I need to create an ActionResult in an ASP.NET MVC application which has a .csv filetype.
I will provide a 'do not call' email list to my marketing partners and i want it to have a .csv extension in the filetype. Then it'll automatically open in Excel.
http://www.example.com/mailinglist/donotemaillist.csv?password=12334
I have successfully done this as follows, but I want to make sure this is the absolute best and recommended way of doing this.
[ActionName("DoNotEmailList.csv")]
public ContentResult DoNotEmailList(string username, string password)
{
return new ContentResult()
{
Content = Emails.Aggregate((a,b)=>a+Environment.NewLine + b),
ContentType = "text/csv"
};
}
This Actionmethod will respond to the above link just fine.
I'm just wondering if there is any likelihood of any unexpected conflict of having the file extension like this with any different version of IIS, any kind of ISAPI filter, or anything else I cant think of now.
I need to be 100% sure because I will be providing this to external partners and don't want to have to change my mind later. I really cant see any issues, but maybe theres something obscure - or another more "MVC" like way of doing this.
I used the FileContentResult action to also do something similar.
public FileContentResult DoNotEmailList(string username, string password)
{
string csv = Emails.Aggregate((a,b)=>a+Environment.NewLine + b);
byte[] csvBytes = ASCIIEncoding.ASCII.GetBytes( csv );
return File(csvBytes, "text/csv", "DoNotEmailList.csv");
}
It will add the content-disposition header for you.
I think your Response MUST contain "Content-Disposition" header in this case. Create custom ActionResult like this:
public class MyCsvResult : ActionResult {
public string Content {
get;
set;
}
public Encoding ContentEncoding {
get;
set;
}
public string Name {
get;
set;
}
public override void ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context) {
if (context == null) {
throw new ArgumentNullException("context");
}
HttpResponseBase response = context.HttpContext.Response;
response.ContentType = "text/csv";
if (ContentEncoding != null) {
response.ContentEncoding = ContentEncoding;
}
var fileName = "file.csv";
if(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(Name)) {
fileName = Name.Contains('.') ? Name : Name + ".csv";
}
response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition",
String.Format("attachment; filename={0}", fileName));
if (Content != null) {
response.Write(Content);
}
}
}
And use it in your Action instead of ContentResult:
return new MyCsvResult {
Content = Emails.Aggregate((a,b) => a + Environment.NewLine + b)
/* Optional
* , ContentEncoding = ""
* , Name = "DoNotEmailList.csv"
*/
};
This is how I'm doing something similar. I'm treating it as a download:
var disposition = String.Format(
"attachment;filename=\"{0}.csv\"", this.Model.Name);
Response.AddHeader("content-disposition", disposition);
This should show up in the browser as a file download with the given filename.
I can't think of a reason why yours wouldn't work, though.
The answer you accepted is good enough, but it keeps the content of the output in memory as it outputs it. What if the file it generates is rather large? For example, when you dump a contents of the SQL table. Your application could run out of memory. What you do want in this case is to use FileStreamResult. One way to feed the data into the stream could be using pipe, as I described here
Related
Suppose I have an C# MVC app which has a controller method that returns one of 3 content types: image png, image jpeg, or application pdf. I have read that it is possible to have images that contain XSS payloads. What would be the best way to Encode/escape these return contents so they aren't vulnerable to XSS? The controller method looks like this:
string contentType = "image/png";
MemoryStream mem = new MemoryStream();
if (ImageFormat == null || ImageFormat == "")
{
image.Save(mem, System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageFormat.Png);
}
else
{
if (ImageFormat.ToUpper() == "PNG") image.Save(mem, System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageFormat.Png);
if (ImageFormat.ToUpper() == "JPEG")
{
image.Save(mem, System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageFormat.Jpeg);
contentType = "image/jpeg";
}
}
mem.Position = 0;
mem.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
return this.Image(mem, contentType);
Where Image is defined the following class here:
using …
namespace x.Classes
{
public static class ControllerExtensions
{
public static ImageResult Image(this Controller controller, Stream imageStream, string contentType)
{
return new ImageResult(imageStream, contentType);
}
}
}
And the OutputStream is written to using:
using …
namespace x.Classes
{
public class ImageResult : ActionResult
{
public ImageResult(Stream imageStream, string contentType)
{
if (imageStream == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("imageStream");
if (contentType == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("contentType");
this.ImageStream = imageStream;
this.ContentType = contentType;
}
public Stream ImageStream { get; private set; }
public string ContentType { get; private set; }
public override void ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context)
{
if (context == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("context");
HttpResponseBase response = context.HttpContext.Response;
response.ContentType = this.ContentType;
byte[] buffer = new byte[4096];
while (true)
{
int read = this.ImageStream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
if (read == 0)
break;
response.OutputStream.Write(buffer, 0, read);
}
response.End();
}
}
}
Is there a way for me to escape/encode the buffer that is getting written to the OutputStream here:`
response.OutputStream.Write(buffer, 0, read);
To protect against XSS attacks? For example if this were HTML that was being returned:
response.OutputStream.Write(HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(buffer), 0, read);
But we know we are returning a jpeg, pdf, or png which means Html encode won't work here. So what do we use to safely escape/encode an image/pdf?
By the time you have buffer ready, it's too late. The same as with HTML, you want to context-sensitively encode any user input in those files, not the whole thing.
Now, with images this doesn't make much sense in the context of XSS, an image is rendered by an image renderer, and not as html, so there won't be any javascript to be run. The general best practice for uploaded images is to process them on the server and save them as a new image, because this removes all unnecessary things, but it has its risks as well if your processor itself is the target of an attack.
SVG for example is a different beast, SVG can have code in it, as can PDF. But again, PDFs will be open on the client with a PDF viewer, not in the context of the web application even if the PDF viewer is the browser itself (the browser hopefully separates Javascript in the PDF from the web page even if the origin is the same).
But javascript in a PDF can still be an issue for the client. Javascript running in a PDF may do harmful things, the simplest of which is consume client resources (ie. DoS of some sort), or it may try to break out of the PDF context somehow exploiting a viewer vulnerability. So the attack would be that one user uploads a malicious PDF for others to download. I think the best you can do against this is scan uploaded files for malware (which you should do anyway).
If you are generating all of this from user input (images, PDFs), then the libraries you use should take care of properly encoding values so that a malicious user can't inject code in a PDF. When the PDF is already generated, you can't "fix" it anymore, user input is mixed with code.
Also make sure to set the following header in responses (along with the correct Content-Type of course):
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
You do not need to encode the images themselves, you need to encode/escape the links to the images.
For example:
Link Title
where image.url.png?logout comes from user input.
You would url encode image.url.png?logout as image.url.png%3Flogout so that it is rendered useless to an attacker.
We have asp.net mvc web application. We are serving pdf file via FileContentResult in controller:
return File("x.pdf", "application/pdf", Server.UrlEncode("x.pdf"));
How can we overwrite PDF file on server side without "file in use" exceptions.
There will be uploading interface but the question is not related with interface. How can I safely overwrite the file. Safe means
Nobody gets error during overwriting process (Some of the users may read during overwriting process)
Overwrite without error ("file in use" or other exceptions)
EDIT
There is good advice from frikinside but FilePathResult does not have FileShare option
public class FilePathResult : FileResult
{
public string FileName
{
get;
private set;
}
public FilePathResult(string fileName, string contentType) : base(contentType)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(fileName))
{
throw new ArgumentException(MvcResources.Common_NullOrEmpty, "fileName");
}
this.FileName = fileName;
}
protected override void WriteFile(HttpResponseBase response)
{
response.TransmitFile(this.FileName);
}
}
So the question is : How can we transmitFile with "FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite" option?
When you upload the file you could implement a lock on the file.
public class SafeFileUploader
{
private object file_lock = new object();
private static SafeFileUploader instance;
private SafeFileUploader() { }
public static SafeFileUploader GetInstance
{
get
{
if (instance == null)
{
instance = new SafeFileUploader();
}
return instance;
}
}
public static SafeFileUploadProcess(string path)
{
lock (file_lock)
{
//FileUploadProcess
}
}
}
UPDATED 2.0
Based on your comment, I'm updating this answer to offer a not exclusive reading method.
using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite))
{
using (StreamReader sr = new StreamReader(fs, Encoding.Default))
{
// FileReadingProcess
}
}
Using FileShare.ReadWrite will permit opening a stream allowing reading and writing by another process.
UPDATED 3.0
If you are using FilePathResult from MVC to returning the file, you can always use a stream as parameter instead of path to ensure FileAccess and FileShare are correct.
return File(new FileStream("x.pdf", FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite), "application/pdf", Server.UrlEncode("x.pdf"));
I have a web page in my asp.net mvc website where user uploads the file. Now my problem is, i need to show the link in a page on click of which user will be able to view the file.
User can upload file or types doc,docx and pdf.
How can i do this.
Please help,
Thank's
The most simple thing you can do is to use System.IO.Directory.GetFiles(..), like this:
var myModel = new myModel {
Files = Directory.GetFiles(#"c:\temp")
}
However, Directory.GetFiles(..) will give you an array of strings, which may a bit hard to work with. If you need to use the files in a bit more object oriented manner, refer to the DirectoryInfo and FileInfo classes.
Example:
var directory = new DirectoryInfo(#"c:\temp");
foreach (FileInfo fi in directory.GetFiles()) {
Console.WriteLine(#"FileName: {0}", fi.Name);
}
MSDN reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/07wt70x2.aspx
Thank's for the reply.
But i have been looking for something like this, which solved my problem.
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Index(string id)
{
string extension = id.Substring(id.IndexOf(".") + 1);
string contentType = string.Empty;
if (extension == "doc" || extension == "docx")
{
contentType = "application/msword";
}
else if (extension == "pdf")
{
contentType = "application/pdf";
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(contentType))
{
throw new Exception("Invalid file");
}
return File(Server.MapPath("~/Docs/" + id), contentType);
}
Where id parameter in above code is the filename.
Thank's
If you're asking how to avoid your download links from being intercepted by MVC routing have a look at http://weblogs.asp.net/pjohnson/archive/2010/11/11/mvc-s-ignoreroute-syntax.aspx
Is there a way to stream a file using ASP.NET MVC FileContentResult within the browser with a specific name?
I have noticed that you can either have a FileDialog (Open/Save) or you can stream the file in a browser window, but then it will use the ActionName when you try to save the file.
I have the following scenario:
byte[] contents = DocumentServiceInstance.CreateDocument(orderId, EPrintTypes.Quote);
result = File(contents, "application/pdf", String.Format("Quote{0}.pdf", orderId));
When I use this, I can stream the bytes, but a OPEN/SAVE file dialog is given to the user. I would like to actually stream this file in a browser window.
If I just use the FilePathResult, it shows the file in a browser window, but then when I click on "Save" button to save the file in PDF, it shows me the Action Name as the name of the file.
Has anyone encountered this?
public ActionResult Index()
{
byte[] contents = FetchPdfBytes();
return File(contents, "application/pdf", "test.pdf");
}
and for opening the PDF inside the browser you will need to set the Content-Disposition header:
public ActionResult Index()
{
byte[] contents = FetchPdfBytes();
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "inline; filename=test.pdf");
return File(contents, "application/pdf");
}
Actually, the absolutely easiest way is to do the following...
byte[] content = your_byte[];
FileContentResult result = new FileContentResult(content, "application/octet-stream")
{
FileDownloadName = "your_file_name"
};
return result;
This might be helpful for whoever else faces this problem. I finally figured out a solution. Turns out, even if we use the inline for "content-disposition" and specify a file name, the browsers still do not use the file name. Instead browsers try and interpret the file name based on the Path/URL.
You can read further on this URL:
Securly download file inside browser with correct filename
This gave me an idea, I just created my URL route that would convert the URL and end it with the name of the file I wanted to give the file. So for e.g. my original controller call just consisted of passing the Order Id of the Order being printed. I was expecting the file name to be of the format Order{0}.pdf where {0} is the Order Id. Similarly for quotes, I wanted Quote{0}.pdf.
In my controller, I just went ahead and added an additional parameter to accept the file name. I passed the filename as a parameter in the URL.Action method.
I then created a new route that would map that URL to the format:
http://localhost/ShoppingCart/PrintQuote/1054/Quote1054.pdf
routes.MapRoute("", "{controller}/{action}/{orderId}/{fileName}",
new { controller = "ShoppingCart", action = "PrintQuote" }
, new string[] { "x.x.x.Controllers" }
);
This pretty much solved my issue.
Previous answers are correct: adding the line...
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "inline; filename=[filename]");
...will causing multiple Content-Disposition headers to be sent down to the browser. This happens b/c FileContentResult internally applies the header if you supply it with a file name. An alternative, and pretty simple, solution is to simply create a subclass of FileContentResult and override its ExecuteResult() method. Here's an example that instantiates an instance of the System.Net.Mime.ContentDisposition class (the same object used in the internal FileContentResult implementation) and passes it into the new class:
public class FileContentResultWithContentDisposition : FileContentResult
{
private const string ContentDispositionHeaderName = "Content-Disposition";
public FileContentResultWithContentDisposition(byte[] fileContents, string contentType, ContentDisposition contentDisposition)
: base(fileContents, contentType)
{
// check for null or invalid ctor arguments
ContentDisposition = contentDisposition;
}
public ContentDisposition ContentDisposition { get; private set; }
public override void ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context)
{
// check for null or invalid method argument
ContentDisposition.FileName = ContentDisposition.FileName ?? FileDownloadName;
var response = context.HttpContext.Response;
response.ContentType = ContentType;
response.AddHeader(ContentDispositionHeaderName, ContentDisposition.ToString());
WriteFile(response);
}
}
In your Controller, or in a base Controller, you can write a simple helper to instantiate a FileContentResultWithContentDisposition and then call it from your action method, like so:
protected virtual FileContentResult File(byte[] fileContents, string contentType, ContentDisposition contentDisposition)
{
var result = new FileContentResultWithContentDisposition(fileContents, contentType, contentDisposition);
return result;
}
public ActionResult Report()
{
// get a reference to your document or file
// in this example the report exposes properties for
// the byte[] data and content-type of the document
var report = ...
return File(report.Data, report.ContentType, new ContentDisposition {
Inline = true,
FileName = report.FileName
});
}
Now the file will be sent to the browser with the file name you choose and with a content-disposition header of "inline; filename=[filename]".
I hope that helps!
The absolute easiest way to stream a file into browser using ASP.NET MVC is this:
public ActionResult DownloadFile() {
return File(#"c:\path\to\somefile.pdf", "application/pdf", "Your Filename.pdf");
}
This is easier than the method suggested by #azarc3 since you don't even need to read the bytes.
Credit goes to: http://prideparrot.com/blog/archive/2012/8/uploading_and_returning_files#how_to_return_a_file_as_response
** Edit **
Apparently my 'answer' is the same as the OP's question. But I am not facing the problem he is having. Probably this was an issue with older version of ASP.NET MVC?
I adapted it in ASP.NET Core with REST API.
public class FileContentWithFileNameResult : FileContentResult
{
public FileContentWithFileNameResult(byte[] fileContents, string contentType, string fileName)
: base(fileContents, contentType)
{
FileName = fileName;
}
public string FileName { get; private set; }
public override Task ExecuteResultAsync(ActionContext context)
{
var response = context.HttpContext.Response;
response.Headers.Append("Content-Disposition", $"inline; filename={FileName}");
response.Headers.Append("Access-Control-Expose-Headers", "Content-Disposition");
response.Headers.Append("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
return base.ExecuteResultAsync(context);
}
}
public FileContentResult GetImage(int productId) {
Product prod = repository.Products.FirstOrDefault(p => p.ProductID == productId);
if (prod != null) {
return File(prod.ImageData, prod.ImageMimeType);
} else {
return null;
}
}
In WebForms, I would normally have code like this to let the browser present a "Download File" popup with an arbitrary file type, like a PDF, and a filename:
Response.Clear()
Response.ClearHeaders()
''# Send the file to the output stream
Response.Buffer = True
Response.AddHeader("Content-Length", pdfData.Length.ToString())
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename= " & Server.HtmlEncode(filename))
''# Set the output stream to the correct content type (PDF).
Response.ContentType = "application/pdf"
''# Output the file
Response.BinaryWrite(pdfData)
''# Flushing the Response to display the serialized data
''# to the client browser.
Response.Flush()
Response.End()
How do I accomplish the same task in ASP.NET MVC?
Return a FileResult or FileStreamResult from your action, depending on whether the file exists or you create it on the fly.
public ActionResult GetPdf(string filename)
{
return File(filename, "application/pdf", Server.UrlEncode(filename));
}
To force the download of a PDF file, instead of being handled by the browser's PDF plugin:
public ActionResult DownloadPDF()
{
return File("~/Content/MyFile.pdf", "application/pdf", "MyRenamedFile.pdf");
}
If you want to let the browser handle by its default behavior (plugin or download), just send two parameters.
public ActionResult DownloadPDF()
{
return File("~/Content/MyFile.pdf", "application/pdf");
}
You'll need to use the third parameter to specify a name for the file on the browser dialog.
UPDATE: Charlino is right, when passing the third parameter (download filename) Content-Disposition: attachment; gets added to the Http Response Header. My solution was to send application\force-download as the mime-type, but this generates a problem with the filename of the download so the third parameter is required to send a good filename, therefore eliminating the need to force a download.
You can do the same in Razor or in the Controller, like so..
#{
//do this on the top most of your View, immediately after `using` statement
Response.ContentType = "application/pdf";
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=receipt.pdf");
}
Or in the Controller..
public ActionResult Receipt() {
Response.ContentType = "application/pdf";
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=receipt.pdf");
return View();
}
I tried this in Chrome and IE9, both is downloading the pdf file.
I probably should add I am using RazorPDF to generate my PDFs. Here is a blog about it: http://nyveldt.com/blog/post/Introducing-RazorPDF
You should look at the File method of the Controller. This is exactly what it's for. It returns a FilePathResult instead of an ActionResult.
mgnoonan,
You can do this to return a FileStream:
/// <summary>
/// Creates a new Excel spreadsheet based on a template using the NPOI library.
/// The template is changed in memory and a copy of it is sent to
/// the user computer through a file stream.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>Excel report</returns>
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult NPOICreate()
{
try
{
// Opening the Excel template...
FileStream fs =
new FileStream(Server.MapPath(#"\Content\NPOITemplate.xls"), FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read);
// Getting the complete workbook...
HSSFWorkbook templateWorkbook = new HSSFWorkbook(fs, true);
// Getting the worksheet by its name...
HSSFSheet sheet = templateWorkbook.GetSheet("Sheet1");
// Getting the row... 0 is the first row.
HSSFRow dataRow = sheet.GetRow(4);
// Setting the value 77 at row 5 column 1
dataRow.GetCell(0).SetCellValue(77);
// Forcing formula recalculation...
sheet.ForceFormulaRecalculation = true;
MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream();
// Writing the workbook content to the FileStream...
templateWorkbook.Write(ms);
TempData["Message"] = "Excel report created successfully!";
// Sending the server processed data back to the user computer...
return File(ms.ToArray(), "application/vnd.ms-excel", "NPOINewFile.xls");
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
TempData["Message"] = "Oops! Something went wrong.";
return RedirectToAction("NPOI");
}
}
Although standard action results FileContentResult or FileStreamResult may be used for downloading files, for reusability, creating a custom action result might be the best solution.
As an example let's create a custom action result for exporting data to Excel files on the fly for download.
ExcelResult class inherits abstract ActionResult class and overrides the ExecuteResult method.
We are using FastMember package for creating DataTable from IEnumerable object and ClosedXML package for creating Excel file from the DataTable.
public class ExcelResult<T> : ActionResult
{
private DataTable dataTable;
private string fileName;
public ExcelResult(IEnumerable<T> data, string filename, string[] columns)
{
this.dataTable = new DataTable();
using (var reader = ObjectReader.Create(data, columns))
{
dataTable.Load(reader);
}
this.fileName = filename;
}
public override void ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context)
{
if (context != null)
{
var response = context.HttpContext.Response;
response.Clear();
response.ContentType = "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet";
response.AddHeader("content-disposition", string.Format(#"attachment;filename=""{0}""", fileName));
using (XLWorkbook wb = new XLWorkbook())
{
wb.Worksheets.Add(dataTable, "Sheet1");
using (MemoryStream stream = new MemoryStream())
{
wb.SaveAs(stream);
response.BinaryWrite(stream.ToArray());
}
}
}
}
}
In the Controller use the custom ExcelResult action result as follows
[HttpGet]
public async Task<ExcelResult<MyViewModel>> ExportToExcel()
{
var model = new Models.MyDataModel();
var items = await model.GetItems();
string[] columns = new string[] { "Column1", "Column2", "Column3" };
string filename = "mydata.xlsx";
return new ExcelResult<MyViewModel>(items, filename, columns);
}
Since we are downloading the file using HttpGet, create an empty View without model and empty layout.
Blog post about custom action result for downloading files that are created on the fly:
https://acanozturk.blogspot.com/2019/03/custom-actionresult-for-files-in-aspnet.html
Use .ashx file type and use the same code