I'm looking to configure Twilio Flex only via code without using the UI. However, I'm stuck trying to find out how to enable the dial pad and caller ID details along with a few other settings.
Is everything able to be configured via an API/Terraform?
How can I find out the missing parts.
You can edit this information by Flex Configuration API.
Follow an example of a request that you can use:
Request method: POST
Request URL: https://flex-api.twilio.com/v1/Configuration?UiVersion=1.30.2 (The UiVersion will be the version of your environment, in this example, the version of the Flex is 1.30.2)
Authentication Type: Basic
Authentication credentials: accountSid:authToken (accountSid is the username and authToken is the password)
Request Body:
{
"account_sid": "ACXXXX",
"outbound_call_flows": {
"default": {
"workflow_sid": "WWXXXX",
"enabled": true,
"queue_sid": "WQXXXX",
"caller_id": "+551199998888",
"location": "BR"
}
}
account_sid -> The Account's account_sid (ACXXXX)
workflow_sid -> The Workflow that you want to configure for outbound calls, you can see existents workflows at Twilio Console following the path Taskrouter > Workspaces > Workflows (https://console.twilio.com/us1/develop/taskrouter/workspaces?frameUrl=/console/taskrouter/workspaces) (WWXXX)
queue_sid -> The Queue that you want to configure for outbound calls, you can see existents queues at Twilio Console following the path Taskrouter > Workspaces > Task Queues (https://console.twilio.com/us1/develop/taskrouter/workspaces?frameUrl=/console/taskrouter/workspaces) (WQXXX)
caller_id -> The Number that will be used for outbound calls, you can see the existents number at Twilio Console following the path Phone Numbers > Manage > Phone Numbers (https://console.twilio.com/us1/develop/phone-numbers/manage/incoming) (+...)
location -> The Location that will be used for outbound calls.
I hope that it can help you! :D
Unfortunately, this is not possible at the moment.
Related
I am writing a Slack integration that can boot certain users out of public channels when certain conditions are met. I have added several OAuth scopes to the bot token, including the following:
channels:history
channels:manage
channels:read
chat:write
chat:write.public
groups:write
im:write
mpim:write
users:read
I am writing my bot in Python using the slack-bolt library and asyncio. However when I try to invoke this code:
await app.client.conversations_kick(channel=channel_id, user=user_id)
I get the following error:
slack_sdk.errors.SlackApiError: The request to the Slack API failed. (url: https://www.slack.com/api/conversations.kick)
The server responded with: {'ok': False, 'error': 'channel_not_found'}
I know for a fact that both the channel_id and user_id arguments I'm passing in are valid. The channel ID I'm using is the string C01PAE3DB0A. I know it is valid because I can use the very same value for channel_id in the following API call:
response = await app.client.conversations_info(channel=channel_id)
And when I call conversations_info like that I get all of the information about my channel. (The same is true for calling users_info with the user_id - it returns successfully.) So why is that when I pass my valid channel_id parameter to conversations_kick I consistently receive this channel_not_found error? What am I missing?
So I got in touch directly with Slack support about this and they confirmed that there is a bug on their end. Specifically, the bug is that I should have received a restricted_action error response instead of a channel_not_found response. Apparently this is a known issue that is on their backlog.
The reason the API call would (try to) return this restricted_action error is simply because there is a workspace setting that, by default, prevents non-admins from kicking people out of public channels. Furthermore, this setting can only be changed by the workspace owner - one tier above admins.
But assuming you are the owner of the Slack workspace, you simply have to log into the Settings & Permissions page, which should look something like this:
And then you have to change the setting labeled "People who can remove members from public channels" from "Workspace admins and owners only (default)" to "Everyone, except guests."
Once I made that change, my API calls started succeeding.
I have a Twilio phone number configured to direct inbound calls to a PHP webhook. The webhook uses some of the addon information to try and find a useful caller name. I'm also using Twilio's built-in CNAM lookups, but they don't work right in Canada (I always get the caller's number as their name).
The webhook is designed to forward calls to a Twilio SIP Domain first, where I expect I'll be answering most of the calls. Other calls, if deemed urgent, will be forwarded via PSTN.
I've reached the point where I can pull out a relevant name, but I'm having difficulty trying to forward that information to my FXS (HT802). As per the device's documentation:
http://www.grandstream.com/sites/default/files/Resources/ht80x_administration_guide.pdf
Auto: When set to “Auto”, the HT801/HT802 will look for the caller ID in the order of P-Asserted Identity Header, Remote-Party-ID Header and From Header in the incoming SIP INVITE
I'm not able to find a means to pass these headers via a SIP noun in TwiML. Based on Twilio's documentation:
https://www.twilio.com/docs/voice/twiml/sip#custom-headers
UUI (User-to-User Information) header can be sent without prepending x-
https://www.twilio.com/docs/voice/api/sending-sip#sip-x-headers
If you send headers without X- prefix, Twilio will not read the header. As a result, the header will not be passed in the output.
For context, here's a reduced snippet of the PHP code I'm using so far. Note: I'm not actually doing anything with the $callerName value yet.
<?php
// Simple "starting value", in case we can't resolve the name.
// (will also resolve the numbers used for unknown/blocked IDs)
$callerName = FriendlyFormatPhoneNumber($_POST['From']);
use Twilio\Twiml;
$addOns = null;
if (array_key_exists('CallerName', $_POST)) {
$callerName = $_POST['CallerName'];
} elseif (array_key_exists('AddOns', $_POST)) {
$addOns = json_decode($_POST['AddOns']);
$teloName = $addOns->results->telo_opencnam->result->name;
// If we pulled a telo name, and it doesn't seem to be a phone number
// (in case that could happen), use the telo name.
if (isset($teloName) && preg_match('/.*[0-9]{4,}, $teloName') == 0) {
$callerName = $teloName;
}
}
$response = new TwiML;
$dialParams = array(,
'timeout' => 20,
'hangupOnStar' => false,
'answerOnBridge' => true,
'action' => API_BASE_URL . '/dial-callback.php'
);
$dialer = $response->dial($dialParams);
$dialer->sip('sip:101#mytwiliodomain.sip.us1.twilio.com;transport=tls');
echo $response;
Long story short: How do I pass a custom caller name to my SIP devices using TwiML and the Twilio SIP Domains? I don't want to overwrite the number, just the name. And only on the inbound calls to the devices registered to my Twilio SIP domain.
In case it helps: Don't worry about translating to PHP if that's not your field; I can translate from TwiML :)
Unfortunately, this is not possible with Twilio SIP Domains. Currently, there is no way to set the Caller Name via TwiML.
I have a Twilio autopilot task from an incoming call, which performs a greeting then asks a question before redirecting to a new task called 'callnumber'. This all works fine.
The 'callnumber' task looks like this
{
"actions": [
{
"handoff": {
"channel": "voice",
"uri": "https://handler.twilio.com/twiml/TWIMLBINID"
}
}
]
}
TWIMLBINID actually has the correct ID from the Twiml Bin.
This is the Twiml content in the bin:
<Response>
<Say>I will put you in contact with our customer care specialist.</Say>
</Response>
Unfortunately I'm not hearing this Response spoken out and instead just get the standard 'an error has occurred' voice message.
I've tried a few different versions of this, even calling an xml file hosted on my own public web server and seeing the same problem. Also tried the dial verb and still seeing this issue.
I feel like I may have missed some configuration, after seeing similar posts like: Twilio autopilot doesnt say what it is supposed to say
Any help is much appreciated!
I was able to get the TwiML Bin working with similar JSON, when I have it associated with a Task that has samples.
So, for example, a call comes in to your Autopilot assistant and initially triggers the Assistant Initiation Task of hello_world where you modified the predefined JSON with a listen action.
{
"actions": [
{
"say": "How can I help you today?"
},
{
"listen": true
}
]
}
You then respond so the task associated with your handoff JSON/TwiML Bin is executed (based on the samples you provided). If you try to call the handoff task directly, it fails.
I have the same JSON for "actions" of the task-seems perfect.
But 2 Small differences for the TwiMLbin :
1)don't forget to put the xml tag in the TwiLbin :
It should be :
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Response>
<Say>For this question, I will put you in contact ...</Say>
</Response>
2)I don't understand how your twiMLbin has such an hyperlink. Normally the syntax is
https://handler.twilio.com/twiml/******SID******
and the SID can not be chosen and mine has 34 characters. (do not use the "friendly name" of the twiMLbin). You have a button in the twiMLbin to copy-paste it directly.
for me it works. Otherwise please provide some more elements
-do you have queries associated to the autopilot task ? if you have task(s) that do not have any queries, the model will refuse to build (you can check this in the screen "natural language router" / tab "build models").
-are you sure you don't have conflicting query that triggers another task than the one you think (typically with short queries, they "vampirize" other intents). For that please provide the logs of the queries (query Vs Task) of your autopilot assistant.
nb : I confirm what philnash said : you should really try with a phone call. I experienced also some "glitches" with the Twilio simulator.
I have found bitbucket api like:
https://bitbucket.org/api/2.0/repositories/{teamname}
But this link return 301 status (moved permanently to !api/2.0/repositories/{teamname}).
Ok, but this one returns status 200 with zero repositories.
I provide two parameters as user and password, but nothing seems changed.
So, can anybody answer how to get full list of private repositories that allowed to specific user?
Atlassian Documentation - Repositories Endpoint provides a detail documentation on how to access the repositories.
The URL mentioned in bitbucket to GET a list of repositories for an account is:
GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{owner}
If you use the above URL it always retrieves the repositories where you are the owner. In order to retrieve full list of repositories that the user is member of, you should call:
GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories?role=member
You can apply following set of filters for role based on your needs.
To limit the set of returned repositories, apply the
role=[owner|admin|contributor|member] parameter where the roles are:
owner: returns all repositories owned by the current user.
admin: returns repositories to which the user has explicit
administrator access.
contributor: returns repositories to which the user has explicit write access.
member: returns repositories to which the user has explicit read
access.
Edit-1:
You can make use of Bitbucket REST browser for testing the request/response.(discontinued)
You should not use the API from the https://bitbucket.org/api domain.
Instead, you should always use https://api.bitbucket.org.
Now one reason you might be getting an empty result after following the redirect could be because some http clients will only send Basic Auth credentials if the server explicitly asks for them by returning a 401 response with the WWW-Authenticate response header.
The repositories endpoint does not require authentication. It will simply return the repos that are visible to anonymous users (which might well be an empty set in your case) and so clients that insist on a WWW-Authenticate challenge (there are many, including Microsoft Powershell) will not work as expected (note, curl always sends Basic Auth credentials eagerly, which makes it a good tool for testing).
Unfortunately, from what I see in the documentation, there is no way to list all private repositories which the user has access to.
GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories
"Returns a paginated list of all public repositories." according to the doco.
GET https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{owner}
"Returns a paginated list of all repositories owned by the specified account or UUID." according to the doco.
So, getting all private repositories not necessarily owned by the user is either not possible, or I haven't found the right endpoint, or the documentation is inacurate.
None of the answers above worked for me, so this is what I did. We'll use the Bitbucket REST API.
Authentication
You can't use your normal credentials. I created an API Password. I'm not sure how to get to this page via your browser, but go here: https://bitbucket.org/account/settings/app-passwords/
Create an App Password, then cut and save the password that Atlassian generates for you.
Curl
curl --user your_username:your_app_password https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/your_workspace?pagelen=100
I piped that to jq and saved it to a file.
your_workspace you get from looking at the URL of any of your repositories.
Paging
The maximum pagelen appears to be 100. If you have more than 100 repos, then you might have to do this:
curl --user your_username:your_app_password https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/your_workspace?pagelen=100&page=2
The JSON
The JSON isn't too bad. You want the "values" array. From there, look at links.clone, which might have two entries like this:
"clone": [
{
"href": "https://user#bitbucket.org/WORKSPACE/REPO.git",
"name": "https"
},
{
"href": "git#bitbucket.org:WORKSPACE/REPO.git",
"name": "ssh"
}
],
That's a cut & paste from my results with personal info changed. Also useful are two other fields:
"full_name": "WORKSPACE/repo",
"name": "Repo",
Expanding on blizzard's answer, here's a little node.js script I just wrote:
import axios from 'axios';
import fs from 'fs';
async function main() {
const bitbucket = axios.create({
baseURL: 'https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0',
auth: {
username: process.env.BITBUCKET_USERNAME!,
password: process.env.BITBUCKET_PASSWORD!,
}
});
const repos = [];
let next = 'repositories?role=member';
for(;;) {
console.log(`Fetching ${next}`)
const res = await bitbucket.get(next);
if(res.status < 200 || res.status >= 300) {
console.error(res);
return 1;
}
repos.push(...res.data.values);
if(!res.data.next) break;
next = res.data.next;
}
console.log(`Done; writing file`);
await fs.promises.writeFile(`${__dirname}/../data/repos.json`,JSON.stringify(repos,null,2),{encoding:'utf8'});
}
main().catch(err => {
console.error(err);
});
I am working on braintree and I want to send custom email notifications to my customers as I am working with recurring billing, so every month these custom notifications should be send to all users. For this I have to use webhooks to retrieve currently ocuured event and then send email notification according to webhook's response. (I think this is only solution in this case, If anyone know another possible solution please suggest). I want to test webhooks at my localhost first, And I have tried to create a new webhook and specified the localhost path as destination to retrieve webhooks. But this shows a error "Destination is not verified"..........
My path is : "http://127.0.0.1:81/webhook/Accept"
These are some of the tools that can be used during development of webhooks :
1) PostCatcher,
2) RequestBin,
3) ngrok,
4) PageKite and
5) LocalTunnel
http://telerivet.com/help/api/webhook/testing
https://www.twilio.com/blog/2013/10/test-your-webhooks-locally-with-ngrok.html
Well Another way to test it is by creating a WebAPI and POSTing Data to your POST method via Postman. To do this, just create a WebAPI in Visual Studio. In the API controller, create a POST method.
/// <summary>
/// Web API POST method for Braintree Webhook request
/// The data is passed through HTTP POST request.
/// A sample data set is present in POSTMAN HTTP Body
/// /api/webhook
/// </summary>
/// <param name="BTRequest">Data from HTTP request body</param>
/// <returns>Webhook notification object</returns>
public WebhookNotification Post([FromBody]Dictionary<String, String> BTRequest)
{
WebhookNotification webhook = gateway.WebhookNotification.Parse(BTRequest["bt_signature"], BTRequest["bt_payload"]);
return webhook;
}
In Postman, Post the following data in the Body as raw JSON.
{
"bt_signature":"Generated Data",
"bt_payload":"Very long generated data"
}
The data for the above Json dictionary has been generated through the below code:
Dictionary<String, String> sampleNotification = gateway.WebhookTesting.SampleNotification(WebhookKind.DISPUTE_OPENED, "my_Test_id");
// Your Webhook kind and your test ID
Just pick the data from sample notification and place it above in the JSON. Run your WebAPI, place debuggers. Add the localhost URL in Postman, select POST, and click on Send.
Your POST method should be hit.
Also, don't forget to add your gateway details:
private BraintreeGateway gateway = new BraintreeGateway
{
Environment = Braintree.Environment.SANDBOX,
MerchantId = "Your Merchant Key",
PublicKey = "Your Public Key",
PrivateKey = "Your Private Key"
};
I hope this helps!
I work at Braintree. If you need more help, please get in touch with our support team.
In order to test webhooks, your app needs to be able to be reached by the Braintree Gateway. A localhost address isn't. Try using your external IP address and make sure the port on the correct computer can be reached from the internet.
Take a look at the Braintree webhook guide for more info on setting up webhooks.
You can use PutsReq to simulate the response you want and do your end-to-end test in development.
For quick 'n dirty testing:
http://requestb.in/
For more formal testing (e.g. continuous integration):
https://www.runscope.com/
If you have a online server you may forward port from your computer to that server.
ssh -nNT -R 9090:localhost:3000 root#yourvds.com
And then specify webhook as http://yourvds.com:9090/webhook
all requests will be forwarded to you machine, you will be able to see logs
I know this is an old question, but according to the docs, you can use this code to test your webhook code:
Dictionary<String, String> sampleNotification = gateway.WebhookTesting.SampleNotification(
WebhookKind.SUBSCRIPTION_WENT_PAST_DUE, "my_id"
);
WebhookNotification webhookNotification = gateway.WebhookNotification.Parse(
sampleNotification["bt_signature"],
sampleNotification["bt_payload"]
);
webhookNotification.Subscription.Id;
// "my_id"
You can use the Svix CLI Listener: https://github.com/svix/svix-cli#using-the-listen-command
This will allow you to easily channel requests to your public endpoint to a local port where you can run your logic against and debug it on your localhost.