I want to load this simple something into my Editor:
Write:-repeat,write("hi"),nl,fail.
So that it prints "hi".
What should I do?
I'm currently trying to do File->New
and Saving a file named Write into E:\Program Files\pl\xpce\prolog\lib
When doing the query:
?-Write.
It's printing:
1 ?- Write.
% ... 1,000,000 ............ 10,000,000 years later
%
% >> 42 << (last release gives the question)
Why?
EDIT
I did some more research. Apparently this is what SWI-Prolog does when you ask it about an uninstantiated variable.
$ prolog
Welcome to SWI-Prolog (Multi-threaded, 64 bits, Version 5.6.64)
Copyright (c) 1990-2008 University of Amsterdam.
SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software,
and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
Please visit http://www.swi-prolog.org for details.
For help, use ?- help(Topic). or ?- apropos(Word).
?- X.
% ... 1,000,000 ............ 10,000,000 years later
%
% >> 42 << (last release gives the question)
?-
UPDATE
Changing the name to lowercase works. Uppercase is for variables:
helloworld.prolog:
helloworld:-write('Hello World!'),nl,fail.
Then:
$ prolog
Welcome to SWI-Prolog (Multi-threaded, 64 bits, Version 5.6.64)
Copyright (c) 1990-2008 University of Amsterdam.
SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software,
and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
Please visit http://www.swi-prolog.org for details.
For help, use ?- help(Topic). or ?- apropos(Word).
?- ['helloworld.prolog'].
% helloworld.prolog compiled 0.00 sec, 1,376 bytes
true.
?- helloworld.
Hello World!
false.
?-
Notice that you have to consult the file first. I tried this out and it works for sure.
You need to name the procedure write, not Write. Upper case starting letters are for variables. (It might be less confusing if you call it something else like writeHi or something, so it doesn't have the same name as a built-in procedure, but it will still work when you call it write because your write has a different arity than the built in one).
Also you might want to replace "hi" with 'hi', though it will work either way (but only the second version will actually print the word hi to the screen - your version will print it as an integer list).
Related
I found in some code I maintain they used this format for an update query
UPDATE X=to_date('$var','%iY-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%F3') ...
But I can't find anywhere in Informix documentation what the i is for. Running this next query will result the same values.
SELECT TO_CHAR(CURRENT, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S%F3') as wo_I,
TO_CHAR(CURRENT, '%iY-%m-%d %H:%M:%S%F3') as with_I FROM X;
wo_i | with_i
------------------------|------------------------
2017-06-20 16:49:44.712 | 2017-06-20 16:49:44.712
So what am I missing?
Resources I looked into:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGU8G_11.70.0/com.ibm.sqlt.doc/ids_sqt_130.htm
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGU8G_11.70.0/com.ibm.sqlt.doc/ids_sqt_129.htm
http://www.sqlines.com/informix-to-oracle/to_char_datetime
It's a trifle hard to find, but one location for the information you need (assuming you use Informix 11.70 rather than 12.10, though it probably hasn't changed much) is:
Client APIs and Tools — GLS User's Guide — GLS Environment Variables
In particular, it says:
%iy — Is replaced by the year as a two-digit number (00 - 99) for both reading and printing. It is the formatting directive specific to IBM Informix for %y.
%iY — Is replaced by the year as a four-digit number (0000 - 9999) for both reading and printing. It is the formatting directive specific to IBM Informix for %Y.
…
%y — Requires that the year is a two-digit number (00 through 99) for both reading and printing.
%Y — Requires that the year is a four-digit number (0000 through 9999) for both reading and printing.
There clearly isn't much difference between the two — I'm not even sure I understand what the difference is supposed to be. I think it may be the difference between accepting but not requiring leading zeros on 1, 2 or 3 digit year numbers. But for the most part, it seems you can treat them as equivalent.
I have what I feel should be a very simple bit of code in Common Lisp, all I want it to do is ask for an input from the user, then print it back.
This is my code (The "Before" and "After" printing is from trying to debug, and it showed something odd.
(defun get-input (prompt)
(clear-input)
(write-string prompt)
(finish-output)
(read-line)
)
(let (
(p1 (get-input "Enter: "))
)
(princ "Before")
(princ p1)
(princ "After")
)
When I run this I get the following
This is SBCL 1.2.1, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.
SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
WARNING: the Windows port is fragile, particularly for multithreaded
code. Unfortunately, the development team currently lacks the time
and resources this platform demands.
* (load "test.lisp")
Enter: This is my string.
AftereThis is my string.
T
As you can see, my "Before" string isn't even printed, and my "After" string has a strange "e" on the end? And why is it seemingly asking for input when I first run the program?
If anyone could help I would be grateful. Thanks
I believe this is what is happening, in order:
The program evaluates the expression to be bound to p1; this generates your prompt & reads your input
Then it prints "Before"
Then it prints the value of p1, which (I think) has a carriage return at the end, so that the next thing to be printed goes at the start of the line
Then it prints "After", overwriting the first 5 characters of "Before"
Additional Information from sam: SBCL under Windows.
Well, yeah. SBCL's port to Windows is very rough.
See the warning in your output:
WARNING: the Windows port is fragile, particularly for multithreaded
code. Unfortunately, the development team currently lacks the time
and resources this platform demands.
SBCL comes from the Linux/Unix/... world. The port to Windows makes assumptions which are valid for Linux/Unix/... but not for Windows.
One thing is line termination. Windows uses CRLF. Unix uses LF. SBCL under Windows uses LF, IIRC. Probably this can be configured somehow.
If you now use a shell under Windows which expects CRLF conventions and create direct output with SBCL using LF conventions, then you may get strange output...
Thus possible solutions are:
use a Lisp which support Windows conventions. Problem: there are not many. There are really good ones like LispWorks and Allegro CL, but they are relatively expensive. I don't know how Clozure CL does it - it also runs under Windows and is free...
find out how to configure SBCL to use Windows I/O conventions. -> SBCL mailing list
reconfigure your terminal/shell to use Unix LF conventions
I can't reproduce that (CLISP and SBCL in a terminal on the Mac):
CLISP
rjmba:~ joswig$ clisp
i i i i i i i ooooo o ooooooo ooooo ooooo
I I I I I I I 8 8 8 8 8 o 8 8
I \ `+' / I 8 8 8 8 8 8
\ `-+-' / 8 8 8 ooooo 8oooo
`-__|__-' 8 8 8 8 8
| 8 o 8 8 o 8 8
------+------ ooooo 8oooooo ooo8ooo ooooo 8
Welcome to GNU CLISP 2.49 (2010-07-07) <http://clisp.cons.org/>
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Michael Stoll 1992, 1993
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Marcus Daniels 1994-1997
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Pierpaolo Bernardi, Sam Steingold 1998
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Sam Steingold 1999-2000
Copyright (c) Sam Steingold, Bruno Haible 2001-2010
Type :h and hit Enter for context help.
[1]> (load "/tmp/g.lisp")
;; Loading file /tmp/g.lisp ...
Enter: hello
BeforehelloAfter
;; Loaded file /tmp/g.lisp
T
[2]> (quit)
SBCL
rjmba:~ joswig$ sbcl
This is SBCL 1.1.16, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.
SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
* (load "/tmp/g.lisp")
Enter: hello
BeforehelloAfter
T
You might want to tell us your specific implementation and platform combination, plus where Common Lisp does its output...
I want to make use of Maxima as the backend to solve some computations used in my LaTeX input file.
I did the following steps.
Step 1
Download and install Maxima.
Step 2
Create a batch file named cas.bat (for example) as follows.
rem cas.bat
echo off
set PATH=%PATH%;"C:\Program Files (x86)\Maxima-5.31.2\bin"
maxima --very-quiet -r %1 > solution.tex
Save the batch in the same directory in which your input file below exists. It is just for the sake of simplicity.
Step 3
Create the input file named main.tex (for example) as follows.
% main.tex
\documentclass[preview,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\def\f(#1){(#1)^2-5*(#1)+6}
\begin{document}
\section{Problem}
Evaluate $\f(x)$ for $x=\frac 1 2$.
\section{Solution}
\immediate\write18{cas "x: 1/2;tex(\f(x));"}
\input{solution}
\end{document}
Step 4
Compile the input file with pdflatex -shell-escape main and you will get a nice output as follows.
!
Step 5
Done.
Questions
Apparently the output of Maxima is as follows. I don't know how to make it cleaner.
solution.tex
1
-
2
$${{15}\over{4}}$$
false
Now, my question are
how to remove such texts?
how to obtain just \frac{15}{4} without $$...$$?
(1) To suppress output, terminate input expressions with dollar sign (i.e. $) instead of semicolon (i.e. ;).
(2) To get just the TeX-ified expression sans the environment delimiters (i.e. $$), call tex1 instead of tex. Note that tex1 returns a string, which you have to print yourself (while tex prints it for you).
Combining these ideas with the stuff you showed, I think your program could look like this:
"x: 1/2$ print(tex1(\f(x)))$"
I think you might find the Maxima mailing list helpful. I'm pretty sure there have been several attempts to create a system such as the one you describe. You can also look at the documentation.
I couldn't find any way to completely clean up Maxima's output within Maxima itself. It always echoes the input line, and always writes some whitespace after the output. The following is an example of a perl script that accomplishes the cleanup.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
my $var = $ARGV[0];
my $expr = $ARGV[1];
sub do_maxima_to_tex {
my $m = shift;
my $c = "maxima --batch-string='exptdispflag:false; print(tex1($m))\$'";
my $e = `$c`;
my #x = split(/\(%i\d+\)/,$e); # output contains stuff like (%i1)
my $f = pop #x; # remove everything before the echo of the last input
while ($f=~/\A /) {$f=~s/\A .*\n//} # remove echo of input, which may be more than one line
$f =~ s/\\\n//g; # maxima breaks latex tokens in the middle at end of line; fix this
$f =~ s/\n/ /g; # if multiple lines, get it into one line
$f =~ s/\s+\Z//; # get rid of final whitespace
return $f;
}
my $e1 = do_maxima_to_tex("diff($expr,$var,1)");
my $e2 = do_maxima_to_tex("diff($expr,$var,2)");
print <<TEX;
The first derivative is \$$e1\$. Differentiating a second time,
we get \$$e2\$.
TEX
If you name this script a.pl, then doing
a.pl z 3*z^4
outputs this:
The first derivative is $12\,z^3$. Differentiating a second time,
we get $36\,z^2$.
For the OP's application, a script like this one could be what is invoked by the write18 in the latex file.
If you really want to use LaTeX then the maxiplot package is the answer. It provides a maxima environment inside of which you enter Maxima commands. When you process your LaTeX file a Maxima batch file is generated. Process this file with Maxima and process your LaTeX file again to typeset the equations generated by Maxima.
If you would rather have 2D math input with live typesetting then use TeXmacs. It is a cross-platform document authoring environment (a word processor on steroids if you like) that includes plugins for Maxima, Mathematica and many more scientific computing tools. If you need to or are not satisfied with the typesetting, you can export your document to LaTeX.
I know this is a very old post. Excellent answers for the question asked by OP. I was using --very-quiet -r options on the command line for a long time like OP, but in maxima version 5.43.2 they behave differently. See maxima command line v5.43 is behaving differently than v5.41. I am answering this question with a cross reference because when incorporating these answers in your solutions, make sure the changes in behavior of those command line flags are also incorporated.
I've been using Doxygen successfully to generate PDF documentation for a sizable Fortran 90 project since v1.6. After a recent upgrade to Doxygen 1.8, pdflatex is choking with an error I can't understand. From refman.log:
.
.
.
<use classfate__source_a022bf629bdc1d3059ebd5fb86d13b4f4_icgraph.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: classfate__source_a022bf629bdc1d3059ebd5fb86d13b4f4_ic
graph.pdf used on input line 607.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 350.0pt x 65.42921pt.
)
(./classm__aerosol.tex
! Undefined control sequence.
<recently read> \LT#LL#FM#cr
l.25 ...1833ffa6f2fae54ededb}{ia\-\_\-nsize}), \\*
? ?
Type <return> to proceed, S to scroll future error messages,
R to run without stopping, Q to run quietly,
I to insert something, E to edit your file,
1 or ... or 9 to ignore the next 1 to 9 tokens of input,
H for help, X to quit.
Looking at the first 25 lines of classm__aerosol.tex, nothing obviously matches the error message:
\hypertarget{classm__aerosol}{\section{m\-\_\-aerosol Module Reference}
\label{classm__aerosol}\index{m\-\_\-aerosol#{m\-\_\-aerosol}}
}
Contains general aerosol-\/related constants and routines.
\subsection*{Public Member Functions}
\begin{DoxyCompactItemize}
\item
subroutine \hyperlink{classm__aerosol_aa06c1f39c6bd34f22be92d21535f0320}{aerdis} (I\-A\-E\-R\-O, M\-A\-E\-R\-O, V\-O\-L, A\-R\-E\-A, M\-U, T\-G\-A\-S, R\-H\-O, A\-G\-A\-M\-M\-A, X\-L\-A\-E\-R, D\-M\-E\-A\-N, N\-A\-E\-R, X\-N\-D\-A\-E\-R, L\-S\-D\-A\-E\-R)
\begin{DoxyCompactList}\small\item\em Return aerosol mass given a volume, based on aerosol size distribution function. \end{DoxyCompactList}\item
real(kind=wp) function \hyperlink{classm__aerosol_a2dff4ff413057e8788fba7270a30c093}{lamsed} (V\-O\-L, H, M\-U\-G, R\-H\-O\-A\-E\-R, A\-G\-A\-M\-M\-A, A\-C\-H\-I, A\-F\-E\-O, K\-O, M\-A\-E\-R, F\-M\-A\-E\-R, F\-A\-E\-R\-S\-S, F\-S\-E\-D\-D\-K)
\begin{DoxyCompactList}\small\item\em Calculate aerosol removal constant and interpolation factor between steady-\/state and decaying aerosol correlations. \end{DoxyCompactList}\item
pure real(kind=wp) function \hyperlink{classm__aerosol_a6d0a04004f49c404c67e0aa69dd39ee1}{fdbend} (V\-E\-L, H\-S\-E\-D, T\-G, R\-H\-O\-G, M\-U\-G, R\-H\-O\-P\-A\-R, C\-A\-E\-R\-O, X\-D\-B\-E\-N\-D, N90\-J)
\begin{DoxyCompactList}\small\item\em Find total impaction efficiency for aerosol deposition considering 90-\/degree bends in a flow path. \end{DoxyCompactList}\end{DoxyCompactItemize}
\subsection*{Public Attributes}
\begin{DoxyCompactItemize}
\item
integer, parameter \hyperlink{classm__aerosol_a8f604b7ffe3c1833ffa6f2fae54ededb}{ia\-\_\-nsize} = 30
\item
integer, parameter \hyperlink{classm__aerosol_ae71813ecf0c7768af9d6292efb14774f}{ia\-\_\-nmass} = 10
\item
real(kind=wp), dimension(\hyperlink{classm__aerosol_a8f604b7ffe3c1833ffa6f2fae54ededb}{ia\-\_\-nsize}), \\*
Nothing obviously matches the recently read chunk "\LT#LL#FM#cr" and I don't know enough low-level TeX to translate that into something that might actually be in the source text.
Suspecting this might have been fixed in a later version of Doxygen than the one shipping with Linux Mint (v1.8.1.2), I built & installed v1.8.3.1 from source, updated my doxyfile, blew away the old documentation and regenerated it. I get the same baffling error.
There's nothing obvious in refman.log that would indicate missing or broken LaTeX packages and I'm completely at a loss as to what's causing this.
As this still gets a hit on Google when you search:
doxygen missing $ inserted
I would like to add something.
Do not use a PROJECT_NAME containing underscores (_)!
After a brief look into the doxygen's current documentation (I am using 1.8.4) it does not make that explicit.
this will be difficult to solve unless you provide a bit more information - possibly using \errorcontextlines=9999 as suggested in the comments on the question.
as a first short though, the name of the control sequence that can't be found (i.e. \LT#LL#FM#cr) is one defined by the longtable package (documentation, p. 15) - thus adding:
\usepackage{longtable}
to the preamble of the document might help.
If so, according to the doxygen documentation here, adding the following to your configuration file should do the trick:
EXTRA_PACKAGES=longtable
I'm currently searching for an application or a script that does a correct word count for a LaTeX document.
Up till now, I have only encountered scripts that only work on a single file but what I want is a script that can safely ignore LaTeX keywords and also traverse linked files...ie follow \include and \input links to produce a correct word-count for the whole document.
With vim, I currently use ggVGg CTRL+G but obviously that shows the count for the current file and does not ignore LaTeX keywords.
Does anyone know of any script (or application) that can do this job?
I use texcount. The webpage has a Perl script to download (and a manual).
It will include tex files that are included (\input or \include) in the document (see -inc), supports macros, and has many other nice features.
When following included files you will get detail about each separate file as well as a total. For example here is the total output for a 12 page document of mine:
TOTAL COUNT
Files: 20
Words in text: 4188
Words in headers: 26
Words in float captions: 404
Number of headers: 12
Number of floats: 7
Number of math inlines: 85
Number of math displayed: 19
If you're only interested in the total, use the -total argument.
I went with icio's comment and did a word-count on the pdf itself by piping the output of pdftotext to wc:
pdftotext file.pdf - | wc - w
latex file.tex
dvips -o - file.dvi | ps2ascii | wc -w
should give you a fairly accurate word count.
To add to #aioobe,
If you use pdflatex, just do
pdftops file.pdf
ps2ascii file.ps|wc -w
I compared this count to the count in Microsoft Word in a 1599 word document (according to Word). pdftotext produced a text with 1700+ words. texcount did not include the references and produced 1088 words. ps2ascii returned 1603 words. 4 more than in Word.
I say that's a pretty good count. I am not sure where's the 4 word difference, though. :)
In Texmaker interface you can get the word count by right clicking in the PDF preview:
Overleaf has a word count feature:
Overleaf v2:
Overleaf v1:
I use the following VIM script:
function! WC()
let filename = expand("%")
let cmd = "detex " . filename . " | wc -w | perl -pe 'chomp; s/ +//;'"
let result = system(cmd)
echo result . " words"
endfunction
… but it doesn’t follow links. This would basically entail parsing the TeX file to get all linked files, wouldn’t it?
The advantage over the other answers is that it doesn’t have to produce an output file (PDF or PS) to compute the word count so it’s potentially (depending on usage) much more efficient.
Although icio’s comment is theoretically correct, I found that the above method gives quite accurate estimates for the number of words. For most texts, it’s well within the 5% margin that is used in many assignments.
If the use of a vim plugin suits you, the vimtex plugin has integrated the texcount tool quite nicely.
Here is an excerpt from their documentation:
:VimtexCountLetters Shows the number of letters/characters or words in
:VimtexCountWords the current project or in the selected region. The
count is created with `texcount` through a call on
the main project file similar to: >
texcount -nosub -sum [-letter] -merge -q -1 FILE
<
Note: Default arguments may be controlled with
|g:vimtex_texcount_custom_arg|.
Note: One may access the information through the
function `vimtex#misc#wordcount(opts)`, where
`opts` is a dictionary with the following
keys (defaults indicated): >
'range' : [1, line('$')]
'count_letters' : 0/1
'detailed' : 0
<
If `detailed` is 0, then it only returns the
total count. This makes it possible to use for
e.g. statusline functions. If the `opts` dict
is not passed, then the defaults are assumed.
*VimtexCountLetters!*
*VimtexCountWords!*
:VimtexCountLetters! Similar to |VimtexCountLetters|/|VimtexCountWords|, but
:VimtexCountWords! show separate reports for included files. I.e.
presents the result of: >
texcount -nosub -sum [-letter] -inc FILE
<
*VimtexImapsList*
*<plug>(vimtex-imaps-list)*
The nice part about this is how extensible it is. On top of counting the number of words in your current file, you can make a visual selection (say two or three paragraphs) and then only apply the command to your selection.
For a very basic article class document I just look at the number of matches for a regex to find words. I use Sublime Text, so this method may not work for you in a different editor, but I just hit Ctrl+F (Command+F on Mac) and then, with regex enabled, search for
(^|\s+|"|((h|f|te){)|\()\w+
which should ignore text declaring a floating environment or captions on figures as well as most kinds of basic equations and \usepackage declarations, while including quotations and parentheticals. It also counts footnotes and \emphasized text and will count \hyperref links as one word. It's not perfect, but it's typically accurate to within a few dozen words or so. You could refine it to work for you, but a script is probably a better solution, since LaTeX source code isn't a regular language. Just thought I'd throw this up here.