Rails: How do I write tests for a ruby module? - ruby-on-rails

Question

I would like to know how to write unit tests for a module that is mixed into a couple of classes but don't quite know how to go about it:
Do I test the instance methods by writing tests in one of the test files for a class that includes them (doesn't seem right) or can you somehow keep the tests for the included methods in a separate file specific to the module?
The same question applies to the class methods.
Should I have a separate test file for each of the classes in the module like normal rails models do, or do they live in the general module test file, if that exists?

Answer 1

IMHO, you should be doing functional test coverage that will cover all uses of the module, and then test it in isolation in a unit test:
setup do
#object = Object.new
#object.extend(Greeter)
end
should "greet person" do
#object.stubs(:format).returns("Hello {{NAME}}")
assert_equal "Hello World", #object.greet("World")
end
should "greet person in pirate" do
#object.stubs(:format).returns("Avast {{NAME}} lad!")
assert_equal "Avast Jim lad!", #object.greet("Jim")
end
If your unit tests are good, you should be able to just smoke test the functionality in the modules it is mixed into.
Or…
Write a test helper, that asserts the correct behaviour, then use that against each class it's mixed in. Usage would be as follows:
setup do
#object = FooClass.new
end
should_act_as_greeter
If your unit tests are good, this can be a simple smoke test of the expected behavior, checking the right delegates are called etc.

Answer 2

Use inline classes (I am not doing any fancy flexmock or stubba/mocha usage just to show the point)
def test_should_callout_to_foo
m = Class.new do
include ModuleUnderTest
def foo
3
end
end.new
assert_equal 6, m.foo_multiplied_by_two
end
Any mocking/stubbing library out there should give you a cleaner way to do this. Also you can use structs:
instance = Struct.new(:foo).new
class<<instance
include ModuleUnderTest
end
instance.foo = 4
If I have a module that is being used in many places I have a unit test for it which does just that (slide a test object under the module methods and test if the module methods function properly on that object).

Answer 3

What I like to do is create a new host class and mix the module into it, something like this:
describe MyModule do
let(:host_class) { Class.new { include MyModule } }
let(:instance) { host_class.new }
describe '#instance_method' do
it 'does something' do
expect(instance.instance_method).to do_something
end
end
end

Answer 4

I try to keep my tests focused only on the contract for that particular class/module. If I've proven the module's behavior in a test class for that module (usually by including that module in a test class declared in the spec for that module) then I won't duplicate that test for a production class that uses that module. But if there's additional behavior that I want to test for the production class, or integration concerns, I'll write tests for the production class.
For instance I have a module called AttributeValidator that performs lightweight validations kind of similar to ActiveRecord. I write tests for the module's behavior in the module spec:
before(:each) do
#attribute_validator = TestAttributeValidator.new
end
describe "after set callbacks" do
it "should be invoked when an attribute is set" do
def #attribute_validator.after_set_attribute_one; end
#attribute_validator.should_receive(:after_set_attribute_one).once
#attribute_validator.attribute_one = "asdf"
end
end
class TestAttributeValidator
include AttributeValidator
validating_str_accessor [:attribute_one, /\d{2,5}/]
end
Now in a production class that includes the module, I won't re-assert that the callbacks are made, but I may assert that the included class has a certain validation set with a certain regular expression, something particular to that class, but not reproducing the tests I wrote for the module. In the spec for the production class, I want to guarantee that particular validations are set, but not that validations work in general. This is a kind of integration test, but one that doesn't repeat the same assertions I made for the module:
describe "ProductionClass validation" do
it "should return true if the attribute is valid" do
#production_class.attribute = #valid_attribute
#production_class.is_valid?.should be_true
end
it "should return false if the attribute is invalid" do
#production_class.attribute = #invalid_attribute
#production_class.is valid?.should be_false
end
end
There is some duplication here (as most integration tests will have), but the tests prove two different things to me. One set of tests prove the general behavior of the module, the other proves particular implementation concerns of a production class that uses that module. From these tests I know that the module will validate attributes and perform callbacks, and I know that my production class has a specific set of validations for specific criteria unique to the production class.
Hope that helps.

Answer 5

In minitest since each test is explicitly a class you can just include the module to the test and test the methods:
class MyModuleTest < Minitest::Test
include MyModule
def my_module_method_test
# Assert my method works
end
end

Answer 6

I would generally test the module in as much isolation as possible, essentially testing the methods, with just enough code, mocks and stubs to get it working.
I would then probably also have tests for the classes the modules is included in. I may not test every class, but would test enough of the classes to get good coverage and have insight into any issues that arise. These tests don't need to explicitly test the module, but would certainly test it's usage in particular scenarios.
Each set of tests would have its own file.