We use an AKS cluster for about 25 micro-services with serilog logs currently writing to a logs volume. Looking for a better way to see the logs for support purposes. We use AppInsights as the destination for OpenTelemetry embedded in the services. I see a Sinks nuget for both AppInsights & AzureAnalytics. I understand MSFT has combined features into "Monitor", but for traditional logging uses, it seems the AzureAnalytics sink is the correct choice? I would use the AppInsights sink for metrics? Is this understanding correct?
Currently just using RollingFile as the output which is difficult to comprehend with multiple replicas for a pod in AKS (hostname of the pod embedded in the file name to keep separate).
Related
I have a microservices based software architecture.
There is a php application which orchestrates the communication among microservices and the application's whole logic.
I need to simulate the communication between microservices as a graph.
There will be edges with weights , which will represent the affinities between microservices.
I am searching for a tool in order to collect all messages and their size.
I have read that there are distibuted tracing systems like Zipkin which i have already deployed, and could accomplish this task.
But, i cannot find how to collect the messages i want.
This is the php library i used for the instrumentation of my app
[https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin-php]
Any ideas about other tools or how to use Zipkin differently to achieve my goal?
Let me add to this thread my three bits. Speaking of Envoy, yes, when attached to your application it adds a lot of useful features from observability bucket, e.g. network level statistics and tracing.
Here is the question, have you considered running your legacy apps inside service mesh, like Istio ?.
Istio simplifies deployment and configuration of Envoy for you. It injects sidecar container (istio-proxy, in fact Envoy instance) to your Pod application, and gives you these extra features like a set of service metrics out of the box*.
Example: Stats produced by Envoy in Prometheus format, like istio_request_bytes are visualized in Kiali Metrics dashboard for inbound traffic as request_size (check screenshot)
*as mentioned by #David Kruk, you still needs to have Prometheus server deployed in your cluster to be able to pull these metrics to Kiali dashboards.
You can learn more about Istio here. There is also a dedicated section on how to visualize metrics collected by Istio (e.g. request size).
I'm trying to collect my application containers' logs throughout their entire life cycle. These containers are running inside Kubernetes pods, I've found solutions like Fluentd but I also found out that I need to specify a backend (Elasticsearch, AWS S3, etc.) whereas I want to collect logs inside files having specific names, for example podname_namespace_containername.json and then parse those files using a script. Is this possible with fluentd?
By far the fastest way to setup log collection is https://github.com/helm/charts/tree/master/stable/fluent-bit. Refer values.yaml for all the options available. It supports multiple backends like ES, S3, Kafka. Every log event is enriched with pod metadata (pod name, namespace, etc) and tagged so that you can organize processing separately on a backend. E.g. on a backend you can select and parse only certain pods in certain namespaces.
According to https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/logging/ you log to stdout/stderr, it gets written to the underlying node, a log collector (daemonset) collects everything and sends further.
FluentBit daemonset in Kubernetes implements exactly this architecture. More docs on FluentBit: https://docs.fluentbit.io/manual/concepts/data-pipeline
I am kind of new the spring cloud dataflow world and while playing around with the framework, I see that if I have a stream = 'test-steram' with 1 application called 'app'. When I deploy using skipper to kubernetes, I see that It creates pod/deployment & service on kubernetes with name as
test-stream-app-v1.
My question is why do we need to have v1 in service/deployment names on k8s? What role does it play in the overall workflow using spring cloud dataflow?
------Follow up -----------
Just wanted to confirm few points to make sure i am on right track to understand the flow
My understanding is with traditional stream (bind through kafka topics) service (object on kubernetes) do not play a significant role.
Rolling Update (Red/Black) pattern has implemented in following way in skipper and versioning in deployment/service plays a role in following way.
Let's assume that app-v1 deployment already exists and upgrade is requested. Skipper creates app-v2 deployment and
wait for it to be ready. Once ready it destroys app-v1
If my above understanding is right I have following follow up questions...
I see that skipper can deploy and package (and it do not have to be a traditional stream) to work with. Is that the longer term plan or Skipper is only intended to work spring-cloud-dataflow streams?
In case of non-tradtional stream package, where an package has multiple apps(rest microservices) in a group, how this model of versioning will work? I mean when I want to call the microservice from other microservice, I cannot possibly know or less than ideal to know the release-version of the app?
#Anand. Congrats on the 1st post!
The naming convention goes by the idea that each of the stream application is "versioned" if Skipper is used with SCDF. The version gets bumped for when, as a user, when you rolling-upgrade and rolling-downgrade the streaming-application versions or the application-specific properties either on-demand or via CI/CD automation.
It is very relevant for continuous-delivery and continuous-deployment workflows, and we provide native options in SCDF through commands such as stream update .. and stream rollback .. respectively. For any of these operations, the applications will be rolling updated in K8s, and each action will bump the number in the application name. In your example, you'd see them as test-stream-app-v1, `test-stream-app-v2, etc.
With all the historical versions in a central place (i.e., Skipper's database), you'd be able to interact with them via stream history.. and stream manifest .. commands in SCDF.
To learn more about all this, watch this demo-webinar (starts # ~41.25), and also have a look at samples in the reference guide.
I hope this helps.
I'm using Spring Cloud Dataflow local server and deploying 60+ streams with a Kafka topic and custom sink. The memory/cpu usage cost is not currently scalable. I've set the Xmx to 64m for most streams.
Currently exploring my options.
Disable embedded Tomcat server. I tried this once and SCDF couldn't tell the deployment status of the stream.
Group multiple Kafka "source" topics to a single sink app. This is allowed by Kafka but unclear if SCDF will permit subscribing to multiple topics.
Switch to using Kubernetes deployer. Won't exactly reduce the memory/cpu usage but distribute it across multiple machines. Haven't pursued this option because Kubernetes isn't used in my org yet. Maybe this will force the issue.
Open to other ideas. Might also be able to tweak Kafka configs such as max.poll.records and reduce memory usage.
Thanks!
First, I'd like to clarify the differences between SCDF and Stream/Task apps in the data pipeline.
SCDF is a lightweight Spring Boot app that includes the DSL, REST-APIs, and the Dashboard. Simply put, it serves as the orchestrator to define and deploy stream and task/batch data pipelines made of stream and task applications respectively.
The actual business logic, its performance, and the underlying resource consumption are at the individual Stream/Task application level. SCDF doesn't interfere with the app's operation, nor it contributes to the resource load. Everything, in the end, is standalone Boot apps - standalone Java processes.
Now, to your exploratory steps.
Disable embedded Tomcat server. I tried this once and SCDF couldn't tell the deployment status of the stream.
SCDF is a REST server and it requires the application container (in this case Tomcat), you cannot disable it.
Group multiple Kafka "source" topics to a single sink app. This is allowed by Kafka but unclear if SCDF will permit subscribing to multiple topics.
Again, there is no relation between SCDF and the apps. SCDF orchestrates full-blown Stream/Task (aka: Boot apps) into coherent data pipeline. If you have to produce or consumer to/from multiple Kafka topics, it is done at application level. Checkout the multi-io sample for more details.
There's the facility to consume from multiple topics directly via named-destination, too. SCDF provides a DSL/UI capability to build fan-in and fan-out pipelines. Refer to docs for more details. This video could be useful, too.
Switch to using Kubernetes deployer.
SCDF's Local-server is generally recommended for development. Primarily because there's no resiliency baked into the Local-server implementation. For example, if the streaming apps crash for any reason, there's no mechanism to restart them automatically. This is exactly why we recommend either SCDF's Kubernetes or Cloud Foundry server implementations in production. The platform provides the resiliency and fault-tolerance by automatically restarting the apps under fault scenarios.
From resourcing standpoint, once again, it depends on each application. They are standalone microservice application doing a specific operation at runtime, and it is up to how much resources the business logic requires.
I work with Docker and Kubernetes.
I would like to collect application specific metrics from each Docker.
There are various applications, each running in one or more Dockers.
I would like to collect the metrics in JSON format in order to perform further processing on each type of metrics.
I am trying to understand what is the best practice, if any and what tools can I use to achieve my goal.
Currently I am looking into several options, none looks too good:
Connecting to kubectl, getting a list of pods, performing a command (exec) at each pod to cause the application to print/send JSON with metrics. I don't like this option as it means that I need to be aware to which pods exist and access each, while the whole point of having Kubernetes is to avoid dealing with this issue.
I am looking for Kubernetes API HTTP GET request that will allow me to pull a specific file.
The closest I found is GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log and it seems it is not quite what I need.
And again, it forces me to mention each pop by name.
I consider to use ExecAction in Probe to send JSON with metrics periodically. It is a hack (as this is not the purpose of Probe), but it removes the need to handle each specific pod
I can't use Prometheus for reasons that are out of my control but I wonder how Prometheus collects metric. Maybe I can use similar approach?
Any possible solution will be appreciated.
From an architectural point of view you have 2 options here:
1) pull model: your application exposes metrics data through a mechanisms (for instance using the HTTP protocol on a different port) and an external tool scrapes your pods at a timed interval (getting pod addresses from the k8s API); this is the model used by prometheus for instance.
2) push model: your application actively pushes metrics to an external server, tipically a time series database such as influxdb, when it is most relevant to it.
In my opinion, option 2 is the easiest to implement, because:
you don't need to deal with k8s APIs in order to discover pods addresses;
you don't need to create a local storage layer to store your metrics (because you push them one by one as they occour);
But there is a drawback: you need to be careful how you implement this, it could cause your API to become slower and you might need to deal with asynchronous calls to your metrics server.
This is obviously a very generic answer, but I hope it could point you in the right direction.
Pity you can not use Prometheus, but it's a good lead for what can be done in this scope. What Prom does is as follows :
1: it assumes that metrics you want to scrape (collect) are exposed with some http endpoint that Prometheus can access.
2: it connects to kubernetes api to perform a discovery of endpoints to scrape metrics from (there is a config for it, but generaly it means it has to be able to connect to the API and list services/deployments/pods and analyze their annotations (as they have info about metrics endpoints) to compose a list of places to scrape data from
3: periodicaly (15s, 60s etc.) it connects to the endpoints and collects the exposed metrics.
That's it. Rest is storage/postprocessing. The kube related part might be a significant amount of work to do though, so it would be way better to go with something that already exists.
Sidenote: while this is generaly a pull based model, there are cases where pull is not possible (vide short lived scripts like php), that is where Prometheus pushgateway comes into play to allow pushing metrics to a place where Prometheus will pull from.