I would like to build a IDE in the browser. Basically a WebApp where you choose which language you want to write code in, then you submit it to an endpoint, and get back the output.
I could not find any docker images that existed and I tried to use Judge but it seems like it is going to cause issues and there is no customer support.
Has anyone built something like this before?
Related
I am new to Pure Data and have no idea why the following are displayed after I clicked help:
I am using Windows 7 and pd-extended 0.43.4.
This error (xy ...could not crate) means that this abstraction or external failed to instantiate. It could be that you don't have it installed, or it is not in Pd's search path so it can't find it. In the patch you are opening those objects seem to be used. In your case that might be the help file.
This is an answer on the pd forum by user whale-av already,
whale-av:
[midiin] and [sysexin] are not supported in windows. Some people have written patches to get around the lack of sysex, and instead of midiin you can use [ctrlin] [notein] etc.
[powtorms~] [mstopow~] do not exist as far as I know even in vanilla for windows, and in the windows extended 0.43.4 release they do not. I remember seeing that they were in a Linux vanilla build, and in a very old Pd build for XP.... so you might be able to find them......... someone might have built them as an external that you could add to your pd/extra folder and then use them like any other object. If you have opened someone elses patch then it is possible that they used those objects in that patch, but you do not have them so they will not "create" and will just show the name in a red dotted box instead of a solid black outline.
[scalar] does not exist, but [scalar-help] does and that explains how to use scalars....... which use other objects but not [scalar]
So, basically, not all objects exist in all versions of Pd, and certainly not under all operating systems.
I am importing some legacy code into an iOS app that uses stdout for some diagnostic output. Of course, iOS does not like you to write to stdout at all, and I need to get that output anyway. I would like to redirect this output to a file, then use the same legacy code again, redirecting the output to a different file. Does anyone know of a way to do this?
I've tried the simplistic
freopen(p, "w", stderr);
This does work--but only once. After using this call, all output to stdout is forever redirected. That's OK, but subsequent calls to redirect the output to a new location cause system instability that eventually leads to a crash. (I have tested this running from XCode, but not directly from a rebooted iPad. I don't know for sure the instability persists if not running in XCode using DEBUG mode.)
I've also tried the method in this post. This works, too, but does not return the system to its original state, and again, only works once. (If you try this at home, include Apple's <unisys.h> instead of <io.h>, and leave the _ off of calls like _dup and _dup2.)
I really don't want to have to go through the code and replace all uses of printf, etc to use an explicit file. In addition to being time consuming, error prone, and ugly, the code is open source. I don't expect the original authors would appreciate my changes, and I don't really want to have to reintegrate the changes each time the original project is updated.
Thoughts?
We have to maintain a lot of classic ASP and VB/ASP.Net applications that link to many different parts of a static website.
The master pages are littered with various
<!-- #include virtual="/site/footer.something" -->
and similar, where there are many many combinations of what /site/ can be.
The problem is, when you're debugging etc. when you try to run one of these sites locally, you're almost guaranteed to get a parser error.
What I want to do is come up with a generic handler so that I can just insert a blank file for any #include file that doesn't exist.
I tried to setup a URL Rewrite rule, which works in the browser (just redirects to an empty html file) but I'm guessing the ASP parser doesn't include as a webrequest as it still generates a parser error.
I don't want to have to copy the static content to my workstation everytime I open a new app and I don't want to edit the master pages to exclude the links as one day I'm just going to forget and deploy something broken.
So the question is, is there a way to serve a default file for these declarations, or some other method ?
Edit: To consider a different fix to this problem; is there some way to insert some kind of file-system handler that can pick up requests for missing files in specific locations and return predefined content ?
Yeah, I know that's a really offbeat direction and probably a very bad idea in practise, but this is quite a frustrating problem in the office now.
What's irritating is that even though IIS has SSI disabled, the ASP processer still honours #include directives. Is there a way to either disable that, or perhaps some way to override the behaviour in some kind of generated class ?
The problem you will encounter is that includes are processed before any of your code runs. The server gathers all of the resources referenced in the scripts then compiles and runs your code. By the time your code is running, the missing include has already thrown a compiler error.
Further, what you're asking could potentially run into other problems. Often times includes contain code (procedures, constants, variable declarations, etc.) that other scripts rely on. So, even if you were to replace the missing include with an empty file, you still may encounter other parser errors if the including script expects that include to contain specific code.
Probably your best bet is to make a console app or something similar that parses your files looking for the include statements, resolves the relative path based on your directory structure and does what you want - write an empty file if it doesn't exist. You could then run your projects through this parser and at least eliminate that issue.
Additionally, you mention the possibility of accidentally deploying something that you've edited to circumvent this problem. I would assume then, that if you were to write out these "dummy" includes, there is no possibility of you accidentally deploying them and overwriting good files?
I'm trying to write a little python application, and to start i simply drop the .py into the device and execute from there.
Now I am at the point where i probably need some credentials for accessing the tracker.
I dont want to create an aegis manifest at this point, since im still in early development, or in the worst case i would like to create a flying manifest for my script and thats it.
I found out (actually in the nokia sdk docs) that what i need is something called aegis-su (in aegis-dss-tools) or aegis-manifest (for the worst case), from aegis-manifest-dev
problem: i searched all google, and i cannot find these packages anywhere..
can someone help me?
We're trying to publish our little web app here.
I've done it several times in the past and it worked pretty well.
As the tags states, its a MVC ASP.Net project coded with VS2008.
Other interns worked on that project and we tried to re-publish again and we have this error:
[IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array.]
XXXXXXX.XXXXXXXRepository..ctor() in
E:\XXXXXX\YYYYYYY\ZZZZZZ\XXXXXXXRepository.vb:11
XXXXXXX.HomeController..ctor() in
E:\XXXXXXX\YYYYYY\ZZZZZZ\Controllers\HomeController.vb:10
Problem is, the path pointed here E:\XXXXXXX....*Controller or *Rep is located on the LOCAL machine where the dev. is made. It's as if something was hardcoded directly in our local machines in the Rep.VB and HomeController.VB. It should point in the path where we published the whole project wich is not E:\XXX\YYY\ZZZ
Anyone ever encountered this ?
Thanks alot guys
Have a nice day.
-Tom
That is just information about where to search error in source files, so those paths have nothing to do with error appearance, they just for debugging purposes - if you will compile from your machine, they will change, but error will not dissapear.
Error message indicates, that problem is, that code tries to access array element, which is not there (let's say array has 1 element and program tries to access second one).