SoapUI project created by using WSDL.. with definitions for Faults with complex types
<xsd:element name="Fault" type="FaultType">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation> </xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
In Mock Response edit window, when I create a Fault response, it prompts to choose the fault name "fault" which is defined in the WSDL...
and it generates following soap fault message
<faultcode>?</faultcode>
<faultstring xml:lang=""></faultstring>
<!--Optional:-->
<faultactor>?</faultactor>
<!--Optional:-->
<detail>
<com:Fault/>
<!--You may enter ANY elements at this point-->
</detail>
</soapenv:Fault>
i was expecting the complex elements as defined in schema in this response ...
did i miss something? or do i need to manually recreate this fault response
Kind Regards,
carya
This is a little dated, but:
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation> </xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
Those are part of the specification as comments. There are tools that can parse the WSDL and show those to you as documentation for the WSDL; SoapUI is not one of those tools.
They are certainly not meant to be part of the message payload. What you are seeing is working as expected! You can have a read through the official docs.
Related
I'm trying to pull some data from the Bing Ads API but I keep getting error code 2015. I'm using Savon with Ruby on Rails. Here is the request:
<env:Envelope xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:tns="https://bingads.microsoft.com/Reporting/v13" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns="https://bingads.microsoft.com/Reporting/v13">
<env:Header>
<AuthenticationToken>blahblahblah</AuthenticationToken>
<CustomerAccountId>blahblahblah</CustomerAccountId>
<CustomerId>blahblahblah</CustomerId>
<DeveloperToken>blahblahblah</DeveloperToken>
</env:Header>
<env:Body>
<tns:SubmitGenerateReportRequest>
<ReportRequest xsi:nil="false" xsi:type="AccountPerformanceReportRequest">
<ExcludeColumnHeaders>true</ExcludeColumnHeaders>
<ExcludeReportFooter>true</ExcludeReportFooter>
<ExcludeReportHeader>true</ExcludeReportHeader>
<Format>Csv</Format>
<Language>English</Language>
<ReportName>AccountPerformanceReportRequest</ReportName>
<ReturnOnlyCompleteData>false</ReturnOnlyCompleteData>
<Aggregation>Summary</Aggregation>
<Columns>
<AccountPerformanceReportColumn>Spend</AccountPerformanceReportColumn>
<AccountPerformanceReportColumn>Clicks</AccountPerformanceReportColumn>
<AccountPerformanceReportColumn>Conversions</AccountPerformanceReportColumn>
<AccountPerformanceReportColumn>Revenue</AccountPerformanceReportColumn>
</Columns>
<Filter xsi:nil="true"/>
<Scope>
<AccountIds xmlns:a1="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays">
<a1:long>blahblahblah</a1:long>
</AccountIds>
</Scope>
<Time>
<CustomDateRangeEnd>
<Day>02</Day>
<Month>04</Month>
<Year>2019</Year>
</CustomDateRangeEnd>
<CustomDateRangeStart>
<Day>01</Day>
<Month>04</Month>
<Year>2019</Year>
</CustomDateRangeStart>
<PredefinedTime xsi:nil="true"/>
<ReportTimeZone>EasternTimeUSCanada</ReportTimeZone>
</Time>
</ReportRequest>
</tns:SubmitGenerateReportRequest>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
As you can see, I'm pulling the report with 'Summary' as the aggregation type. If I use 'Monthly' as the aggregation type and include a 'TimePeriod' column, it works perfectly, but if I do that then the data returned is for the whole month of April as opposed to the date range I've selected 04-01-2019..04-02-2019.
Here is the response:
<s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<s:Body>
<s:Fault>
<faultcode>s:Server</faultcode>
<faultstring xml:lang="en-US">Invalid client data. Check the SOAP fault details for more information</faultstring> <detail>
<ApiFaultDetail xmlns="https://bingads.microsoft.com/Reporting/v13" xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<TrackingId xmlns="https://adapi.microsoft.com">52665fe5-3eb8-42e0-ad8e-942e848297ce</TrackingId>
<BatchErrors/>
<OperationErrors>
<OperationError>
<Code>2015</Code>
<Details>No Dimension selected.</Details>
<ErrorCode>RequiredColumnsNotSelected</ErrorCode>
<Message>The specified report request does not specify all the required columns for this report type. Please submit a report request with the required columns for this report type, and optionally additional columns that are to be included in the report.</Message>
</OperationError>
</OperationErrors>
</ApiFaultDetail>
</detail>
</s:Fault>
</s:Body>
</s:Envelope>
The error code returned would lead me to believe that a TimePeriod column is required even for Summary, but that contradicts what is documented here.
All other aggregation types work with this setup. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Good catch. We will update documentation to clarify that at least one attribute (non performance stat) e.g., AccountId must be included. Most of the other reports have specific attributes that must be included, whereas the account report does not. I hope this helps!
I'm building a contract-first SOAP web service with spring-ws 2.2.3. My XML Schema uses extensions, leading to xsi:type= attributes in the XML requests. Since some respones can be very large (30MB), I'm using a AxiomSoapMessageFactory instead of the default SaajSoapMessageFactory, as suggested in the Spring WS docs. I validate incoming requests with a PayloadValidatingInterceptor:
PayloadValidatingInterceptor interceptor = new PayloadValidatingInterceptor();
interceptor.setSchema(new ClassPathResource("format-service.xsd"));
interceptor.setValidateRequest(true);
interceptor.setValidateResponse(false);
My problem is that I get spurious validation errors, depending on where in the XML the namespace is declared: if it's declared in the payload, then everything works fine:
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" >
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<sch:formatRequest xmlns:sch="http://example.com/springws/extension/schema">
<sch:value xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="sch:currencyType">
<sch:amount>1000</sch:amount>
<sch:currency>EUR</sch:currency>
</sch:value>
</sch:formatRequest>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
But as soon as I move the sch namespace declaration up to the Envelope:
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:sch="http://example.com/springws/extension/schema" ...>
validation fails and I receive a SOAP Fault:
<faultcode>soapenv:Client</faultcode>
<faultstring xml:lang="en">Validation error</faultstring>
<detail>
<spring-ws:ValidationError xmlns:spring-ws="http://springframework.org/spring-ws">UndeclaredPrefix: Cannot resolve 'sch:currencyType' as a QName: the prefix 'sch' is not declared.</spring-ws:ValidationError>
<spring-ws:ValidationError xmlns:spring-ws="http://springframework.org/spring-ws">cvc-elt.4.1: The value 'sch:currencyType' of attribute 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance,type' of element 'sch:value' is not a valid QName.</spring-ws:ValidationError>
<spring-ws:ValidationError xmlns:spring-ws="http://springframework.org/spring-ws">cvc-type.2: The type definition cannot be abstract for element sch:value.</spring-ws:ValidationError>
<spring-ws:ValidationError xmlns:spring-ws="http://springframework.org/spring-ws">UndeclaredPrefix: Cannot resolve 'sch:currencyType' as a QName: the prefix 'sch' is not declared.</spring-ws:ValidationError>
<spring-ws:ValidationError xmlns:spring-ws="http://springframework.org/spring-ws">cvc-attribute.3: The value 'sch:currencyType' of attribute 'xsi:type' on element 'sch:value' is not valid with respect to its type, 'QName'.</spring-ws:ValidationError>
<spring-ws:ValidationError xmlns:spring-ws="http://springframework.org/spring-ws">cvc-complex-type.2.1: Element 'sch:value' must have no character or element information item [children], because the type's content type is empty.</spring-ws:ValidationError>
</detail>
It appears like a bug in the AxiomSoapMessageFactory / Axiom implementation to me (namespace context is lost), as both requests validate fine when using the SaajSoapMessageFactory. Note that the validation only fails on the xsi:type= attribute. The same namespace is recognized correctly for elements.
I cannot use SaajSoapMessageFactory due to high memory consumption for large responses. I found similar problems described in the Spring forum and on SO, but no solution. Thanks for help!
The reason is that Spring-WS uses OMContainer#getXMLStreamReader(). Instead it should use OMContainer#getXMLStreamReader(boolean, OMXMLStreamReaderConfiguration) and set the preserveNamespaceContext property to true in the OMXMLStreamReaderConfiguration object.
You should file a bug for Spring-WS, or even better, fix the issue and submit a pull request.
Trying to call a SAP SOAP Web Service from a generated sudzc app shows errors I don't know:
SudzCExamples[5192:f803] <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns="urn:sap-
com:document:sap:soap:functions:mc-style"><soap:Body><ZComUrlGetrecords>
<IYear>2012</IYear></ZComUrlGetrecords></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
SudzCExamples[5192:f803] <soap-env:Envelope xmlns:soap-
env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap-env:Header></soap-env:Header><soap-
env:Body><soap-env:Fault><faultcode>soap-env:Server</faultcode><faultstring
xml:lang="en">CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT:XSLT exception.System expected element
'IYear'</faultstring><detail><ns:SystemFault
xmlns:ns="http://www.sap.com/webas/710/soap/runtime/abap/fault/system/">
<Host>undefined</Host><Component>APPL</Component><ChainedException>
<Exception_Name>CX_SOAP_CORE</Exception_Name><Exception_Text>CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT:XSLT
exception.System expected element 'IYear'</Exception_Text></ChainedException>
<ChainedException><Exception_Name>CX_SXMLP</Exception_Name><Exception_Text>XSLT
exception</Exception_Text></ChainedException><ChainedException>
<Exception_Name>CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT</Exception_Name><Exception_Text>System expected
element 'IYear': Main Program:/1BCDWB/WSS825E06E4DEC40F9171D|
Program:/1BCDWB/WSS825E06E4DEC40F9171D| Line: 18| Valid:X</Exception_Text>
</ChainedException></ns:SystemFault></detail></soap-env:Fault></soap-env:Body></soap-
env:Envelope>
2012-03-11 20:09:30.631 SudzCExamples[5192:f803] soap-env:Server CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT:XSLT
exception.System expected element 'IYear'
(null)
The strange thing is that it seems as if the request has the IYear element. Can someone tell me where to search the problem?
I ran into this same problem yesterday and discovered the solution after some experimentation. First thing I did was use my SoapUI client to make the request successfully. SoapUI comes with a free trial and even if you do not use the free trial you can still use it to make accesses to the web service without registering it. I used the xml from the successful request I made to compare against the request that SudzC was making. They differ in several ways, and the way that SudzC forms the request is not sufficient.
My suggestion to you is to compare the two requests and change SudzC's request to match the SoapUI request. You can do this by editing the Soap source code that SudzC gives to you, this source code is found particularly in the Soap.m file in the createEnvelope function.
Also, if your requests have an empty header SudzC does not include the header part of the request. Hard code in an empty header after the namespace portion of the envelope. Doing all this fixed this exact issue for me.
I am attempting to consume a web service using Delphi 2010 and Indy. To establish a usable SOAP stream to compare to the one created by my program, I am testing in SOAPUI. I am using a SOAP stream provided by the web service provider which also matches the SOAP stream specified in the WSDL file. I am getting an HTTP 400 (bad request) error from the service.
From what I can find online, it appears that receiving an HTTP 400 error indicates that your SOAP request is malformed and can not be read by the web service. I have tested my SOAP stream using XMLPad and the XML seems to be well formed. I suppose this may mean that something does not match its schema requirement. I will first check the schema description for the password in case that is expected to not be sent as plain text. What else should I be checking to eliminate an HTTP 400 error?
Here is my request (less username and password) in case it helps:
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:wsa="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing"
xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd"
xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"
xmlns:xop="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/xop/include"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://wwww3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<soap:Header>
<wsa:Action>http://edd.ca.gov/SendTransmission</wsa:Action>
<wsa:MessageID>urn:uuid:5aa788dc-86e1-448b-b085-2d2743cf9f26</wsa:MessageID>
<wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:Address>http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/role/anonymous</wsa:Address>
</wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:To>http://fsettestversion.edd.ca.gov/fsetproxy/fsetservice.asmx</wsa:To>
<wsse:Security soap:mustUnderstand="1">
<wsse:UsernameToken wsu:Id="UsernameToken">
<wsse:Username>#USERNAME#</wsse:Username>
<wsse:Password Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">#PASSWORD#/wsse:Password>
<wsse:Nonce EncodingType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0#Base64Binary">O5QWht1bslLCX6KnlEypAA==</wsse:Nonce>
<wsu:Created>2012-02-29T22:32:38.250Z</wsu:Created>
</wsse:UsernameToken>
<wsu:Timestamp wsu:Id="Timestamp-805a7373-335c-43b6-ba21-6596c4848dbf">
<wsu:Created>2012-02-22T15:41:42Z</wsu:Created>
<wsu:Expires>2012-02-22T15:46:42Z</wsu:Expires>
</wsu:Timestamp>
</wsse:Security>
</soap:Header>
<soap:Body>
<SendTransmission xmlns="http://edd.ca.gov/">
<SendTransmissionRequest xmlns="http://www.irs.gov/a2a/mef/MeFTransmitterServiceWse.xsd">
<TransmissionDataList>
<Count>1</Count>
<TransmissionData>
<TransmissionId>123456789</TransmissionId>
<ElectronicPostmark>2012-02-22T07:41:42.2502206-08:00</ElectronicPostmark>
</TransmissionData>
</TransmissionDataList>
</SendTransmissionRequest>
<fileBytes>
<xop:Include href="cid:1.634654933022658454#example.org"/>
</fileBytes>
</SendTransmission>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
There may be something else, but at the moment, I am suspicious of the wsse:UsernameToken. I downloaded the document at http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0.pdf and read it last night. It's written in fairly plain language and I feel like I understand what it is saying but it leaves me with a smaller question than the one I asked originally. This document proposes that you can use a plain text password in this format:
<S11:Envelope xmlns:S11="..." xmlns:wsse="...">
<S11:Header>
...
<wsse:Security>
<wsse:UsernameToken>
<wsse:Username>Zoe</wsse:Username>
<wsse:Password>IloveDogs</wsse:Password>
</wsse:UsernameToken>
</wsse:Security>
...
</S11:Header>
...
</S11:Envelope>
Or you can use a password digest. It defines a password digest like this:
Password_Digest = Base64 ( SHA-1 ( nonce + created + password ) )
According to the reference, the format for a password digest would look like this:
<S11:Envelope xmlns:S11="..." xmlns:wsse="..." xmlns:wsu= "...">
<S11:Header>
...
<wsse:Security>
<wsse:UsernameToken>
<wsse:Username>NNK</wsse:Username>
<wsse:Password Type="...#PasswordDigest">
weYI3nXd8LjMNVksCKFV8t3rgHh3Rw==
</wsse:Password>
<wsse:Nonce>WScqanjCEAC4mQoBE07sAQ==</wsse:Nonce>
<wsu:Created>2003-07-16T01:24:32Z</wsu:Created>
</wsse:UsernameToken>
</wsse:Security>
...
</S11:Header>
...
</S11:Envelope>
This is not the format used in the example provided by the web service publisher. The plain text version in the reference does not use a nonce. The example message uses a nonce but calls for a plain text password. It appears to me that the use of a nonce without a password digest does not add any security to the message. It could be any random string of characters if there is no agreement for how it is to be created. Am I missing the point?
I know this must seem like a tedious undertaking, but I am hoping that by providing this here, maybe we can provide a little help to the next person coming along.
I too have come across this issue. The web service publisher (edd.ca.gov) responded by stating that the " value is required by the SOAP 1.2 standards" yet I find no valid support for that. It looks like we both are heading down the same path (FSET) and maybe we should team up and work together, two heads are better than one. I have found many mistakes within the example code and I too have yet get it to work.
i use mimic.js regarding a project that i m developing..
the issue that i face, is if there is a fault response from the webservice,
mimic, doesn't handle it, and the browser remains "awaiting" for a response, that has actually been back, but hasn't been handled by mimic..
to be more specific, one typical fault response is the following..
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<methodResponse>
<fault>
<value>
<struct>
<member>
<name>faultCode</name><value><int>104</int></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>faultString</name><value><string>Invalid Input Parameters</string></value>
</member>
</struct></value></fault></methodResponse>
and chrome console get me the error
mimic.js:11 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'childNodes' of null
any suggestions on how to handle "fault" responses?
mimic.js hasn't been altered at all..
also tried to bypass the fact that mimic can't handle the fault, by trying to use the isFault flag, in the if statement, with no success either..
isFault is supposed to get a boolean value, i guess true/false?
i figured out the problem..
when there was an error, the response, from the web service returned with a header as text/html this had as a result mimic.js not to be able to identify that the response was valid xml, and ended with the uncaught typeerror...
only way that i currently figured to handle this, is just with a try..catch, which doesn't actually solves the problem, it just bypass it..and return with a generic alert..