I'm trying to write an equation in Latex which uses the circumflex character as an operator. The whole thing should look something like this:
a ^ b
I tried stuff like $a \^ b$ or $a \hat{ } b$ but the first one didn't work at all and the second one didn't look nice (see image result for second method). What would be the right way of doing this?
You could use something like this:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\[
a \,^{\wedge}\, b
\]
\end{document}
Related
I am working on some algorithm documenation for a project and trying to write out the equations in latex.
The one problem I am encountering and have not found a nice way (assuming there is one) is mixing text and equations in a single line.
Here is an example of what I am doing (and later how I am doing it).
I am defining the equation, and than what each variable means (left aligned text hence the &).
The latex code to generate this
\begin{equation}
A = 3B * 4C + 5D
\end{equation}
Where:
\begin{flalign*}
&A = Something \: cool\\
&B = Something \: cooler\\
&C = Something \: even \: cooler!!\\
\end{flalign*}
My questions are:
Is there a better way to do spaces in between words besides putting \: everywhere?
If I dont put the \: I get this below, all the words are combined?
Is this the most latex idiomatic way to acheive this? Am I missing something that could help me?
So I can get the output the way I want, I just want to make sure its "correct" before I get to deep.
You should never set whole words in math mode. Besides the obvious problem with spaces you noticed, this will also completely mess up the kerning between the letters.
Instead you can use the \text{...} macro from the amsmath package.
The amsmath package also provides the \intertext macro, which you could use to insert Where: while retaining alignment of the equal signs in the equations above and below:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{flalign}
A &= 3B \cdot 4C + 5D\\
\intertext{Where:}
A &= \text{Something cool}\notag\\
B &= \text{Something cooler}\notag\\
C &= \text{Something even cooler!!}\notag
\end{flalign}
\end{document}
This might be an edge case, but I'm trying to create a beamer presentation with knitr where I want to display a code chunk using different formulas as arguments for a function. I found that when using overlays, the tilde in the code chunks disappear. Is there a way to get them to display?
Here's a minimal reproducible example:
\documentclass{beamer}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Slide with overlay}
\only<1>{
<<notilde, eval = FALSE>>=
myfunction(data, formula = ~ x)
#
}
\only<2>{
<<notilde2, eval = FALSE>>=
myfunction(data, formula = y ~ x)
#
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Slide without overlay}
<<tilde, eval = FALSE>>=
myfunction(data, formula = ~ x)
#
\end{frame}
\end{document}
The first frame of the presentation looks like this:
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT:
The slide without overlay looks like this:
To clarify, the syntax of <<...>> and # is specific to the R package knitr. Anything between these symbols are interpreted by knitr as R code chunks and converted to latex to include syntax highlighting.
You can replace the ~ with the math mode $\sim$
If not in a special environment like verbatim, the tilde in latex is a protected space, i.e. a space at which no line break occurs.
It is not clear from your question: is it working for your second frame, without overlay?
I don't know part of your syntax: is the << ... >>= ... # equivalent to a verbatim or code environmet? It looks a bit, as your text is set in a fixed space font and has syntax highlihting.
I am writing a beamer presentation. My problem is a syntax issue with \section[Outline]{title}. \section is working fine with all of my section titles except in the following example:
\section[$\mathbb{Z}[G]$-module constructions]{$\mathbb{Z}[G]$-modules and Geometric Constructions}
I need a [ or \[ symbol around the G (i.e., [G]) in the Outline part of \section,however, Tex throws tons of errors whenever anything resembling a bracket is in there.
All ideas are welcome and thanks in advance.
Michael Anderson points out a much cleaner way of doing the same in the comments. Define the command in your preamble as
\newcommand[1]{\bracket}{[#1]}
and use the syntax $\bracket{G}$ to place brackets around G.
The problem is because LaTeX interprets the ] in [G] as a closing bracket for the [Outline] part of the command. Here's a work around for that. In your preamble, add the following:
\newcommand{\rbracket}{]}
Now define your section as
\section[$\mathbb{Z}[G\rbracket $-module constructions]{$\mathbb{Z}[G]$-modules and Geometric Constructions}
This is how the outline should look like
By wrapping the short title in an additional layer of {...} you can "hide" the problematic content from latex:
\documentclass{beamer}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}
\tableofcontents
\end{frame}
\section[{$\mathbb{Z}[G]$-module constructions}]{$\mathbb{Z}[G]$-modules and Geometric Constructions}
\begin{frame}
content...
\end{frame}
\end{document}
Michael Anderson gave a nice solution, but when I tried it, I got errors. Then I wrote this:
\newcommand{\bracket}[1]{[#1]}
and that worked to get brackets in brackets with:
\bracket{content}
to get [content].
Instead of making a macro for each letter, as in
\def\bA{\mathbf{A}}
...
\def\bZ{\mathbf{Z}}
Is there a way to loop over a character class (like capital letters) and generate macros for each? I'd also like to do the same for Greek letters (using bm instead of mathbf).
\def\mydefb#1{\expandafter\def\csname b#1\endcsname{\mathbf{#1}}}
\def\mydefallb#1{\ifx#1\mydefallb\else\mydefb#1\expandafter\mydefallb\fi}
\mydefallb ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ\mydefallb
New for Greek
\def\mydefgreek#1{\expandafter\def\csname b#1\endcsname{\text{\boldmath$\mathbf{\csname #1\endcsname}$}}}
\def\mydefallgreek#1{\ifx\mydefallgreek#1\else\mydefgreek{#1}%
\lowercase{\mydefgreek{#1}}\expandafter\mydefallgreek\fi}
\mydefallgreek {beta}{Gamma}{Delta}{epsilon}{etaex}{Theta}{Iota}{Lambda}{kappa}{mu}{nu}{Xi}{Pi}{rho}\mydefallgreek
$\bGamma\bDelta \bTheta \bLambda \bXi \bPi $
$\bbeta \bgamma\bdelta \bepsilon \betaex \btheta \biota \blambda \bkappa \bmu \bnu \bxi \bpi \brho$
Expanding on Andrew's answer, here is a solution without \expandafter:
\makeatletter
\#tempcnta=\#ne
\def\#nameedef#1{\expandafter\edef\csname #1\endcsname}
\loop\ifnum\#tempcnta<27
\#nameedef{b\#Alph\#tempcnta}{\noexpand\mathbb{\#Alph\#tempcnta}}
\advance\#tempcnta\#ne
\repeat
This will define \bA, \bB, and so on, to expand to \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{B}, and so on.
Wouldn't be better to define one command
\newcommand\bm[1]{\ensuremath{${\boldmath$#1$}}$}
and it can be used both in text mode and math mode.
Usage:
\[\bm{F(x)}=\int\bm\delta(x)\ dx]
\where \mb F is blah blah blah and \bm \delta is halb halb halb...
Result:
F(x)='inegral delta(x)'dx
Where F is blah blah blah and 'delta' is halb halb halb...
Outer dollars are there to leave math (roman) mode because \boldmath command has no effect in math mode. Inner ones switch back to math (bold). Additional braces (${\boldmath) ensures that \boldmath command will work only with #1
Another advantage of this code is testing new commands for existence of \bb and \bg. So you can't crash LaTeX makros easily.
I hope this is what you're looking for.
I would recommend doing:
\newcommand{\b}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
as Crowley says, and similar for all the other alphabets. However, if you really want to do it using LaTeX code, here's one that seems to work:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\newcounter{char}
\setcounter{char}{1}
\loop\ifnum\value{char}<27
\edef\c{\Alph{char}}
\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\def\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\csname\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter b\expandafter\c\expandafter\endcsname\expandafter{\expandafter\mathbb\expandafter{\c}}
\addtocounter{char}{1}
\repeat
\begin{document}
\(\bZ\)
\end{document}
I lost count of how many 'expandafter's there are in that! To get lowercase letters, replace the Alph by alph.
Well, it seems simple enough, but I can't find a way to add a caption to an equation.
The caption is needed to explain the variables used in the equation, so some kind of table-like structure to keep it all aligned and pretty would be great.
The \caption command is restricted to floats: you will need to place the equation in a figure or table environment (or a new kind of floating environment). For example:
\begin{figure}
\[ E = m c^2 \]
\caption{A famous equation}
\end{figure}
The point of floats is that you let LaTeX determine their placement. If you want to equation to appear in a fixed position, don't use a float. The \captionof command of the caption package can be used to place a caption outside of a floating environment. It is used like this:
\[ E = m c^2 \]
\captionof{figure}{A famous equation}
This will also produce an entry for the \listoffigures, if your document has one.
To align parts of an equation, take a look at the eqnarray environment, or some of the environments of the amsmath package: align, gather, multiline,...
You may want to look at http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/float/ which allows you to define new floats using \newfloat
I say this because captions are usually applied to floats.
Straight ahead equations (those written with $ ... $, $$ ... $$, begin{equation}...) are in-line objects that do not support \caption.
This can be done using the following snippet just before \begin{document}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{aliascnt}
\newaliascnt{eqfloat}{equation}
\newfloat{eqfloat}{h}{eqflts}
\floatname{eqfloat}{Equation}
\newcommand*{\ORGeqfloat}{}
\let\ORGeqfloat\eqfloat
\def\eqfloat{%
\let\ORIGINALcaption\caption
\def\caption{%
\addtocounter{equation}{-1}%
\ORIGINALcaption
}%
\ORGeqfloat
}
and when adding an equation use something like
\begin{eqfloat}
\begin{equation}
f( x ) = ax + b
\label{eq:linear}
\end{equation}
\caption{Caption goes here}
\end{eqfloat}
As in this forum post by Gonzalo Medina, a third way may be:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{caption}
\DeclareCaptionType{equ}[][]
%\captionsetup[equ]{labelformat=empty}
\begin{document}
Some text
\begin{equ}[!ht]
\begin{equation}
a=b+c
\end{equation}
\caption{Caption of the equation}
\end{equ}
Some other text
\end{document}
More details of the commands used from package caption: here.
A screenshot of the output of the above code: