I had been using a Subversion for my source control, combined with git ONLY to deploy (push) to heroku. My pattern was: Update local working copy from latest master at remote subversion repository. Then do git commit and git push heroku (Git was set to ignore .svn stuff). This working copy I only used to push to heroku, I had another subversion folder for doing live development, and committing to the remote subversion repository for tracking.
I have now switched to git fully. I did a complete import from subversion into a new remote git repository. I've successfully been working on my local working copy of the git repo (origin), and pushing changes when it suits me (also collaborating with one other developer, but I basically run the operation).
MY Question:
I would now like to return to my OTHER git working copy that I had previously been using to push to heroku (that has .svn/ stuff in it as well). I'm thinking of just adding my new git repository as an [origin] entry in the .git/config.. pulling the latest changes from my new git remote, and pushing to heroku, but I'm wondering if it will freak out.
It will try and merge and get confused won't it? AND, even if the pull worked, will the heroku remote get confused about a push that originated from some new git repo?
I could clobber (delete) that working copy (used to push to heroku from subversion), and make a new clone of my new git repository, then add heroku to the .git/config. But I'm concerned pushing to heroku will still cause it to get confused, since I used to push from a different working copy.
Any advice would be great!
Thanks in advance!
If I understand you correctly, you want to switch back to the former SVN repository as your working copy, and you want to preserve the old SVN history?
There are a couple of options available.
Push the recent changes from the new Git repository to Heroku, then switch to the old repository and pull from Heroku. This will bring you old repository up to date.
Temporarily change the URL in the old repository's config file to point to the local path of the new repository. Pull the recent changes from there, and then revert back to the Heroku URL when done. This will also bring your old repository up to date.
The first option is the most expedient, and the second is the long way round. Either way, you will have the same net result of an up to date local repository containing all history. The surplus new repository can be disposed of in either case.
Edit:
To address your concerns about whether Heroku will care about the origin of the commit, in brief, no the repository on Heroku is another git repository that accepts commits from authenticated users.
As long as the credentials are correct, the originating repository does not matter. This is the beautiful thing about DVCS - there is not one controlling or corruptible repository - It is entirely possible for you to now clone from Heroku on another machine and continue work from there. As long as your credentials are the same, the history will show any and all commits you push, but does not care where from.
If your desire is to simply use a clean repository to work with, the new one will be the favorite. The old one can be deleted without ill effects.
To prove this - check the SHA-1 hashes for a commit in both new and old repositories, and you will see they are identical. The hash is unique for all commits, and can be used to check the code integrity at all times. There will never be more than one change for any given hash.
As a side note, the repository is portable in that it is entirely self contained, and can be moved around freely on your storage space, or even be used on external storage such as a USB thumb drive.
Related
I was trying to push my code (ruby on rails) stored in GitLab to production. As it didn't work, I tried to check git repository and accidentally created a new one through project/repo$ git init.
After that I got a message about Initializing a new repository.
According to other solutions for accident git init, it wouldn't be a problem if I initialized a new repository in already existing one, but in this case I would get the Reinitializing existing repository message, which I didn't get. So should I just delete the repository via rm -rf .git? According to this I accidentally started a new git init on an existing git project, what do I need to get it back to normal?, it will do me no good, or it might be different situation?
I have very little technical knowledge, so if you could explain "for dummies" that would be great!
Update: I deleted the repository and everything works now.
What the full message about "initializing a new repository"? In short, yes all git related files are stored in the .git directory so if you delete it you can start fresh. That sounds like a good idea considering that you won't loose anything yet.
Note that git init only sets up the repo to commit. You still need to make an initial commit in order to push to your remote on GitLab. You do this via git's commit command.
I'm beginner on rails, heroku and git, but I've done all installation stuffs.
I created two projects on heroku.com, but I don't know how to change them from my PC (the way I looked from help doesn't work such as "$ git push heroku master").
So, how can I edit one of my herokuapp in different computers?
As I understand, I need git commands to bound my projects on PC to herokuapp, and commands to update projects from heroku to my PC (mostly 2 different Win 7 and sometimes iMac). Am I right? Does anybody can tell me how it's works?
Thank you
If you haven't ever used a version control system before you might be in for a steep learning curve.
Git allows you to manage source revision across distributed repositories. In your case, it might make sense to set up a GitHub account and create a git repository there, then use that as your master repository. You use git to pull code from the master repository to your local machine, where you make your changes. You commit your changes to your local repository and then push these changes to the master repository.
On your heroku account you then git pull from the master repository to retrieve the changes you made.
This brushes over a lot of detail that you need to know. I suggest you start googling git tutorials and read up about how git works and how it's intended to be used.
If you are totally new to git and heroku i would suggest you to go through this
My heroku repo grew to 1.5gb, so the nice fellows at heroku support cleared out the remote heroku repo and suggested I push a fresh copy.
However, the results of du -h .git locally show .git to be 276m. And, predictably, heroku throws an error when I try to push master to it.
So, my question: can I delete my local .git folder, do git init and push to heroku? What exactly would that do?
My app's code is pushed to github - my usual workflow is:
git add .
git commit -m "message"
git push #to github
git push heroku master
Possible Problems
There are two likely reasons your repository could be larger than expected.
You have a lot of binary assets in your repository.
You have a huge commit history.
Possible Solutions
If either of these things are the cause, you have a few options. Consider the following.
If your problem is binary assets, move your assets to an external asset store (e.g. Amazon S3 or a remote filesystem). You can then remove them from your history with git-filter-branch followed by git-gc. This will slim down your repository a lot.
If your problem is a really large history, make a separate shallow clone to push to Heroku. For example:
git clone --depth 1 my_repo heroku_repo
Well, you couldn't do that, unless you force a push (which is almost never recommended). This would erase your whole commit history and create a brand new repository.
But if you WANT to erase everything because of space... you can. It's just... strange.
What happens if you only push master?
You might want to do some housekeeping.
Do the upvoted answer but bear in mind that you can't push a shallow clone. Here's a follow up: Pushing to github after a shallow clone
I am an almost perfect beginner at Github so please humor me with this elementary question.
I have a laptop PC that I've been using to interact with a repo on Github. I just bought a Mac and I would like to do my programming on both machines.
I have installed Git on the new machine and I have set up my username, e-mail, and Github token on the Terminal.
What are the basic commands I need to do this:
Download the repo from Github the first time? I've created a new folder on my Mac but going there and typing git pull git#github.com/sscirrus/repo.git produces fatal: not a repository (or any of the parent directories): .git.
Upload those changes again such that the main repo is updating cleanly with each new push. I assume that once I have the code in my new folder, it would be a matter of git add . and git push with password entry?
I am reading through tutorials on Git but just want to make sure I'm doing something sensible for my situation before my newbieness screws up a lot of prior work. Thank you!
Go through this book, http://progit.org/book/ and http://gitcasts.com/ for video tutorial.
And I recommend you follow these steps
Clone the repository (git clone repoAddress)
create a new branch (git branch branchName)
checkout that branch (git checkout branchName)
make changes and commit in that branch (git add files)
checkout master (git checkout master)
perform a pull (it updates the local repository with the remote one) git pull
If there is change, checkout the branch and rebase it with local master
If there is conflict resolve it and add that file and make a commit again
checkout master again and merge the branch (git merge branch)
push the commits to the remote repository.(git push)
If you want a GUI tool, then there is GitX which is made for Mac OS X. http://gitx.frim.nl/
Download the git repo for first time - do a clone of the repo first. this will bring your code from github to your machine for the first time.
git clone your_git_repo_url
from second time, you can
git pull your_git_repo_url
Upload the changes after commits
git push your_git_repo_url
Please read scott chacons git books. these will get you the basics of git. and learning this will help in the long run.
You need to use git clone, not git pull.
You'll want to git commit after add and before push. add just adds something to the index (Worst name ever. The "index" is essentially a pending commit.) and commit actually commits it to your repository. push then pushes committed stuff from your local repository to a remote repository.
Whilst there's a lot to be said for using git from the command line (to help understanding) you might like to try the github clients (for mac & windows - download them from the github homepage - at the bottom in the section marked 'clients') which I'm guessing might not have been available when you posted your question.
The Windows one lets you specify a default storage directory (where it clones the repos into) - the Mac one prompts you with each clone as to where you want to stick it.
Both very easy to use to do what you want (clone, pull, push etc and also good for seeing what branches you have and changing between them)
I am developing some school grading software and decided to use Github to host the project. After building some code on my Ubuntu box I pushed it to Github and then cloned it down to my MacBook Pro. After editing the code on the MBP I pushed it back to Github. The next morning I tried to update my repo on the Ubuntu box with a git pull and it gave me all kinds of trouble.
Whats the best way to work in this situation? I don't want to fork my own repo and I don't really want to send myself emails or pull requests. Why can't I just treat Github like a master and push/pull from it onto all of my personal repos on different computers?
I'll assume your problem was that the machine on which you first created the repo crapped out when you tried to issue the git pull command.
When you clone an existing git repository (like you did on your 2nd machine, the MacBook Pro), you're automatically set up to so your git pull commands will automatically merge the remote with your local changes.
However, when you initially create a repo and then share it on a remote repository, you have to issue a few commands to make things as automated as a on cloned repo.
# GitHub gives you that instruction, you've already done that
# git remote add origin git#github.com:user_name/repo_name.git
# GitHub doesn't specify the following instructions
git config branch.master.remote origin
git config branch.master.merge refs/heads/master
These last few instructions configure git so future git pull's from this repo will merge all remote changes automatically.
The following is a bit of shameless self-promotion. If you use Ruby, I have created a Ruby-based tool that lets you deal with all these kinds of things with git remote branches. The tool is called, unsurprisingly, git_remote_branch :-)
If you don't use Ruby, my tool is probably gonna be too much of a hassle to install. What you can do is look at an old post on my blog, where most of the stuff grb can do for you was explicitly shown. Whip out your git notes file :-)
You can also add multiple SSH public keys.