I am really confused over getting GPS location of user. do i have to implement separate logic for GSM and CDMA devices??...besides there are so many modes for getting GPS location(cellsite , stand alone , cell assisted etc). really confused over which criteria to set..and also some networks refuse some modes(e.g. cellsite).
what i really know that autonomous mode works for all. but that cant be used inside buildings , over near tall buildings...so that doesn't make any sense.
Related
I have developed a mobile application allowing field agents to collect data based on geolocation.
Each agent is assigned to a specific point of sale where he has to go, and when he arrives, he has to point out his presence in this point of sale before starting the collection.
To detect that the agent is in the store, I used a radius of 20 meters to take into consideration errors, but the problem is that position detection isn't easy in offline mode and the user should insist for the position to be captured.Knowing that the GPS chip doesn't need internet to capture location.
My question is more about looking for advices and best practices if you've got some experience on these kind of applications.
In the Android phones especially i've increased the precision in the settings, but i'me having the same issues.
Notice : Online things are working good
For one of our projects i'm looking for a way to only let centrals (native iOS or Android app) connect with the perhiperal when they are inside a defined connection range (distance around the perhiperal).
I know that BLE is not designed for distance measuring but i hoped there is a reliable way to make a difference between centrals in a range <2m from the perhiperal and centrals >3,5 meter from the perhiperal.This means i do not need to measure the exact distance.
An important thing to mentoin is that our perhiperal can be located in an "open field" situation but also in situations where it is surounded with walls or concrete for example in a entry floor of a building or a carpark.
Another possible issue is that the central can be inside a car but if this is the case, all centrals for the concerning perhiperal are inside a car. Ofcourse it can be different cars.
Note that there is max 1 perhiperal at the time inside the connection range.
In our current version we developed an formulla what uses the received RSSI strength to estimate the distance. Unfortunately we cannot get this working reliable enough. Maybe we need to use another formulla or calibration method or whatever, we really tried many things during the last 6 months.
The concrete question is:
Is it technically possible to achieve the target as described above and when yes, what is the way to achieve the target above? We are open for specific BLE antenna's or specific designed casings for the BLE antenna or whatever is needed. It is also okay when we need to build an calibration application or specific hardware to calibrate our perhiperals, for each perhiperal, so we are realy open minded for any solution as long as it works reliable!
When more info is required to give an answere, please let me know what is missing and i will complete the info.
Unfortunately, it is like you said, you cannot use Bluetooth or Bluetooth Low Energy for short distance/range measurements. Bluetooth was just not designed that way. You want to get accurate reliable measurement for something between 2-3.5, this is way too small for BLE to be capable of that. I know that this is not what you want to hear, but I have already tried this and wasted many months on this before.
The only thing I can recommend if you really really need to continue down this path is that in order to get a more reliable outcome, you will need many many devices that are measuring the RSSI simultaneously, and then those devices need to be talking to each other to get an average RSSI measurement. You may also want to look at configuring the Tx power based on the average readings that you get, i.e. the closer the device gets, you lower the Tx power of both the scanning and advertising devices. Finally, directional antennas can be used if you are planning to use non-Android non-iOS devices for scanning, but this will be tricky if the only antenna you can change is that of the peripheral.
Recently, while developing an app on the iPhone, I came across the problem of tracking vehicles. It was easy to track the vehicles on a map if they were stationary using Parse ( although not sure if it was the best method) but the issue was tracking vehicles if they were moving. I didn't want to query for geopoints in Parse unnecessarily if the location of the vehicle did not change. I was steered towards using Twisted, and after doing some investigation, realized this might be a solution. Using the reactor loop, when locations were changed I could notify the other users and update their maps appropriately. Conceptually, I understand this problem but having trouble finding information or help regarding GPS with twisted.
I currently have been running the gps example from the site, http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/12.0.0/core/examples/gpsfix.py
Using my MacBook pro to test, I found the available serial port and it attempts to open as a NMEAReciever but I was expecting a GPS location to be written. Once I can understand how to interact with the GPS, I feel I could tackle communicating this information through the iPhone with NSStreams such in the fashion of this tutorial except instead of sending text messages, it will be sending GPS locations
http://www.raywenderlich.com/3932/networking-tutorial-for-ios-how-to-create-a-socket-based-iphone-app-and-server
Overall, my question is how can I access the GPS coordinates of a device using Twisted through the tutorial provided. I hope my question was detailed enough and I would be more than happy to correspond with someone any more details. Thank you
I (eventually) wrote twisted.positioning, which is essentially a better version of the twisted.protocols.gps thing you're using. It has much nicer abstractions over concepts like positions, as well as receivers. That may be interesting to you, because it provides abstractions that you can use to e.g. combine information from GPS and other sources (like compass). However, I think that in iOS-land, that job is already (mostly) handled by Core Location. I'd assume that the best course of action is too hook that up to twisted.positioning (shouldn't be particularly difficult, can't be anywhere nearly as hard as NMEA is, at least!). Lacking iOS development experience, I can't tell you how to access Core Location from Python; I can only point at the docs.
twisted.positioning is also an improvement when it comes to documentation. Unfortunately, that wasn't very difficult, because its predecessor came with none at all. I hope the one scant example that is provided helps, though; and I'd be more than happy to elaborate if it doesn't.
I would like to develop a mobile app for iPhones, that calculates time needed to reach a given velocity. For example: I'm in my car, open the app, choose 100km/h and when I accelerate the app should start to count time and it stops counting just in the moment when I reach 100km/h. It should be very accurate.
I heard about two solutions. First is to use the accelerometer/gyroscope, but some people told me it's bad idea, because I won't be able to calculate time on longer distances. The second option is to use GPS, but on the other hand it can be not as accurate as I want it to be.
So I need suggestions, which option is better and why.
My targets are iPhones 4s and newer.
If you want to be more precise than the GPS you will need to have some sort of sensor. Most similar apps and concepts will create a receiver that plugs into the car that the iPhone can connect to. This has the benefit of making all of the sensors in the car available to you. This is an example: https://www.automatic.com/how-automatic-works/
Using the sample code provided from WWDC, I've been trying to write a simple proof-of-concept app that performs indoor positioning in my office building. I have a floor plan image and replaced the standard image in the demo code. I've also done the requisite mapping of GPS coordinates to pixels for the two anchor points.
When I run the app in the simulator and specify static GPS coordinates, I see the position updated as expected in the simulator. When I run it on my phone, however, the experience isn't nearly as seamless as Apple advertised in the video. On my iPhone 5s, the positioning is all over the place, and rarely anywhere close to accurate. Even sitting next to a window with a clear line-of-sight to the sky I still get very inaccurate results.
I would assume that this might have something to do with our physical layout, WiFi topology, or other such parameters. However, I also noticed that Apple has a portal where you can register your facility for use with indoor positioning. Does this have something to do with the poor results in my app? I can't imagine how Apple would be able to help with such a scenario, but thought it might have something to do with it.
Are there other steps I should take to increase the accuracy of my app? Is there a way to leverage iBeacons for improved positioning indoors? I haven't found any documentation indicating so, but thought maybe someone here would know.
You're right, Apple has the portal available at https://mapsconnect.apple.com
At this portal you can add your venue and Apple will guide you on setting it up. However, your venue must have all of the following attributes:
Accessible to the general public
Annual visitors in excess of 1 million per year
Availability of complete, accurate, and scaled reference maps
Wi-Fi throughout the area
Associated app that's authorized by venue owner
If your venue has all the required attributes, then you also will need to answer these questions about your usage:
How are you planning to use indoor positioning? (Ads, Navigation, Delivering content)
How many venues would you like to enable with indoor positioning?
What type of venue do you have? (Airport, Hospital, Museum, Mall, Office)
What type of floor plans do you have? (CAD, BIM, GeoJSON, AI, PDF, PNG, etc)
Are the venues equipped with Wi-Fi and/or iBeacon?
Name of the largest venue
Address of the largest venue
Once you have completed the entire form and jumped through the last hoop, you will be brought to a page that confirms the details. Once done, it's all in their hands and they will contact you.
Indoor Positioning does not work well without addional devices like iBeacons.
There is no useable GPS receivement in buildings, the reflected signal is often far worse than 50m .
GPS might work indoors if it is a single floor building with a thin roof, but this is usually not the case in indoor buildings.
The only thing that works well, is to buy some iBeacons and mount them at various locations in the office.
You have to manage the location of that beacons: they only send you an id, and (maybe?) the distance to that iBeacon. (Please check wheter you get distance to beacon)
But ios LocationService will not use that iBeacons.
So either use iBeacons or forget your project. There is no well working solution for indoor positioning. Some use magnetic fields, there is even an App for that, but this needs measuring your whole office in detail.
Why don't you try with the indoor SDK which can be integrated in iOS applications. Also try to give the accuracy level appropriately when you use location framework API.