Instead of making a macro for each letter, as in
\def\bA{\mathbf{A}}
...
\def\bZ{\mathbf{Z}}
Is there a way to loop over a character class (like capital letters) and generate macros for each? I'd also like to do the same for Greek letters (using bm instead of mathbf).
\def\mydefb#1{\expandafter\def\csname b#1\endcsname{\mathbf{#1}}}
\def\mydefallb#1{\ifx#1\mydefallb\else\mydefb#1\expandafter\mydefallb\fi}
\mydefallb ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ\mydefallb
New for Greek
\def\mydefgreek#1{\expandafter\def\csname b#1\endcsname{\text{\boldmath$\mathbf{\csname #1\endcsname}$}}}
\def\mydefallgreek#1{\ifx\mydefallgreek#1\else\mydefgreek{#1}%
\lowercase{\mydefgreek{#1}}\expandafter\mydefallgreek\fi}
\mydefallgreek {beta}{Gamma}{Delta}{epsilon}{etaex}{Theta}{Iota}{Lambda}{kappa}{mu}{nu}{Xi}{Pi}{rho}\mydefallgreek
$\bGamma\bDelta \bTheta \bLambda \bXi \bPi $
$\bbeta \bgamma\bdelta \bepsilon \betaex \btheta \biota \blambda \bkappa \bmu \bnu \bxi \bpi \brho$
Expanding on Andrew's answer, here is a solution without \expandafter:
\makeatletter
\#tempcnta=\#ne
\def\#nameedef#1{\expandafter\edef\csname #1\endcsname}
\loop\ifnum\#tempcnta<27
\#nameedef{b\#Alph\#tempcnta}{\noexpand\mathbb{\#Alph\#tempcnta}}
\advance\#tempcnta\#ne
\repeat
This will define \bA, \bB, and so on, to expand to \mathbb{A}, \mathbb{B}, and so on.
Wouldn't be better to define one command
\newcommand\bm[1]{\ensuremath{${\boldmath$#1$}}$}
and it can be used both in text mode and math mode.
Usage:
\[\bm{F(x)}=\int\bm\delta(x)\ dx]
\where \mb F is blah blah blah and \bm \delta is halb halb halb...
Result:
F(x)='inegral delta(x)'dx
Where F is blah blah blah and 'delta' is halb halb halb...
Outer dollars are there to leave math (roman) mode because \boldmath command has no effect in math mode. Inner ones switch back to math (bold). Additional braces (${\boldmath) ensures that \boldmath command will work only with #1
Another advantage of this code is testing new commands for existence of \bb and \bg. So you can't crash LaTeX makros easily.
I hope this is what you're looking for.
I would recommend doing:
\newcommand{\b}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
as Crowley says, and similar for all the other alphabets. However, if you really want to do it using LaTeX code, here's one that seems to work:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\newcounter{char}
\setcounter{char}{1}
\loop\ifnum\value{char}<27
\edef\c{\Alph{char}}
\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\def\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\csname\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter b\expandafter\c\expandafter\endcsname\expandafter{\expandafter\mathbb\expandafter{\c}}
\addtocounter{char}{1}
\repeat
\begin{document}
\(\bZ\)
\end{document}
I lost count of how many 'expandafter's there are in that! To get lowercase letters, replace the Alph by alph.
Related
Does anyone know how to make (nice looking) double bracket multiset notation in LaTeX, i.e something like (\binom{n}{k}) where there are two outer brackets instead of 1 as in binomial? You can see an example of what I mean in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiset under the heading "Multiset coefficients" with the double brackets.
In Wikipedia they typeset it as:
\left(\!\!{n\choose k}\!\!\right)
but although this works well for LaTeX in maths mode, with inline equations the outer bracket becomes much larger than the inner bracket.
I have also tried using
\genfrac{((}{))}{0pt}{}{n}{k}
but it has an error with the double brackets.
I am using \binom as well in my document, so I would like the bracket sizes to be similar for \binom and \multiset.
You can explicitly specify the size of the brackets via
\big( \Big( \bigg( or \Bigg(
Then use \! for negative space to get the brackets closer to each other.
One can use the e-TeX \middle command as follows:
\newcommand{\multibinom}[2]{
\left(\!\middle(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{#1}{#2}\middle)\!\right)
}
This assumes that you are using the AMSmath package. If not, replace \genfrac with the appropriate construct using \atop.
(Of course this is a hack: the proper solution would be scalable glyphs for the doubled parenthesis, but I can't find any fonts that provide it.)
I'm surprised it wasn't googlable either, so I'll provide a solution here for posterity's sake.
It is also possible to define two different new commands, using \tbinom and \dbinom (section 4.11.2 of the User's Guide for the amsmath Package):
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand{\inlinebnm}[2]{\ensuremath{\big(\!\tbinom{#1}{#2}\!\big)}}
\newcommand{\displybnm}[2]{\bigg(\!\!\dbinom{#1}{#2}\!\!\bigg)}
\begin{document}
Text $\inlinebnm{a}{b}$ text. %% inline
Text \inlinebnm{a}{b} text. %% inline (also ok thanks to ensuremath)
\[
\displybnm{a}{b} %% display-style
\]
\end{document}
Is there an alternative way to enter multiple arguments to LaTex newcommand constructions? I have defined
\newcommand{\nuc}[2]{\ensuremath{^{\text{#1}}\text{#2}}}
and I would like to call the command through
\nuc{12,C}
and not
\nuc{12}{C}.
I have created other commands with even more arguments and my poor pinky can't handle all the brackets.
Thanks!
Maybe you will like it.
\def\nuc #1,#2.{\ensuremath{^{\text{#1}}\text{#2}}}
Sample of using:
\nuc 12,C.
Note. Use the dot at the end.
I like to praise perltex for defining complicated functions. This isn't complicated, but you can extend it quite impressively.
%myfile.tex
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{perltex}
\perlnewcommand{\commafrac}[1]{
$input = shift;
#inputs = split(/,/, $input);
return "\\ensuremath{\\frac{$inputs[0]}{$inputs[1]}}";
}
\begin{document}
One half is $\commafrac{1,2}$.
\end{document}
Compile with perltex --latex=pdflatex myfile.tex. I know that \frac wasn't your example, but I find it a visually appealing one.
Use plain TeX \def:
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\nuc}[1]{\nuc##1\#nil}
\newcommand*{\nuc#}{}
\protected\def\nuc##1,#2\#nil{\ensuremath{^{\text{#1}}\text{#2}}}
\makeatother
As fas as I know \nuc{12}{c} is the only way. If you don't want to put all the "}{"s, let the editor do it. Write \nuc{12,c} first, then replace all commas with "}{"s.
I'm trying to create a new environment in my LaTeX document where indentation in the next paragraph following the environment is suppressed.
I have been told (TeXbook and LaTeX source) that by setting \everypar to {\setbox0\lastbox}, the TeX typesetter will execute this at the beginning of the next paragraph and thus remove the indentation:
\everypar{\setbox0\lastbox}
So this is what I do, but to no effect (following paragraph is still indented):
\newenvironment{example}
{\begin{list}
{}
{\setlength\leftmargin{2em}}}
{\end{list}\everypar{\setbox0\lastbox}}
I have studied LaTeX's internals as well as I could manage. It seems that the \end routine says \endgroup and \par at some point, which may be the reason LaTeX ignores my \everypar setting. \global doesn't help either. I know about \noindent but want to do this automatically.
Example document fragment:
This is paragraph text. This is paragraph text, too.
\begin{example}
\item This is the first item in the list.
\item This is the second item in the list.
\end{example}
This is more paragraph text. I don't want this indented, please.
Internal routines and switches of interest seem to be \#endpetrue, \#endparenv and others. Thanks for your help.
I couldn't get anything to work without redefining \end, but I'm certainly no expert.
The following is quite hacky, but worked in my limited testing. Of course this will interfere with nested environments (you should be able to redefine \begin to restore the old \end if you have problems).
\newenvironment{example}{%
\bgroup
\let\oldend=\end
\def\end##1{\oldend{##1}\csname #afterindentfalse\endcsname
\csname #afterheading\endcsname}
\begin{list}{}
{\setlength\leftmargin{2em}}
}{%
\end{list}
\egroup
}
Can't you avoid this by not having a blank line between your environment and the next line?
This is paragraph text. This is paragraph text, too.
\begin{example}
\item This is the first item in the list.
\item This is the second item in the list.
\end{example}
% (No blank line)
This is more paragraph text. I don't want this indented, please.
Something as simple as this works for me:
\makeatletter
\newenvironment{example}{%
\bgroup
\list{}{}
}{%
\endlist
\#afterindentfalse
\#afterheading
\egroup
}
\makeatother
But, it doesn't work before the first \section (or \chapter, in the case of classes "book" and "report") is called. I don't know why.
I tried the Ivan's answer, but it wasn't working for me. But I did get it working! Here's what I did:
\makeatletter
\renewenvironment{quotation}{%
\bgroup%
\let\oldend=\end%
\def\end##1{\oldend{##1}\csname #afterindentfalse\endcsname%
\csname #afterheading\endcsname}%
\list{}{\listparindent 1.5em%
\itemindent \listparindent%
\leftmargin 1.5em% This controls the size of the indentation
\rightmargin \leftmargin
\parsep \z# \#plus\p#}% This line reduces inter-paragraph space to normal values.
\item\relax%
}{%
\endlist%%
\egroup%
}
\makeatother
The advantage to this is that it typesets your blockquotes very nicely, and removes the indentation from paragraph after the blockquote.
You can do this without redefining \end
\makeatletter
\newenvironment{example}
{\begin{list}
{}
{\setlength\leftmargin{2em}}}
{\end{list}%
\def\if#endpe{%
\#doendpe
\let\par\##par
\iffalse}}
\makeatother
Explanation
\end changes \everypar after expanding \endexample. To make things even more complicated it sets \par to restore \everypar{}. Appearently \#doendpe is ment to make sure that there is no indentation if the paragraph continues after the environment, but to restore normal behavior if there is a \par (or empty line) after the environment.
You may want to avoid changing \end because it would have to be changed at the begining of the environment and may therefore disturb nested environments. Luckily the definition of \end contains \expandafter\endgroup\if#endpe. We can use \if#endpe as a hook to inject our code to the outer scope. After the \endgroup \if#endpe is automatically restored.
Include \#afterindentfalse\#afterheading at the end of your definition.
I had the same problem. I just used this:
\noindent \newenvironment
You should not mess with the \everypar token list, unless you know exactly what you are doing. Use
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
to get rid of indenting in the whole document.
ending your environment with \noindent could help you
I use the listings package to insert source code. I would like to print all keywords uppercase in the output, regardless of the case in the input.
The manual states that
keywordstyle=[number][*]style
produces just what I want. However the following (almost) minimal example does not work.
if I set keywordstyle to "[1][]{\bfseries}" I end up with "[]" in front of every keyword
and "[*]{\bfseries}" gives me an asterisk in the start of the document.
I also tried "\MakeUppercase" and "{\MakeUppercase}" for keywordstyle which resulted in several errors, the first being:
! Incomplete \iffalse; all text was ignored after line 11
Minimal example:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{listings}
\lstdefinelanguage{KA_assembler}
{morekeywords={add,and,or,xor},
keywordstyle=[1][*]{\bfseries},
sensitive=false,
}
\lstset{language=KA_assembler}
\begin{document}
\begin{lstlisting}
and %r1, %r2
xor %r2, %r3
and %r4, %r5
\end{lstlisting}
\end{document}
I use Miktex for compilation of the tex files. So how do I force uppercase for Keywords?
In the manual, the brackets around the * look a bit different then the brackets around number. The reason is that the brackets around * are not meant to be used in the latex code, they just indicate that the presence of the * is optional. So try
keywordstyle=[1]*\bfseries
or
keywordstyle=*\bfseries
- it worked for me.
I use LaTeX to type up programming homeworks for classes. I need to do this:
my line of text blah blah blah
new line of text with blank line between
I know I can use double slash to break lines \\, but LaTeX will only take the first line break (complains about more) and starts a new line, it produces this :
my line of text blah blah blah
new line of text with blank line between
How can I get that extra line break in there so I can have space between my lines of text?
Line break accepts an optional argument in brackets, a vertical length:
line 1
\\[4in]
line 2
To make this more scalable with respect to font size, you can use other lengths, such as \\[3\baselineskip], or \\[3ex].
Do you want more space between paragraphs? Then you can change the parameter \parskip.
For example, try
\setlength{\parskip}{10pt plus 1pt minus 1pt}
This means that the space between paragraphs is usually 10pt, but can grow or shrink by up to 1pt. This means you give LaTeX the ability to change it up to one 1pt in order to achieve a better page layout. You can remove the plus and minus parts to make it always your specified length.
If you are trying to display source code, try the listings package or use verbatim. If you are trying to typeset pseudocode, try the algorithm package.
Insert some vertical space
blah blah blah \\
\vspace{1cm}
to scale to the font, use ex (the height of a lowercase "x") as the unit, and there are various predefined lengths related to the line spacing available, you might be particularly interested in baselineskip.
You can use the setspace package which gives you spacing environments, e.g.:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{setspace}
\begin{document}
\doublespace
my line of text blah blah blah
new line of text with blank line between
\end{document}
Or use a verbatim environment to control the layout of your code precisely.
For programs you are really better off with a verbatim or alltt environment, but if you want a blank line that LaTeX will not bitch about, try
my line of text blah blah blah\\
\mbox{ }\\ %% space followed by newline
new line of text with blank line between
While verbatim might be the best choice, you can also try the commands \smallskip , \medskip or guess what, \bigskip .
Quoting from this page:
These commands can only be used after
a paragraph break (which is made by
one completely blank line or by the
command \par). These commands output
flexible or rubber space,
approximately 3pt, 6pt, and 12pt high
respectively, but these commands will
automatically compress or expand a
bit, depending on the demands of the
rest of the page
I find that when I include a blank line in my source after the \\ then I also get a blank line in my output. Example:
It's time to recognize the income tax as another horrible policy mistake like banning beer, and to return to the tax policies that were correct in the Constitution in the first place. Our future depends on it.
\\
Wherefore the 16th Amendment must forthwith be repealed.
However you are correct that LaTeX only lets you do this once. For a more general solution allowing you to make as many blank lines as you want, use \null to make empty paragraphs. Example:
It's time to recognize the income tax as another horrible policy mistake like banning beer, and to return to the tax policies that were correct in the Constitution in the first place. Our future depends on it.
\null
\null
\null
Wherefore the 16th Amendment must forthwith be repealed.
\\\\
This works on pdfLatex. It creates 2 new lines for you.
Maybe try inserting lines with only a space?
\ \\
\ \\
This just worked for me:
I was trying to leave a space in the Apple Pages new LaTeX input area. I typed the following and it left a clean line.
\mbox{\phantom{0}}\\