Related
I have rule A implemented with a macro that uses declare_directory to produce a set of files:
output = ctx.actions.declare_directory("selected")
Names of those files are not known in advance. The implementation returns the directory created by declare_directory with the following:
return DefaultInfo(
files = depset([output]),
)
Rule A is included in "srcs" attribute of rule B. Rule B is also implemented with a macro. Unfortunately the list of files passed to B implementation through "srcs" attribute only contains the "selected" directory created by rule A instead of files residing in that directory.
I know that Args class supports expansion of directories so I could pass names of all files in "selected" directory to a single action. What I need, however, is a separate action for every individual file for parallelism and caching. What is the best way to achieve that?
This is one of the intended use cases of directory outputs (called TreeArtifacts in the implementation), and it's implemented using ActionTemplate:
https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/blob/c2100ad420618bb53754508da806b5624209d9be/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/actions/ActionTemplate.java#L24-L57
However, this is not exposed to Starlark, and has only a couple usages currently, in the Android rules AndroidBinary.java and C++ rules CcCompilationHelper.java. The Android rules and C++ rules are going to be migrated over to Starlark, so this functionality might eventually be made available in Starlark, but I'm not sure of any concrete timelines. It would probably be good to file a feature request on Github.
I am trying to use a custom filter using log4j2 in two ways below. Unfortunately I get invalid element or attribute 'filter' error. Is log4j2 xml needed for filters?
I tried with or without using package name in the filter none of which works
appender.custom.filter=com.test.util.CustomAppender
packages=com.test.util
appender.custom.filter=CustomAppender
I am busy making a sublime text plugin/package that will ease development of lua scripts in my workplace.
We have several lua files with different extensions depending on their purpose. I want ST3 to give the proper lua syntax to these files.
I know you can set ST3 to remember syntax for a specific file extension and this is saved as a (in my case) Lua.sublime-settings file in AppData\Roaming\Sublime Text 3\Packages\User
However, if I put this file in my new plugin's folder, it's ignored.
Am I doing something wrong or is what I want not possible?
This doesn't work because syntax specific settings are only loaded from the package that defines the syntax and from the User package (so the user can customize them).
The following is a quote from the official documentation on settings:
Settings files are consulted in this order:
1. Packages/Default/Preferences.sublime-settings
2. Packages/Default/Preferences (<platform>).sublime-settings
3. Packages/User/Preferences.sublime-settings
4. <Project Settings>
5. Packages/<syntax>/<syntax>.sublime-settings
6. Packages/User/<syntax>.sublime-settings
7. <Buffer Specific Settings>
The only places where <syntax> is referenced is from the package itself and from the user package.
If I had to guess, I would say that this is because outside of the original package author that defined the syntax, all other settings would be considered user customizations, and those settings need to be in the User package (specifically in the root of it) to ensure that they're loaded last.
A simple (but undesirable) solution would be to document for the user that they have to take this step manually.
Another approach would be to add some plugin code that extends the settings when your plugin is loaded:
def plugin_loaded():
settings = sublime.load_settings("Lua.sublime-settings")
extensions = settings.get("extensions", [])
if "blarb" not in extensions:
extensions.append("blarb")
settings.set("extensions", extensions)
sublime.save_settings("Lua.sublime-settings")
If you go this route you may want to include an extra sentinel setting somewhere (in settings specific to your package or some such) that says if you did this or not instead of just forcing the setting in as the example above does.
In practice you would then check if you've set that sentinel or not instead of forcing the extension in, so that if the user decides to use some other syntax for your files you're not forcing them into the Lua syntax.
It's also possible to define your own syntax that just embeds the standard Lua syntax, which allows this to Just Work⢠without having to write any code or have the user do anything:
%YAML 1.2
---
name: Blarb
scope: source.lua
file_extensions:
- blarb
contexts:
main:
- include: scope:source.lua
When you do this, the scope in the file will still be source.lua because that's what the scope in the syntax file says. and the status line will set the syntax name to Blarb. You could modify either of those to change the top level scope or displayed name, if desired.
An example would be to change the scope to source.blarb so that you could create key bindings/snippets that only apply to Lua files of your specific variant.
A potential downside/feature of this is that since the name of the syntax specific settings comes from the name of the file that provides the syntax, if the user has any Lua specific settings, they won't apply to your Blarb files by default.
Similarly anything that's specific to Lua by checking for a scope of source.lua won't work in Blarb files for same reasons, which may or may not be an issue.
I use java and saxonee-9.5.1.6.jar included build path , when run, getting these errors at different times.
Error at xsl:import-schema on line 6 column 169 of stylesheet.xslt:
XTSE1650: net.sf.saxon.trans.LicenseException: Requested feature (xsl:import-schema)
requires Saxon-EE
Error on line 1 column 1
SXXP0003: Error reported by XML parser: Content is not allowed in prolog.
javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException: Failed to compile stylesheet. 1 error detected.
I open .xslt file in hex editor and dont see any different character at the beginning AND
I use transformerfactory in a different project but any error I get.
Check what the implementation class of tFactory is. My guess is it is probably net.sf.saxon.TransformerFactoryImpl - which is basically the Saxon-HE version.
When you use JAXP like this, you're very exposed to configuration problems, because it loads whatever it finds sitting around on the classpath, or is affected by system property settings which could be set in parts of the application you know nothing about.
If your application depends on particular features, it's best to load a specific TransformerFactory, e.g. tFactory = new com.saxonica.config.EnterpriseTransformerFactory().
I don't know whether your stylesheet expects the source document to be validated against the schema, but it it does, note that this isn't automatic: you can set properties on the factory to make it happen.
I would recommend using Saxon's s9api interface rather than JAXP for this kind of thing. The JAXP interface was designed for XSLT 1.0, and it's a real stretch to use it for some of the new 2.0 features like schema-awareness: it can be done, but you keep running into limitations.
How can I add filters to skip some of the classes in a namespace/assembly. For example: SYM.UI is the base assembly and i want to skip SYM.UI.ViewModels. Writing the below filter but it is including all of them and not fulfilling my request:
+[SYM.UI*]* -[SYM.UI.ViewModels*]*
Kindly help me correcting this?
The opencover wiki is a good place to start.
The usage is described as +/-[modulefilter]typefilter (this is based on how you would see the types in IL; where the type filter also includes the namespace and module filter usually is the name of the assembly (without the file extension).
Thus to exclude your types you could use
+[SYM.UI]* -[SYM.UI]SYM.UI.ViewModels.*
NOTE: Exclusion filters take preference over inclusion filters.
You can use following:
"-filter:+[*]* -[SYM.UI]SYM.UI.ViewModels.*"
Note that the quotes must be around the -filter: part, too