Is there a way to capture only the data layer and disregard the upper layers in wireshark? If not, is there a different packet dump utility that can do this? PREFERABLY 1 file per packet!
What I am looking for: A utility that dumps only the data (the payload) layer to a file.
This is programming related...! What I really want to do is to compare all of the datagrams in order to start to understand a third party encoding/protocol. Ideally, and what would be great, would be a hex compare utility that compares multiple files!
You should try right-clicking on a packet and select "Follow TCP Stream". Then you can save the TCP communication into a raw file for further processing. This way you won't get all the TCP/IP protocoll junk.
There is a function to limit capture size in Wireshark, but it seems that 68bytes is the smallest value. There are options to starting new files after a certain number of kilo, mega, gigabytes, but again the smallest is 1-kilobyte, so probably not useful.
I would suggest looking at the pcap library and rolling your own. I've done this in the past using the PERL Net::Pcap library, but it could easily be done it other languages too.
If you have Unix/Linux available you might also look into tcpdump. You can limit amount of data captured with -s. For example "-s 14" would typically get you the Ethernet header, which I assume is what you mean by the datalink layer. There are also options for controlling how often files are created by specifying file size with -C. So theoretically if you set the file size to the capture size, you'll get one file per packet.
Using tshark I was able to print data only, by decoding as telnet and printing field telnet.data
tshark -r file.pcap -d tcp.port==80,telnet -T fields -e telnet.data
GET /test.js HTTP/1.1\x0d\x0a,User-Agent: curl/7.35.0\x0d\x0a,Host: 127.0.0.1\x0d\x0a,Accept: */*\x0d\x0a,\x0d\x0a
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found\x0d\x0a,Server: nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)\x0d\x0a,Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:32:58 GMT\x0d\x0a,Content-Type: text/html\x0d\x0a,Content-Length: 177\x0d\x0a,Connection: keep-alive\x0d\x0a,\x0d\x0a,<html>\x0d\x0a,<head><title>404 Not Found</title></head>\x0d\x0a,<body bgcolor=\"white\">\x0d\x0a,<center><h1>404 Not Found</h1></center>\x0d\x0a,<hr><center>nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)</center>\x0d\x0a,</body>\x0d\x0a,</html>\x0d\x0a
Not perfect but it was good enough for what I needed, I hope it helps some one.
Related
I am using wireshark to decode gsm packets. Wireshark picks up all communication at that frequency and decodes it.
Overview of the packets obtained.
Now in the system information 5 packet, we have the required parameter.Details of system information 5 packet
I wish to write a code such that if there is only a single value in the last entry of the packet i.e. the neighbour list, an alert inform of a pop up message or something is generated.
These packets have to captured and processed in real time.
I have installed pyshark but cant figure out how to move forward.
Please help
I can only give a partial answer, which is how to detect if there's only a single value or not. My suggestion is to use tshark and then post-process the data using another tool, such as wc. For example:
tshark -i lo -Y "gsm_a.rr.arfcn_list" -T fields -e gsm_a.rr.arfcn_list | wc -w
If the result is 1, then there's only 1 entry in the list.
How you generate an alert from this, I'm not sure.
I have fragmented packets coming from multiple sources stored in a *.pcap file. I need to merge all these payloads coming from the same source and extract the payloads in a file.
I need to do the above task using tcpdump or tshark commands.
Please let me know if I have missed something or if you need more clarification.
With pdml2flow (pypi) you can merge/aggregate frames based on any fields extracted by tshark / wireshark and print them as JSON, XML or any other format. You can also easily create a new plugin which extracts, rearranges and saves the payload for your use-case.
For example if you'd like to aggregate all frames with the same source and destination mac and print them as JSON you could do:
tshark -i interface -Tpdml | pdml2flow -f eth.src -f eth.dst +json
This might help if you can find a set of fields based on which you would like to merge/aggregate.
Disclosure: I am the author of pdml2flow.
I have a huge pcap file. I want to know facebook usage in terms of data transfered (upload, download). For that, I am using wireshark to read this file. From a question on stackoverflow , there are many fields that can be used to find bytes.
frame.len==243
ip.len=229
udp.length==209
data.len=201
Now, I have test frame.len and ip.len both gives different results. What I should consider correct ? I am a newbie in networks terminology and I have to just find correct data transfered.
What happens, when you connects to server and requests some simple page:
Server application generates requested data (e.g. <body>Hello world</body> string) and passes it to HTTP layer
HTTP layer generates necessary header according to RFC (specifies HTTP version, status code, content type etc), prepends it to generated data and pass everything to TCP layer
TCP layer may break data into more than one pieces (not our case, message is already too small) and prepend necessary info for transport layer to each piece (src/dst port number, sequence number, some flags, checksum etc), then passes it to IP level
IP layer prepends necessary info for routing (source/dest addresses, TTL and other stuff), then passes it to lower layer (e.g. Ethernet)
Ethernet adds its part (MAC addresses, maybe VLAN tags) and pushes all to physical device
Resulted data is sent byte-by-byte from server's NIC to network
So your question is actually up to you. What do you want to measure? Is it "data, which I need to display excluding all auxiliary info"? Or is it "all number of bytes I need to send/receive for getting this lovely cat picture"? Here is a list of fields to get size of each part:
To get data lenght only (as string, unfortunately): http.content_length_header == "606"
To get (data + HTTP header) length: tcp.len == 973
To get (data + HTTP + TCP + IP layers): ip.len=1013
To get every byte sent: frame.len == 1027
If you want to measure bandwidth occupation, use frame.len. If you're interested in "pure site weight", it should be independent from environment, so use http.content_length_header. Things might become more complicated on high level considering the following:
Era of HTTPS means you can't easily observe HTTP content in traces, so tcp.len might be the highest option
Some data (e.g. audio, video) is transferred over different protocol stack (e.g. IP - UDP - RTP)
I have a simple point to point UDP WiFi simulation in NS-3 that outputs data to a trace file. It provides lots of useful data but there is no information that gives a unique ID for each packet. I can't find anything in wireshark either when I open the pcap files.
I have output the results of my simulation to an ascii trace file and pcap files for both nodes but I can't find any packet identifier. I can see the sequence numbers of the packets but that's it.
I am new to NS-3 so I am not sure how to produce this information.
Here is some of the output from the trace file.
t 2.00082 /NodeList/0/DeviceList/0/$ns3::WifiNetDevice/Phy/State/Tx ns3::WifiMacHeader (DATA ToDS=0, FromDS=0, MoreFrag=0, Retry=0, MoreData=0 Duration/ID=0usDA=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, SA=00:00:00:00:00:01, BSSID=00:00:00:00:00:01, FragNumber=0, SeqNumber=0) ns3::LlcSnapHeader (type 0x806) ns3::ArpHeader (request source mac: 00-06-00:00:00:00:00:01 source ipv4: 10.1.1.1 dest ipv4: 10.1.1.2) ns3::WifiMacTrailer ()
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks.
In case you might not be aware of this already, let me first point out what might seem to be the obvious but: "there is no such thing as unique packet id in real networks" and since pcap traces are designed to contain dumps of real packets in real networks, there is zero chance you will be able to find a unique packet id in a pcap trace generated by ns-3.
Now, ns-3 does contain a per-packet unique id that is available with the Packet::GetId method and you can trivially change the source code of the function that generates your ascii dump to add this in src/wifi/helper/yans-wifi-helper.cc. Grep for "Ascii".
Now if you want to know why it does not do this by default because it is so useful, I honestly can't remember but:
there is probably something related to the ns2 trace format that inspired this ascii format. Compatibility with existing tools might have been an issue
adding a packet id goes against the ns-3 philosophy of matching what real networks do
I want to have a list of source IP addresses of an interface outbound traffic. How could I find the direction of a packet whether it's inbound or outbound reading traffic using libpcap? I don't know the subnet information of either side. And there are clients/servers on both sides, so I can't rely on port number ranges to filter traffic.
Why there is no information in libpcap packet header about direction, or filter option like inbound in pcap-filter?
Netsniff-NG, while not relying on libpcap, supports Linux kernel packet type extensions.
They're documented
here
One of the packet types is outgoing and commented as "outgoing of any type".
The following example will capture all packets leaving your interface.
$ netsniff-ng --in eth0 --out outgoing.pcap --type outgoing
Using this you can utilize other command-line tools to read the PCAP file and pull out all the source
addresses. Maybe something *nix-ey like this:
$ tcpdump -nnr outgoing.pcap | cut -d " " -f3 | cut -d . -f1-4
Note: I haven't tried this on a router.
you could use "ether src" or "ether dst" to filter packet direction. This require you to know the mac address of the interface.
You can select a direction that packets will be capture calling pcap_setdirection() before pcap_loop().
For example, to capture incoming packets only you need to write:
handle = pcap_open_live("eth0", 65535, 1, 0, errbuf);
pcap_setdirection(handle, PCAP_D_IN);
pcap_loop(handle, -1, process_packet, NULL);
Possible directions are: PCAP_D_IN, PCAP_D_OUT, PCAP_D_INOUT.
See tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_setdirection.3pcap.txt
The PCAP file format does not contain a field that holds the interface used during the capture. With that said, the newer PCAP-NG file format, currently used by Wireshark & Tshark, supports it along with packet direction.
Existing pcap-ng features:
packet dropped count
annotations (comments)
local IP address
interface & direction
hostname <-> IP address database
PcapNg
It sounds like you're capturing from a router or firewall so something like the following
would not work.
ip src 192.168.1.1
Capturing the traffic into flows may be an option but it still will not provide you with direction information. Though, you will be able to determine the source and destinations address easily. If you have an existing pcap you can convert it to the ARGUS format:
argus -r capture.pcap -w capture.argus
ra -nnr capture.argus
Other tools, some w/ examples, that can easily obtain end-points/hosts are:
ntop -f capture.pcap
tcpprof -nr capture.pcap
Wireshark Endpoints
flow-tools
You'll have to parse out the information you want, but I don't think that's too much trouble. I recommend taking a look at PCAP-NG if you can't work with this.