser, 95% of the time on the first try an error message will pop up saying there was an HTTP 500 error (which our server never returns).
Viewing the details of this message within the blackberry browser, it says nothing but java.lang.nullpointerexception which, again, could not have come from our server (running apache/php).
However, if the user clicks on the link a few more times, or navigates away and goes back to that page, it suddenly works. No change on the server, it just shows the application install screen. Unfortunately, this doesn't always work; sometimes the error 500 just keeps showing up.
The link is rather long (containing an sha hash as a token as part of the URL), but I would think that a long URL would either always be broken or always work, not work intermittently.
The link uses a php script to download the jad and cod files. Linking to the files directly rather than using the script seems to work more often (I haven't determined if that also ever has an error 500 or not), but I can't find any issues with the headers. The content type is set correctly and, like I said, if the headers were an issue, I'd think it would either always work or always break.
Any clues?
You may be able to shed some light on the problem by looking at the event logs, which you can get using JavaLoader:
javaloader -u eventlog > event.log
Search for NullPointerException within those logs and you'll be able to see what's causing it.
I can't explain the intermittent behaviour, but I had a similar situation where I was getting the java.lang.NullPointerException in the browser details. Unfortunately, the Event Log (as dumped by javaloader.exe) or by viewing on-device using Alt-L-G-L-G didn't show the exception.
(I'm using bb-ant-tools and JDE 4.6.1.) When the signature tool ran, I noticed that there were two .cod files being signed and I can see both of them inside the .jar file the compiler creates. But the output written was a single .cod file of size 92306 bytes that was not a .zip of smaller .cod files. The compiler somehow was not able to create a .cod that contained siblings. For comparison, compiling the project with JDE 5.0.0 created sibling .cod files that were able to be loaded over OTA.
My project included an .mp3 file of 53542 bytes which I happened to not require. After removing it, the 4.6.1 compiler outputted a single .cod and I was able to successfully download it via OTA.
Related
I have an app that lets the user pick local files and send them to the backend to add to their vault. To pick the file, I use FilePicker.platform.pickFiles. It seems to work fine, the file is picked and when it's an image we show a preview to the user (and it always works).
Once the user has picked all their files, we create a list of Future to try and send the files to the backend, then we await the list to resolve. If we deem a picture is too big, we reduce the size using FlutterImageCompress.compressAndGetFile.
This usually works, but on iPhone, there is a seemingly random behavior where the file isn't found and an error is thrown : Cannot retrieve length of file, path = '/private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/3600F812-FD42-4441-A654-766991E45E04/tmp/com.feykro.myApp.int-Inbox/myFile.pdf' (OS Error: No such file or directory, errno = 2)
The file in the example works just fine in other instances, the problem seems random and not directly tied to the file I chose. The problem is not exclusive to pdf files either, as it also occurs on images even though they're picked correctly and displayed in the app.
Any idea what could be causing this ?
Thanks in advance !
When I open the Umbraco (7.6.3) backoffice, I'm unable to view or make changes to templates. It seems like other functionality is unaffected, and I can create & edit specific pages. However, attempting to open the templates themselves just leads to a white screen. This problem exists across browsers:
Other screens render just fine:
What gives?
Checking the console when attempting to load gives an interesting error:
Error: Argument 'Umbraco.Editors.Templates.EditController' is not a function, got undefined...
Resolution:
The issue seemed to be caused by outdated files in the Umbraco folder. Copying most directories over from packages\UmbracoCms.7.6.3\UmbracoFiles\umbraco\ seems to have done the trick.
Looking at the changelog, it seems like the JS folder was the most influential in getting this fixed.
Are you sure that you're on 7.6.3? The UI appears to be pre-7.6 (I can tell because the colours haven't been updated).
If you have just upgraded, it's possible that your browser has cached the JS which is used - hard refresh your browser to see if the UI updates.
Umbraco also uses a dependency service to compile all of the used JS/CSS files together into one large one. This service will not be used if your website is in debug mode. Either:
Turn debug mode on in the Web.config
Delete any files in the \App_Data\ClientDependency\ folder as this is where the cached compiled files are kept (these will be regenerated)
My first thought would be file permissions.
Have you run the health check for permissions in the developer section? Need to make sure that your application pool user has write permissions on the Views folder.
I'm building a Reporting web application right now with MVC3 and I've come up to a couple problems.
My goal is to have it able to generate and view Crystal Reports, SSRS reports, and Excel documents.
Right now I'm working on the Excel segment and I'm running into more trouble than I thought I would. First off, when I link directly to the file, it either opens inside the browser or it downloads it from the server and if the user makes changes it doesn't actually save it to the true file on the server.
I've tried both linking to the file directly using Razor and a ViewModel with the path to the document as well as directing it to an action that returned a File.
I've also tried linking it to a shortcut to the actual file thinking that if I could open the shortcut it would open the file the way I wanted it to and unfortunately it didn't really open at all.
The users already have access to the files on the server through a network drive, so as of right now they can go into the server, open the excel document, edit and save it no problem. I want to duplicate this effect through a link. The program already has a file browser built, so I can browse between the files and make links to the reports.
Thanks in advance!
Since they are apparently on a network drive, you can just link to the files directly, relative to the user?
For example: a link to file://///SERVERNAME/folder/
I tested it between two computers on the network, and that seems to work. However, you still get a popup asking that you want to do with the file, open or save. (both in firefox and IE)
Note: Yes, that many slashes seem necessary, lol
I'm making a website where a user can say which items he wants to cache. Based on this, a manifest file is generated. By doing this the user can still browse in the website when he is offline. This is all working fine in google chrome. But on iPad it's not working as it should.
Sometimes things get cached sometimes not, not even the pages i visited.
We have been testing with 2 iPads all morning, but we haven't been able to get the same result on both iPads. Even if we do exactly the same, we sometimes get different results.
So what we do:
turn WiFi on
browse to the website
make some settings so some pages/images/... are added to the manifest file
turn WiFi off
go back to safari refresh/browse to pages that should be cached.
Sometimes on one iPad (this is an iPad 1) it works exactly as it should, but sometimes it doesn't work at all.
On the other iPad (this is an iPad 2) it never works completely as it should. Just some random results.
It also looks like the results are different when we completely shutdown safari, and then clear the cache and then do the whole process of downloading and caching stuff...
Somebody can help me with this problem? It's a real pain in the ass at the moment... :(
Open web server (IIS)
Select website
Open MIME type
Add or edit to text/cache-manifest
Reset iis at command prompt iisreset
It works for me.
I've encountered some problems as well with ipad caching.
MIME type of the manifest file is not set right due to windows hosting. The standard MIME type on a windows server is "application/x-ms-manifest". This was created when the ClickOnce applications came to life. The MIME type that is necessary to work on safari is: "text/cache-manifest"
Cache size is too small on ipad (you should get a warning to enlarge it)
the Ipad needs time! I've noticed that the cache is not filled when you see all assets or when the website is "loaded". Give it twice the normal time to load before you place the website to your homescreen.
Cache of the cache :) The iPad only reloads the files when the modified date on the server is changed. So when you really want to test, clear all cache on the iPad, remove the link on the homescreen and upload all your files again.
Conclusion: Time consuming!
Hint: Turn on the debug console in safari on your desktop or iPad. It gives a fair idea if you did something wrong or if it is a cache problem on the iPad.
It looks like the problem didn't have anything to do with the application cache. It was somehow a problem with the cookies/the way i was dynamically building the manifest file.
I'd like to slightly echo Pieter-Paulus Vertongen, I had a similar experience with Windows hosting.
According to the debugging console in Safari, the mime type for the manifest file was being misread and nothing was being downloaded as a result.
I copied all of my files, including the .htaccess file, over to a linux server without changing any content within the files...and then the caching worked beautifully.
So yes, it's possible this may be an issue of where the files are hosted. Use the debugging console and Jonathan Stark's code to find out:
http://jonathanstark.com/blog/debugging-html-5-offline-application-cache?filename=2009/09/27/debugging-html-5-offline-application-cache/
I am working on an internal application. We have a website that displays all our SSRS reports for a group of work. I have been asked to see if I can link all the files (pdf, word, excel) for the group of work. These files are stored on a file server that users viewing the reports have access to. Each group has its own group of reports and shared files.
Is it possible to open the files (without downloading them) from a webpage? Meaning that they file is opened from the file server? I don't want people to download a copy of the file.
I am pretty sure this can work with IE because sharepoint does it. However, other browsers may have an issue.
EDIT: What I would like is to have a web page with links to the files. When they click on a link (say for a word doc), word will open the file that resides on the file server. Without out a local copy downloaded from the network share.
EDIT2: Please note, I know what I am asking is probably not possible in all browsers. I am more or less just making sure. It seems possible in IE using activeX, but out side of that browsers do a good job at keeping processes inside a sandbox.
3 options. Remember this is for an internal website.
link to the share using file://. This will have the side affect of downloading the file to be viewed. As long as user clicks open every time it should not be a big deal.
Use JavaScript and activeX to open word (excel, reader, ect) passing in the file path as a command line arguments. This works only in IE and in win7 (probably vista) user will get a pop up asking if it is ok for the activeX control to run.
Create a new protocol. openfile://. This would be set up to run an application that is installed on the client machine which would open the file. Since it is internal, the application could be installed on the machines without issues. This also requires a registry change.
I haven't picked one as this change is still being looked into but i figure I would update this in case someone runs into something similar.