I'm using Virtual Server 2005 and working with a virtual hard disk 16GB.
I need expand this virtual disk to 20GB.
Thanks.
Beatriz
You could try VMToolkit. It's free!
Related
I was reading the textbook:Computer Systems A Programmer’s Perspective, in chapter 9.7.2:Linux Virtual Memory System (third edition) that talks about virtual memory.
I was a bit confused by the structure of virtual memory for linux process as shown below:
My question is: does kernel virtual memory preserve for kernel to run
and rest of the virtual memory preserve for user process? What does kernel code and data do? And what does the physical memory in kernel virtual memory?
does kernel virtual memory preserve for kernel to run and rest of the virtual memory preserve for user process?
Yes, there is a part of virtual memory that is always reserved for the kernel and another part that is left available to userspace processes. Every single process has its own virtual memory, but the kernel is always mapped in the higher part (higher addresses) of virtual memory. Whether or not this mapping is visible to the process depends on Kernel Page Table Isolation.
See also: Do the virtual address spaces of all the processes have the same content in their “Kernel” parts?
What does kernel code and data do?
Part of the high virtual memory is a direct mapping of the actual kernel image. That is, the kernel executable and all its data. You can see it in more detail here in this page of the kernel documentation, marked as "kernel text mapping, mapped to physical address 0".
See also: What's the use of having a kernel part in the virtual memory space of Linux processes?
And what does the physical memory in kernel virtual memory?
That part of the image is totally misleading. I don't know precisely what information the authors of the book were trying to convey, but physical memory is definitely not a part of kernel virtual memory. They were probably trying to address the fact that there is a direct mapping of all physical memory in the kernel virtual memory, which can be seen again on the same page of the kernel documentation, marked as "direct mapping of all physical memory".
Physical memory refers to the real memory of the system (i.e. the RAM). Each region of virtual memory is mapped to some region of physical memory. This virtual-to-physical mapping is totally transparent to processes and is managed by the kernel. For example, two executables that have the same file open in read-only mode are usually sharing the same physical memory region, while seeing two different virtual address.
This is a more accurate depiction of the relationship between virtual and physical memory:
Source: https://computationstructures.org/lectures/vm/vm.html
cited from the CSAPP book, 3rd version, section 9.7.2, where the picture is shown.
Interestingly, Linux also maps a set of contiguous virtual pages (equal in size to the total amount of DRAM in the system) to the corresponding set of contiguous physical pages. This provides the kernel with a convenient way to access any specific location in physical memory—for example, when it needs to access page tables or to perform memory-mapped I/O operations on devices that are mapped to particular physical memory locations.
I think the Physical memory in the picture just reflects what's described above: a virtual memory area that maps to the entire physical memory.
I have three node CouchDB cluster. It is running on windows. Each node has 16vcpu and 64GB RAM. I am fairly new to CouchDB and to nonrelational databases in general.
The cluster is running on windows. What I am struggling with is one of the nodes (which I am assuming is the coordinator) is using the page file about 120GB disk space while it has about 48GB free RAM available to it.
We increased the RAM from 32Gb to 64GB to help with the paging. Only to find out that, it is now using more of the page file since the page file is being currently managed by the Windows OS.
I would assume it would be paging once it used all the available RAM, but what we have is 120GB paging file while it has about 50GB free RAM.
Why is it using the page file which has less response time while it has free RAM available to it?
Wasn't it supposed to use unreserved RAM for disk caching of frequently accessed DB file blocks to speed up access? Why is it behaving this way?
Is there a CouchDB or Erlang Beam configuration setting that I should be looking at?
I thought that virtual address space was a section of RAM allocated to a specific process. But the book I'm reading says that 4 gbs is the standard limit of virtual address space. Isn't that the entire amount of RAM? If that is the case then I'm confused at what virtual address space is. Can anyone enlighten me?
That's the whole point of virtual addresses: The OS handles the physical memory, the process handles its own, virtual memory which is mapped to any memory the OS has available, not necessarily RAM.
On a 32 bit operating system the virtual address space (VAS) is, as you say, usually 4 GiB. 32 bits give you (2^32) addresses (0 ... (2^32)-1), each addressing one byte.
You could have more or less physical RAM and still have a 4-GiB-VAS for each and every process running. If you have less physical RAM, the OS would usually swap to harddrives.
The process doesn't need to know any of this, it can use the full VAS it is given by the OS and it's the OS' job to supply the physical memory.
(This is actually just a dumbed-down version of the Wikipedia article on VAS.)
Lets say if i have a server of 500gb of disk space. Suppose, if i have to create 500VM's of each virtual machine of size 50gb. How can I do it?
I was reading across few puzzles and came across this question.
Most VMs will allow you to create dynamic disks. So you create a dynamic disk of a maximum size (say 10GB), but it only actually uses what is written to the disk (which is generally much less).
Of course if you fill the disk with 10GB of data, then it uses 10GB of real storage.
Under Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition, SP2 (/3GB switch not enabled)
As I understand it, and I may be wrong, the maximum addressable memory for a process is 4GB.
Is that 2GB of private bytes and 2GB of virtual bytes?
Do you get "out of memory" errors when the private byte limit or virtual byte limit is reached?
It is correct that the maximum address space of a process is 4GB, in a sense. Half of the address space is, for each process, taken up by the operating system. This can be changed with the 3GB switch but it might cause system instability. So, we are left with 2GB of addressable memory for the process to use on its own. Well, not entirely. It turns out that a part of this space is taken up by other stuff such as DLLs an other common code. The actual memory available to you as a programmer is around 1.5GB - 1.7GB.
I'm not sure about how you can handle accidentally going above this limit but I know of games which crash in large multiplayer maps for this reason. Another thing to note is that a 32bit program cannot use more than the 2GB address space on a 64bit system unless they enable the /LARGEADDRESSAWARE:YES linker flag.
Mark Russinovich started a series of posts on this..
Pushing the Limits of Windows: Physical Memory
While 4GB is the licensed limit for 32-bit client SKUs, the effective limit is actually lower and dependent on the system's chipset and connected devices. The reason is that the physical address map includes not only RAM, but device memory as well, and x86 and x64 systems map all device memory below the 4GB address boundary to remain compatible with 32-bit operating systems that don't know how to handle addresses larger than 4GB. If a system has 4GB RAM and devices, like video, audio and network adapters, that implement windows into their device memory that sum to 500MB, 500MB of the 4GB of RAM will reside above the 4GB address boundary.
You can only access 2Gb of memory in total (without the 3Gb switch) on 32bit Windows platforms.
You could run multiple 32bit VMs on a 64bit OS so that each app has access to as much memory as possible if your machine has more than 4Gb.
A lot of people are just starting to hit these barriers, I guess it's easier if your app is in .net or Java as the VMs happily go up to 32Gb of memory on 64bit os.
On 32 bits, if there is enough physical memory and disk space for virtual memory, memory runs out around 3GB since the kernel reserves the address space above 0xC0000000 for itself. On a 64 bits kernel running a 64 bits application, the limit is at 8TB.
For more details, check out MSDN - Memory Limits for Windows Releases
Maximum addressable memory for a 32bit machine is 4GB, for a 64bit machine you can address loads more. (Although some 32bit machines have extension systems for accessing more, but I don't think this is worth bothering with or considering for use).
You get out of memory errors when the virtual limit is reached. On Windows Server 2003, task manager tells you the limit on the performance tab labelled 'Commit Charge Limit'.