I am currently working on turtlebot3 robot. which ROS version is suitable ? How different ROS version can effect my work? is it possible to use the version that has already met EOL date?
Right now the turtlebot3 package has releases available for Kinetic, Melodic, and Noetic. None of the 3 releases will have really noticeable impacts on your work in the general sense. You can use an EOL distro, but it's really dependent on what OS you will be running.
Related
I am looking for the legacy mbedtls documentation.
It was available at tls.mbed.org before joining the trustedFirmware project. Now, sadly, it is not reachable anymore.
Thanks!
tls.mbed.org only had the latest version, and then it froze at some point and was showing an old version until it went down. I haven't found a site hosting multiple versions of the documentation.
You can typeset the documentation on a typical Unix-like system (e.g. Linux or macOS or WSL or Cygwin) by checking out the version you want from the GitHub repository. This has the advantage that you can typeset the documentation for your configuration: after setting mbedtls/mbedtls_config.h (mbedtls/config.h in Mbed TLS 2.x), run
make apidoc
and browse apidoc/modules.html or apidoc/files.html.
If you want the whole documentation including all compile-time options and features that may or may not be enabled in your build, run
scripts/apidoc_full.sh
Note that this overwrites mbedtls/mbedtls_config.h.
I use ubuntu on win10 (WSL)
bazel can't sync
I can't find out how to solve. Help please~~
enter image description here
This is a known problem. See here or here.
Quote:
Currently, the plugin only supports Linux.
We plan to support Mac in the near future, and in the longer term
Windows as well, but there are no fixed dates planned.
my question is little vague but I tried looking for the answer here and there but could not understand if I can leverage docker for my work. My requirements
I usually try different versions of java, python and other software like different versions of eclipse, Linux package and other tools. This at the end make my Ubuntu installation a complete mess and some time completely broken. Then I started using Vm it solve most of the problem but make my pc very slow for frequent switching.
So my question can I achieve my work using docker without affecting my os? Can I run gui application, install different package without affecting underlying OS.
Switch actively between different docker container and underlying os.
Clean/remove unused/broken install of docker instance (containers?) etc. Any pointer to similar use case or how to would be helpful.
Thanks.
Ps- if it doesn't fit for SO then please move it to where it is best fitted. Sorry for non programming question.
Can it be done?
yes, there are examples of docker images that run graphical application, but running those containers might be a bit tricky. See for instance Can you run GUI apps in a docker container?
Is Docker the right tool for your problem ?
Maybe a package manager such as Nix would be better suited, as graphical software installed with it won't have any issue. With Nix you can install side-by-side many versions of a single software without interference.
Torch is a scientific computing framework with wide support for machine learning algorithms. It is easy to use and efficient, thanks to an easy and fast scripting language, LuaJIT, and an underlying C/CUDA implementation.
Q:
Is there a way to install torch on MS Windows 8.1?
I got it installed and running on Windows (although not 8.1, but I don't expect the process to be different) following instructions in this repository; it's now deprecated, but wasn't deprecated few months ago when I built it. The new instructions point to torch/torch7 repository, but it has a different structure and I haven't been able to build it on Windows yet.
There are instructions on how to install Torch7 from luarocks, but you may run into issues on windows as well; I haven't tried this process. It seems like there is no official support for Windows yet, but some work is being done by contributors (there is a link to a pull request in that thread).
Based on my experience, compiling that deprecated repo may be your best option on Windows at the moment.
Update (7/9/2015): I've recently submitted several changes that fix compilation issues with mingw, so you may try the most recent version of torch7 and follow the build instructions in the ticket. Note that the changes only apply to the core lib and additional libraries may need similar changes.
This webpage hosted by New York University recommends installing a Linux virtual machine in order to run Torch7 on Windows through Linux. Another option would off course be to install a Linux dist in parallel with Windows 8.
Otherwise, if you don't mind running an older version of Torch, there is a Windows installer for Torch5 at SourceForge.
I think to use a GPU from inside the virtual machine, the processor and the motherboard should not only support VT-x , but VT-d should be supported too.
But the question is, if I use a CPU with VT-d supported, do you think there will be a significant loss in PCIe connections efficiency?
From what I understand,
VT-d is important if I want to give the virtual machines direct access to my hardware components (like PCI Express cards). Like directly attach graphics card to vm instead of host machine. Isn't that mean that the PCIe connections efficiency will be the same just like if it was the host?
Is it possible to get Z3 running on a system providing posix API without having python installed?
I have seen the new version 4.3 uses python already in the build-process (scripts/mk_make.py).
Whats about older versions like 4.1? Is it imaginable to get it to run on posix without python?
Is Python not available in your system?
Python was always used to automatically generate some parts of the Z3 code base. In the first source code release, we have included the automatically generated code. Actually, at that time, we were using a combination of python + sed + awk + grep to generate these parts of the code. Another problem with the first release is that the build system for Windows (+ Visual Studio) was completely different from the build system for the other platforms. The Makefiles for Linux and OSX were derived from Visual Studio Project files. Some users also started to report problems with the build system for Linux and OSX. So, to reduce these problems and have a uniform build system, we decided to use python (and python only) to:
Automatically generate code (for bindings for different languages, API logging support, etc)
Check the system for requirements
Generate the Makefiles
And any other form of automation
Python is very attractive for us because it works in most systems (even non posix compliant ones). We can easily write portable scripts. Moreover, after we made the switch, we can compile Z3 in more platforms. We successfully compiled it on Windows, Linux (Mint, Ubuntu, Suse, etc), OSX, Cygwin, and FreeBSD.
In the "unstable" (aka working-in-progress) branch, we don't even require autoconf anymore, we use python to do all system specific configuration. To build Z3, we just need: python, C++ compiler (Visual Studio C++, g++ or clang++), ar (on non-windows platform), make (or nmake). This is very small set of requirements. Python is available in most platforms by default.
That being said, is it possible to remove the python requirement? Yes, it is, but it would have to replace python with something else. Something, that would allows us to perform all tasks described above. Take a look in the directory scripts at http://z3.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/0c1f2a82818a,
we would have to port all these automation scripts to something that can be used on all platforms we support.