Sleep delta to check cycles count - memory

// Pseudocode
void sleep::check_delta()
{
const auto tick_count = GetTickCount
Sleep(1000)
const auto tick_delta = GetTickCount() - tick_count
if (tick_delta >= 1200)
{
sleep_report.unknown = 0
sleep_report.report_id = 0x45
sleep_report.delta = tick_delta
battleye::report(&sleep_report, sizeof(sleep_report), 0
}
}
In one of the articles about reverse-engineering BattlEye anticheat, it is said that anticheat sends the process to sleep, and checks the number of cycles before and after inactivity. How to explain these actions?

Related

Why Buy order is not placed when calculated Stoploss and Take profit are used

I have a simple BUY order that, when the Take Profit and Stoploss are in points (ie: Ask+10*_Point), operates correctly. But when I change the take profit and stop loss from points to my own calculated values (CL_OP), the BUY order is not placing trades. How can I solve the issue:
input int _Hour =16;
input int _Minute =30;
bool NewBar()
{
static datetime OldTime = 0;
if(OldTime < Time[0])
{
OldTime = Time[0];
return(true);
}
else
{
return(false);
}
}
void OnTick()
{
int Hour_Int = Hour();
int Minute_Int = Minute();
double CL_OP = (Close[1] - Open[1]);
bool LastBearHiLoEngulf = (Close[1] < Open[1] && High[1] > High[2] && Low[1] < Low[2] );
if(NewBar())
if(OrdersTotal()==0)
// Apply signals on Buy opportunities
if( Hour_Int == _Hour && Minute_Int == _Minute && LastBearHiLoEngulf == TRUE)
{
int buyticket = OrderSend
(
Symbol(), // all symbols
OP_BUY, // Buy without delay
1, // 1 Microlots
Ask, // for market price
3, // 3 pips slippage
Ask - CL_OP, // Stop Loss - 1000*_Point
Ask + CL_OP , // Take profitworks with 100*_Point
"Buy LastBearHiLoEngulf Target: ", // comment
144, // Magic number
0, // no experiation day
Green // draw green arrow
);
}
}
double CL_OP = (Close[1] - Open[1]);
CL_OP is not a normal price to open trade. Actually, it is the Size of the Candle 1!
It should be something like this:
double CL_OP = Close[1] + (Close[1] - Open[1]);

how to track take profit and stoploss in mql4

I have the following code in mql4 and it is partially working but having an issue with order tracking.
int ticket;
void OnTick(){
... not included code, setting variables, etc ...
if(tenkan_sen < kijun_sen){
comment += "\nSHORT!";
if(OrderSelect(ticket,SELECT_BY_TICKET) && OrderType() == OP_BUY){
if(OrderClose(OrderTicket(),OrderLots(),Bid,1000,clrCrimson)){
ticket = 0;
}
}
if(ticket <= 0){
// need to set stoploss and takeprofit prices
double short_tp = current_close - (atr*6);
double short_sl = current_close + (atr*2);
ticket = OrderSend(_Symbol,OP_SELL,0.01,Bid,1000,short_sl,short_tp,"This is a sell",1,0,clrPink);
}
} else if(tenkan_sen > kijun_sen){
comment += "\nLONG!";
if(OrderSelect(ticket,SELECT_BY_TICKET) && OrderType() == OP_SELL){
if(OrderClose(OrderTicket(),OrderLots(),Ask,1000,clrPink)){
ticket = 0;
}
}
if(ticket <= 0){
// need to set stoploss and take profit prices
double long_tp = current_close + (atr*6);
double long_sl = current_close - (atr*2);
ticket = OrderSend(_Symbol,OP_BUY,0.01,Ask,1000,long_sl,long_tp,"This is a buy",1,0,clrCrimson);
}
}
}
This was previously based on the logic of closing the previous position upon opening the last position, it was working as expected before I added the sl and tp values. I am not sure how I should reset the ticket variable to 0 in the event of a sl or tp, or if there is a different way I should be handling this.

Time errors in ADC

I measure distance using ultrasonic signal. STM32F1 generate Ultrasound signal, STM32F4 writing this signal using microphone. Both STM32 are synchronized using signal generated another device, they connected one wire.
Question: Why signal comes with different times? although I don’t move receiver or transmitter. It's gives errors 50mm.
Dispersion signals
Code of receiver is here:
while (1)
{
if(HAL_GPIO_ReadPin(GPIOA, GPIO_PIN_5) != 0x00)
{
Get_UZ_Signal(uz_signal);
Send_Signal(uz_signal);
}
}
void Get_UZ_Signal(uint16_t* uz_signal)
{
int i,j;
uint16_t uz_buf[10];
HAL_ADC_Start_DMA(&hadc1, (uint32_t*)&uz_buf, 300000);
for(i = 0; i<lenght_signal; i++)
{
j=10;
while(j>0)
{
j--;
}
uz_signal[i] = uz_buf[0];
}
HAL_ADC_Stop_DMA(&hadc1);
}
hadc1.Instance = ADC1;
hadc1.Init.ClockPrescaler = ADC_CLOCK_SYNC_PCLK_DIV4;
hadc1.Init.Resolution = ADC_RESOLUTION_12B;
hadc1.Init.ScanConvMode = DISABLE;
hadc1.Init.ContinuousConvMode = ENABLE;
hadc1.Init.DiscontinuousConvMode = DISABLE;
hadc1.Init.ExternalTrigConvEdge = ADC_EXTERNALTRIGCONVEDGE_NONE;
hadc1.Init.ExternalTrigConv = ADC_SOFTWARE_START;
hadc1.Init.DataAlign = ADC_DATAALIGN_RIGHT;
hadc1.Init.NbrOfConversion = 1;
hadc1.Init.DMAContinuousRequests = DISABLE;
hadc1.Init.EOCSelection = ADC_EOC_SINGLE_CONV;
More information here:
https://github.com/BooSooV/Indoor-Ultrasonic-Positioning-System/tree/master/Studying_ultrasonic_signals/Measured_lengths_dispersion
PROBLEM RESOLVED
Dispersion signals final
The time errors was created by the transmitter, I make some changed in it. Now synchro signal takes with help EXTI, and PWM generated all time, and I controlee signal with Enable or Disable pin on driver. Now I have dispersion 5mm, it enough for me.
Final programs is here
https://github.com/BooSooV/Indoor-Ultrasonic-Positioning-System/tree/master/Studying_ultrasonic_signals/Measured_lengths_dispersion
Maybe, It is a problem of time processing. The speed of sound is 343 meters / sec. Then, 50mm is about 0.15 msec.
Have you thought to call HAL_ADC_Start_DMA() from the main()
uint16_t uz_buf[10];
HAL_ADC_Start_DMA(&hadc1, (uint32_t*)&uz_buf, 10 );//300000);
// Sizeof Buffer ---------------------^
and you call
void Get_UZ_Signal(uint16_t* uz_signal) {
int i;
// For debugging - Get the time to process
// Get the Time from the System Tick. This counter wrap around
// from 0 to SysTick->LOAD every 1 msec
int32_t startTime = SysTick->VAL;
__HAL_ADC_ENABLE(&hadc1); // Start the DMA
// return remaining data units in the current DMA Channel transfer
while(__HAL_DMA_GET_COUNTER(&hadc1) != 0)
;
for(i = 0; i<lenght_signal; i++) {
// uz_signal[i] = uz_buf[0];
// 0 or i ------------^
uz_signal[i] = uz_buf[i];
__HAL_ADC_DISABLE(&hadc1); // Stop the DMA
int32_t endTime = SysTick->VAL;
// check if negative, case of wrap around
int32_t difTime = endTime - startTime;
if ( difTime < 0 )
difTime += SysTick->LOAD
__HAL_DMA_SET_COUNTER(&hadc1, 10); // Reset the counter
// If the DMA buffer is 10, the COUNTER will start at 10
// and decrement
// Ref. Manual: 9.4.4 DMA channel x number of data register (DMA_CNDTRx)
In your code
MX_USART1_UART_Init();
HAL_ADC_Start_DMA(&hadc1, (uint32_t*)&uz_signal, 30000);
// Must be stopped because is running now
// How long is the buffer: uint16_t uz_signal[ 30000 ] ?
__HAL_ADC_DISABLE(&hadc1); // must be disable
// reset the counter
__HAL_DMA_SET_COUNTER(&hdma_adc1, 30000);
while (1)
{
if(HAL_GPIO_ReadPin(GPIOA, GPIO_PIN_5) != 0x00)
{
__HAL_ADC_ENABLE(&hadc1);
while(__HAL_DMA_GET_COUNTER(&hdma_adc1) != 0)
;
__HAL_ADC_DISABLE(&hadc1);
__HAL_DMA_SET_COUNTER(&hdma_adc1, 30000);
// 30,000 is the sizeof your buffer?
...
}
}
I made some test with uC STM32F407 # 168mHz. I'll show you the code below.
The speed of sound is 343 meters / second.
During the test, I calculated the time to process the ADC conversion. Each conversion takes about 0.35 uSec (60 ticks).
Result
Size Corresponding
Array Time Distance
100 0.041ms 14mm
1600 0.571ms 196mm
10000 3.57ms 1225mm
In the code, you'll see the start time. Be careful, the SysTick is a decremental counter starting # the uC speed (168MHz = from 168000 to 0). It could be good idea to get the msec time with HAL_GetTick(), and usec with SysTick.
int main(void)
{
...
MX_DMA_Init();
MX_ADC1_Init();
// Configure the channel in the way you want
ADC_ChannelConfTypeDef sConfig;
sConfig.Channel = ADC_CHANNEL_0; //ADC1_CHANNEL;
sConfig.Rank = 1;
sConfig.SamplingTime = ADC_SAMPLETIME_3CYCLES;
sConfig.Offset = 0;
HAL_ADC_ConfigChannel(&hadc1, &sConfig);
// Start the DMA channel and Stop it
HAL_ADC_Start_DMA(&hadc1, (uint32_t*)&uz_signal, sizeof( uz_signal ) / sizeof( uint16_t ));
HAL_ADC_Stop_DMA( &hadc1 );
// The SysTick is a decrement counter
// Can be use to count usec
// https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/systick-timer
tickLoad = SysTick->LOAD;
while (1)
{
// Set the buffer to zero
for( uint32_t i=0; i < (sizeof( uz_signal ) / sizeof( uint16_t )); i++)
uz_signal[i] = 0;
// Reset the counter ready to restart
DMA2_Stream0->NDTR = (uint16_t)(sizeof( uz_signal ) / sizeof( uint16_t ));
/* Enable the Peripheral */
ADC1->CR2 |= ADC_CR2_ADON;
/* Start conversion if ADC is effectively enabled */
/* Clear regular group conversion flag and overrun flag */
ADC1->SR = ~(ADC_FLAG_EOC | ADC_FLAG_OVR);
/* Enable ADC overrun interrupt */
ADC1->CR1 |= (ADC_IT_OVR);
/* Enable ADC DMA mode */
ADC1->CR2 |= ADC_CR2_DMA;
/* Start the DMA channel */
/* Enable Common interrupts*/
DMA2_Stream0->CR |= DMA_IT_TC | DMA_IT_TE | DMA_IT_DME | DMA_IT_HT;
DMA2_Stream0->FCR |= DMA_IT_FE;
DMA2_Stream0->CR |= DMA_SxCR_EN;
//===================================================
// The DMA is ready to start
// Your if(HAL_GPIO_ReadPin( ... ) will be here
HAL_Delay( 10 );
//===================================================
// Get the time
tickStart = SysTick->VAL;
// Start the DMA
ADC1->CR2 |= (uint32_t)ADC_CR2_SWSTART;
// Wait until the conversion is completed
while( DMA2_Stream0->NDTR != 0)
;
// Get end time
tickEnd = SysTick->VAL;
/* Stop potential conversion on going, on regular and injected groups */
ADC1->CR2 &= ~ADC_CR2_ADON;
/* Disable the selected ADC DMA mode */
ADC1->CR2 &= ~ADC_CR2_DMA;
/* Disable ADC overrun interrupt */
ADC1->CR1 &= ~(ADC_IT_OVR);
// Get processing time
tickDiff = tickStart - tickEnd;
//===================================================
// Your processing will go here
HAL_Delay( 10 );
//===================================================
}
}
So, you'll have the start and end time. I think you have to make the formula on the start time.
Good luck
If you want to know the execution time, you could use that little function. It returns the micro Seconds
static uint32_t timeMicroSecDivider = 0;
extern uint32_t uwTick;
// The SysTick->LOAD matchs the uC Speed / 1000.
// If the uC clock is 80MHz, the the LOAD is 80000
// The SysTick->VAL is a decrement counter from (LOAD-1) to 0
//====================================================
uint64_t getTimeMicroSec()
{
if ( timeMicroSecDivider == 0)
{
// Number of clock by micro second
timeMicroSecDivider = SysTick->LOAD / 1000;
}
return( (uwTick * 1000) + ((SysTick->LOAD - SysTick->VAL) / timeMicroSecDivider));
}

Rounding a Duration to the nearest second based on desired precision

I recently started working with Dart, and was trying to format a countdown clock with numbers in a per-second precision.
When counting down time, there's often a precise-yet-imperfect way of representing the time - so if I started a Duration at 2 minutes, and asked to show the current time after one second has elapsed, it is almost guaranteed that the precision of the timer will report at 1:58:999999 (example), and if use Duration.inSeconds() to emit the value, it will be 118 (seconds) which is due to how the ~/ operator works, since it's rounding down to integers based on the Duration's microseconds.
If I render the value as a clock, I'll see the clock go from "2:00" to "1:58" after one second, and will end up displaying "0:00" twice, until the countdown is truly at 0:00:00.
As a human, this appears like the clock is skipping, so I figured since the delta is so small, I should round up to the nearest second, and that would be accurate enough for a countdown timer, and handle the slight imprecision measured in micro/milli-seconds to better serve the viewer.
I came up with this secondRounder approach:
Duration secondRounder(Duration duration) {
int roundedDuration;
if (duration.inMilliseconds > (duration.inSeconds * 1000)) {
roundedDuration = duration.inSeconds + 1;
} else {
roundedDuration = duration.inSeconds;
}
return new Duration(seconds: roundedDuration);
}
This can also be run in this DartPad: https://dartpad.dartlang.org/2a08161c5f889e018938316237c0e810
As I'm yet unfamiliar with all of the methods, I've read through a lot of the docs, and this is the best I've come up with so far. I think I was looking for a method that might looks like:
roundedDuration = duration.ceil(nearest: millisecond)
Is there a better way to go about solving this that I haven't figured out yet?
You can "add" your own method to Duration as an extension method:
extension RoundDurationExtension on Duration {
/// Rounds the time of this duration up to the nearest multiple of [to].
Duration ceil(Duration to) {
int us = this.inMicroseconds;
int toUs = to.inMicroseconds.abs(); // Ignore if [to] is negative.
int mod = us % toUs;
if (mod != 0) {
return Duration(microseconds: us - mod + toUs);
}
return this;
}
}
That should allow you to write myDuration = myDuration.ceil(Duration(seconds: 1)); and round the myDuration up to the nearest second.
The best solution according to the documentation is to use .toStringAsFixed() function
https://api.dart.dev/stable/2.4.0/dart-core/num/toStringAsFixed.html
Examples from the Documentation
1.toStringAsFixed(3); // 1.000
(4321.12345678).toStringAsFixed(3); // 4321.123
(4321.12345678).toStringAsFixed(5); // 4321.12346
123456789012345678901.toStringAsFixed(3); // 123456789012345683968.000
1000000000000000000000.toStringAsFixed(3); // 1e+21
5.25.toStringAsFixed(0); // 5
Another more flexible option can be...
You can use this function to roundup the time.
DateTime alignDateTime(DateTime dt, Duration alignment,
[bool roundUp = false]) {
assert(alignment >= Duration.zero);
if (alignment == Duration.zero) return dt;
final correction = Duration(
days: 0,
hours: alignment.inDays > 0
? dt.hour
: alignment.inHours > 0
? dt.hour % alignment.inHours
: 0,
minutes: alignment.inHours > 0
? dt.minute
: alignment.inMinutes > 0
? dt.minute % alignment.inMinutes
: 0,
seconds: alignment.inMinutes > 0
? dt.second
: alignment.inSeconds > 0
? dt.second % alignment.inSeconds
: 0,
milliseconds: alignment.inSeconds > 0
? dt.millisecond
: alignment.inMilliseconds > 0
? dt.millisecond % alignment.inMilliseconds
: 0,
microseconds: alignment.inMilliseconds > 0 ? dt.microsecond : 0);
if (correction == Duration.zero) return dt;
final corrected = dt.subtract(correction);
final result = roundUp ? corrected.add(alignment) : corrected;
return result;
}
and then use it the following way
void main() {
DateTime dt = DateTime.now();
var newDate = alignDateTime(dt,Duration(minutes:30));
print(dt); // prints 2022-01-07 15:35:56.288
print(newDate); // prints 2022-01-07 15:30:00.000
}

Why wont my MQL4 EA code change my open positions to breakeven?

Trying to add a StopLoss to my open market positions which also takes into account my brokers stoplevel. I have set this to add a breakeven stop loss when my trade gets to 100 points in profit.
This is the code - but its completely ignoring any order modification during my back testing.
OK this is now what I have so far, one for loop for the buy, one for the sell. I;ve also declared the "BuyMod" & "SellMod" to true as was suggested in pervious answers, as well as Normalzing prices in the OrderModify signature.
/*Breakeven Order Modification*/
bool BuyMod = true;
bool SellMod = true;
for(int b = OrdersTotal()-1;b>=0;b--)
{
if(OrderSelect(b,SELECT_BY_POS,MODE_TRADES))
{
double aBidPrice = MarketInfo(Symbol(),MODE_BID);
double anOpenPrice = OrderOpenPrice();
double aNewTpPrice = OrderTakeProfit();
double aCurrentSL = OrderStopLoss();
double aNewSLPrice = anOpenPrice;
double pnlPoints = (aBidPrice - anOpenPrice)/_Point;
double stopPoints = (aBidPrice - aNewSLPrice)/_Point;
int stopLevel = int(MarketInfo(Symbol(),MODE_STOPLEVEL));
int aTicket = OrderTicket();
if(OrderType() == OP_BUY)
if(stopPoints >= stopLevel)
if(aTicket > 0)
if(pnlPoints >= breakeven)
if(aNewSLPrice != aCurrentSL)
{
BuyMod = OrderModify(OrderTicket(),OrderOpenPrice(),NormalizeDouble(aNewSLPrice,Digits),NormalizeDouble(aNewTpPrice,Digits),0,buycolor);
SendMail("Notification of Order Modification for Ticket#"+IntegerToString(OrderTicket(),10),"Good news! Order Ticket#"+IntegerToString(OrderTicket(),10)+"has been changed to breakeven");
}
}
}
for(int s = OrdersTotal()-1; s>=0; s--)
{
if(OrderSelect(s,SELECT_BY_POS,MODE_TRADES))
{
double anAskPrice = MarketInfo(Symbol(),MODE_ASK);
double anOpenPrice = OrderOpenPrice();
double aNewTpPrice = OrderTakeProfit();
double aCurrentSL = OrderStopLoss();
double aNewSLPrice = anOpenPrice;
double pnlPoints = (anOpenPrice - anAskPrice)/_Point;
double stopPoints = (aNewSLPrice - anAskPrice)/_Point;
int stopLevel = int(MarketInfo(Symbol(),MODE_STOPLEVEL));
int aTicket = OrderTicket();
if(OrderType()== OP_SELL)
if(stopPoints >= stopLevel)
if(pnlPoints >= breakeven)
if(aNewSLPrice != aCurrentSL)
if(aTicket > 0)
{
SellMod = OrderModify(OrderTicket(),OrderOpenPrice(),NormalizeDouble(aNewSLPrice,Digits),NormalizeDouble(aNewTpPrice,Digits),0,sellcolor);
SendMail("Notification of Order Modification for Ticket#"+IntegerToString(OrderTicket(),10),"Good news! Order Ticket#"+IntegerToString(OrderTicket(),10)+"has been changed to breakeven");
}
}
}
This code will not work due to several reasons:
First:The function-call signature of OrderModify() is wrong.
You might want to know, that OrderModify() call-signature requires as per MQL4 documentation to include also an OrderExpiration value in the call, even though the Order is currently not a pending order any more.
Check the documentation and the IDE tooltip, which helps one remind the order of the function call parameters.
Second:The other, less-visible reasons could be reported by GetLastError() after the OrderModify() function call returns a False as an indication of failure.

Resources