What are the .channels and .registry folders in the symfony /plugins folder? - symfony1

I am upgrading a Symfony website from 1.2.9 to 1.4.1 and having a lot of fun in the process (NOT!).
I have decided to clean up all unecessary files and folders and leave things to the bear minimum, in the process - since I had acquired a lot of plugins etc over a period of time - some of which were installed by PEAR and others (mostly), manually. Since I dont like using PEAR in any case, I will be installing all plugins manually hence forth (from now on).
As part of the cleanup process, I want to get rid of the /plugins folder. I suspect that these are to do with PEAR, but I dont know if symfony needs them to run. In my 1.4 website, I will be installing all the plugins that I (actually use) manually. So can I get rid of the following files (in /plugins) ?
.channels
.depdb
.depdblock
.filemap
.lock
.registry

Yes these are pear related. You can get rid of them.
I'm doing the same move from pear to manual install.

Related

Webpacker creates huge node_modules

I created a new project with Rails 5.1 and I want to use webpacker to manage my react dependencies. The problem is after installing webpacker it creates a huge 130Mb+ dir node_modules with every possible node_package. This does not make sense as default behavior. How can I configure Webpacker to only keep the packages I'm actually using. I have searched for this issue in every way I could and I did not see any answers that made sense
Install what you need via yarn add, they will be listed in your package.json. Once you run assets:precompile (which will also run webpacker:compile) or just webpacker:compile, the public folder will be populated the compiled assets you are going to need to run the app.
Like Tamer says, node_modules should be in your .gitignore file. In dev, you will see all the node modules due to existing dependencies but that doesn't mean they are going to be used.
In summary, don't worry and rely on yarn.

apache karaf clean start

I'm trying to clean start karaf on Windows using clean option.
It does delete data directory with bundles cache but it copy new bundles into data directory from system directory not local maven repository. But system directory has stale jars in comparison to local maven repository which cause karaf to start with stale bundles.
Is this a 'feature' of clean option? Am I missing something? How could I start Karaf with latest code from maven repo not dealing with file system?
You can't as the system directory is per default the one to use.
The clean does mean to clear up bundles in a awkward state and is only rarely used. Sometimes this happens if you start and stop the karaf container very close to each other then bundle might be in an incomplete state and since those bundle state is kept only a clean will help. Another way of cleaning is to delete the data folder.
So what you look like to be intending is to update certain bundles that are installed from the systems folder. For that you need to install the never version cause Karaf nows which versions are in the systems folder, those bundles are defined in the framework feature which is the basic feature to be used by Karaf itself.
If you have your own bundles in the system folder there is no way of updating those as those are regarded to be bootfeatures. In case you want to update those you'll need to make sure those features aren't boot features anymore and after that just do install the never versions of your bundles and uninstall the older ones. This can be done with the command shell.
One side note, it's usually best to ask those questions on the users mailinglist of Karaf, you get more people to answer your questions there.

How to update plugins version (of a rails project) when old version had manual changes

How to update many plugins version when old plugin's version had manual changes in project?
Is there any tool available for doing this?
or tell proper method for updating ruby plugin version if some plugins may have manual changes done before in the older plugin's version.
Best method when a plugin is required or preferred *might be to copy out the old plugin to a dummy directory for reviewing later, then
uninstall the plugin, (script/plugin uninstall plugin_name)
install the old (but unmodified version) plugin (script/plugin install plugin_name_source_address) - likely either from rubyforge or github
review against the saved version you put in the dummy directory using an editor capable of differential display (that is, which allows you to compare two files for variations. Notepad++ is one freebie that will do this, but there are a ton of editors that allow diff views)
(this may or may not be something you can script. idk. I'm not that good, but I don't know of a tool that will do it all for you)
do another uninstall on the plugin to clear it out, since it's job is done,
install the new version of the plugin (script/plugin install plugin_name_source_address)
and finally edit the new plugin as necessary to accommodate any customization that was performed by you or some third party to the original utility.
I say as necessary because some of the customizations may not even be required in the newer version, although I can't say for sure...
finally, once all your patches are re-added to the new plugin and it's been tested and verified, either delete the dummy directory or archive it for future reference.
See, and I didn't even cop out with a bundler answer. You DID ask for assistance with a plugin, right? ;)
I'm not quite following you, but surely but that's what the Gemfile is for?
Take a look at Bundler
Try to run "$gem install rails"(it will install the newer version of rails) and then install watever the gem it asks finally run "$bundle install"

is symfony system wide?

i have a directory with some .php files in it...do i need to install symfony in that directory so that i can run symfony commands from that directory?? i tried: pear channel-discover pear.symfony-project.com
and got:
Channel "pear.symfony-project.com" is already initialized
the i tried: pear install symfony/symfony
and got:
WARNING: configuration download directory "/build/buildd/php5-5.3.2/pear-build-download" is not writeable. Change download_dir config variable to a writeable dir to avoid this warning
Cannot install, php_dir for channel "pear.symfony-project.com" is not writeable by the current user
how do i fix this please? must i run it as sudo??
thanks
If I remember well, Symfony is "system-wide" if installed through PEAR (like you are trying to do).
Now it is recommended by the manual to do a "standalone" install through SVN. See http://www.symfony-project.org/gentle-introduction/1_4/en/03-Running-Symfony
As well, the sandbox will bring a "standalone" installation of Symfony (you will have to be in the project root directory to be able to run the symfony commands)
EDIT
Example of quick install using SVN:
mkdir /path/to/symfony
cd /path/to/symfony
svn checkout http://svn.symfony-project.com/tags/RELEASE_1_4_0 .
but it should be better to follow the manual and configure the external SVN sources.
I run servers where I have applications that use different versions of symfony simultaneously. I found it much easier to deal with the SVN checkout than the PEAR insteall.
So what I've done is do an SVN checkout of each revision that I need
into it's own folder. In my case i check them out to
/usr/share/symfony/(version)
Then I configure the ProjectConfiguration.class.php to reference whatever version is needed, using the line:
require_once '/usr/share/symfony/1.x.x/lib/autoload/sfCoreAutoload.class.php';
If I need to switch to a different symfony version, I can just change that config.
That is, assuming all my code is compatible with that version

Looking for SVN Best Practices When Building Rails Applications on Ubuntu [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
First a bit of background.
I have been working on the MS platform for my entire development career. Up until 2 weeks ago, I had never booted any other OS than 98/XP/Vista. I started using VSS long long ago, and made the change to SVN about 2 years ago. With SVN I use TortiseSVN and use the standard branch/tag/trunk setup.
My projects are also self contained, meaning I can go to a fresh dev box, pull down a single repository, open VS, press F5 and it will run (most of the time). All dependencies are stored in a lib folder, source code is in a src folder, etc...
In an effort to learn new things, I've decided to build a Ruby on Rails application and have created a Ubuntu based development machine. I have a SVN server up and running and am working with another person on this project. He happens to be using a Mac for his development machine.
And now for the issues.
I seem to be struggling with how to manage the various versions of ruby, rails and all of the plugin's I'm working with. I also seem to be struggling with using SVN on Ubuntu.
So Ubuntu comes with Ruby pre-installed. I want to say it's version 1.8.5. Either way, I had a bunch of gems to install for the plugin I'm using (Community Engine). Being new to *nix, I didn't use sudo when installing them and ran into all sorts of issues. I ended up blowing away Ruby completely and starting fresh. That seemed to work.
The problem is though, that after I commit my code, and the other guy gets latest, he has to go through the whole process of installing gems.
What is the best practice for managing gems and plug-ins in a RoR application? I don't care if a zillion files get added to SVN. Diskspace and network bandwidth are cheap. I just don't know how to do this correctly.
So on to SVN.
I have installed RapidSVN, but very frequently run into issues with folders getting locked. A couple times I realized my mistake, others, I had no clue why. But in both scenarios, i couldn't fix it. I ended up making a backup of my code, pulling down a new working copy, then manually moving over changes and being a bit smarter when committing them to the project.
I actually RTFM a bit last night and found that I'm supposed to create a bookmark for my repos, then do a "checkout working copy" from that bookmark. I'm not sure why, but ok, that's what the manual says...
What are some best practices for using SVN on a RoR project on Ubuntu?
I'm literally looking for a step by step process on this one.
edit
I forgot to mention, I use NetBeans for my IDE, although i have not looked to see what kind of SVN support it has, if any. I looked at RubyMine, and would love to use it, but it appears to be too unstable right now.
For plugins, I'd personally recommend just sticking them in the vendor folder and add them to SVN as if you'd written the code yourself. Piston was also a great solution, but switched away from it when all the common plugins started moving to github (piston has been unreliable since then)
For gems, hopefully you're using rails 2 or higher. You should be listing the gems you require in your config/environment.rb using config.gem. Here's a bunch of information about that feature
What this means is that if you add a new gem, the next time your co-worker updates, his rails app won't boot until he's got the neccessary gems. He can then install them in one step using sudo rake gems:install
You can take this one step further, and put your gems in the vendor directory. This is commonly known as "vendor everything." The easiest way to do this is to list all the gems you use in environment.rb as above, and then run rake gems:unpack. There are 2 problems with this approach however, so I prefer not to use it myself.
If you have 10 apps and they each vendor their gems, you end up keeping 10 copies of common gems in subversion, which makes updating all your sites a whole lot slower.
This may not be an issue for you, or may be worth putting up with, it's just a personal preference.
Some gems (such as mongrel or hpricot) have native extensions written in C. What this means is that when you install them, the .c source code is downloaded, and gcc gets run to compile it specifically for your system.
If you installed a native C extension on ubuntu, then put it in the vendor folder, and later on tried to run that on OS X (or even possibly a different version of ubuntu) it would most likely crash your ruby process and bring your app down.
If all your gems are pure-ruby ones, then this is not a problem, but it's just something to be aware of.
Many people use piston or desert to manage plugins and install gems into Rail local vendor folder (stored under SVN).
http://www.rubyinside.com/advent2006/12-piston.html
http://pivotallabs.com/users/brian/blog/articles/459-build-your-own-rails-plugin-platform-with-desert
I also recommend using geminstaller which will help you both install all the same gems and the same versions of them
http://geminstaller.rubyforge.org/
I use SVN from the command line but if you were more comfortable with TortiseSVN you might want to try IDEs that have SVN nicely integrated like RadRails and NetBeans. The IDEs have very similar graphical SVN managers similar to Tortise, if you want to work on the cmd line just find a simple 10 minute SVN tutorial and you should be good to go.
I have never heard of rapid SVN and the normal SVN tool has always worked just find with me, hardly ever causing the locking folders issue.
Orion mentioned having to rebuild gems that have been vendored when sharing them between different OS's - you can use the gems:build rake task to rebuild them automatically.
First, figure out svn from the command line. The svn-book is on line. It's not too hard to do svn status or svn commit -m "blah". Most problems come if you use OS functions to delete or rename files. Use the svn commands for that.
Next, if rapidsvn is not working out for you, try svn-workbench. Hate to say it, but none of the linux svn GUI tools that I have seen are as good as tortoisesvn.
Plugins and svn are an issue. There is a tool called piston that aims to clear that up, though I don't use it. I check out the plugins into my vendor/plugins directory. If a new version comes out that I really want, I use my trusty update_plugin bash script to update the plugin:
#!/bin/bash
# reinstall the plugin in an svn friendly way
plugin="some_plugin"
plugin_url="http://some_server/some_plugin/trunk"
for f in site1 site2 site3
do
echo $f
cd ~/rails/$f
svn delete vendor/plugins/$plugin
rm -rf vendor/plugins/$plugin
svn -m "remove $plugin" commit
script/plugin install $plugin_url
svn add vendor/plugins/$plugin
svn -m "add $plugin" commit
done

Resources