Drivers which are provided by Microsoft are already WHQL certified? - device-driver

I have a question. Drivers which are provided by Microsoft are already WHQL certified? Is there any exceptional case? Please help me in this case.

Related

Erlang Netconf Support

Does Erlang/OTP has Netconf client and server implementation?
Google brings me to http://erlang.org/doc/man/ct_netconfc.html; what is this ct for?
The other project that I found seems to be not maintained https://github.com/FlowForwarding/enetconf
Is there anyone who is using Netconf with Erlang and can help provide some starting point.
Greg
The ct_netconf module is part of the "Common Test" test framework, and is probably not usable as a standalone client.
But yes, there is Erlang software that implements Netconf. ConfD was written in Erlang, by the company Tail-F (who got bought by Cisco some years ago). I can't find any online docs, but from mailing list discussions it looks like the free (but not open source) ConfD Basic has Erlang and C bindings. You can get it from here: http://www.tail-f.com/confd-basic/ (registration required).
See http://www.tail-f.com/company-story/ for more background.
(At https://github.com/tail-f-systems there is a Netconf client in Java, but no open source Erlang code.)

Docker not supported on 32-bit OS

I am new to docker and was wondering if someone can explain to me on a technical level why docker is not supported on 32-bit Operating Systems. I have tried researching this question but could not find a very clear answer.
Thanks in advance.
On a technical level, there is no reason, as it works.
But Docker should add resources to support it.
The same way Oracle or any other company does not support software that do work.

Is it possible to rewrite drivers for GPU not by manufacturer

My GPU received new drivers from Windows Update. However last version of driver provided by Ati/AMD (not sure) available from the site is more than a year old. I do not know what happened. Microsoft wrote new drivers on his own? Microsoft forced AMD to that?
The questions are: Is it possible that someone has written his own GPU drivers which works on specific OS far better than drivers provided by the manufacturer? Would not it require technical documentation of the GPU (which probably is kept safe by the manufacturer)?

How can I make my system HL7 certified?

I'm developing a Health Care System, and I'm new with HL7. My Question is how can I make my system HL7 (Health level 7) certified? What are the main steps I should follow?
Thanks,
You can become member of http://www.hl7.org community and ask there. As far as I know and what http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HL7 says about certifications there is no such thing as 1 worldwide HL7 certification authority right now (although hl7.org offers some kind of conformance testing).
There are many conformance levels and many integration profiles and many vendors and many legacy systems.
What seems to make most sense is to clearly declare IHE Integration Statement (see http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Frameworks for more) as HL7 and DICOM are rather technical tools, implementation details that nobody really much cares about (besides programmers).
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE)
...Systems developed in accordance with IHE communicate with one another better, are easier to implement, and enable care providers to use information more effectively...
Also the Googling tip by #sqlab may be very usefull. By looking for HL7 Conformance Statement, DICOM Conformance Statement, IHE Integration Statement you can find many examples of what other vendors do

Books for transport layer protocol implementation in Computer Networks

I am trying to implement a transport layer protocol for my project. I am going to use Linux as my operating system. Could you please suggest me some books or links that explain the implementation of transport layer (like TCP)? Thank you..
Thanks,
Bala
As far as I can tell, the latest (December 2008) book dedicated to this one and only topic is
TCP/IP Architecture, Design and Implementation in Linux.
772 pages, enough to keep anyone busy for a little while.
Note that it doesn't cover UDP, deferred to a future book.
Caveat: Even though the book was released end dec 2008, the base kernel tree it describes is a 2.4.20 one. OTOH, I don't think the TCP/IP stack has changed that much since then. The author announces in his preface that 2.6 specifics will be covered in a future edition.
The book on the topic - TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 2: The Implementation, by W. Richard Stevens the great.

Resources