Most important code just for example. Func UPDATE is called in every draw frame.
I want implement jumping virtualJumpActive == true logic.
I invert procedure for virtualJumpActive == true to make scene object and camera position set by cannonjs position but just in some short time.
My camera.posY follow fixed values for now.
I wanna only Y (for cannonjs Z / jumping ) to be navigated by physics and other XY
to be navigated by camera (WASD user control)...
It is little intricate situation, i have 3 factors
position of camera
position of player (hands)
position of player collision object
In normal regime player collision object follow camera and player.
In jump moment i wanna apply by vertical force and make camera follow collision object. Also i wanna that always Y component depens on physics data. In that way i will have jumping on top of other objects.
var playerUpdater = {
UPDATE: () => {
App.scene[objName].rotation.rotateY(
matrixEngine.Events.camera.yaw + 180)
var detPitch;
var limit = 2;
if(matrixEngine.Events.camera.pitch < limit &&
matrixEngine.Events.camera.pitch > -limit) {
detPitch = matrixEngine.Events.camera.pitch * 2;
} else if(matrixEngine.Events.camera.pitch > limit) {
detPitch = limit * 2;
} else if(matrixEngine.Events.camera.pitch < -(limit + 2)) {
detPitch = -(limit + 2) * 2;
}
if(matrixEngine.Events.camera.virtualJumpActive == true) {
// invert logic
// Scene object set
App.scene[objName].rotation.rotateX(-detPitch);
var detPitchPos = matrixEngine.Events.camera.pitch;
if(detPitchPos > 4) detPitchPos = 4;
App.scene[objName].position.setPosition(
App.scene.playerCollisonBox.physics.currentBody.position.x,
App.scene.playerCollisonBox.physics.currentBody.position.z,
App.scene.playerCollisonBox.physics.currentBody.position.y
)
// Cannonjs object set
// Switched Z - Y
matrixEngine.Events.camera.xPos = App.scene.playerCollisonBox.physics.currentBody.position.x;
matrixEngine.Events.camera.zPos = App.scene.playerCollisonBox.physics.currentBody.position.y;
matrixEngine.Events.camera.yPos = App.scene.playerCollisonBox.physics.currentBody.position.z;
// App.scene.playerCollisonBox.
// physics.currentBody.velocity.set(0, 0, 0);
App.scene.playerCollisonBox.
physics.currentBody.angularVelocity.set(0, 0, 0);
setTimeout(() => {
matrixEngine.Events.camera.virtualJumpActive = false;
matrixEngine.Events.camera.virtualJumpY = 2;
}, 350);
} else {
// Scene object set
App.scene[objName].rotation.rotateX(-detPitch);
var detPitchPos = matrixEngine.Events.camera.pitch;
if(detPitchPos > 4) detPitchPos = 4;
App.scene[objName].position.setPosition(
matrixEngine.Events.camera.xPos,
matrixEngine.Events.camera.yPos - 0.3 + detPitchPos / 50,
matrixEngine.Events.camera.zPos,
)
// Cannonjs object set
// Switched Z - Y
App.scene.playerCollisonBox.
physics.currentBody.position.set(
matrixEngine.Events.camera.xPos,
matrixEngine.Events.camera.zPos,
matrixEngine.Events.camera.yPos);
App.scene.playerCollisonBox.
physics.currentBody.velocity.set(0, 0, 0);
App.scene.playerCollisonBox.
physics.currentBody.angularVelocity.set(0, 0, 0);
}
}
};
.full {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
<object class="full" data="https://fps-matrix-engine.vercel.app"/>
Any suggestion ?
More data:
Stackoverflow Question ref code =>
https://codepen.io/zlatnaspirala/pen/eYKrmdM?editors=0010
Source code github
Last update
https://fps-matrix-engine.vercel.app
Related
I'm using plotbands in a gauge chart to represent angle ranges. But I'm facing a problem with the plotband angles when the "from" value is higher than the "to" value.
JSFiddle
As you can see, the plotband is set as from: 270, to: 45 but it really is rendered as if it was set as from: 45, to: 270. That renders exactly the oposite angle range that I need.
The only way that I can find to do that is setting two plotbands, one from 270 to 360 and another one from 0 to 45, but that seems very unconvenient.
Is there any easy way to achieve what I'm trying to do?
As I have mentioned in my comment, I think that you should be able to override getPlotBand method in your code for enabling plotBands with bigger from value than to value:
(function(H) {
H.wrap(H.Axis.prototype, 'init', function(proceed, chart, userOptions) {
this.getPlotBandPath = function(from, to, options) {
var center = this.center,
startAngleRad = this.startAngleRad,
pick = H.pick,
map = H.map,
pInt = H.pInt,
fullRadius = center[2] / 2,
radii = [
pick(options.outerRadius, '100%'),
options.innerRadius,
pick(options.thickness, 10)
],
offset = Math.min(this.offset, 0),
percentRegex = /%$/,
start,
end,
open,
isCircular = this.isCircular, // X axis in a polar chart
ret;
// Polygonal plot bands
if (this.options.gridLineInterpolation === 'polygon') {
ret = this.getPlotLinePath(from).concat(this.getPlotLinePath(to, true));
// Circular grid bands
} else {
// Keep within bounds
from = Math.max(from, this.min);
to = Math.min(to, this.max);
// Plot bands on Y axis (radial axis) - inner and outer radius depend on to and from
if (!isCircular) {
radii[0] = this.translate(from);
radii[1] = this.translate(to);
}
// Convert percentages to pixel values
radii = map(radii, function(radius) {
if (percentRegex.test(radius)) {
radius = (pInt(radius, 10) * fullRadius) / 100;
}
return radius;
});
// Handle full circle
if (options.shape === 'circle' || !isCircular) {
start = -Math.PI / 2;
end = Math.PI * 1.5;
open = true;
} else {
start = startAngleRad + this.translate(from);
end = startAngleRad + this.translate(to);
}
radii[0] -= offset; // #5283
radii[2] -= offset; // #5283
ret = this.chart.renderer.symbols.arc(
this.left + center[0],
this.top + center[1],
radii[0],
radii[0], {
start: start, // Math is for reversed yAxis (#3606)
end: end,
innerR: pick(radii[1], radii[0] - radii[2]),
open: open
}
);
}
return ret;
}
proceed.call(this, chart, userOptions);
});
}(Highcharts))
Live example:
http://jsfiddle.net/2Ljk7usL/9/
openlayer 2.13 has a visible pan control but not ol3.
I tried adding one here: http://jsfiddle.net/tr8691ev/13/
var v=map.getView();
var c=v.getCenter();
c[1]=+2;
// p=ol.animation.pan({duration:600,source:v.getCenter()});
//map.beforeRender(p);
v.setCenter(c,v.getZoom());
This one doesn't work as it should.
What is wrong with it? Thanks.
I did a function to change the center if user pan outside an area.
In this case is important handle the resolution of the map to know how big is the area depending on zoom.
In your case when user click left you should change center
var mapHorizontalMove = (mapSize[0] * resolution) / 10.0;
var mapVerticalMove = (mapSize[1] * resolution) / 10.0;
//left
center[0] -= mapHorizontalMove;
//right
center[0] += mapHorizontalMove;
//down
center[1] -= mapVerticalMove ;
//up
center[1] += mapVerticalMove ;
Mysample:
var maxExtent = [-79.59975, -1.200, -53.03076, 13.72883];
view.on('change:center', function (evt) {
var center = view.getCenter();
var x = center[0];
var y = center[1];
var resolution = view.getResolution();
var mapSize = map.getSize();
var mapHalfWidth = (mapSize[0] * resolution) / 2.0;
var mapHalfHeight = (mapSize[1] * resolution) / 2.0;
if (center[0] - mapHalfWidth < maxExtent[0]) {
x = maxExtent[0] + mapHalfWidth;
} else if (center[0] + mapHalfWidth > maxExtent[2]) {
x = maxExtent[2] - mapHalfWidth;
}
if (center[1] - mapHalfHeight < maxExtent[1]) {
y = maxExtent[1] + mapHalfHeight;
} else if (center[1] + mapHalfHeight > maxExtent[3]) {
y = maxExtent[3] - mapHalfHeight;
}
if (center[0] != x || center[1] != y) {
view.setCenter([x, y]);
}
});
.:| Just for whom witch reaches here like Me |:.
If you have got a OpenLayers' map without any controls visible,
And every thing seems Ok in your code,
Just add ol.css in your Head tag and all will be come back.
I want to check if an animated circle element collides (overlaps) with an animated Path Element in a set of Path Elements.
To make the example easier to understand I animated circles and want you to show me, how you can make the green circle appear red, as soon one of the black circles collides with it:
http://jsfiddle.net/329pK/2/
The Code from the Fiddle:
JS
var paper = Raphael("canvas", 800, 800);
var cx = 400;
var cy = 400;
// Helpers
function rand(min, max) {
return Math.random() * (max - min) + min;
}
var bigCircle = paper.circle(cx, cy, 500);
function flyMeteor(){
var ptOnCircle = bigCircle.getPointAtLength(rand(1,bigCircle.getTotalLength()));
var anim = Raphael.animation({
fill: 'black',
opacity: 0,
cx: ptOnCircle.x,
cy: ptOnCircle.y,
stroke: 0,
r: 0
},1200,function(){
this.remove();
});
var circle = paper.circle(cx, cy, 4).attr({
fill:'black',
stroke: 0
}).animate(anim);
};
setInterval(function(){
flyMeteor();
},200);
var circle = paper.circle(250, 250, 80).attr({
fill:'green',
stroke: 0
});
HTML
<div id="canvas"></div>
Thank you very much for your help!
I'm not sure if there's an easy answer to this one. There are a few SVG methods like referenced here Hit-testing SVG shapes? but I'm not sure they could really be used for this. It also depends if its just circles, or if the circles are just placeholders for something more complex. If its circles, you could follow collision detection like Circle Collision Javascript which I've used in an example below...
For checking, I'm checking all objects outside the animation. This feels a bit clunky, and it would be better to have inside the animation somehow, but haven't seen a way one can do this (you could do your own animate func).
fiddle here http://jsfiddle.net/RvvXL/1/
circle.data('myAnim', anim);
....
function collision (p1x, p1y, r1, p2x, p2y, r2) {
var a;
var x;
var y;
a = r1 + r2;
x = p1x - p2x;
y = p1y - p2y;
if ( a > Math.sqrt( (x*x) + (y*y) ) ) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
....
setInterval( function() { // maybe use requestAnimationFrame
paper.forEach( function(el) {
if( el.type=='circle' ) {
if( collision( el.attr('cx'), el.attr('cy'), el.attr('r'), bigCircle.attr('cx'), bigCircle.attr('cy'), bigCircle.attr('r') ) ) {
if( el.data('myAnim') ) {
el.stop( el.data('myAnim') );
el.remove();
}
};
}
} );
I have been googling around for a bit and am trying to determine how to do a simple swipe event across an html element such as a div, to cause some action to happen in javascript.
<div id="swipe_me">
Swipe Test
</div>
Can someone show me or point me to some documentation?
javascript.
something a bit like (untested code)
onInitialized: function(e, slider) {
var time = 1000, // allow movement if < 1000 ms (1 sec)
range = 100, // swipe movement of 50 pixels triggers the slider
x = 0, t = 0, touch = "ontouchend" in document,
st = (touch) ? 'touchstart' : 'mousedown',
mv = (touch) ? 'touchmove' : 'mousemove',
en = (touch) ? 'touchend' : 'mouseup';
slider.$window
.bind(st, function(e){
// prevent image drag (Firefox)
e.preventDefault();
t = (new Date()).getTime();
x = e.originalEvent.touches ? e.originalEvent.touches[0].pageX : e.pageX;
})
.bind(en, function(e){
t = 0; x = 0;
})
.bind(mv, function(e){
e.preventDefault();
var newx = e.originalEvent.touches ? e.originalEvent.touches[0].pageX : e.pageX,
r = (x === 0) ? 0 : Math.abs(newx - x),
// allow if movement < 1 sec
ct = (new Date()).getTime();
if (t !== 0 && ct - t < time && r > range) {
if (newx < x) { slider.goForward(); }
if (newx > x) { slider.goBack(); }
t = 0; x = 0;
}
});
}
I'm new to using the vertex buffer in XNA. In my project I construct one using a very large amount of vertices. I have been drawing the primitives heretofore with DrawUserIndexedPrimitives(), but I have grown out of that and need more efficiency, so I am trying to figure out the basics of buffers.
I think I've successfully implemented a buffer (and have been very satisfied with the performance improvements), except that all the faces look wrong. Here's how the primitives looked without the buffer: http://i.imgur.com/ygsnB.jpg (the intended look), and here's how they look without: http://i.imgur.com/rQN1p.jpg
Here's my code for loading a vertex buffer and index buffer:
private void RefreshVertexBuffer()
{
List<VertexPositionNormalTexture> vertices = new List<VertexPositionNormalTexture>();
List<int> indices = new List<int>();
//rebuild the vertex list and index list
foreach(var entry in blocks)
{
Block block = entry.Value;
for (int q = 0; q < block.Quads.Count; q++)
{
vertices.AddRange(block.Quads[q].Corners);
int offset = vertices.Count;
foreach (Triangle tri in block.Quads[q].Triangles)
{
indices.Add(tri.Indices[0] + offset);
indices.Add(tri.Indices[1] + offset);
indices.Add(tri.Indices[2] + offset);
}
}
}
vertexBuffer = new DynamicVertexBuffer(graphics, typeof(VertexPositionNormalTexture), vertices.Count, BufferUsage.None);
indexBuffer = new DynamicIndexBuffer(graphics, IndexElementSize.ThirtyTwoBits, indices.Count, BufferUsage.None);
vertexBuffer.SetData<VertexPositionNormalTexture>(vertices.ToArray(), 0, vertices.Count);
indexBuffer.SetData<int>(indices.ToArray(), 0, indices.Count);
}
and here is the draw call for plain rendering:
public void Render(Planet planet, Camera camera)
{
effect.View = camera.View;
effect.Projection = camera.Projection;
effect.World = planet.World;
foreach (KeyValuePair<Vector3, Block> entry in planet.Geometry.Blocks)
{
int blockID = planet.BlockMap.Blocks[entry.Value.U][entry.Value.V][entry.Value.W];
if (blockID == 1)
effect.Texture = dirt;
else if (blockID == 2)
effect.Texture = rock;
effect.CurrentTechnique.Passes[0].Apply();
foreach (Quad quad in entry.Value.Quads)
{
foreach (Triangle tri in quad.Triangles)
{
graphics.DrawUserIndexedPrimitives<VertexPositionNormalTexture>(PrimitiveType.TriangleList,
quad.Corners, 0, quad.Corners.Length, tri.Indices, 0, 1);
}
}
}
}
...and for the vertex buffer rendering:
public void RenderFromBuffer(Planet planet, Camera camera)
{
effect.View = camera.View;
effect.Projection = camera.Projection;
effect.World = planet.World;
graphics.SetVertexBuffer(planet.Geometry.VertexBuffer);
graphics.Indices = planet.Geometry.IndexBuffer;
effect.CurrentTechnique.Passes[0].Apply();
graphics.DrawIndexedPrimitives(PrimitiveType.TriangleList, 0, 0, planet.Geometry.VertexBuffer.VertexCount, 0, planet.Geometry.IndexBuffer.IndexCount / 6);
}
My indices may be off? Or is this due to some quirks with how the graphics device acts with a buffer vs. user indexed?
Edit: It may also have something to do with the way I stitch triangle indices. When I built this project with DrawUserIndexedPrimitives, I ran into some issues similar to this where triangles facing a certain direction would draw on the wrong 'side' (or, the wrong face would be culled). So I came up with this solution:
Triangle[] tris;
if (faceDirection == ADJACENT_FACE_NAMES.BOTTOM | faceDirection == ADJACENT_FACE_NAMES.OUTER | faceDirection == ADJACENT_FACE_NAMES.LEFT)
{
//create the triangles for the quad
tris = new Triangle[2]{
new Triangle( //the bottom triangle
new int[3] {
0, //the bottom left corner
1, //the bottom right corner
2 //the top left corner
}),
new Triangle( //the top triangle
new int[3] {
1, //the bottom right corner
3, //the top right corner
2 //the top left corner
})};
}
else
{
tris = new Triangle[2]{
new Triangle(
new int[3] {
2, //the top left corner
1,
0
}),
new Triangle(
new int[3] {
2,
3,
1
})
};
}
The problem is that the triangles are being culled. So you have two options to fix this:
You can change the order of the triangle indices.
foreach (Triangle tri in block.Quads[q].Triangles)
{
indices.Add(tri.Indices[1] + offset);
indices.Add(tri.Indices[0] + offset);
indices.Add(tri.Indices[2] + offset);
}
You can change your RasterizerState...
Default rasterizer state is RasterizerState.CullClockwise...
You can change it to RasterizerState.CullCounterClockwise
EDIT:
this line has a bug:
graphics.DrawIndexedPrimitives(PrimitiveType.TriangleList, 0, 0, planet.Geometry.VertexBuffer.VertexCount, 0, planet.Geometry.IndexBuffer.IndexCount / 6)
should be:
graphics.DrawIndexedPrimitives(PrimitiveType.TriangleList, 0, 0, planet.Geometry.VertexBuffer.VertexCount, 0, planet.Geometry.IndexBuffer.IndexCount / 3)